Hypothetical Case Study on Child Development and Ecological Perspective

This article evaluates the various challenges that Justin faces and how they negatively affect and influence his behaviour. Moreover, the article addresses the different types of ecological perspective that influence the aggressive attitude that Justin has and how they play an important role in a potential improvement in his behaviour.

Running Head: HYPOTHETICAL CASE STUDY 1
Hypothetical Case Study
Name:
Institution:

Hypothetical Case Study 2
Introduction
According to Scott, Arney and Vimpani (2010), child development depends on the ability
of the family to maintain well-being and safe environment through acknowledging how
psychological, biological and social factors influence their development. Therefore, it is crucial
that during parenting the parents should understand that for positive child development the
parent must be able to meet the child’s need consistently and effectively (Scott et al., 2010).
Furthermore, for proper caregiving, the parents must be perceptive, responsive and flexible in
that they are available whenever their kids need them. It is also important for the parents to
understand their family theory which forms the main concept when undertaking family therapy.
From the case study, Justin acts as the centre of concern from his mother (Gill) sister (Hannah)
and father (Fred) due to his aggressive behaviour. Justin’s grandmother admits that Justin had a
hard early childhood because her mother was not around since she had begun her teaching
career. In spite of that, Justin says that he got mad at his mum because she prevented him from
seeing his dad after they separated. It is also notable that the Askin family faces various
challenges from Justin’s other siblings (Philip and Hannah) regarding their health though they
seem to be adapting steadily. There is also various systems theory that should get noted for their
contribution to the wellbeing of an individual and various social work interventions that provide
an improved and fit social environment.
Factors Negatively Impact on Justin’s Well-being
1. Microsystem
As Stated by Healy (2014), there is various ecological perspective which is important in
different contexts in a child’s wellbeing and development. These four different ecosystems that

Hypothetical Case Study 3
influence the wellbeing of a child include microsystems, mesosystems, exosystems and
macrosystems. According to Scott et al. (2010), the microsystems help in the child’s
development in that it is the immediate neighbourhood in which the child got surrounded. The
social worker may use microsystem to help Justin strengthen his relationship with his family and
his extended family. Also, the system would help the social worker to address the cause of
Justin’s aggressiveness (Healy, 2014). From the case study, it is notable that the immediate
neighbourhood that Justin get surrounded with was not her mother and dad which made his
childhood difficult. Thus, Justin was placed under childcare at an early age though Betty
(Justin’s grandmother) sometimes helped in taking care of Justin. Betty also says that Justin used
to cry a lot when his mother (Gill) used to leave him with his grandmother or at child care.
According to Healy (2014), the main purpose why microsystem is important to the child’s early
development was because it helps the child create a good relationship with people in their real
life. Justin did not have a chance of having a good relationship with her mum because she was
not around since she had begun her teaching career and the situation got worse when his mum
separated from his father. Gill denied Justin the chance to see his father as often as he could she
felt hurt by the man (Fred) she loved and who made her sacrifice her career so they may have a
family.
Teater (2014) states that it is important for the social worker to consider how the physical
and social environmental aspects affect and impact on the behaviour and wellbeing of the child
because they influence values of individuals in the society. Hence, the social environment that
Justin grew up in his early age did not give him a chance to have a proper social and physical
environment which affected his interdependence network principle. Justin never had a positive
relationship (interdependence network) with his grandmother which seemed not to impact

Hypothetical Case Study 4
positively on his behaviour and attitude, thus, his aggressive nature (Teater, 2014). Also, Justin’s
parents lacked the proper means of interacting and improving their relationship with their son.
From the case study, Gill admits that they tried all manners of disciplinary actions to ensure that
their son was back on track though they failed. She states that Fred used to smack Justin
occasionally which did not improve his behaviour or their relationship with him. The parents
also tried rewarding him when he behaved well though it also did not have a positive input in his
behaviour and attitude. In spite of that, the other ecological perspective principle that may have
affected Justin was non-linear which influenced the relationship between Justin and his
childhood environment. Justin’s childhood environment was the childcare which had a negative
impact on his wellbeing because he always cried when his mum left him there.
2. Mesosystem
According to Scott et al. (2010), the mesosystem is another ecological system that
focuses on the interrelationship between two or more systems and how they help promote
educational pathways. Smith, Faulk and Sizer (2016) states, “The findings of confirmatory factor
and path analyses demonstrate that personal relationships and linkages to important community
resources including recreational, school, faith-based, extended-family, and work-related sources,
are related not only to better family functioning but also to positive peer relations and indirectly
to youth self-reliance” (p. 318). Thus, the mesosystem helps the social worker to access the
challenges that may prevent the child from going to school (Teater, 2014). From the case study,
Justin admits to the social worker that he hates school because the teachers think that he is a
bully. However, Justin says that he gets teased to by other students who say he is big and dumb
which creates the aggressive nature in him.

