1ENG 112 Considering ‘The Stranger’ as a work by Albert Camus, identification of aspects that are humane, becomes a strenuous job. Meursault may not have received a trial that was entirely humane in nature, but his own nature showed extreme derailment from the normative aspects of humaneness itself. In that regard, it becomes important to understand that the emotional and cognitive complexity of Meursault as a person becomes a key attribute that detaches himself from what common people may seem as logical. The aspect of faith and religion for instance, playsnomeaningfulroleinthelifeofMeursault.Atthesametime,theinterpersonal relationships that Meursault shares with people, fail to promote a certain mindset in Meursault that would seem logical and rational. Meursault looks at the humanity in world as a meaningless existence. His acceptance of the ‘gentle indifference of the world’, serves to highlight the vagueness of his position with respect to his actions and their consequences. 1. When she laughed I wanted her again. A moment later she asked me if I loved her. I said that sort of question had no meaning, really; but I supposed I didn’t. This passage highlights an aspect of the duality in desires, needs as well as perceptions that Meursault faces. The absurdity of this passage can indicate that Meursault’s trial cannot be entirely based on logical understanding of circumstances. 2.I’d read, of course, that in jail one ends up by losing track of time. But this had never meant anything definite to me. I hadn’t grasped how days could be at once long and short . . . In fact, I never thought of days as such; only the words “yesterday” and “tomorrow” still kept some meaning. The importance of this passage lies in showing how the jail acted as an alienating factor for Meursault and his emotions. This is not a humane treatment where the person loses his own self consciousness.
2ENG 112 3. Never in my life had I seen anyone so clearly as I saw these people; not a detail of their clothes or features escaped me. And yet I couldn’t hear them, and it was hard to believe they really existed. This passage explores how Meursault, despite being able to see the physical features of the people around him, never felt any emotional connection with them. 4. It was then I felt a sort of wave of indignation spreading through the courtroom, and for the first time I understood that I was guilty. They got the doorkeeper to repeat what he had said about the coffee and my smoking. As an exploration of a sliver of resuscitation of a human feelings in a generally apathetic man, this passage holds key significance in producing the contrast between the binary elements in the novel.