This paper scrutinizes Australia’s reliance on international healthcare workers in relation to its current immigration policies. It examines the impacts of the country’s current immigration policies on healthcare workers and provides recommendations for a solution.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running Head: IMMIGRATION POLICY IN AUSTRALIA1 Immigration Policy in Australia Student Name Institution Affiliation Date
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES2 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................4 2.0 Australia’s Reliance on International Health Workers..............................................................5 3.0 Current Australian Policies on International Health Worker Immigration...............................6 4.0 Historical Reasons for Development of Immigration Policies in Australia..............................7 5.0 Current policies sustainability...................................................................................................8 6.0 Recommendations......................................................................................................................9 7.0 References................................................................................................................................10
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES3 Executive summary This paper scrutinizes Australia’s reliance on international healthcare workers in relation to its current immigration policies. Australia has enacted immigration policies which are expected to negatively affect its healthcare sector. This is in consideration to the fact that the country heavily relies on international health workers to sustain its healthcare system. It relies on the data recorded between 2006- 2011. The impacts of the country’s current immigration policies on healthcare workers will be scrutinized with an aim of revealing how sustainable they are. Also, the historical reasons which have led to the enactment of strict immigration policies in this country like the high population will be scrutinized. Lastly, recommendations will be presented with an aim of getting a solution for the problem which has been created by the enacted immigration policies.
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES4 1.0 Introduction The world’s migration of healthcare workers has remained to be an issue of concern in healthcare provision and development. Australia is among the major importers of health care workers, but determining how outsourcing of health workers from other countries into the Australian healthcare system has been a challenging endeavor, especially in regard to causation relationships. Initially, migration of health care workers to Australia was governed by different visa policies, which were administered by the department of immigration and citizenship. Most of the overseas health care professionals would, therefore, enter the country freely through temporary skilled visas for limited periods of time, up to 4 years. During the initial period, the workers were allowed to seek additional assessment through the application of permanent migration rights to Australia following positive assessments by relevant professional bodies and registration boards (3.2.2 overseas trained health professionals). Overseas health workers would be recruited directly by the employers, often through health professional recruitment agencies or by territory and state governments directly. The current concerns about healthcare workers movement from third world countries to first world countries have led to the implementation of protocols such as “Commonwealth Code of Practice for the International Recruitment of Health Workers”,where Australia is a member. Australia is among the countries which have extraordinary reliance on international medical practitioners compared to other OECD countries. From the year 2005 to 2011, 17910 healthcare practitioners were sponsored on a temporary basis to Australia, with an additional 2790 being selected as skilled migrants. Apart from this number, thousands of unfiltered healthcare practitioners had also arrived in advance through different humanitarian agencies (Accessing government health & welfare data). Australia’s reliance on international healthcare
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES5 practitioners has kept increasing owing to a number of factors. First, medical migration has remained to be the key strategy to address the maldistribution of the medical workforce in Australia. Secondly, the registration body for international healthcare practitioners has improved their outcomes hence enhancing their immediate value as a source of supply (Gregory, 2015). Thirdly, the reliance of international healthcare practitioners has increased in the country especially in the undersupplied fields. Fourthly, the demand for international healthcare practitioners has continued to increase in Australia. Therefore, based on these facts Australia’s dependence on international healthcare workers is likely to persist rather than reduce in the future. 2.0 Australia’s Reliance on International Health Workers According to the medical statistics of 2011, Australia highly depends on international health care workers. This finding was supported by research byNegin, Rozea,Cloyd, andMartiniuk (2013). According to this research, out of 70,231 medical practitioners who were working in Australia in the year 2011, 32,919 which are approximately 47.3% of the total number were the only Australian-born citizens while the rest were international practitioners (Accessing government health & welfare data). Among the international practitioners, most of them came from South and Southeast Asia. Back in the year 2006, the statistics were a little bit different, with the number of aboriginal medical practitioners higher, 51.9% of the total number of medical practitioners in Australia (Your chance to migrate to Australia in 2018, 2018). According to the research, out of a total number of 239,924 midwifery and nursing practitioners in Australia, 66.8% which is equivalent to 127,911 were aboriginal practitioners,
