Affordable Housing Solutions in Australia

This assignment delves into the complexities of affordable housing in Australia. It examines various aspects including government policies like the National Rental Affordability Scheme, the role of private sector involvement, and factors influencing housing supply and demand in rural and regional areas. Students are expected to analyze research findings and policy documents from sources such as AHURI, APMRC, and Australian Government publications to present a comprehensive understanding of affordable housing challenges and potential solutions.

TITLE
Submitted by:
Full Name of Student
For Partial Fulfilment of:
Master of Business and Project Management
Submission Date:
October 2017

2

Table of Contents
1. Data Collection..............................................................................................................................4
2. Data Analysis.................................................................................................................................8
For Data analysis.............................................................................................................................10
3. Findings.......................................................................................................................................12
4. Future Work................................................................................................................................25
5. Conclusion...................................................................................................................................26
6. References...................................................................................................................................27
3

1. Data Collection
The data collection in this document distinguishes how Australians of all socioeconomics feel
about moderateness and its effect on their fantasies of property proprietorship or property
updating and gives bits of knowledge into what governments and experts can do to influence
change. Private land is the nation's biggest resource class at $7.0 trillion – far overwhelming
superannuation at $2.2 trillion and recorded stocks at $1.8 trillion. Australian family units
have the greater part their riches tied up in the private lodging area and around 70% of their
obligation is lodging related. This new review uncovers the degrees to which the colossal
Australian long for home possession is turning into a difficult test. It uncovers that a
developing extent of more youthful ages, while overwhelmingly keeping up a supported
hunger to experience the fantasy, are remaining home with guardians – progressively into
their 30s – to put something aside for stores. It catches how much guardians are being relied
upon to help their grown-up youngsters in either putting something aside for - or paying for -
a home, and uncovers how families with low salaries as well as youthful kids are winding up
more powerless against contract push. The review recognizes how purchasing a house is
turning into the benefit of high wage workers who are being required to relegate regularly
expanding extents of wage towards adjusting a home loan. What's more, it uncovers how
more seasoned Australians are profoundly frightful of the expenses of moving or downsizing,
which thusly is influencing supply and adding to raising lodging costs considerably
encourage particularly in internal urban areas. Following measures were done during on the
data collected:
Price to income ratio
As shown in graph below, the national cost to wage proportion was recorded at 6.10x (8.0x
for houses and 7.1x for units). 15 years prior the national proportion was recorded at 4.4x
4

(4.3x for houses and 4.9x for units). The current moderating of middle value development has
seen the two measures really fall a little from their current pinnacles.
Proportion of household income required for a 20% deposit
As per the statistics available it took out138.9% of a family’s salary in September 2016 for a
20% store on a home, 143.2% for a house and 128.9% for a unit. In September 2001 it took
85.9% of a family units wage to buy a home, with figures of 83.4% for a house and 95.7% for
a unit. The information demonstrates that as property costs have kept on surging it has turned
out to be progressively hard to put something aside for a store particularly considering
negligible family pay development.
Extent of family pay required to benefit a 80%
LVR contract 36.8% of a family's pay was required to benefit a 80% LVR contract for a
home in September 2016 with the figures 38.0% for a house and 34.2% for units. In
September 2001 it took 26.8% of family unit pay with a figure of 26.0% for a house and
29.8% for units. This investigation is especially affected by loan fees. In spite of the fact that
financing costs are right now the most minimal they've been in the course of recent years, a
5

home loan is expending as a significant part of the family unit salary as it was in March 2004
when loan fees were 215 premise focuses higher.
Extent of family unit salary required to lease a home
Tenants burned through 29.0% of their family unit pay on lease in September 2016. The
going with graph demonstrates that over late years there has been little change in the extent of
family unit pay required to pay lease. This features rental development has for the most part
followed nearly to family unit wage development (dissimilar to property costs).
The table underneath demonstrates the reasonableness measures over each of the significant
districts broadly. What turns out to be plentifully certain is that reasonableness weights are
substantially more predominant in Sydney and Melbourne than they are somewhere else in
the nation. With property costs proceeding to rise and wage development much lower,
moderateness keeps on falling apart. Remember that Sydney and Melbourne represent very
6

nearly 40% of the national populace so disintegrating moderateness in these two urban areas
impacts an extensive extent of the general populace.
Region Price to income
ratio
% of
household
income
required for a
20% deposit
% of household
income required
to
service an 80%
LVR
mortgage
% of of
household
income required
to
rent a home
Brisbane 5.7 114.1% 30.3% 25.4%
Australian
Capital
Territory
5.2 103.5% 27.5% 21.4%
Hobart 5.5 110.7% 29.4% 27.4%
Melbourne 7.1 142.8% 37.9% 25.6%
Regional Qld 6.7 134.0% 35.5% 30.0%
Regional NSW 6.6 132.9% 35.2% 29.9%
Regional Vic 5.6 111.2% 29.5% 27.0%
7

