Impact of Brexit on Indian Students' Perception towards Studying Abroad

The provided content explores the impact of Brexit on abroad studies, focusing on the perspectives of Indian students. The themes discussed include the value of SAARC compared to EU, improvement in fee structure, creation of a positive environment for education programs, and changes in visa restrictions. Additionally, the content touches upon the long-term success of the UK economy and education system due to Brexit. Overall, the assignment aims to gauge the opinions and perceptions of Indian students regarding the effects of Brexit on abroad studies.

Dissertation

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I owe my deepest gratitude to my mentor who inspired and guided me with his wisdom
and knowledge. His commitment to the highest standards motivated me to carry out the entire
dissertation in the right manner. I would express sincere thanks to my family members and
friends who provided me immense support throughout the entire research work. I would also like
to thank my colleagues and team members who helped me in gathering the data for the study and
its analysis.

ABSTRACT
In present study, BREXIT is considered as one of most impressive topic in current
market and it has great impact on the diverse economic and social aspects that are related with
UK. It is one of key reason that researcher has selected the specific topic related to BREXIT for
the present study. Indian students are most attracted towards abroad studies so impact of current
conditions on their perception is also essential because it allows to have effective development of
UK education system In addition to this, it can be said that BREXIT will allow government to
have designing of impressive policies that may impact Indian students'' perception. BREXIT
influences employment ratio and economic values in optimistic manner then Indian students'
perception will also be in favour of studies in UK. by having application of BREXIT the
governing policies will be changed to great context that will provide benefits to Indian students.
It means if this message has been shared in appropriate manner then perception of Indian
students can be influenced in positive manner.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................1
Overview................................................................................................................................1
Research problem...................................................................................................................2
Chapter structure....................................................................................................................2
Aim and objectives.................................................................................................................3
Focus and Purpose..................................................................................................................3
Research question...................................................................................................................4
Framework and analysis.........................................................................................................4
Potential Significance.............................................................................................................5
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW.........................................................................................6
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................13
Introduction..........................................................................................................................13
Research Philosophy............................................................................................................13
Research Design...................................................................................................................14
Research Strategy.................................................................................................................15
Research procedures.............................................................................................................19
Ethical Considerations..........................................................................................................19
Summary...............................................................................................................................19
CHAPTER 4: DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS ..................................................................20
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION.....................................................40
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................44

ILLUSTRATION INDEX
Illustration 1: Theme 1. Are you in support of Brexit...................................................................20
Illustration 2: Theme 2. Brexit has impacted global competitiveness of British businesses in
positive manner..............................................................................................................................22
Illustration 3: Theme 3. European Union's monetary policy was influencing economic
development...................................................................................................................................23
Illustration 4: Theme 4. Which factor impacts your perception in regard to abroad studies.........25
Illustration 5: Theme 5. Economic and social aspects has been changed in recent time due to act
of BREXIT.....................................................................................................................................27
Illustration 6: Theme 6. Economic values of nation impacts your perception in respect to abroad
studies............................................................................................................................................28
Illustration 7: Theme 7. Brexit has increased the value of SAARC as compared to EU...............29
Illustration 8: Theme 8. Improvement in fee structure due to Brexit impacts your perception in
respect to abroad studies................................................................................................................30
Illustration 9: Theme 9. Brexit creates positive environment that forces you to join education
programs within UK......................................................................................................................32
Illustration 10: Theme 10. Brexit impacts factor related to UK economic and social development
........................................................................................................................................................33
Illustration 11: Theme 11. Work culture prospects are uncertain that still creates an issue of
Indian students' to find job in UK while studying.........................................................................34
Illustration 12: Theme 12. Brexit is having indirect impact on.....................................................35
Illustration 13: Theme 13. Brexit provides long term success to UK economy and education
system............................................................................................................................................36
Illustration 14: Theme 14. According to you which is one of key benefit that Indian students
attain due to act of Brexit...............................................................................................................37
Illustration 15: Theme 15. Changes in Visa restrictions will also provide better convenience to
Indian students...............................................................................................................................38
Illustration 16: Theme 16: Does affordable pricing of courses impact your perception ..............39
Illustration 17: Theme 17: Conducting a fair is helpful in creating better awareness and attract
more and more students.................................................................................................................41

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
Overview
As per detailed study, number of Indian students are willing to have studies in UK but the
act of BREXIT has greatly influenced the perception of students. BREXIT is considered as an
abbreviation for British Exit. This abbreviation is mainly installed in year 2016 on 23 June. It
has been noticed that citizens of UK has also participated effectively in open voting program so
that appropriate decision can be taken into account in regard to Britain exit from European Union
(Vijayanand, 2016). It has been noticed that the act of BREXIT has great impact on the
economic and social aspects of UK. It means the changes in students perception is also one of
key factor that need to be evaluated effectively. Work flexibility can be promoted effectively due
to exit from EU which is also beneficial for fair trade working. Other policies and legal values of
UK can also be transformed in appropriate manner.
Economic development of UK is one of key benefit that businesses can attain due to
BREXIT. It also indicates that the selected topic is one of influencing topic for UK so it is
essential to have better understanding about the subject and its impact. It has been noticed that
there are number of Indian students who are willing to have purchase in UK due to BREXIT
there perception has influenced to great context (Dennis, 2016). Indian students are always
attracted towards abroad study that allows them to meet key goals and objectives. UK economy
and job opportunities was greatly dependent with the development of European Union. Decision
in respect to BREXIT has changed these aspects which has decreased the dependency on
European nations.
In present dissertation, the researcher has emphasised on reasons behind the BREXIT and
its impact on the education system of UK. Specifically the impact on Indian students is
considered as critical aspect of the study. It plays a key role in development of UK so the topic
selected is appropriate and it helps in effective understanding about the concept of BREXIT.
Along with this, the information in regard to essential factors that impact the perception of Indian
students can also be gathered in appropriate manner (Jonsas, 2016). Current study is also
beneficial to identify the impact of BREXIT on the Indian students' perception. Moreover,
diverse methods to improve Indian students' perception has also been presented in the study.