Hypothetical Case Study 5
Also, it is worth noting that due to the teasing that Justin experiences from another
student he developed a “Don’t care” attitude which contributed to his aggressive nature. He says
that he goes to school because he has no option but he is hopeful that one day he may not have to
go. According to Roundy (n.d), mesosystems consists of the various interactions that a person
may have with their microsystems. For instance, Justin’s parents had a good relationship with his
teacher though it was still difficult to understand what caused his aggressive behaviour. The
teacher confirms that Gill and Fred are very cooperative though they lack the required skill and
knowledge in managing Justin. It, in turn, affects Justin in that they are unable to help him
achieve great grades in school and improve his reading. In spite of that, they are unable to
manage Justin because he had been suspended twice for hitting and bullying other children.
Another factor that affects Justin is that he was unable to concentrate in class because he thought
about footy, movies and TV shows that his dad takes him when he should be doing his class
work. The lack of concentration in his class work contributed to his poor performance in class.
3. Exosystem
According to Roundy (n.d), another ecological perspective is the exosystem which
involves factors that affect the child’s wellbeing without them being involved directly in the
decision-making process. From the case study, Justin says that he hates his mum because she
(Gill) prevented him from seeing his father often. It means that Justin was not actively involved
in the separation of his parents though he got affected by their separation indirectly. It
contributes to his aggressive behaviour because he tells the social worker that he is mad that his
family is no longer together and feels that Susie is the cause of their parent’s separation. Cabrera,
Fitzgerald, Bradley and Roggman (2014) state, “Based on new evidence, our expanded model
incorporates more dynamic reciprocity, temporal factors, and nuanced considerations of context

Hypothetical Case Study 6
in which fathers parent. We identify aspects of context as well as fathers' personality and
behaviour that are central to the next generation of studies on fathers” (p. 336). Therefore, Fred
attitude towards his ex-wife (Gill) plays a crucial role in the behaviour of Justin indirectly
because Fred seems not to care much about the heartbreak he caused Gill which may have
resulted in the “Don’t care” attitude Justin has in school.
4. Macrosystem
Healy (2014) states that macrosystems mark as the cultural foundation of the society
because they influence the religion and peace of the child’s wellbeing. From the case study, it is
notable that Gill (Justin, Philip and Hannah’s mother) is from a church-going family while Fred
(Justin, Philip and Hannah’s father) is family that had no active involvement in the church.
However, Gill and Fred’s parenting skills were almost identical as they acquired them from their
parents. Gill says that she attends church weekly and both Hannah and Philip attend Sunday
school though Justin had refused to attend church over the past year. The lack of a cultural
background that could help improve Justin’s behaviour is not available which makes him more
aggressive as evident in the past six months. Therefore, family wellbeing provides a good
foundation for proper child wellbeing and positive parenting which Justin seemed to lack
(Newland, 2015). It is important for the social worker to understand that if a child does not get
proper wellbeing development from his or her family and school, then the cultural part would
help. Culpepper and Killion (2016) certify the claims that macrosystems influence the child’s
values and cultural patterns especially the child’s beliefs and ideas.
Strength Factors of the Askin Family

