United States Supreme Court

ILLINOIS v. WARDLOW(2000)


No. 98-1036

Argued: November 2, 1999Decided: January 12, 2000

In 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the police officers had reasonable suspicion to stop and question defendant Wardlow on the basis of his unprovoked flight

ILLINOIS v. WARDLOW(2000)

Evidence

This article examines the case study of Illinois vs. Wardlow, focusing on the factors determining reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment. It discusses the decision held and its implications on Fourth Amendment rights.

Harvard University

Illinois vs. Wardlow: Case Study, Decision, and Fourth Amendment Rights

This article provides an analysis of Michael Brown’s shooting from a legal perspective. It discusses the use of force by police officers and how it relates to the Tennessee V. Garner and Graham V. Coroner cases. The article argues that the use of force by the police officer in Brown’s case was justified.

ILLINOIS v. WARDLOW(2000)

End of preview

Illinois vs. Wardlow: Case Study, Decision, and Fourth Amendment Rights

Michael Brown’s Shooting

The Fifth and Sixth Amendment

ILLINOIS v. WARDLOW(2000)

End of preview

Illinois vs. Wardlow: Case Study, Decision, and Fourth Amendment Rightslg...

Michael Brown’s Shootinglg...

The Fifth and Sixth Amendmentlg...

Illinois vs. Wardlow: Case Study, Decision, and Fourth Amendment Rights

Michael Brown’s Shooting

The Fifth and Sixth Amendment