Human Cloning Assignment PDF

Running head: HUMAN CLONING 1
Human Cloning
Name
Institution

HUMAN CLONING 2
Human Cloning
In essence, the debate on cloning has gained momentum in the contemporary society
especially with the advances in technology. Since the cloning of the first sheep named Dolly
Prospect of human cloning has no doubt catapulted its own way in the overall public
consciousness. For instance, in the year 2000 various Italian, as well as American scientists,
made their intentions clear on the aspect of cloning human particularly babies for the infertile
couples. In recent times, scientists announced that they would begin on the implantations plans
of human embryos, especially into women. Consequently, the United States House of the
Representatives passed the famous “Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001”, a bill that was
accepted through a bi-partisan margin of close to 265 to about 162. Apparently, it received the
support from both the liberal, conservative, pro-abortion group and progressive. The overall
intention of the bill was to make sure that human cloning was banned for both the research as
well as the reproductive purposes. Despite the fact that United States president promised to pass
the bill into law, the majority of the Senate leaders opposed the move. This paper proposed to
discuss in support of a ban on cloning.
While there are various people who are advocating for the creation of a cloned embryonic
stem cell and opposing the creation of clones that would rather be implanted and then carried to
term, there are other individuals who are in the haste of producing one of the best world’s best
cloned human baby. In fact, there are scientists such as Panos Zavos and Severino Antinori who
anticipated starting cloning of human embryos in few years (Yeung, 2018). Such scientists were
focused on implementing this idea despite the magnitude of genetic implications that has been
encountered in animal cloning; the overall risks expected risks to the mothers and the likelihood
of serious birth implications. In fact, about ninety-five of the attempts to clone animals have

HUMAN CLONING 3
often ended up in a failure. The scientist who did cloning of Dolly is said to have failed almost
276 times before they succeeded to come up with a single live-born clone of a rather adult sheep.
According to the most expert scientist, various attempts to clone humans have a high likelihood
of ending up in failure (Yeung, 2018). As a result, there are some scientists such as Ian Wilmut
and Rudolf Jaenisch who concluded that the main cause of abnormal cloning is the aspect of
faulty reprogramming of genomes. In case there is the introduction of nucleus belonging to a
somatic cell into the enucleated egg, there is a need of reprogramming the DNA in the nucleus
with an aim of coming up with a fully developed human being (Braidotti, 2018). If this process
does not go right, there is a likelihood of the creation of abnormal gene expressions.
Primarily, there is various Congress who are outspoken in the haste of opposing human
cloning for the purpose of reproduction. Nonetheless, there has been an attempt by Senator
Daschle to delay the overall consideration of the H.R 2505, and thus there has not been any
existing consensus particularly on the banning of embryo cloning that is aimed for the research
process (Murphy, 2018). Notably, such type of human cloning is deemed unethical for many
reasons. One reason is that the research of human cloning can only be deemed justifiable in case
it is based on the utilitarian calculus that is tasked at prizing millions of human lives who could
sometimes be treated or rather cured as a result of such research over the overall lives of
embryos that would instead be destroyed for the purpose of the research (Segers, Pennings,
Dondorp, de Wert, & Mertes, 2018). However, it is not an ethical idea to sacrifice the lives of
others for the potential benefits of other individuals. Additionally, it is no doubt unethical to
subject human beings as a means to an end despite their age gap. This has even forced various
embryonic researchers to be opposed with the idea of coming up with a special creation of
embryos for the purpose of research. Notably, this is true even considering that it is actually what