Community Development Principles and Young People Groups' Impact

This essay delves into the principles of community development, emphasizing the role of "Young People Groups" in addressing social change and empowering individuals. It examines community development through the lens of geographical and interest-based communities, referencing key scholars and their perspectives on community work. The essay explores the evolution of community work from top-down to bottom-up approaches, highlighting the tensions between government-led initiatives and community capacity building. It discusses the impact of neoliberalism on community services and the challenges faced by community workers. Furthermore, the paper investigates the importance of youth participation in community development, the need for effective solutions, and the role of community social work in fostering partnerships and promoting social justice within rapidly changing communities. The essay concludes by stressing the significance of youth groups in the expansion of social services and the empowerment of community members.

Running head: HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author note:

1
HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
Youth participation in community development has been observed as one of the most
effective ways for encouraging young people's dynamic commitment to humanitarian and
community services (Kenny & Connors, 2016). Young People Groups work in community
development on the basis of their assured fundamental values and ideologies calling for the
institution of voluntary connections with young people, associations with communities in
addition to other relevant organisations, as well as specialized supervision from qualified
practitioners. Young People Groups aim to arise and do something productive to certain
degree for their community. Young People Groups are fully aware of the issues and concerns
the communities are encountering lately (Ledwith, 2020). The best desired change they can
bring as Young People Groups is to offer their time to aid and benefit their community
through volunteering. The following will discuss principles of community development, ways
in which it would help in attaining change and to what extent Young People Groups aim to
address change in the society.
Communities can either be of geographical nature or a community which shows
similar interest. According to Twelvetrees (2008), the most distinguished way in considering
community is through the process of helping people in improving and developing their
communities by performing independent collective action that is though collaborative
engagement. People who tend to perceive them as community workers have not been
effective in representing them in a way in which other individuals can apprehend their effort.
British community work has changed from two chief traditions (Popple, 1995). The first one
can be explained as the top-down approach that is the apprehension of dominant groups in
order to integrate and fit in subordinate groups into the main philosophy for guaranteeing
their confidence and sustainability. On the other hand, the second major theme in community
work is linked to the bottom-up approach that reveals pressure from below or communal
community action. There are a range of recognized struggles within working class groups that

2
HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
attempt to protect their progress in their life chances. According to Nash (2016), in current
times, local as well as central government have interchanged the religious institutions, the
academies as well as individual middleclass humanitarians as the key players in redeveloping
urban regions. There can be identified several projects which involve young people groups,
youth projects as well as summer play groups. Thus, a foremost theme of community work
depends on integrating individuals as well as groups into mainstream society besides to
generate services and capitals more profound way to their needs, typically in administrating
and establishing the projects. According to Russell (2011), macro-sociological perspective
makes youths in encountering commonly altering life world. These frequent alterations
facilitates youths to perceive ways in which several aspects of communication and
anticipations change from one group to the other and numerous behaviours or customs are
commonly understood.
On the other hand, Taylor (2015), mention about the tensions between top down,
objective driven, government supported initiatives in communities and the time which has
been consumed in order to develop community capacity in addressing local health issues.
Furthermore, problems confronted by practitioners have been reflected where community
views of need and provision priority fluctuate with those who support agencies, government
directions or the welfares of health professionals or specific health disciplines. In the view of
Taylor (2015), concepts like capacity building, social infrastructure as well as social capital is
based on range of case study materials as well as the theoretical constructs are familiarized in
accessible language. These approaches further deliver range of effective ‘toolkits’ along with
summarising and evaluating diverse models of community development though practice
based knowledge and certainties. Meanwhile, Stepney and Popple (2008) has emphasized on
means through which the concept of community has altered fundamentally since the last two
decades. The concept has evolved from a consideration that is chiefly centred on geography

3
HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
or attachment about recognizable communal limits, to a consideration that shows high
inconsistency. Thus, as a confrontation to the already accepted representation of ‘community’
by administrations as well as the media, these draw consideration to ways in which
‘community’ can develop as a place for philosophical struggle and domination, affected by
prevalent powers of disparity and discernment, chiefly in relation to sexual category, race,
class and culture. In addition, Stepney and Popple (2008) draw attention to a relationship
between social independent strategies and a ‘pluralist’ attitude to public. In their view, this
development, which is quite recognized in the United Kingdom during the 1970s, has
recognized the organizational characteristic of dispossession in addition to the radical aspect
of community work. It has further underlined change at the micro level. The supporting
justification is that when specialized community workforces emphasize on humanizing in
addition to improving the administrative accountabilities and abilities of community
members, progresses in substantial conditions can be accomplished. It has been mentioned
that neoliberals have received drastic achievement in generating markets for possessions the
commodification of which has been perceived to be inconceivable such as drinking water,
children and social welfare (Kim, 2016).
Rothman (1995) has highlighted the association amid the commodification of
facilities as well as the privatization of community subdivision human provision interventions
on the one hand, as well as the process of New Public Management recognized and state
activities on the other. Strategies learnt by neoliberalism likewise focus on the connection
between human service personnel and ‘communities’ by preferring specific ‘choice’ besides
decline of organizational factors. These factors tend to influence the delivery of material,
communal as well as educational possessions. Furthermore, as a part of this procedure,
human service workforces have been gradually pressurized to function within administration
programs that aim for dealing with individuals and residents who have been excluded from