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES6 while the rest were international practitioners mainly from UK, South Asia, and Ireland (Mossialos, Wenzl, Osborn & Sarnak, 2016). Compared to the preceding statistics of 2006, a slight difference is noted. This is because, in 2006, approximately 69.8% of all the nursing and midwifery practitioners were Aboriginals in Australia. Based on the research, the Western Australia had the highest number of international practitioners compared to all the other regions (Accessing government health & welfare data). Also, most of the medical practitioners in Australia are aboriginals compared to urban areas where international practitioners have dominated Contradicting statistics were however evident when high-level medical practitioners were put into consideration. Those practitioners include dentists, pharmacists, gynecologists, and other allied practitioners. According to this research, out of a total number of 15,168 high-level practitioners who worked in the country between 2006 and 2011, 68.9% which is equivalent to 10452 workers were international practitioners (Allen, 2019). The largest contributors to this number were: Indians, Philippines, Nepalese and Zimbabweans. The number of healthcare foreigners has continued to increase as more countries advance their healthcare education systems and that has also translated to an increased number of healthcare practitioners who are migrating into Australia to seek employment opportunities (Restrictions on Immigration in Australia, 2019). 3.0 Immigration Policies in Australian One of the current Australian policies on foreigners is the shift towards temporary immigration policy. This policy places the immigration system of Australia at the risk of losing
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES7 its public confidence and that will undermine its long-running success (Wright & Clibborn, 2017). The harms which the current government policies on immigration are likely to cause can be compared with the successful campaigns of Brexit to leave European Union which illustrates the consequences of unmanaged public perception of immigration. Although the UK’s immigration policies would produce economic benefits and help plug gaps in the labor market of UK, the opponents perceived it as a step to prevent free labor movement (Commonwealth Parliament & Parliament House 2013). Australia is no exception; the changes in the country’s immigration policies which have shifted towards temporary immigration are likely to harm major sectors of the country’s economy (McAllister, 2018). Also, the weak regulations to employers who hire migrant health workers, via temporary visa risk their mistreatment. This is in consideration of the fact that Australia’s healthcare system has a high dependency on foreign healthcare workforce (O'Sullivan, Russell, McGrail & Scott, 2019). 4.0 Historical Reasons for Development of Immigration Policies in Australia The alarming rate at which the population of Australia is increasing is the main reason behind the current policies on immigration. Although immigration is the defining feature of the country’s economic and social life, the 2016 report by the productivity commission argued that the population of the country was running out of control. The creation of an immigration department and public catch cry in Australia post-war has led to successive waves of migrants from all walks of life (Hawthorne & Lesleyanne 2013). That has shaped the character of the country and influenced its development.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES8 The country’s migration program has undergone revolution over a generation without consultative public debate. Since John Howard’s tenure as the prime minister, successive governments have stripes altered the country’s migration program leading to an increase in its population. Statistics indicate that there has been a massive increase in the country’s permanent migration since 1966 when it was 85000 to 2017 when it hit 208 000. The debate on these alarming rates has not only exploded from the confines of new people seeking to relocate to Australia but also with the increasing vituperativeness of Australia public resources like road congestion, house prices and availability of resources such as water and land. Debates on the population of Australia have linked it to future economic downturns (Medical practitioners’ workforce 2015). For instance, the current long-running boom has been argued on the basis of high congestion and overcrowding in the country, which is slowly raising housing and infrastructure prices. 5.0 Current policies sustainability The policies are not sustainable and will need serious reforms to get public support. Most importantly, the mistreatment and underpayment of international workers will need to be addressed urgently for these policies to be sustainable (Ueffing, Rowe & Mulder, 2015). This is because such issues have got their way into the public domain and will have adverse impacts on the country’s competitive stand in industries such as horticulture and healthcare and education which depend on migrant workers (Murray, Wilson & Dean of Medicine & Dentistry, 2019). For instance, current media reports, academic studies, and government inquiries have indicated that mistreatment of temporal workers is no longer limited to 7-Eleven. This is a clear indication that strong enforcement and regulations on immigration policies are needed if the country wishes to restore its image.