Research problem
BREXIT is considered as one of most impressive topic in current market and it has great
impact on the diverse economic and social aspects that are related with UK. It is one of key
reason that researcher has selected the specific topic related to BREXIT for the present study.
Indian students are most attracted towards abroad studies so impact of current conditions on their
perception is also essential because it allows to have effective development of UK education
system (Fischer, 2016). In recent years the ratio of Indian students in UK has also decreased so
relation of BREXIT activities with them also need to be understand in appropriate manner.
Indian students take care of diverse economic and social factors before taking decision
regarding abroad studies. It means by having understanding about factors that impact perception
of Indian students' the government of UK can also take better decisions in order to improve
effectiveness of BREXIT (Hook and Szomszor, 2016). Proper learning about ways that help in
managing outcome of BREXIT is also essential. It is also one of key reason behind the selection
of subject. Number of UK government decisions are also taken into account as per BREXIT
characteristics so understanding about the concept of BREXIT is also critical. For continuous
improvement in UK economic and social aspects the current study is significant.
Chapter structure
Chapter 1: Introduction – It is a chapter that provides a clear framework about the study and
topic so that objectives of study can be accomplished. In this, overview of topic is being
presented so that better understanding about the topic can be developed. Along with this, the
potential significance of the study will also be presented so that better understanding can be
developed in respect to the subject.
Chapter 2: Literature Review – It is most significant chapter of the study that need to be
considered as critical aspect. In this, different literature documents in regard to Brexit and Indian
students will be compared so that better outcome can be attained. Along with this, in-depth
assessment of the areas of research study will be done on the basis of published works of well
known authors.
Chapter 3: Research Methodology – In this chapter different tools and techniques will be
selected to make sure that better support has been provided to overall study. Proper justification
behind the selection of tool will also be presented in this chapter. It will provide in gathering
information and make sure that resources are being used effectively.

Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Findings – In addition to this, it can be said that data analysis is
also one of most essential section of the study. In this, interpretation of collected information
must be presented in appropriate manner. With an assistance of this, appropriate outcomes can be
attained so that objectives of study can be attained.
Chapter 5: Conclusion and Recommendations – It is a section in which overall summary of
study is being presented. In this, presentation of key findings is also being taken into account to
make sure that better outcomes are attained. Along with this, recommendation will also be
presented on the basis of final outcome of the study.
Aim and objectives
Aim:
Key aim of the current dissertation is to analyse the impact of BREXIT on perception of
Indian students who are willing to have study in UK. With an assistance of diverse objectives the
current aim of study can be accomplished in desired way.
Objectives:
 To understand the concept of BREXIT
 To evaluate factors that impact perception of Indian students'
 To identify impact of BREXIT on Indian students' perception
 To recommend through which UK government can attract Indian students' towards study
in UK
Focus and Purpose
Key purpose of the study is to explore the concept of BREXIT so that better
understanding can be developed in regard to BREXIT. The research will fulfil the purpose of
analysing the gaps left by previous researches on the topic. Along with this, number of literature
has been presented in the study that provides learning in respect to BREXIT. With an assistance
of this, key benefits to the UK economic and social aspects can be understand in appropriate
manner. Indian students' perception is also a key factor that need to be explore in desired way
(Vijayanand, 2016). It helps in identifying the impact of BREXIT on Indian students' perception
who are looking to have study in abroad nation like UK.
Another key motive behind the study is to understand key factors that impact students
perception so that goals and objectives can be accomplished effectively. By having improved

focus on the number of study the needs and expectations of Indian students can be identify in
appropriate manner (Harrison, 2016). Learning will also provide information about diverse ways
that can be adopted under BREXIT by UK government for attracting more and more Indian
students.
Research question
 What do you understand by concept of BREXIT?
 Which factors impact perception of Indian students'?
 How BREXIT influences the Indian students' perception?
 How UK government can attract Indian students' towards study in UK?
Framework and analysis
As per detailed study, there are various steps that need to be consider by researcher for
effective analysis of information. It has been noticed that descriptive design has been employed
in the study and it helps in providing better description of all characteristics. With an assistance
of this, better and specific description is being provided so that goals and objectives can be
accomplished. It helps in meeting the objectives of study and analyse the impact of BREXIT on
Indian students.
Inductive approach has been accessed by the researcher in order to meet key goals and
objectives. By having improved focus on inductive approach the flexible work structure need to
be developed. It assists in finding the results and make sure about the impact of BREXIT on the
Indian students' perception. However, the selection of inductive approach is beneficial for the
study. In addition to this, it can be said that interpretivism philosophy is being adopted by the
researcher in order to meet goals and objectives of the study. Qualitative techniques of research
are also being followed by investigator so that better outcomes can be attained. By having
assistance of qualitative technique the collected data can be presented in appropriate manner. In
order to have effective data collection both primary and secondary data collection methods has
been used. Survey has been conducted for offering better support to primary data collection.
Other than this, online survey method is also beneficial to have effective gathering of
data so that objectives can be accomplished. In addition to this, sampling of survey is also 50
Indian students' who are studying the UK. Support has been provided to survey by having
improved focus on questionnaire which are designed as per objectives of the study. Along with