Regional SA 4.8 95.7% 25.4% 24.9%
Regional WA 5.1 101.4% 26.9% 26.0%
Darwin 4.5 89.7% 23.8% 22.2%
Combined
regional areas
6.3 125.3% 33.2% 28.6%
Regional NT 4.7 93.5% 24.8% 28.1%
National 6.9 138.9% 36.8% 29.0%
Adelaide 6.2 124.5% 33.0% 25.7%
Perth 5.5 110.9% 29.4% 22.2%
Combined
capital cities
6.7 133.8% 35.5% 25.7%
2. Data Analysis
The 2017 Perceptions of Housing Affordability Report depends on an investigation directed
by Galaxy Research utilizing an online authorization based board.Age, sexual orientation and
zone portions were connected to the specimen.
8

Following the culmination of meeting, the information was weighted by age, sexual
orientation and zone to mirror the most recent ABS populace gauges. The outcomes were
dissected to find the deltas that recognized diverse dispositions and practices around lodging
moderateness that were seen to be critical or which could reveal encourage insight into the
perplexing woven artwork of reasonableness crosswise over states, socio-economics, family
cosmetics, wage and home proprietorship sort. The last report was composed to feature these
stories inside the information. To make the report simpler to expend, the information has not
been introduced where there were no huge behavioral contrasts showed. In these occurrences,
national outcomes are demonstrative of how the littler gatherings likewise carry on or feel.
How vital is home possession?
The perfect of property possession is critical for non-mortgage holders - 89% say it is vital,
which incorporates 55% who say it is imperative.
Twenty to thirty year olds – of whom 60% have never possessed a property – are the destined
to seek to the fantasy with 96% rating it as imperative. The study likewise demonstrates the
new wonder of 'lease vesting' is additionally beginning to grab hold with 14% of non-
mortgage holders expressing they would purchase a speculation property to start with, and a
further 27% expressing they would think of it as. Be that as it may, only 4% of non-mortgage
holders officially claimed a speculation property.
Worry about lodging reasonableness
Worry about lodging reasonableness is to a great degree high with 88% of Australian non-
9

property proprietors worried to some degree about having the capacity to bear to purchase a
property. This is comprised of 58% of the individuals who lease/rent who are extremely
worried about having the capacity to stand to purchase their first home, while 53% of the
individuals who live in a condo are exceptionally worried about having the capacity to bear to
purchase.
Notwithstanding owning a property isn't sufficient to soothe this nervousness with 77% of
property
proprietors worried to some degree about having the capacity to bear the cost of what they
need and requirement for their next home move.
For Data analysis
We use the 2016-17 Survey to dissect connections between customary lodging stress
measures and prosperity results over the investigation time frame. A key element of the
10

overview is that it empowers two key sorts of examination. In the first place, the study is
rehashed each year thus empowers rehashed cross - sectional examination whereby one can
dissect the lodging stress and prosperity results of every year's overview respondents.
Second, the review has a longitudinal outline, which grants specialists to track study
respondents after some time to watch how lodging anxiety and prosperity results have
changed for every person over a period covering ten years, i.e. we can watch similar people
after some time. In the present setting it is especially helpful as it contains a scope of lodging,
pay and prosperity factors that offer plentiful chance to research the relationships between's
customary lodging stress measures and prosperity results. Lodging cost trouble is a family
marvel, so directing an examination on a family premise would bring about twofold -
checking where there is more than one individual living with in a family. Obviously, there are
sure impediments while picking the family unit as the unit of examination, particularly
regarding prosperity results, as people living inside a similar family can have distinctive
levels of prosperity in spite of having a similar lodging cost load. We address this
impediment by breaking down the prosperity of the family unit part with the most noteworthy
pay; it is expected that the most elevated pay worker inside the family unit would ordinarily
probably bear the best obligation regarding the family unit's lodging costs than others living
inside a similar staying.
A key methodological issue relates to the estimation of the conventional lodging stress
measure. Traditionally, lodging stress measures depend on lodging cost: salary proportions.
Here, we measure lodging expense and wage on a family unit premise as both are shared
among family unit individuals. Lodging costs are by and large characterized in the writing as
intermittent home loan reimbursements for proprietor buyers and rental instalment for
tenants. Nonetheless, data on rate use isn't accessible from the study. Subsequently,
11

