Poverty, HIV/AIDS and Development

Poverty, HIV/AIDS and Development 1
Running Head: Poverty, HIV/AIDS, and Development
Poverty, HIV/AIDS, and Development

Poverty, HIV/AIDS and Development 2
Introduction
This essay includes the discussion about various strategies for getting the maximum advantages
of existing International Aids funding. HIV is well known as the virus which attacks the immune
cells named by CD-4 cells that are the division of the T cells. AIDS gets considered as the
syndrome which might be possible to come or not to come into the view of the advanced level of
infection of HIV. This essay helps in understanding the contribution of local NGO working on
HIV/AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa, Malawi from the year of 2000 to date.
Strategies to get maximum advantages of the existing International Aids funding
According to Viergever and Hendriks (2016), the increased resources have been brought into the
nations AIDS/HIV programs by taking the initiatives of global health. The main challenge for
the funding of HIV prevention, treatment or concern in the centre of low-revenue nations has
been greatly characterized. The huge call-up of the funds for the universal AIDS & HIV retort
over the programme of the plague has been unmatched in the health record of all people in the
country.
According to Khieng (2014), the positive impacts are increased awareness of government. The
donors support for funds for the disease of HIV retort in central point-low earning nations
avoided by around 7% between 2014 & 2016. The extent of these has been rivalled by
multilateral institutions & donor governments as well. The continuous tendency of less
speculation for the worldwide HIV retort is following many years of dreary line financial support
just because of the economic disaster hits in 2008 & international aid budget began to the
constraint. In recent years regressions have also seen the same (Khieng, 2014). It is filling

Poverty, HIV/AIDS and Development 3
various spaces in funding or performing towards the more sustainable response to the HIV in
Algeria.
According to Basu et al., (2013) it is well known that service & support to people who are living
with the AIDS/HIV have greatly expanded and rapidly as well. The political declaration of
United Nations on AIDA & HIV called on the worldwide society of mobilizing connecting the
US$22 billion or US$24 billion just for the international HIV retort in the middle & low-earnings
nations by the year of 2015. It has been observed that the lack of investment in the population of
key programmes always remains an inexorable problem. In the year of 2011 UNAIDS strategic
investment framework encourages the nations for prioritizing the spending on the groups of the
population that has mostly affected by the HIV to get the highest & efficient impact on funding.
According to Olivier and Wodon (2014), the domestic expenses have comprised around 57% of
all these sources in Malawi. UNAIDS ambitious approach of fast-track has greatly authorized by
the assembly of UN general in the year of 2017 with political announcements on ending AIDS.
The goal of funding which got place in the year of 2011 by United Nations was failed to spot
with around US$ 19.2 billion. It has made it available for the HIV retort in middle or low-
earnings countries by the end of the year of 2016. It has also committed to the conclusion of the
global HIV plague like public fitness threat in 2030. For achieving this, UNAIDS approximated
that US$ 6.3 billion will be needed for the HIV retort in 2020. It is progressively falling with the
$23.9 billion by the year of 2030. For reaching the 2020 target the world must raise the ratio of
available sources for the HIV retort by around US$ 1.6 billion each & every year between 2018
& 2020 (William, 2018). As result, there is the lot more emphasis on the nations that are most
impacted by the plague of HIV to finance their own views or find more cost-effective efficient to
do so.