This article discusses various aspects of Human Resource Management such as organization structure, job design, internal communications, equity, organization culture, organization change, team work, conflict, leadership styles, power, influence and motivation. It also suggests ways to improve productivity and employee engagement.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Human resource management Name of the student: Name of the university: Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Answer 1: Organization structure Wilson Brothers is a Canadian firm that was started by brothers, Bob and John, who have made quite a mark in the industry through effective use of their resources and strategic planning. The organizational structure of any company plays a crucial role in determining its success and level of productivity (Ashkensas et al., 2015). At Wilson Brothers, aline organizational structureis followed. In such a scenario, there exist vertical and direct relationships between the various branches or departments of the organization. In this case, the CEO of the company, namely the brothers form top authority and the rest of the organization is answerable to them; thus, Wilson Brothers has a rigid hierarchical system. Now the advantage of such an organizational structure is that it is already ingrained in the minds of the employees and reduces chances of confusion; moreover, since the authority of the board members is established without question, it hastens the decision making process. However, it must also be asserted that such an organizational structure would be impractical, especially since the company is planning to expand their horizons to other locations as well. Moreover, as has been seen in the case of Wilson Brothers, the authority has a tendency to become dependent on only a select few teams or individuals, depriving others of the chance to prove themselves. On the contrary, afunctional or line and staff organizational structurewould better fit the company profile; in such a structure, vertical relationships between line managers within the organization are supported by a specialist team of people who have expertise in specific fields (Tran & Tian, 2013). Answer 2: Job design At Wilson Brothers presently, ahumanistic approach to job designis followed. It is commonly assumed that monetary benefits and incentives form the chief sources of employee motivation; however, it has been found that the job design, or the role of the employee, plays
2HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT an integral role as well. The human resource team at Wilson Brothers ensures that the job design is carved out on the basis of the people involved in organizational processes. In this process, the employee’s need for recognition, appreciation, growth and responsibility is taken care of. However, to further enhance productivity through principles of job design at the company, one can make use of theJob Characteristics Model, which was first introduced by Oldham and Hackman in 1975 (Ali et al., 2014). Such a model shows that variety within the tasks assigned to an employee, coupled with a sense of responsibility and accountability, can increase employee satisfaction. In addition, autonomy as part of the job design would not only make the employee feel empowered and liberated but also increase his or her productivity levels. Answer 3: Internal communications The management at Wilson Brothers, in an attempt to modernize and digitalize their operations, has adopted a new method ofinternal organizational communications. All decisions made by the top authority are communicated to the subordinates and the rest of the organization in the form of emails. For example, at the start of the last financial year, a notification was issued to each member of the organization about the budget drawn by the board members. While digital modes are certainly the future of all communication, it must be asserted that it also paves the way for miscommunication; employees who do not check their emails on a regular basis might miss out on important information. Chances of such miscommunication can be eliminated if the authority at Wilson Brothers conducts regular meetings with the agenda to discuss internal organizational communications (Men, 2014). The sole purpose of such a meeting would be to discuss the concerns of various employees or clarify doubts or queries that one might have; both
3HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT employees and the management would be encouraged to express their opinions or even offer criticism if need be. Such practices would allow open lines of communication and reduce scope for miscommunication (Bharadwaj, 2014). Answer 4: Equity The management at Wilson Brothers claims to follow a policy of equity and fairness while meting out treatment to the employees; followingAdam’s equity theory, it is important to assess an employee’s perception about fair treatment in the workplace (Resick et al., 2013). A survey revealed that some members of the organization were dissatisfied with the behavior of the authorities; to them, the management was partial to a few specific people, while the interests of the others were largely ignored. Such an ambience in the organization can be affect employee motivation and engagement. However, there are few things that the Wilson brothers could do to create a sense of fairness and equity; for example, the criteria for promotion and the grounds on which an employee would be promoted should be dealt with transparency and clarity. Moreover, there should be no ambiguity in the paycheck; each employee should receive a detailed document at the end of the month, stating his or her base salary, bonuses or deductions and so on. Answer 5: Organization culture Organization culture refers to the working environment of the employees, or the culture they are operating in. At Wilson Brothers, ahierarchical organization cultureis prevalent. In such a culture, the employees are answerable to the authorities and have no freedom to exert their own will. However, such a culture can be derogatory to the productivity of employees since they function in fear.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT On the contrary, aclan cultureor anadhocracy culturemay be implemented in the workplace. In the first scenario, as the name suggests, a friendly work environment is offered where the employees and their supervisors can work in collaboration, without rigid hierarchy separating them. In an adhocracy culture, a dynamic work environment is present where the employees would be motivated to take on new tasks and work on new projects or even partake in group activities. According to Harrison’s culture model, the organizational culture should be role oriented so as to make sure that tasks are completed in a rational and logical manner (Ramdhani, Ramdhani & Ainissyifa, 2017). Answer 6: Organization change Last year, Wilson Brothers implemented a massive organizational change in order to improve their revenue outcome and reel in more profits; they altered their strategy from growth based on acquisition to growth based on integration. However, failure to implement the change properly not only incurred losses but also had a negative toll on the organizational culture. One of the major reasons for this failure was the inability to communicate the decision effectively. The first step in the change management process should have been to notify each member of the organization about the decision; next, efforts should have been made to establish a definite brand identity. This would include a unique selling proposition and brand positioning strategies. The strategy should have been based on a principle of clarity, transparence, emphasis on implementation and alignment. To implement such a change in strategy, theLewin’s change management modelshould have been used; any change is expected to take an organization by surprise (Shirley, 2013). Nevertheless, splitting the organization change into three ways (so that the change is executed not at once but in phases) would ensure that the desired results are obtained.
5HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Answer 7: Team work Team work certainly forms one of the pillars of any organization and although Wilson Brother claims to have instilled team spirit in the company, they have only been partially successful. The organization structure is such that the employees have been divided into various teams with each team being supervised by separate supervisors. However, there has been observed a gap in communication between the supervisor and the rest of the team. Such gaps in communication not only lead to chaos but also conflicts. It is the team leader’s responsibility to foster team spirit within the team and that can only be achieved through close association with the rest of the team. Moreover, an important aspect of team work is conflict resolution; there are bound to be conflicts amidst people working in a high pressure situation, but way the conflict is resolved determines the success of the team as a whole. TheGRPI model(goals, roles, procedures and interpersonal relationships) introduced by Rubin, Fry and Plovnick states that the foundation of team effectiveness would require a specification of team objectives, job design and positive relationships within the team (Raue et al., 2013). Answer 8: Conflict At an organization of any kind, the rise of conflict can be expected; what matters is how the conflict is dealt with and resolved. At Wilson Brothers, it has been observed that there is evidence ofintergroup conflicts; healthy competition between the teams is encouraged, but this has escalated to a point that the management had to be involved. The conflicts mainly arose between the marketing department and that of customer support with regards to the interests and of the customer and their requirements.
6HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT In order to effectively resolve conflicts between various groups within the organization, the first step taken by the Wilson Brothers should be to identify the triggers that could be fuelling conflict; moreover, adequate measures should be taken to ensure that no person is harmed or hurt in the process. It is the duty of the organization to be impartial in offering solutions so that the opinions and viewpoints of each individual are taken into consideration (Rahim, 2017). Also, the organization should demonstrate flexibility in offering solutions to the conflict that has risen; the supervisors should be ready to take into account the opinions of their subordinates while resolving the issue. Answer 9: Leadership styles At an organization that is essentially based on team work, a strong leadership style would be needed to lead the teams to success. At Wilson Brothers, it has been observed that most of the team leaders follow anautocratic style of leadership; in such a leadership style, the supervisor or the team leader has sole authority; all other team members and subordinate employees would have to accept the leader’s authority without question. One of the main disadvantages of such a leadership style is that it results in monopoly, and the opinions of the team members are entirely discarded. Instead, ademocraticorsituational leadership stylewould be recommended. Here, the leader coordinates with his team members and works in accordance with them. Such collaborative team work in the organization would not only inculcate a sense of team spirit but also enhance the productivity level of the team as a whole. Moreover, such a leadership style would be flexible and versatile and the leader would be able to adapt his strategy according to the needs of the team (McKleskey, 2014). Answer 10: Power, influence and motivation
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT At Wilson Brothers, a combination oflegitimateandcoercive poweris used by the management to ensure smooth functioning of the organizations. In legitimate power, each individual is responsible for the action he or she takes and they would be held accountable for it; such a method involves a system where the supervisor issues commands and controls his subordinates. A coercive power system would mean that often individuals within the organization might be compelled to do something without their will and might even be penalized if they refuse. On the contrary, areward power systemshould be follow; it is important to make the employees feel that their work is being recognized and appreciated. Such a model would mean that the employees are guaranteed rewards and incentives if they manage to complete a specific task within the given deadline or if they manage to reach their target (Shields et al., 2015). This is bound to increase employee engagement and motivation and automatically encourage them to work harder, thus enhancing performance.
8HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT References: Ali, S. A. M., Said, N. A., Kader, S. F. A., Ab Latif, D. S., & Munap, R. (2014). Hackman and Oldham's job characteristics model to job satisfaction.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,129, 46-52. Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T., & Kerr, S. (2015).The boundaryless organization: Breaking the chains of organizational structure. John Wiley & Sons. Bharadwaj, A. (2014). Planning internal communication profile for organizational effectiveness.IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review,3(2), 183-192. McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,5(4), 117. Men, L. R. (2014). Strategic internal communication: Transformational leadership, communication channels, and employee satisfaction.Management Communication Quarterly,28(2), 264-284. Rahim, M. A. (2017).Managing conflict in organizations. Routledge. Ramdhani, A., Ramdhani, M. A., & Ainissyifa, H. (2017). Conceptual Framework of Corporate Culture Influenced on Employees Commitment to Organization.International Business Management,11(3), 826-830. Raue, S., Tang, S. H., Weiland, C., & Wenzlik, C. (2013). The GRPI model–an approach for team development.White Paper Draft, SE Group. Resick, C. J., Hargis, M. B., Shao, P., & Dust, S. B. (2013). Ethical leadership, moral equity judgments, and discretionary workplace behavior.Human Relations,66(7), 951-972.
9HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Shields, J., Brown, M., Kaine, S., Dolle-Samuel, C., North-Samardzic, A., McLean, P., ... & Plimmer, G. (2015).Managing employee performance & reward: Concepts, practices, strategies. Cambridge University Press. Shirey, M. R. (2013). Lewin’s theory of planned change as a strategic resource.Journal of Nursing Administration,43(2), 69-72. Tran, Q., & Tian, Y. (2013). Organizational structure: Influencing factors and impact on a firm.American Journal of Industrial and Business Management,3(2), 229.