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES9 Some of the visa arrangements in the new policies have made temporary migrant workers slaves to their employees. For instance, international healthcare practitioners are entitled to work for a period of fewer 40hrs per fortnight. These and other transgressions have exposed international students to cancellation and removal of their visas. That has made learners resident rights, enrolment in education, and employment to fully depend on employers without sharing their breaches of visa conditions as specified by the Department of Immigration and Border Protection. These and other arrangements which have created dependence on employers must be fixed otherwise temporary migrants will always remain fearful to seek redress (Negin, Rozea, Cloyd & Martiniuk, 2013). 6.0 Recommendations From what has been presented in this paper, the main problems facing the healthcare workers as a result of the new immigration policies are as a result of weak enforcement which has exposed healthcare workers into mistreatments by the employers. The government should, therefore, enforce and regulate temporary visas to ensure that the rights of healthcare migrants are protected from the abuse of employers. That way, healthcare workers will be free to enter the country without fear.
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES 10 7.0 References 3.2.2 Overseas trained health professionals. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/work-res-ruraud- toc~work-res-ruraud-3~work-res-ruraud-3-2~work-res-ruraud-3-2-2 Accessing government health & welfare data. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.aihw.gov.au/about-our-data/accessing-australian-government-data Allen, L. (2019, March 15). Migration helps balance our ageing population – we don't need a moratorium. Retrieved fromhttps://theconversation.com/migration-helps-balance-our- ageing-population-we-dont-need-a-moratorium-100030 Commonwealth Parliament, & Parliament House. (2013, February 19). Australia's Migration Program. Retrieved from https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Li brary/pubs/BN/1011/AustMigration Gregory, R. G. (2015). The two-step Australian immigration policy and its impact on immigrant employment outcomes. InHandbook of the Economics of International Migration(Vol. 1, pp. 1421-1443). North-Holland. Hawthorne, & Lesleyanne. (2013, October 29). International medical migration: What is the future for Australia? Retrieved from https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/199/5/international-medical-migration-what- future-australia
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES 11 McAllister, I. (2018). National identity and attitudes towards immigration in Australia.National Identities,20(2), 157-173. Medical practitioners workforce 2015, How many medical practitioners are there? (n.d.). Retrieved fromhttps://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/workforce/medical-practitioners- workforce-2015/contents/how-many-medical-practitioners-are-there Mossialos, E., Wenzl, M., Osborn, R., & Sarnak, D. (2016).2015 international profiles of health care systems. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Murray, R., Wilson, A., & Dean of Medicine & Dentistry. (2019, March 15). How can Australia have too many doctors, but still not meet patient needs? Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/how-can-australia-have-too-many-doctors-but-still-not-meet- patient-needs-78535 Negin, J., Rozea, A., Cloyd, B., & Martiniuk, A. L. (2013, December 31). Foreign-born health workers in Australia: An analysis of census data. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3882294/ O'Sullivan, B., Russell, D. J., McGrail, M. R., & Scott, A. (2019, January 22). Reviewing reliance on overseas-trained doctors in rural Australia and planning for self-sufficiency: Applying 10 years' MABEL evidence. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6341566/ Restrictions on Immigration in Australia. (2019, January 29). Retrieved from https://borgenproject.org/restrictions-on-immigration-in-australia/
AUSTRALIAN IMMIGRATION POLICIES 12 Ueffing, P., Rowe, F., & Mulder, C. H. (2015). Differences in attitudes towards immigration between Australia and Germany: The role of immigration policy.Comparative Population Studies,40(4). Wright, C. F., & Clibborn, S. (2017). Back Door, Side Door, or Front Door: An Emerging De- Factor Low-Skilled Immigration Policy in Australia.Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J.,39, 165. Your chance to migrate to Australia in 2018: Changes announced to Skilled Occupation Lists. (2018, January 17). Retrieved from https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/punjabi/en/article/2018/01/17/your-chance- migrate-australia-2018-changes-announced-skilled-occupation-lists