this, qualitative technique of data analysis has been adopted in order to meet objectives of the
study.
Potential Significance
Present study is significant because it facilitates in exploring the concept of BREXIT in
detail. With an assistance of this, the economic and social impact of BREXIT can also be
understand in appropriate manner. Key potential significance of the study is that it is beneficial
for academicians who are looking towards higher education. It will provide better understanding
about BREXIT and its impact on the Indian students' perception (Howard and Kollanyi, 2016).
Learning will also present a deep and innovative insight about the techniques that can be used by
UK government in order to attract Indian students' towards study in UK. It will also present an
overview of factors that impact the perception of Indian students which is beneficial for effective
designing of strategies. Research will also get an overview of BREXIT on the Indian students'
perception.

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction
It is one of most critical aspect for the study, in this section different literature documents
are being analysed by researcher so that better outcome can be attained. n this section,
information which the researcher has gathered from a range of secondary sources is presented.
This section of study consists of the works of other authors and researchers who have done
similar studies earlier. In addition to this, it can be said that for present dissertation the different
literature in regard to Brexit will be considered as critical aspect. It will assist in meeting
objectives and provide better understanding.
Concept of BREXIT
As per the view of Howard and Kollanyi (2016), it can be said that BREXIT is
considered as an abbreviation for British Exit. This abbreviation is mainly installed in year 2016
on 23 June. It has been noticed that on 23 June, 2016 the citizens of UK has participated in open
voting to understand the perception of nation towards exit from European Union. It has been
noticed that BREXIT voting process has influenced working of diverse sectors within UK and
Europe because Britain is one of key participant in Europe economy. By having exit from EU the
trade working and other policies are being changed as legal values of EU has also transformed in
context to UK. Oliver (2016) has stated that referendum roiled global markets, including
currencies. It also impacts the economic development of UK because trade activities and global
perception towards UK has changed in diverse manner. In addition to this, it can be said that
BREXIT is one of influencing topic for UK because it has also influenced government
administrations. On July 13, Prime Minister David Cameron has resigned from the
administrative post because he was in the support of European Union. It has resulted that home
secretary and leader of Conservative Party named Theresa May has become Prime Minister.
According to Armstrong and van de Ven (2016), it can be said that supporters of
BREXIT has presented their views on different aspects that are linked with European debt crises.
Experts has also discussed the global competitiveness of British businesses, if UK exit from
European Union. Number of meeting, discussions and conferences has been taken into account
from government and experts to evaluate the social, psychological and economic impact on UK
due to BREXIT. Compression in respect to EU support and BREXIT was also one of key
element that has been considered during that period before conducting an open voting on 23

June, 2016. Key reason behind BREXIT is that many people of UK believe that consideration of
EU limits the development of UK policies and economy (Barnard and Ludlow, 2016). As a
member of EU, UK government need to design governing policies as per consideration of EU
standards that means free and independent policy formation was not there. Many people believe
that if policies and procedures are design in flexible manner then it will allow to have effective
application. It is also beneficial for promotion of governing activities and meet objective of
sustainable development. It means, following view point of experts has forced promotion of
BREXIT. (Baker, Ali and Thrasher, 2016) has also contended that being a member of EU, it was
essential to provide in-depth information about policies of EU. It reduces the level of
competitiveness in European market because most of information was shared under EU that
allows other member nations also to adopt same policy. It can also be considered as another
reason that has promoted the act of BREXIT.
Corbett (2016) has argued that UK was always in oppose of EU and its standards that is
one of key reason that Britain has already decided to not follow European Union's monetary
policy. As per detailed study, European Union's monetary policy forces to use euro as a currency
in trade activities but UK has opposed the policy and started using pound as a medium of
monetary transaction. It clearly indicates that UK is not ready to share its competitiveness with
any other nation in the Europe. It also reflects that UK does not share open borders with a
number of other European nations. Shaw (2016) has asserted that British vote to leave the
European Union is likely to impose major instability on top of economic fragility and artificial
financial markets. In addition to this, it can be said that experts of UK believe that if UK
economic conditions will impact due to EU exit then it will also influence the competitiveness of
other nations in European state. It is because majority of EU nations trade activities are
associated with Britain. Experts perception indicates that UK is enough capable to overcome
such economic crises which will allow to gain competitive advantage over its competitor nations.
Factors that impact perception of Indian students'
According to Babonneau, Haurie and Vielle (2016), there are number of factors that
impact the perception of Indian students' while having participation in decision making process.
One of key factor that influences students' perception is qualities of academic program according
to their needs. If education program is beneficial for student in order to meet career objectives
then Indian student will be attracted to join the program. Davies (2016) has stated that opinion