contemplates that have utilized the study to quantify lodging costs for the most part have a
tendency to avoid rate instalments. In the present examination, because of information
restrictions, we do exclude rate instalments in our lodging cost measure. Nonetheless,
perceive that lodging help adds to lightening qualified families' lodging taken a toll load.
Open lodging rent announced in the review is as of now a net lease measure as open lodging
rents are commonly set at roughly 25 for each penny of the family unit's assessable pay level
up to the market lease of the property inside which the family unit lives. Be that as it may,
private rental inhabitants inside the study are made a request to report how much lease they
pay every week. Some private leaseholders are qualified for Commonwealth Rent Assistance.
3. Findings
How the states look at
Victorians and Tasmanians are well on the way to possess a home inside and out with 22% of
inhabitants being without contract in those states contrasted and 19% for NSW and only 15%
in Queensland. Occupants of the ACT (47%) and WA (41%) are destined to claim their home
with a home loan, contrasted and 33% of inhabitants in NSW. Queensland is the place the
best number of occupants depend on rental settlement with 43% leasing or renting, contrasted
and 31% who claim a property with a home loan.
While living in a remain solitary house overwhelms over the states, flat living is most
noteworthy in NSW at 22%, trailed by Queensland at 17% and Victoria at 15%.
There was a slight inclination towards the view that now is a decent time to offer – especially
in NSW and VIC – instead of purchase which was the more grounded see in WA.
12

How essential is home possession?
Over the states, the significance of purchasing a home to the individuals who are as of now
leasing or living with guardians is overpowering. Queenslanders were the most determined
with 91% expressing it was imperative with 61% expressing it was vital. The numbers were
comparable in NSW where 91% of respondents said having the capacity to purchase their
own particular home was critical with 57% expressing it was essential. In WA, 87%
expressed it was vital with 46% expressing it was critical contrasted and Victoria where 86%
said it was imperative however 51% named it as vital. Occupants of Tasmania and the ACT
were the well on the way to rate home possession as not imperative with 17% and 16%
expressing it was not a need.
Worry about lodging moderateness
Worry about not having the capacity to bear the cost of what you need or requirement for
your next home is most astounding among the individuals who as of now claim property in
NSW (82%) trailed by WA (81%). In Victoria 73% of property holders communicated worry
about not having the capacity to bear the cost of what they needed or expected to purchase,
contrasted and 71% in Queensland and 70% in South Australia and NT. In the ACT, 74% of
respondents felt this dread, yet just 58% of property holders were worried in Tasmania. State
fringes are a solid marker of negativity about lodging moderateness with 45% of NSW
inhabitants trusting reasonableness is currently in particular or essentially more awful than it
was a year back contrasted and 36% of Victorians.
13

For NSW occupants, the greatest hindrances to moderateness are stamp obligation (48%),
remote purchasers in the market (46%) and financial specialists in the market and having the
store (42% each). For Victorians, having the store and remote purchasers in the market (44%
each)are substantial or colossal hindrances took after by sureness of business (40%).
Queenslanders find getting the store together as the greatest obstruction (48%) trailed by
getting credit endorsement and loan costs (43% each) and after that stamp obligation (42%).
WA occupants are additionally very worried about the store (47%) trailed by stamp
obligation (46%) and assurance of work (45%).
14

Occupants in SA and NT discover stamp obligation an obstacle (48%) trailed by assurance of
work and raising the store break even with at 42%. Tasmanians are most worried about stores
(46%), loan fees (44%) and conviction of business and stamp obligation square with at
43%.ACT inhabitants are the most loose of the considerable number of states and domains
with discernments about obstructions once in a while transcending 40% of respondents and at
exactly that point on the theme of stamp obligation (46%). Speculators in the market rank
second at 39% took after nearly by the discernment that outside financial specialists are an
obstruction and raising the store (38% each).
15

