Robotic Principles and In-Line Robot Cells: ENG1202 HNC Report

This report delves into the principles of in-line robot cells, crucial in modern manufacturing, particularly in automotive industries. It examines various cell layouts, including those with mobile transport systems, and discusses synchronous, continuous, and non-synchronous transfer systems. The report highlights the importance of robot safety, emphasizing hazard assessment and preventative measures to ensure a secure working environment. It covers potential risks associated with industrial robots and underscores the significance of comprehensive safety protocols, including proper installation, programming, and ongoing risk assessment throughout the project lifecycle. The document provides a comprehensive understanding of in-line robot cells, transfer systems, and safety protocols, which are essential for students and professionals in the field of electrical and electronic engineering. The report also addresses the importance of adhering to safety guidelines and practices.

HNC ELECTRONICS AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
[Author Name(s), First M. Last, Omit Titles and Degrees]
[Institutional Affiliation(s)]

In-Line robot cell
In such organization, robot is furnished with methods for transport, for example, versatile base,
inside work cell to perform different errands at various areas. The vehicle instrument may be
floor mounted tracks or even overhead railing framework that enables robot to be moved along
direct ways (Cai, Gu, Li and Liu, 2018). Portable robot work cells are appropriate for
establishments where robot must help more than one station (generation machine) that has long
preparing cycles, and stations cannot be organized around robot in a robot-focused cell
organization.
One such reason could be because of stations being topographically isolated by separations more
prominent than the robot’s reach. The sort of design takes into account timesharing assignments
that would bring down robot inert time. One of issues in planning such work cell is to locate
ideal number of stations or machines for robot to support (Christiansen, Yaskawa Nordic, 2017).
An In-Line robot cell layout has a versatile transport with the work parts. Such transport goes
close to robots for playing out a capacity on the work parts. Such sort of game plan is for most
part utilized in vehicle enterprises for amassing the vehicle bodies. To be progressively explicit,
the robots are put next to sequential construction system to do a few activities like spot welding.
In in-line robot cell plan, anybody of accompanying exchange framework may be utilized:
 Synchronous or discontinuous exchange framework
 Ceaseless exchange framework (De Smet & Dynalog, 2015)
 Non synchronous exchange framework
Synchronous or Intermittent exchange framework:

In such exchange framework, each work part is shipped simultaneously from one work
environment and put away in another workstation. The robots are put in a fixed situation close to
moving line in that work parts travel. With the assistance of start and stop movement, the work
parts are halted beside a robot for playing out the tasks on it.
Continuous transfer framework:
The consistent exchange framework moves the work parts persistently at a steady time along a
transport (Foumani, Smith-Miles and Gunawan, 2017). The ceaseless development of work parts
makes the robots intense to work in a fixed position. Accordingly, there are two following
framework that takes care of such issue, for example,
A moving gauge following framework: During an activity, such framework enables robot to
move proportional with the way of work parts. Subsequently, the voyaging position of robot and
work parts would continue as before.
A stationary pattern following framework: In such technique, robot is set in a fixed situation
along a line. Rather than moving the robot, such framework utilizes controller for following the
portable work parts. Here, following alludes to capacity of a robot to continue the areas of
customized focuses comparative with the work part in any event, during development of
transport.
Non synchronous exchange framework:
The non-synchronous exchange framework permits the work parts to move independently along
a transport. As like synchronous exchange, such framework likewise moves with a beginning
and stop movement. Now and again, there the probability of lopsided appearance timings.

Consequently, sensors are utilized for determining beginning time of procedure to robot. Such
exchange framework is likewise called as power – and – free framework.
Prevention of potential hazards
As mechanical robots become increasingly well known, numerous clients wonder whether robots
are sheltered to actualize inir office. Albeit a mechanical robot would improve ergonomic
conditions in generation territory, there is observation that robot would make dangerous
workplace (Foumani, Smith-Miles, Gunawan and Moeini, 2015). Such recognition is powered by
the robots open programmability as far as speed as well as frequency that seems difficult to
control. So as to ease concerns, hazard appraisal ought to be performed during advancement of
mechanical work cell. At each phase of evaluation, singular wellbeing prerequisites would be
distinguished and the fitting guarding and security gadgets are resolved so as to lessen potential
dangers.
Albeit every one of such potential perils may be risky, they are each preventable as long as
laborers are accomplished on the automated framework and the mechanical integrator has
satisfied all occupation necessities inclusive of legitimate establishment, programming, alongside
hazard appraisal. Any threats ought to likewise be considered during underlying structure stage
and shared as a living report all through venture life cycle. For whatever length of time that such
seven potential dangers are tended to ahead of schedule, modern robots are incredibly protected
and may support ythe main concern (Gu, Li and Li, 2015). Before the customers buy a modern
apply autonomy framework, we generally urge them to get comfortable with such security
guidelines and practices, yet regardless of what mechanical integrator you use, guarantee they
completely comprehend and are considered responsible to such gauges.

References
Cai, Y., Gu, H., Li, C. and Liu, H., 2018. Easy industrial robot cell coordinates calibration with
touch panel. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 50, pp.276-285
Christiansen, H., Yaskawa Nordic AB, 2017. Method and robot cell for handling stacks of
flexible substrates. U.S. Patent Application 15/129,708
De Smet, P., Dynalog Inc, 2015. Robot-cell calibration. U.S. Patent 8,989,897
Foumani, M., Smith-Miles, K. and Gunawan, I., 2017. Scheduling of two-machine robotic
rework cells: in-process, post-process and in-line inspection scenarios. Robotics and
Autonomous Systems, 91, pp.210-225
Foumani, M., Smith-Miles, K., Gunawan, I. and Moeini, A., 2015. Stochastic scheduling of an
automated two-machine robotic cell with in-process inspection system. In International
Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering (CIE) 2015 (pp. 528-535). Computers &
Industrial Engineering
Gu, H., Li, Q. and Li, J., 2015, October. Quick robot cell calibration for small part assembly. In
14th IFToMM World Congress, Taipei