of family members also plays a key role in Indian students' perception that means UK
government need to understand cultural values of India. It has been noticed that many of Indian
students' are attracted towards abroad study because their parents wants them to improve their
career. If student is not receiving support from family members then it will impact the
perception. It means it is necessary to design education policies and other aspects in such manner
that students' as well as family members feel motivated towards abroad education system. Along
with this, if any other family member is living in abroad nation or studied in any other nation
then it also has direct impact on the abroad studies (Jonsas, 2016). By having observation of
lifestyle of family members who live in abroad the students' feel motivated to join abroad study
program and meet expected future needs effectively.
Fischer (2016) has also stated that income level of family also impacts the decision of
Indian students' in regard to abroad studies. If income level of family is low then Indian student
will not prefer to go out for the studies. It indicates that financial support is one of key factor that
allows to have impact on decision making process. Friends circle is also a key factor that
motivates Indian students' to have study in abroad. If friends who have studied or lived in abroad
for any other reason is not offering positive feedback then it will also impact the individual
perception. It also reflects that decision making process of student is linked with social and
psychological aspects. It is one of key reason that Indian students' focuses on perception and
feedback provided by friends and family members. Oliver, (2016) has also contended that there
are few other factors that also need to be consider by management in order to have effective
promotion of abroad study. It has been noticed that if individual is self motivated and he is
seeking to have qualification with abroad certificate then he will have preference to visit other
nation for higher studies. Indian students' are also more attracted towards higher studies so it is
necessary for nations to improve standards in respect to higher level studies. In addition to this, it
can also be said that desire to understand global culture is also one of key factor that impacts the
perception of Indian students'. Along with this, desire to have learning about global standards is
also one of critical aspect. For example, individual is willing to learn new concepts and policies
that are employed by British companies then he will be attracted to choose education program in
UK so that he can have better understanding about the subject (Dennis, 2016). It also helps in
meeting key needs of individual and enhances the morale to get attracted towards education
programs in abroad. If level of experience is optimistic then he will also have word of mouth

among friends and family members. It will also impact the perception of other students' and
motivate them to join abroad studies.
According to Howard and Kollanyi (2016), unavailability of courses in home country is
also one of key factor that impact the perception of Indian students'. In Indian there are number
of educational courses that are not offered so students' get attracted towards study in other nation.
However, if education standards in home nation is also not improved then it will also impact the
perception of Indian students'. Nowadays students' prefer courses and institutes that offer core
values and helps in meeting future needs. It means weakness of home notion education system
can be strength of other nations in order to have influence over perception. For example, Indian
students' are more attracted towards fashion and designing courses but in India there are very few
institutes that offer such kind of courses. It is also one of key reason that students' get attracted
towards abroad nations for higher studies so that their future needs can also be accomplished in
appropriate manner. (Hook and Szomszor, 2016) has contended that education system
presentation is also one of key factor that allows to have improved focus on abroad studies. It has
been noticed that if education programs are being shared effectively in the market then it will
allow students' to get attracted. Along with this, proper information in regard to education
programs and courses also need to be shared effectively in the market so that better awareness
can get attracted. If Indian students' are not well aware about the course then he will not get
attracted towards education program. It indicates that social, economic and psychological
aspects has direct link with Indian students' perception.
Impact of BREXIT on Indian students' perception
Vijayanand (2016) has stated that economic and social aspects has been changed in
recent time due to act of BREXIT. Nation has decided to quit the working as per EU because
country will not be a member of EU. The stability of UK’s economy and its equation with EU is
now under the scanner. Higher education is an important domain which is likely to see major
changes after BREXIT, particularly for Indian students' aspiring to study in the UK and EU. In
addition to this, it can be said that BREXIT is one of crucial decision that has diverse impact on
the Indian students' perception. It has been noticed that economic values of nation will have great
impact on the Indian students'. It is because the UK economy is already considered as noticeable
factor. After a slight fall in pound the growth is being noticed that means soon economic
conditions will be stable. Decision has increased the value of SAARC as compared to EU that

also impact Indian students' in many ways. It will also reduce the fee structure that means the
cost of study in UK will decrease. It will impact the Indian students'' perception in positive
manner and attract them more to join education programs within UK. Harrison (2016) has also
contended that immediate application impacts the cost of studying in the UK because of decrease
in currency devaluation. However, work culture prospects are uncertain that still creates an issue
of Indian students' to find job in UK while studying. It means the cost of study in UK still can be
high if Indian students' consider this aspect as critical element. Davies (2016) has argued that
application of BREXIT is not having direct impact on the international rates and tuition fees. It
means the cost is again the key factor that may influence the perception of Indian students'. In
addition to this, it can be said that BREXIT will allow government to have designing of
impressive policies that may impact Indian students'' perception. If after exit policies are offering
benefits to Indian students' then it will impact perception in positive manner. In recent years it
has been noticed that Indian students' are more attracted towards US for higher studies instead of
UK. It is because policies did not favour students' in gaining work experience. By having
improved focus on BREXIT the issue can be overcome effectively which will impact Indian
students' perception in positive manner (Davies, 2016).
Coles (2016) has stated that if nation becomes stable and UK economy is having growth
after BREXIT for long term then it will impact Indian students' perception in positive manner. It
has been noticed that UK policies were designed in such manner that it continuously adding the
expense factor for international students'. It creates difficulty for other nation individuals which
does not attract Indian students towards abroad studies in UK. Along with this, decline in
economic aspects and job opportunities also a critical aspect that impact Indian students'
perception. It means if BREXIT influences employment ratio and economic values in optimistic
manner then Indian students' perception will also be in favour of studies in UK. Franklin (2016)
has contended that by having application of BREXIT the governing policies will be changed to
great context that will provide benefits to Indian students. It means if this message has been
shared in appropriate manner then perception of Indian students can be influenced in positive
manner. Along with this, changes in tuition fee is also a critical factor that will enhance the
motivation of Indian students to join higher education programs within UK. With an assistance
of this, the changes in Visa restrictions will also provide better convenience to Indian students
that allows to meet key goals and objectives (Nataraj and et.al., 2012). It will also impact the