16

Moderateness and installment push
A third or a greater amount of leaseholders in each state trust they should forego more than
the customary 30% of wage into their home loan when they get one and this is generally lined
up with the view of moderateness in each state. Tenants in NSW (48%) will probably devote
between 30 to 49% of their pay to adjusting a home loan, contrasted and 45% in Queensland,
41% in WA and 37% in Victoria. The examination demonstrates that Tasmanian property
holders are right now having the most trouble paying existing home loans, however an
expansion of up to 1% in financing costs would imply that 32% of WA mortgage holders
would encounter trouble took after by Victoria and Queensland.
17

The Investor Landscape
The research shows that 43% of investors own their home mortgage free, while 41% of
investors own a home but are paying it off with a mortgage. Only 11% of those who own an
investment property are renting, while 5% live with parents. Not surprisingly, only 25% of
people who own an investment property believe that negative gearing is an impediment to
housing affordability while 31% of those surveyed believe it is not an impediment at all.
Investment properties are also more likely to be owned by families with children living at
home. The survey showed 22% of those with children aged 5 to 17 owned an investment
property followed by 18% of those with very young children aged 0 to 4 and 17% of those
with children 18+, indicating that property is an important family investment strategy.
18

Landscape for Investor
The examination demonstrates that 43% of financial specialists possess their home loan free,
while 41% of speculators claim a home however are paying it off with a home loan. Just 11%
of the individuals who claim a venture property are leasing, while 5% live with guardians. Of
course, just 25% of individuals who claim a speculation property trust that negative adapting
is an obstacle to lodging moderateness while 31% of those overviewed trust it isn't a
hindrance by any stretch of the imagination. Venture properties are additionally more
inclined to be claimed by families with kids living at home. The overview demonstrated 22%
of those with kids matured 5 to 17 possessed a venture property took after by 18% of those
with exceptionally youthful kids matured 0 to 4 and 17% of those with youngsters 18+,
showing that property is a vital family speculation methodology
19

How the ages think about:
Inside the study, respondents were separated into three generational classifications. The most
youthful were Millennials matured 18-34, Gen X matured 34-49 and Baby Boomers matured
50-64. Their reactions recognized some critical contrasts in both the level of home possession
and how much it was probably going to be acquired. There were likewise contrasts in
assessment between the issues that every age accepted were making lodging moderateness
troublesome and the measures best to address it. The distinction in levels of property
proprietorship over the ages was set apart with 34% of Millennials right now owning
property, hopping to 62% of Gen X and 68% of Baby Boomers. The more develop ages of
Gen X and Baby Boomers have had the advantages of significant value creation, especially
20

profiting by the solid lodging market development cycles that happened between 2000 to
2003 (when capital city abiding esteems rose +74%), 2006 to 2007 (when capital city staying
values rose +22%) and 2009 to 2010 (development of +20%) and in addition the present
cycle of development where capital city residences are currently 49.3% higher. 7 Perhaps
obviously given the measure of time they have needed to pay off a home loan, Baby Boomers
were well on the way to claim a property by and large (37%) contrasted and 13% for Gen X
and 9% for Millennials. Inside the review, 44% of the Millennials worked all day, while 55%
of Gen X and 37% of Baby Boomers worked all day. People born after WW2 were the in all
probability not to work with 41% as of now not working by any means, which is undoubtedly
characteristic of retirement at the higher end of the age section. Recent college grads were
most drastically averse to possess a home with 60% expressing they had never claimed a
property. Recent college grads were well on the way to lease (38%) or live with guardians
(27%). A little extent – 12% - possessed a venture property. About a third (31%) of Gen X
lease or rent while 15% are probably going to inhabit home. In the interim 28% of Baby
Boomers lease or rent and 1% inhabit home. The extent of Gen X and Baby Boomers who
possess a speculation property are 19% and 18% individually. How vital is home possession?
The review demonstrates that while home proprietorship is overwhelmingly vital over the
ages, the level of that significance drops off to some degree with age. Of the Millennials who
are either leasing or living at home, 96% expressed it was imperative with 61% expressing it
was vital while 87% of Gen X expressed it was vital (53% expressing it was vital). Albeit
likewise in a critical dominant part, only 73% of Baby Boomers expressed that home
proprietorship was vital and not as much as half (40%) said it was vital.
Worry about lodging moderateness
21

