Hofstede’s five dimensions cultural analysis of Australia and its impact on Qantas Airlines

Running Head: Working with others
Working with others

Working with others 1
Hofstede’s five dimensions cultural analysis of Australia and its impact on Qantas Airlines
The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief overview about the Hofstede’s cultural dimensions
and its impact on the company Qantas. Qantas is an airlines services provider company. Further,
the Hofstede’s cultural dimension provides information about the attributes of the country that
can affect the activities of the organization. Further, the paper provides a detailed analysis of the
relation of the concept with the company. More details are discussed below:
The Hofstede’s cultural dimension was originated by Professor Geert Hofstede who initiated this
process to carry a comprehensive approach on the values in the workplace that are influenced by
the cultures of the country. Further, he defined culture as a collective programming of the minds
distinguishing the members of one group or category of people from others. The six dimensions
were identified by the researchers namely, Michael Minkov, Gert Jan Hofstede, Professor Geert
Hofstede, and their research team. It should be noted that this application is used by marketers
worldwide to manage their internal business activities accordingly. This framework is made for
cross culture communication (Peltokorpi, and Froese 2014). This concept specifically impacts
upon the effects of the society’s culture on the values of its members and the ways in which these
values relate to the behavior of people. Further, it should be noted that six dimensions are
defined under this process that are power dimension, individualism versus collectivism,
masculinity versus femininity, uncertainty avoidance, long term orientation versus short term
normative orientation and lastly, indulgence versus restraint (Hauff, Richter, and Tressin, 2015).
The cultural analysis of the country Australia explains that, in case of power dimension the
country ranks low that is 36. This aspect says the extent to which less power people of the
country are driven with the decision taken by more powerful member of the society. In this
country, superiors take decision and the employees have to rely on them to take decision. The
individualism aspect talks about the extent to which people in the country are connected with
their families. This aspect talks about the nature of people preferring I instead of We. Under
individualism, people only prefer taking care and living with their immediate family and not
extended ones (Arifin 2014). Australia mark high in this case which shows that they prefer loose
knit group under which they are self-reliable and not dependent on any other person. Masculinity
aspect of Hofstede’s dimension says that people of a country are driven by competition,
achievements and monetary benefits in the society. They work to gain success and become the

Working with others 2
winner. Whereas femininity aspect says that the people likes attaining quality of life instead of
becoming winner in the society. Australia scores 61 in this case which says that the people of the
country work only to become the best and win. These people are proud of their success and
achievements in life (Jain, and Kaur 2014).
Uncertainty avoidance talks about the extent to which people of Australia feel threatened by
ambiguous situations and try to avoid them. The country scores very intermediate in this case.
Further, long term orientation says that people of a country maintain relation with the past and
then deals with the future challenges present in the environment. The country score low in this
case which says that they have a normative culture. Lastly, indulgence versus restraint says that
the degree to which people of the country try to control their desires in the environment.
Australia is an indulgent country where people have an optimistic tendency towards every aspect
(van Scheers, and Botha 2014).
Relating the use of concept to the cultural dimension theory, it should be noted that Qantas is an
airlines organization that initiates its activities in different parts of the world. So, it is important
for the managers to understand the culture of different countries so as to initiate diversity in the
organization and satisfy the employees as well. With the use of this framework, Qantas
understand the culture of different countries and then initiate cross culture activities. They also
employ expatriates and help them to easily sustain in the different environment without facing
cultural shock. Hofstede’s culture dimension helps the company to analyze the nature of people
living in different parts of the world and inculcate them in their business. If the organization
induces such cultural aspects in their business then it will also attract the customers with
different ethnic background (Mazanec, Crotts, Gursoy, and Lu 2015).
This concept provides advantage to the company to understand the nature of people coming from
different parts of the world. The company also employs people which bring innovation in the
organization. Different minds use different strategies for the organization to grow. Apart from
that, these expatriates also provide expansion opportunities to Qantas (Qantas 2018). As they
have adequate knowledge about the culture of their native place. So, it gives them advantage to
expand in that area as well. Qantas also reduces the extent of cultural shock faced by the
employees, and settle them easily in the environment. Satisfied employees promote the activities
of the company at their native place as well. Also, this dimension helps the employees in