perception of individuals in positive manner which is beneficial to have advancement in morale
of Indian students to join courses in UK. It has been noticed that fund sources that attracts Indian
students to study abroad might get affected. For example, European financial company is
offering education scholarships to Indian students but after BREXIT the company has decided to
not fund the individuals. It means financial support is low which may impact the perception of
Indian students in negative manner.
Ways through which UK government can attract Indian students' towards study in UK
Franklin (2016) has stated that there are number of ways through which UK government
can attract Indian students towards abroad courses in UK. It means it is necessary for UK
government to make sure that strategies and policies are being designed as per needs of Indian
students. As Indian students consider friends and family experience that means government need
to improve work culture so that existing Indians can feel comfortable. It means structure and
policies need to be transformed in order to improve word of mouth. It has also been noticed that
there are number of Indian students who are willing to study in abroad but due to lack of
financial resources they are not able to accomplish objectives. Coles (2016) has said that above
statement indicates that government need to make sure that pricing of courses is affordable or
cheap as compared to other nations. It will enhance the morale of Indian students to have
participation in education programs offered in UK. Along with this, It is also necessary for
government of UK to focus on number of activities that may provide financial support to Indian
students so that more and more students can be attracted towards education system. Diverse
scholarship programs can also be introduced in order to make sure that goals and objectives are
being accomplished effectively.
Davies (2016) has contended that it is also necessary for UK government to focus on
activities that may create better awareness within market. It will also assist in attracting more and
more students towards UK education programs so that better support can be provided to
sustainable development. Along with this, academic advisor can be appointed at local Embassy
in India. It will allow to have effective promotion of courses so that goals and objectives can be
accomplished. It means students who are interested in studying abroad can easily visit to the
Embassy in order to gain information about education courses. Students can also easily
understand fee structure and other process in appropriate manner. Harrison (2016) has also
sated that study abroad fairs can also be organised by UK government in order to meet key goals

and objectives. It has been noticed that conducting a fairs is helpful in creating better awareness
and attract more and more students. It will also impact the overall development of UK education
system in diverse manner. In these fairs the information about UK education system and courses
can be shared in appropriate manner. It will lead development of UK education system in
appropriate manner. Marketing of educational institutes and other key benefits of system also
need to be consider as significant aspect. It is necessary for UK governance to make sure that
promotion of education institutes is considered as critical aspect so that goals and objectives can
be accomplished in appropriate manner. Vijayanand (2016) has critically explained that tie up
with foreign universities also a critical aspect that may enhance the morale of Indian students. It
is significant for UK governance to make sure that tie up with Indian universities is attracting
Indian students in appropriate manner so that goals and objectives can be accomplished
effectively.

CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY
Introduction
As per the detailed study, after literature review the researcher need to focus on effective
drafting of methodology section. It assists in effective accomplishment of the study and lead to
meet evidences. In addition to this, research methods also need to be considered as critical aspect
for further activities in regard to the study. Research methods are the procedures that are used for
acquiring evidence and analysing it for answering the research questions. In present dissertation
the choice of methodology has been made with a consideration of standards so hat aim to analyse
the influence of BREXIT on Indian students'' cam be accomplished effectively (Creswell, 2013).
In this, key methods that assist in completion of research has been discussed. Proper justification
of selection of research method and technique has also provided in the section so that outcomes
can be attained in appropriate manner. It will also help in answering the questions that are
directly associated with the research problem. Certain techniques have been considered by the
expert for appropriate data collection, etc. For effective analysis of data, appropriate selection of
techniques has been presented in this chapter.
Research Philosophy
In order to meet the objectives of the current dissertation report, selection of research
philosophy is also essential. It is referred as an overarching term that helps in completion of
report. It is also associated with the effective development of cognition. With an assistance of
this, the nature of study can be understand in appropriate manner which is beneficial for
accomplishment of objectives (Gibaldi, 2010). It is necessary to have appropriate explanation of
research philosophy which helps in development of background of a study. In other words, it can
be stated that research philosophy is also considered as way in which individual takes the
activities. It means it is varied perceptions and beliefs of experts in respect to the study.
There are basically two kinds of philosophies that can be adopted by researcher such as
interpretivism and positivism philosophy. By having appropriate selection of the philosophy the
outcome of study can be attained. It also helps in analysing the influence of BREXIT on Indian
students' who are looking forward to study in the United Kingdom (Merriam, 2009).
interpretivism philosophy approach is mostly used by experts to provide a significance to
individual beliefs. It provides a support to the study and helps in meeting the aim of the
dissertation. Along with this, it is also significant to provide appropriate justification in respect to