The examination demonstrates that worry levels about lodging reasonableness are remarkably
high over the ages, albeit once more, this abatements somewhat with age. Among the
individuals who don't at present claim a property, 95% of Millennials are worried to some
degree about having the capacity to stand to purchase either their first home or their next
home, of whom half are exceptionally concerned. This contrasts and 86% of Gen Xers, 54%
of whom are extremely concerned, and 72% of Baby Boomers with 45% exceptionally
concerned. Uneasiness levels stay critical even once a property has been acquired with 91%
of Millennials concerned they won't have the capacity to bear the cost of their best course of
action, contrasted and 77% of Gen X and only 64% of Baby Boomers. Twenty to thirty year
olds however are probably going to be somewhat less melancholy about how lodging
moderateness is following than different ages. At the point when contrasted and a year ago,
29% of Millennials think lodging reasonableness is more regrettable at this point. More
established ages feel this is increasingly the case with 38% of Gen X feeling reasonableness
is more awful now than it was a year prior and 40% of Baby Boomers trusting it to be the
situation. Misery about reasonableness into the future in like manner increments with age
with 54% of Millennials thinking lodging moderateness will be much more dreadful to some
degree one year from now contrasted and 59% of Generation X and 64% of Baby Boomers.
What are the hindrances to lodging moderateness?
The deterrents to lodging moderateness are seen contrastingly over the ages particularly over
the feature issues of stamp obligation and outside venture. Twenty to thirty year olds are most
drastically averse to see outside speculators as an obstruction to lodging moderateness with
22

only 17% expressing they were a colossal hindrance in contrast with 26% of Gen X and 31%
Baby Boomers. So also, just 13% of Millennials discovered stamp obligation a gigantic
obstruction contrasted and 23% of Gen X and 29% of Baby Boomers. Arranged by
significance, Millennials are well on the way to discover having the store (49%), financing
costs (44%) and a mix of assurance of business and getting credit endorsement (41% each) to
be the greatest obstructions. This contrasts and Gen X, 48% of whom trust stamp obligation
is a noteworthy obstruction, trailed by the quantity of outside purchasers in the market and
the trouble raising a store (45% each) and in conclusion, sureness of work (40%). Children of
post war America are significantly more contradicted to stamp obligation (49%) and the well
on the way to accuse the quantity of outside purchasers in the market (48%) for moderateness
issues, trailed by sureness of work (42%). A further 40% trust speculators in the market are
an issue that blocks moderateness.
23

24

4. Future Work
Best methodologies for enhancing lodging reasonableness Millennials are the in all likelihood
(68%) to trust that a well-paying and secure occupation is the best help when purchasing a
first home contrasted and 58% of Gen X and 49% of Baby Boomers. Children of post war
America it appears disdain stamp obligation more than any age and trust it is an obstruction.
The exploration indicates 80% of Baby Boomers said the lessening or expulsion of stamp
obligation for first home purchasers would be useful contrasted and 69% of Millennials -
ostensibly the individuals who might be most influenced by any change - and 71% of Gen X.
People born after WW2 are likewise more probable than different ages to feel that a lessening
in the quantity of transients to Australia would be a viable technique (56%) to enhance
lodging moderateness contrasted and 51% of Gen X and 47% of Millennials. Millenninals are
destined to trust that the arrangement of a government lodging pastor in charge of tending to
lodging moderateness issues broadly could be powerful with 61% of respondents
guaranteeing it would be important contrasted and 56% of Gen X and 53% of Baby Boomers.
25

5. Conclusion
This paper has given a reliable arrangement of appraisals of the quantities of families in
lodging stress and an examination of their attributes under a scope of various measures.
These evaluations have been moored by utilization of a 30/40 manage with a 30 for each
penny proportion of lodging expenses to net family pay as the benchmark for lodging stress
and with the most minimal two quintiles of the equivalised expendable family unit salary
conveyance being utilized to figure out which families are characterized as lower wage
families. This grapple measure has been picked in light of the fact that it meets huge numbers
of the necessities of criteria inferred by Statistics New Zealand for deciding suitable markers
for measuring lodging moderateness 31 . It produces a synopsis measure that is easy to
decipher, open and freely engaging. It obviously advises about the degree of the issue it
speaks to. It gives clear and helpful yield. The outcomes acquired give adequate detail to
screen moderateness results; they give a sign of the prosperity of the family units whose
lodging results are being measured; they depend on existing information, require just a set
number of parameters and are easy to screen both at a point in time yet additionally after
some time. They can be disaggregated in a way that gives data at a level suitable for helping
arrangement assessment and supporting strategy advancement. Be that as it may, similar
attributes can be connected to huge numbers of the minor departure from this stay measure.
Refinements of this essential measure will give (some of the time just hardly) extraordinary
appraisals of the numbers and sorts of families in lodging stress however the occurrence of
lodging worry among various family unit sorts is generally vigorous to various measures
similar to the general evaluation of where the significant issues are. For examinations after
some time, it is critical that a reliable measure is utilized. The examinations at a given
26