4
HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
the communities (Diemer, Rapa, Park & Perry, 2017). Stepney and Popple (2008) have
explained this type of community organization as a ‘communitarian paradox’. The scholars
have further claimed that approaches of trust and partnership intended to benefit the state-
succeeded ‘excluded’ groups can, in contradiction, function to deteriorate the simple
community principles of support, independence and self-accountability.
Community intervention practices must take in the numerous forms that exist (Taylor,
2015). Moreover, for youth people groups it is important to distinguish that a lot of
complications have fairly procedural characteristics (King & Church, 2015). These
characteristics often relate to a continuous flu epidemic or sometimes a community adversity.
Thus in the opinion Rothman (1995), seeking for effective solutions would demand for an
immediate, significant involvements by specialists in addition for an extraordinary amount of
technocratic preparation and intervention. Moreover, rationalistic planning is theoretically as
well as practically identified as most applicable when technical understanding regarding the
problem exists. Thus, planning at that moment tends to take up a practical character. In
addition, for community development the Social Security Administration projects can be
cited as examples which focus on closely probing demographic developments, projected
incomes, benefit principles, and eligibility guidelines.
It has been noted that true community social work approach is grounded on the needs
of the public as well as on the authorization of its members. Community social work aims to
improve a varied range of approaches of intervention which are approachable to community
desires (Taylor, 2015). Furthermore, it pursues to change more local contribution in shaping
the nature as well as style of endowment of social work facilities for the public. Agreeing to
Taylor (2015), working in agreement with formal as well as informal social linkages in
communities; emphasis on the category and nature of affiliations between people, families,
administrations and groups and the community; in addition to recognition that the greater part

5
HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
of care, management and control in the community is carried out by associates of the
community who are recognized as the important components of community social work.
Thus, it can be concluded that the shift towards community social work with the
involvement of youth people groups is the start of expansion of a close functioning
partnership of social services with people, concentrating more carefully on the community
and its strong point. Local as well as central government have interchanged the religious
institutions, the academies as well as individual middleclass humanitarians as the key players
in redeveloping urban regions. Community social work thus reposes on the consideration of
the nature of community as well as the implication and method of social care. Moreover, the
concept of community is frequently related to a number of fundamentals, like geographical
position, common features or connections, social connections, systems as well as relationship
and common sentiments. Human service workforces have been gradually pressurized to
function within management programs that aim for dealing with individuals and residents
who have been excluded from the communities. It is important to note that communities
develop and adjust over time and the challenge faced by the community social workers tends
to be one of reducing domination and encouraging social justice coordination in the setting of
speedily altering communities, communal standards and universal contexts.

6
HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
References
Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Park, C. J., & Perry, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of
the Critical Consciousness Scale. Youth & Society, 49(4), 461-483. DOI:
10.1177/0044118X14538289
Kenny, S., & Connors, P. (2016). Developing Communities for the Future 5ed. Cengage AU.
Kim, J. (2016). Youth Involvement in Participatory Action Research (PAR). Critical Social
Work, 17(1). Retrieved from: https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5891
King, K., & Church, A. (2015). Questioning policy, youth participation and lifestyle
sports. Leisure studies, 34(3), 282-302. Retrieved from:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02614367.2014.893005
Ledwith, M. (2020). Community development: A critical approach. Policy Press.
Nash, D. B. (2016). Improving population health by working with communities. American
health & drug benefits, 9(5), 257. Retrieved from:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5007054/
Popple, K. (1995). Models of community work, in his text, Analysing Community Work, Its
Theory and Practice.
Popple, K., & Stepney, P. (2008). Social work and the community: A critical context for
practice. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Rothman, J. (1995). Strategies of community intervention: Macro practice. FE Peacock
Publishers, Inc.
Russell, K. M. (2011). Growing Up A Third Culture Kid. Human Architecture: Journal of the
Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 9(1). Retrieved from: http://www.okcir.com/Articles
%20IX%201/KR.pdf
Taylor, J. (2015). Working with communities. OUPANZ.

7
HUMANITARIAN AND COMMUNITIES STUDIES
Twelvetrees, A. (2017). Community Development, Social Action and Social Planning.
Macmillan International Higher Education.