the research problem. With an assistance of the interpretivism philosophy the experts can
effectively highlight the key features that are associated with the study (Ridley, 2012). It means
the real facts and figures that target research problems can be presented in the study. It is also
beneficial to have effective evaluation of small sample size that helps in meeting objectives. It
also indicates that the researcher has effectively attained accurate analysis of small sample of
Indian students' who are willing to study in the United Kingdom. In-depth information can be
presented for effective understanding the views of a large number of people (Philips and Clark,
2012).
Other than this, positivism philosophy can also be accessed buy the researcher in order to
meet the objectives of the study. By having improved focus on such philosophy the researcher
may share his viewpoint that helps in understanding the key values related with social world. In
this, researcher mainly focuses on the information collection in general to specific. In order to
have better understanding about the subject the experts has decided to choose mixed philosophy
(Jackson, 2008). In this, experts has focused on development of activities that allows to have
interaction with students' so that better outcomes can be attained. This makes the researcher to
concentrate on facts. With this, the phenomena are reduced to the minimum. Along with this,
selection of mixed philosophy for current investigation is beneficial because it helps in covering
characteristics of both positivism and interpretivism according to nature of study. Key reason
behind not selecting the positivism philosophy is that it does not allow to have interaction within
the environment. In addition to this, it can be said that the positivism philosophy is not being
selected because it is not according to the nature of study.
Research Design
It is a significant for experts to have appropriate selection of research design so that
overall outcome can be attained in appropriate manner. It is considered as factor that provides a
support to overall strategy that has been chosen for the study. It also promotes a logic behind the
selection of strategies and helps in meeting objectives of the study. Along with this, research
design is also advantageous for addressing the research problems. Hence, it is referred as blue
print that allows to employ strategies in accurate manner. It also provides a support to data
collection, measurement and analysis (Chui, 2007). There are different kinds of research designs
that are being preferred by researcher to complete the study. Classification of design can be as
descriptive, explanatory, etc. It has been noticed that explanatory design is mostly used by

researcher when they are looking forward to explore information about the subject. It is
significant for researcher to have determination of diverse factors that are associated with the
concern subject so that objectives can be accomplished. It has been noticed that explanatory
research is mainly accessed when researcher are focused to have testing cause and effect
relationship (Johnson and Clark, 2006). Explanatory design implies that the research in question
is aimed at explaining the phenomena. Hence, this design allows researcher to connect ideas for
explaining the key values associated.
In order to have effective accomplishment of the study, researcher has focused on
descriptive research design. By having improved focus on the selected design the experts may
analyse the information in descriptive form. With an assistance of this, study can effectively
address research problems in in-depth manner. Aim of the current study is to evaluate the
influence of BREXIT on Indian students' who are willing to study in UK (Saunders et. al., 2006).
It means by focusing in descriptive design the factors that impact Indian students'' behaviour can
be accomplished in desired way. Moreover, this design has facilitated towards observing the
subject in a completely natural and unchanged environment. In addition to this, the application of
descriptive design also allows to collect data that is beneficial for the study. Information can be
collected in such manner that appropriate recommendations in practice can also be provided as
per analysis (Singh, 2010). In addition to this, it can be said that exploratory research design is
not being selected for the investigation because it provides effective support to quantitative study
as compared to qualitative study. It indicates that the selection of descriptive design is
appropriate and it matches the qualitative aspects of the study.
Research Strategy
Approach
Research approach is the way through which investigator may take study to the
impressive level of success. It means it is a kind of strategy that helps in accomplishment of the
objectives which are framed under study. It also allows to maintain the validity of the research
investigation so preference of students' towards abroad study in UK can be analysed after voting
of BREXIT. There are two kinds of approaches that can be employed for completion of the
study. Inductive and deductive approaches are key points that helps in study and ensure that
methodological aspects are well maintained. Deductive approach of study is not being selected
for the present investigation because it demands a specific case study. In present investigation

there is no specific case study is being provided. It means the de-selection of approach was
appropriate which helps in meeting objectives. For present study, inductive approach has been
used by the investigator because a flexible structure is provided by this approach with respect to
the processes and findings of the study. Along with this, approach is also beneficial to have
occurrence of data collection in any particular situation. It indicates that researcher may have
effective accomplishment of objectives by concerning about inductive approach. Inductive
approach is appropriate because using this approach, researcher has been able to develop
empirical generalizations. It has also facilitated in analysing diverse factors that are associated
with the subject and attain better results. It also allows to have observation of information that
allow researcher to find out the factors that are responsible for changes in Indian students''
behaviour.
Research Type
According to in-depth study of research tools and techniques, it can be said that there are
different kinds of researches that are being considered by experts. Classification of research type
can be as qualitative and quantitative. Quantitative research is mainly focused towards use of
statistical tools that allows to evaluate information in mathematical manner. The main aim of
such research is to count and classify features and construct statistical models. On the other side,
qualitative research is a method that allows to understand topic in descriptive manner. In this,
non statistical tools are being used by researcher to have effective accomplishment of objectives.
In present study the qualitative research techniques are being employed so that impact of
BREXIT on perception of Indian students' can be evaluated in appropriate manner. Qualitative
research is a technique that provide concern towards exploration of issues so that key aspects
related to subject can be understand in appropriate manner. With an assistance of this, research
questions can be answered in desired way and present a sensible understanding to unstructured
information. It is beneficial to gain in-depth learning about subject and meet objectives of the
study. It also provides support to the descriptive aspects of the research. In this, questionnaire
support is being required so that objectives can be accomplished in desired way.
Data collection
Data collection is considered as a process that allows to have effective gathering of
information in respect to the topic so that better support can be provided to data analysis. It is
considered as one of most significant section of dissertation report. It makes sure that experts are