purpose of time, any of various measures is probably going to be acceptable. Various
conclusions can be drawn from the outcomes displayed in this report:
 utilization of the 30/40 manage with the 30 for each penny lodging cost proportion
characterized by lodging expenses and gross family unit pay and the most reduced 2
quintiles of the wage dissemination in light of family change (that is, equivalised)
extra cash produces preservationist appraisals of the numbers in lodging stress and
thus of the occurrence of lodging stress; and
 numerous families characterized as being in lodging weight on this measure have
inadequate wage to meet an economical evaluation of their non-lodging needs.
 utilization of extra cash in the base of a proportion measure will build the appraisals
of numbers in and occurrence of lodging stress.
6. References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017a) Housing Occupancy and Costs
, Australia, 2016-17, Cat No. 4130.0.55.001
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017b) Household Income and Income Distribution,
Australia, 2016-17, Cat No. 6523.0
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017c) Household Income and Income Distribution,Australia
- Detailed Tables, 2016-17, Cat No. 6523.0.55.001
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2014) Housing assistance in Australia 2014 , cat.
no. HOU 275, AIHW, Canberra. Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) (2015)
Administration of the National Rental Affordability Scheme , ANAO Report No. 8
2015 – 16, ANAO, Canberra.
27

Australian Government (2011) A guide to Australian Government p ayments: 1 July –
19 September 2011 , Centrelink, Canberra.
Andrews, K. (2014) 'Round 5 of flawed National Rental Affordability Scheme not
proceeding' 13 May, accessed 8 June 2015,
http://www.formerministers.dss.gov.au/15215/round - 5 - of - flawed - national -
rental - affordability - scheme - not - proceeding/ .
Australian National University (ANU) (2015a) National Rental Affordability Scheme ,
ANU, accessed 15 June 2015, http://www.anu.edu.au/study/
accommodation/national - rental - affordability - scheme .
Australian National University (ANU) (2015b) Student Residence Cost Comparison
ANU, accessed 15 June 2015, http://www.anu.edu.au/study/ accommodation/st
udent - residence - cost - comparison .
Australian Population and Migration Research Centre (APMRC) (2015) ARIA
(Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia) , APMRC, accessed 21 February 2016,
http://www.adelaide.edu.au/apmrc/research/projects/category/ about_aria.html .
Australian Government (2008a) National Rental Affordability Scheme Act 2008 , No.
121, 2008, Australian Government, Canberra.
28

Australian Government (2008 b) National Rental Affordability Scheme Regulations
2008 , Select Legislative Instrument No. 232, 2008, Australian Government,
Canberra.
Berry, M., Whitehead, C., Willia ms, P. and Yates, J. (2006) Financing affordable housing: a
critical comparative review of the United Kingdom and Australia , AHURI
Research and Policy Bulletin No. 84. Australian Housing and Urban Research
Institute, Melbourne, http://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/research - and - policy -
bulletins/84 .
Beer, A., Tually, S., Rowley, S., Haslam McKenzie, F., Schlapp, J., Birdsall - Jones,
C. and Corunna, V. (2011) The drivers of supply and demand in Australia's
rural and regional centres , AHURI Final Report No. 165, Australian Housing
and Urban Research Inst itute, Melbourne, https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final -
reports/165 .
Berry, M. (2002) New approaches to expanding the supply of affordable housing in
Australia: an increasing role for th e private sector , AHURI Final Report No.
14 , Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Melbourne,
https://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final - reports/14 .
Bratt, R. G. and Vladeck, A.(2014) 'Addressing restrictive zoning for affordable
housing:experiences in four states,Housing Policy Debate, vol. 24, no. 3: 594–636.
Blessing, A. and Gilmore, T. (2011) 'The invisible hand? Using tax credits to
encourage institutional investment in social housing, Int ernational Journal of
Housing Policy , vol. 11, no. 4: 453 – 68
29