Cultural Difference Between Indigenous and Western People
Verified
Added on 2022/12/01
|6
|1425
|460
AI Summary
This report explores the various differences between the indigenous group and the western worldview. It discusses the challenges faced by the first people due to the cultural differences that exist between the two groups.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: HRM Cultural difference between indigenous and western people Name of the student Name of the University Author note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1CULTURAL DIFFRENCE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN PEOPLE Introduction Culture is an intrinsic part of a human being that governs perception of the world. It refers to the perception through which a person views a situation based upon their values, beliefs, philosophical perspective and their own experiences. Lack of knowledge about other cultures can give rise to conflicts. This report explores the various differences between the indigenous group and the western worldview. It discusses about the challenges faces the first people owning to the differences that existed between the two groups. Discussion Culture is dynamic, multi-dimensional and always changing, therefore multiple point of view invokes differences between various cultures. However, it is important that there is positive examination of facts and knowledge sharing between culture and respect for each other.Diverseculturalbackgroundgiverisetodiverseopinionandworldview.The aboriginals and the Torres Straight island people have similar worldview but it varies greatly with the western perception. The differences that exists between the two groups are discussed below. Analysing differences The western philosopher Hobbes describes due to limited resources human beings are always at war with each other, leading to emotional strife and constant competition (Harris, 2017). In comparison, the indigenous groups believe that nature provides abundant of resources that is to be shared, in collaboration with others creating an environmental stewardship that is in balance with nature (Blake et al, 2018). The western worldview has a very commercial approach to nature, where nature and its resources ranked in hierarchy, with man the top of the structure dominating everything below. On the other hand, indigenous people believe men are a part of interconnected world where men are in perfect harmony with
2CULTURAL DIFFRENCE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN PEOPLE nature. While the western world has a more scientific and sceptical view of life (Hatfield, 2018), the indigenous group is more spiritual in their outlook. Indigenous people view resources as a part of sustenance that needs to be looked after not exploited for personal gain, westerns believe resources need to be extracted for the development of the human race. The relationship of indigenous folks with their land can be described as a deep ontological connection that preached they belonged to the land, they never owned it. This ideology clashed with the western concept where land was owned, promoted land acquisition for profit and development.The western worldview on economics is also widely different from the indigenous worldview. Intensive centralised production constantly, accumulating wealth for personal gain, whereas, the indigenous economy as its worldview preaches a decentralised production, optimum utilization of resources, promotes resources management encourages sharing and cooperation. Problems arising from the cultural differences Cultural difference and lack of knowledge thereof caused immense frustration and emotional strife amongst the first people. Historically, the indigenous community remained cut off from the rest of the world allowing them to grow and practice their ways without any interference.WhentheearlyEuropeansettlerscamein,theirperceptionviewedthe aboriginal and Torres Strait people as lesser beings for their dark skin colour and primitive lifestyle. The indigenous tribes lacked western knowledge of politics or science and suddenly found themselves in precarious situation. The wars followed leaving thousands dead reduced the indigenous population dramatically, the settlers had unchallenged advantage over the natives with their superior warfare machinery and techniques. The state established extreme control, intervened the lives of the indigenous people, and took complete control of their land and resources. The laws reflected the dominant western perception that had no indigenous representation at the state level, and harmed the indigenous people irrevocably. Once freemen
3CULTURAL DIFFRENCE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN PEOPLE found their freedom snatched, landless, starved and treated as outsiders in their own motherland. Reduced resources forced the natives to use their kinship system to barter labour for food, the settlers perceived this as an opportunity to exploit. The natives received different treatment for their “race” and subjected to western atrocities such as introduced them to diseases such as small pox, poisoned food and others. This increased death rates and reduced birth rates reducing their population (Adams et al, 2018). Contemporary issues Laws such as Aborigines Protection Act 1909, Aborigines Act 1905, and Welfare Ordinance 1953 created self-serving, abusive and restrictive practices on the natives to cater to the advantages of the whites. The natives were subjected to atrocious laws that stemmed from racist beliefs. Children who were part white were separated from their families to mainstream them into the white society. The stolen generation led to disintegration of families, caused deep psychological damage between the child and the parents, led to alienation of the child, destroyed communities and established racism more dominantly (O’Donnell et al, 2019). The assimilation of these children into the white society had a more sinister approach that aimed at changing the relationship between the natives and their environment altogether. The effects of which is still visible today. Studies show higher infant mortality rate, higher mental behavioural maladjustments, experience higher victimisation rate. There is better representation of the natives today and more measures is being taken by the government as well the natives to preserve and advocate their culture (Nelson, 2018). Conclusion Schools have introduced curriculum where island, aboriginal and the non-indigenous are taught about each other’s cultural to increase cultural competency and obliterate harmful practices (Forrest, Lean & Dunn, 2016). Indigenous group members are able to represent
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4CULTURAL DIFFRENCE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN PEOPLE themselves in the government and are voicing their opinions more effectively now. Many non-profit organisations support native population and integrate their unique environmental practices to preserve the environment and bring about social and economic changes (Hunt, 2018).
5CULTURAL DIFFRENCE BETWEEN INDIGENOUS AND WESTERN PEOPLE References Adams, S., Martin, R., Phillips, S., Macgregor, C., & Westaway, M. (2018). Truth-Telling in theWakeofEuropeanContact:HistoricalInvestigationof AboriginalSkeletal Remains from Normanton.Archaeologies,14(3), 412-442. Blake, T., Chatfield, M., Chang, A., Petsky, H., & Mcelrea, M. (2018). Spirometry reference values for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) children and young adults. Forrest, J., Lean, G., & Dunn, K. (2016). Challenging racism through schools: teacher attitudes to cultural diversity and multicultural education in Sydney, Australia.Race Ethnicity and Education,19(3), 618-638. Harris, J. F. (2017).The ascent of man: A philosophy of human nature. Routledge. Hatfield, G. (2018). Helmholtz and Philosophy: Science, Perception, and Metaphysics, with Variations on Some Fichtean Themes.McMillan, M., & Rigney, S. (2018). Race, reconciliation, and justice in Australia: From denial to acknowledgment.Ethnic and Racial Studies,41(4), 759-777. Hunt, J. (2018). Partnerships for Indigenous development: International development NGOs, Aboriginal organisations and communities. Nelson, T. (2018). Rewriting the narrative: Confronting Australia’s past in order to determine our future.NEW: Emerging Scholars in Australian Indigenous Studies,4, 20-26. O’Donnell, M., Taplin, S., Marriott, R., Lima, F., & Stanley, F. J. (2019). Infant removals: The need to address the over-representation of Aboriginal infants and community concerns of another ‘stolen generation’.Child abuse & neglect,90, 88-98.