having improved focus on data collection methods the aim and objectives of the research can be
accomplished in appropriate manner. There are basically two kinds of data collection process
that helps in data gathering. Classification of methods can be as primary and secondary data
collection. It means the impact of BREXIT on perception of Indian students' has been evaluated
with an assistance of both primary and secondary sources. It has been noticed that primary data
collection is first hand information that allows to meet key goals and objectives in desired way.
In order to meet the objectives the researcher has also focused on application of both primary and
secondary tools. In respect to primary tools, questionnaire has been designed to have effective
gathering of information. Questionnaire has been designed as per key objectives so that impact
of BRXIT on Indian students'' perception can be analysed in desired way. However, there are
few other methods that can also be adopted in regard to primary collection such as survey,
interview, etc. Experts has also preferred survey as alternate options because this method is
suitable according to other research tools and techniques adopted by investigator. With an
assistance of this, the views of respondents can be evaluated in appropriate manner. Present
research also allows to identify the impact of BREXIT on Indian students'' perception. In order to
complete the study in appropriate manner the geographical barrier are being considered
effectively. It provided the respondents with opportunity to fill the questionnaire at their pace. It
clearly indicates that researcher has focused on both questionnaire and survey as critical aspect
of primary data collection.
On the other side, the use of secondary sources is also beneficial to meet the objectives of
the study. It has been noticed that secondary method data collection is another technique that
allows to have effective gathering of information for the research. Secondary data is consisted of
information which is being published earlier in other studies. It is a way that allows to have data
collection through improved focus on diverse scholars. It is also considered as second hand tool
that allows to evaluate the key aspects that are associated with BREXIT. Books, journals, online
sources, etc are key sources that have been used in the study to meet the standards of secondary
data collection. Along with this, in order to have accurate data collection the researcher has also
focused on articles, blogs, government reports, etc.
Instrument
Current research study aim is to evaluate the impact of BREXIT on Indian student's
perception towards study in UK. With an assistance of following research instrument the

designed objective has been accomplished in desired way. In addition to this, it can be said that
questionnaire is an instrument that allows to have effective accomplishment of primary research
process. Questionnaire has been used as an instrument to have accurate collection of information
from primary sources. Questionnaire is mainly designed with a consideration of close ended
aspects. Questionnaire is also designed in such manner that respondents can effectively provide
answers. Along with this, by having an appropriate designing of instrument the researcher has
also compared different answers that are provided by respondents. Information collection in
primary research is also easy to analyse because answers are present in close ended form.
Questionnaire is being selected from the investigator because it allows to have direct interaction
with students and allows to have valid collection of data. It helps in meeting the objectives of the
study and provide better understanding about the subject.
Sampling
Sampling is considered as method that provides a support to primary research. It is
mostly employed to have proper evaluation of selected items. In present study the probability
sampling technique has been used by management so that impact of BREXIT on Indian students''
perception evaluation must be accomplished in appropriate manner. In this, support of random
sampling method has been provided to the primary data collection. It is a method that allows
researcher to explore the key findings in appropriate manner. Sample size for the study is 50
students' who are studying the UK. College and educational institutions has been targeted to
gather responses from Indian students'. Probability sampling method assures that different units
in the population have equal opportunities of being chosen. Limited selection of sampling has
assisted in effective analysis of information so that goals and objectives can be accomplished in
desired way. Along with this, sampling is also beneficial to represent the number of respondents
who has taken participation primary research process. In addition to this, sampling of survey is
also 50 Indian students' who are studying the UK. Support has been provided to survey by
having improved focus on questionnaire which are designed as per objectives of the study.
Analysis
It is a method that allows to have accurate analysis of gathered information so that
objectives can be accomplished in effective manner. Data analysis is a process in which logical
findings are being presented to illustrate the collected information. In present study the
qualitative technique of analysis has been adopted by researcher. It helps in effective

interpretation of data and make sure that factors associated with subject are being explained in
appropriate manner. In this, thematic technique of data analysis has been employed. Different
themes has been designed to make sure that data is being presented in accurate form. With this,
themes could be formulated by identifying patterns across the data. Themes will be framed on
the basis of primary data collection in which graphs and tables will be presented.
Research procedures
Validity and reliability
It is significant for researcher to focus on validity and reliability of information so that
objectives of the study can be accomplished. It also improves the effectiveness of the study and
ensure that appropriate outcomes are being provided. References and citations are being
provided to support the information used in the dissertation. Researcher has also followed
standards to make sure that data collection tools that have been used are valid. Experts has only
used those sources that are presented with a support of authentic mediums. Information is also
relevant to the subject that means validity and reliability aspects are well maintained.
Ethical Considerations
In order to meet the ethical standards the researcher has shared accurate information
about study with all participants. Purpose and methods are being communicated so that research
process can be accomplished in effective manner. Personal information of respondents has also
not shared with any kind of third party so that confidentiality standards can also be well
maintained. Along with this, without any prior permission from scholars and respondents the
information has not been collected that also promote ethical consideration within study.
Summary
In present study, qualitative methods has been used to analyse the impact of BREXIT on
the perception of Indian students'. Along with this, inductive approach has been used by the
investigator because a flexible structure is provided by this approach with respect to the
processes and findings of the study. Primary and secondary sources has been accessed to
accomplish data collection process. In order to have effective accomplishment of the study,
researcher has focused on descriptive research design.