Hypothetical Case Study 7
Healy (2014) states, “A key strength of systems perspectives is that they provide a
framework for understanding and responding to people in their environments” (p. 132).
Therefore, the ecological systems enable the social worker to makes a proper assessment of an
individual or community level which promotes understanding and suitable and reliable
systematic changes (Healy, 2014). From the case study, the social worker can rate the anger,
trust and worry level of the individuals in the Askin family. The assessment would enable in
strengthening further the relationship of each in Askin family because everyone was honest
about how they feel and want. The case study gives a good understanding of the cause of Justin’s
aggressive attitude which has had his family worried which give the Askin family a proper
opportunity for improving his wellbeing.
Furthermore, the ecological system helps the social worker to respect the different
contributions that the various systems play and impact on the child’s development. Gill states
that the strengths of the Askin family are that they bring up children that are morally upright and
obedient to their parents and respect them. Furthermore, Gill said that her parents and sisters
were actively involved in church because they attended the church weekly. Also, they believed
that Fred leaving her betrayed the vows they had made in church when they got married.
Therefore, it is notable that Askin was a strong cultural family that believed in families holding
up together which would provide their kids with the best chance of proper upbringing. In spite of
that, the family is close an in contact communication which helps the family improve and
strengthen their family ties. In the case study, Gill confirms that she is close to Betty (her mum)
and sister (Sarah) and they are always in constant communication and also Sarah’s family does
things together with the Askin family. Furthermore, Fred spends time with his son, and he helped
Justin with his administration in a football club.

Hypothetical Case Study 8
Resources and Protective Factors of the Askin Family
From the case study, Gill and her children still live in their family home which is
relatively comfortable and located in the town. The house acts as an important resource that Gill
does not want to lose the property. It is worth noting that Gill feels a bit distressed about the
issue because Fred and Susie (Fred’s new companion) would like Gill to buy them out of the
house which she cannot pay they their share of the house’ worth. Furthermore, the Askin is
protective in that Gill does not want to socialise much apart from connecting to church, and her
family because she lost trust in relationships thus protecting her family from further heartbreak.
In spite of that, Gill became protective over her son Justin when she did not want him associating
with his father who had broken her heart.
Possible Approaches Facilitating Greater Wellbeing and Environment for Justin
From the case study, the social worker identified some of the causes that have had a
negative impact on the Justin leading to his aggressive behaviour. The social worker can help
Justin improve on his aggressive behaviour by advising Gill to spend some more time with him
which will help in improving his relationship. Moreover, the social worker may advise Gill and
Fred to talk to the teacher regarding the teasing that Justin faces from other students which will
improve his attitude towards other students. Also, this will enable him to pay attention in class
more which will help him achieve better grades through formal and informal learning (Swist,
Collin, McCormack and Third, 2015).
Conclusion
This article evaluates the various challenges that Justin faces and how they negatively
affect and influence his behaviour. Moreover, the article addresses the different types of

Hypothetical Case Study 9
ecological perspective that influence the aggressive attitude that Justin has and how they play an
important role in a potential improvement in his behaviour. In spite of that, the article explains
the various strengths and resources that the Askin family and also how their cultural practices
have influenced the behaviour of Justin. Also, the article evaluates the necessary changes that
require to get made to make sure that Justin wellbeing improves.

Hypothetical Case Study 10
References
Cabrera, N. J., Fitzgerald, H. E., Bradley, R. H., & Roggman, L. (2014). The ecology of father‐
child relationships: An expanded model. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 6(4), 336-
354.
Culpepper, D., & Killion, L. (2016). 21st Century Sport: Microsystem or Macrosystem?. Sport
Journal. Retrieved from: http://thesportjournal.org/article/21st-century-sport-
microsystem-or-macrosystem
Healy, K. (2014). Social work theories in context: Creating frameworks for practice. Macmillan
International Higher Education.
Newland, L. A. (2015). Family well‐being, parenting, and child well‐being: Pathways to healthy
adjustment. Clinical Psychologist, 19(1), 3-14.
Roundy, L. (n.d). Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory of Development: Definition &
Examples. Retrieved from: https://study.com/academy/lesson/bronfenbrenners-
ecological-systems-theory-of-develop
Scott, D., Arney, F., & Vimpani, G. (2010). Think child, think family, think community (Doctoral
dissertation, Cambridge University Press).
Smith, E. P., Faulk, M., & Sizer, M. A. (2016). Exploring the meso-system: The roles of
community, family, and peers in adolescent delinquency and positive youth
development. Youth & society, 48(3), 318-343.
Swist, T., Collin, P., McCormack, J., & Third, A. (2015). Social media and the wellbeing of
children and young people: A literature review.

Hypothetical Case Study 11
Teater, B. (2014). An introduction to applying social work theories and methods. McGraw-Hill
Education (UK).