This document provides solutions for Homework 4 (Individual Exercise) in Statistics. It includes answers to questions on t-test, regression analysis, scatter plot, and correlation analysis. The document also includes hypothesis testing, interpretation of results, and recommendations for hiring a new manager.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Homework 4 (Individual Exercise) Statistics Student name: Tutor name: 1|P a g e
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Homework 4 (Individual Exercise) Question 1: In a press conference, the provost of a university told the public that the average GPA of their students is 3.5. A reporter is skeptical about the provost’s statement. He surveyed a random sample of 100 students on campus. The mean GPA from the sample is 3.4 and the standard deviation is 0.4. Please do a t-test to test the following research hypothesis. You need to first write down the null and alternative hypotheses. 1.Whether the average GPA of the university students is equal to 3.5? a.Research Hypotheses (H0 and Ha): Hypothesis H0:Mean GPA for the students is equal to 3.5 Versus H1:Mean GPA for the students is not equal to 3.5 b.T-test: tcalc=X−μ sX wheresX=s √n(d.f.=n-1) tcalc=X−μ s √n tcalc=3.5−3.4 0.4 √100 =2.5 Howevert0.95,99=2.5 It can be observed that T >t0.95,99that is 1.98 < 2.05 The null hypothesis is rejected. The conclusion is that the areas with greater levels of collective efficacy will have significantly different mean juvenile crime rate. 2|P a g e tcalc=X−μ sX wheresX=s √n(d.f.=n-1)
Homework 4 (Individual Exercise) c.Interpret the results using 0.05 significance level (critical value is 1.98 for two-tailed, α=.05, d.f. = 99, and critical value is 1.66 for one-tailed, α=.05, d.f. = 99). tcalc=2.5 Howevert0.95,99=1.98 It can be observed therefore that T >t0.95,99that is 1.98 < 2.05 The null hypothesis is not rejected. The conclusion is that theMean GPA for the students is equal to 3.5. Question 2:The Human Resources department of XYZ Company wants to example the relationship between manager characteristics and performance rating. Interpret the following regression results. Here are variable information. PERFORMANCE: Performance rating for a business unit manager SALES: average sales for that unit EXPERIENCE: the number of years the manager has been in the industry DUMMY: =1 if the manager has an MBA, =0 if the manager has no MBA. 1.What are the dependent and independent variables? Dependent variable:Performance Independent variables:Sales, experience & dummy 3|P a g e
Homework 4 (Individual Exercise) 2.What are the null and alternative hypotheses? Hypothesis H0:There is no significant prediction of manager performance by sales, experience and dummy Versus H1:There is a significant prediction of manager performance by sales, experience and dummy 3.List the independent variables in order from greatest to least in terms of how strong the relationship is with performance. Dummy Experience Sales 4.Interpret the regression results (F-value, model fit, and parameter estimate/regression coefficient). Since the p-value calculated (0.00) is less than the level of significance (0.05), it can be concluded that the sample data has sufficient evidence to conclude that the model fits the data well. For the regression coefficients, it can be concluded that a unit change in dummy causes 3.8 units change in performance. To add on, a unit change in experience causes a 0.03 unit change in performance. Lastly, a unit change in sales causes a 0.00038 unit change in performance. 5.Based on the results, what is the prediction equation for manager performance (PERFORMANCE)? Performance=0.03(experience)+3.8(dummy)+0.00038(sales)+¿72.68 6.Based on the results, what would you tell the human resources department who is hiring a new manager? I will tell the manager to put more weight on dummies as opposed to experience and average sales units when hiring a new manager. 7.When might one prefer to use an ANOVA program instead of a multiple regression analysis? ANOVA program is appropriate where the independent variable has more than one level. 4|P a g e
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Homework 4 (Individual Exercise) Question 3: SPSS Exercise Download “Store data.sav” from Canvas. Make sure you include the SPSS output in your homework submission. A store wants to know how advertising spending relate with store traffic. The manager randomly selected 20 stores and recorded the following variables: the number of people entering the store on a given Sunday (TRAFFIC), the advertising spending the previous week (ADV). Answer the following questions. 1.Draw a scatter plot between TRAFFIC and ADV. Figure 1 It can be observed that there is a linear relationship between advertising spending and store traffic. It can also be concluded that since R2is 0.74, 74% of the changes that occur in store traffic is due to advertising spending. 5|P a g e
Homework 4 (Individual Exercise) 2.Run a Pearson correlation analysis of TRAFFIC and ADV. Correlation results table Correlations Store trafficAdvertising spending Store traffic Pearson Correlation1.863** Sig. (2-tailed).000 N2020 Advertising spending Pearson Correlation.863**1 Sig. (2-tailed).000 N2020 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Table 1 The Pearson correlation coefficient r is 0.86. This indicates that there is a strong relationship between store traffic and advertising spending. The correlation is also significant since the p-value is 0.00 less than the level of significance. 3.Write the null and alternative hypotheses. Hypothesis H0:There is no relationship betweenstore traffic and advertising spending. Versus H1:There is a significant relationship betweenstore traffic and advertising spending 4.Run a simple regression analysis and interpret the results. (F-value, model fit, and parameter estimate / regression coefficient). Simple linear regression result table ANOVAa ModelSum of SquaresdfMean SquareFSig. 1 Regression2496109.53812496109.53852.329.000b Residual858604.2121847700.234 Total3354713.75019 a. Dependent Variable: Store traffic b. Predictors: (Constant), Advertising spending Table 2 6|P a g e
Homework 4 (Individual Exercise) Coefficientsa ModelUnstandardized CoefficientsStandardized Coefficients tSig. BStd. ErrorBeta 1(Constant)148.642100.1031.485.155 Advertising spending1.541.213.8637.234.000 a.Dependent Variable: Store traffic Table 3 Since the p-value calculated (0.00) is less than the level of significance (0.05), it can be concluded that the sample data has sufficient evidence to conclude that the model fits the data well. For the regression coefficients, it can be concluded that a unit change in advertising spending causes 1.54 units change in store traffic. 7|P a g e