CHAPTER 4: DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
Introduction
It is also a critical section after methodology, it provides an analysis of information which
is gathered from primary data. It is a chapter that provides a proper understanding about the
subject and helps in draw the final results. In present study the responses are taken from Indian
students. Qualitative approach is being adopted by researcher for present study in which support
of thematic approach is also being taken into account. It is a section that provide an evaluation of
the research findings.
Theme 1. Are you in support of Brexit
Factors Frequency
Yes 40
No 10
On asking the respondents about the Brexit, it has been noticed that Indian students are
well known of Brexit. In addition to this, it can be said that respondents has been taken from 50
Indian students out of which 40 has stated that they are in the favour of the Brexit. Other rest of
10 has said they are not in the support to the Brexit because it does not provide better job
opportunities. However, the favourable respondents has stated that by having exit from EU the
trade working and other policies are being changed as legal values of EU has also transformed in
context to UK. Along with the supporters of BREXIT has presented their views on different
Yes No
0
10
20
30
40
50
Are you in support of Brexit
Column B
Illustration 1: Theme 1. Are you in support of Brexit

aspects that are linked with European debt crises. In addition to this, it can be said that only 10 of
students has said that they are not in the support of Brexit. Respondents has also stated that, in
order to attract the Indian students towards the Brexit and improve their perception. The
government of UK can have conferences in colleges so that better understanding in regard Brexit
and advantages to community can be developed. It will influence the perception of potential
Indian students in positive manner which will helpful in offering support to the act of Brexit. It is
also necessary for UK government to focus on activities that may create better awareness within
market. Responses indicates that, it will also assist in attracting more and more students towards
UK education programs so that better support can be provided to sustainable development.
Theme 2. Brexit has impacted global competitiveness of British businesses in positive manner
Factors Frequency
Strongly
Agree 20
Agree 5
Neutral 5
Disagree 10
Strongly
Disagree 10

On analysing the responses of the participants regarding the Brexit impact on global
competitiveness of British businesses. It has been noticed that majority of Indian students'
percept that British businesses will have positive development that will consider sustainable
development. In addition to this, it can be said that 40 percent of Indian stated that they are
strongly agreed with the statement “Brexit has impacted global competitiveness of British
businesses in positive manner”. Only 20 percent of respondents are not in the favour of the
statement. It indicates that Brexit has provided various benefits to business firms which is also
influencing the Indian students perception in diverse manner. In addition to this, it can be
interpreted that 10 percent of Indian students also indicates that they are agreed with the
statement that Brexit will have impact on global competitiveness of British businesses in positive
manner.
Indian students percept that in order to improve the positiveness over the UK businesses
due to Brexit the government need to set out new policies. It means new policies need to be
framed according to market needs and businesses perception so that overall working can be
advanced. It also allows to have sustainable development and make sure that Indian students are
having better opportunities in the market. It will allow to influence the Indian students'
perception towards education system of UK. By having improved focus on changes in UK
policies the issue can be resolved in desired way.
Theme 3. European Union's monetary policy was influencing economic development
40%
10% 10%
20%
20%
Brexit has impacted global competitiveness of British businesses in positive manner
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Illustration 2: Theme 2. Brexit has impacted global competitiveness of British
businesses in positive manner

Factors Frequency
Yes 35
No 15
Analysis of the responses shows that majority of the Indian students thinks that European
Union's monetary policy was influencing economic development. It means the Brexit is having
positive impact on UK economy as well as Indian students' perception. It has been noticed that
out of 50 respondents the 35 of Indian students has said that they believed that European Union's
monetary policy was influencing economic development. Rest of 15 respondents are not in the
favour of statement. In addition to this, it can be said that in earlier the UK government was only
allowed to make polices according to rules and regulations of EU. It has reduced the work
flexibility within UK government that has impacted working in diverse manner.
In order to have better development and formation of monetary policies the exit from EU
was essential. Indian students has also stated that new standards can be set out that helps in
developing the monetary policies to boost economic conditions of UK. Respondents reflected
35
15
European Union's monetary policy was influencing economic development
Yes
No
Illustration 3: Theme 3. European Union's monetary policy was
influencing economic development

that key reason behind BREXIT is that many people of UK believe that consideration of EU
limits the development of UK policies and economy. As a member of EU, UK government need
to design governing policies as per consideration of EU standards that means free and
independent policy formation was not there. Along with this, fiscal development can also be
improved by having improved focus on BREXIT and flexibility development.
Theme 4. Which factor impacts your perception in regard to abroad studies
Factors Frequency
Quality of academic program 22
Opinion of family members 8
Income level of family 10
Desire to understand global
culture 10
Quality of academic program
Opinion of family members
Income level of family
Desire to understand global culture
0
5
10
15
20
25
Which factor impacts your perception in regard to abroad studies
Column B
Illustration 4: Theme 4. Which factor impacts your perception in regard to abroad studies

Through the above analysis of the above data it can be interpreted that majority of Indian
students thinks that the decision regarding the abroad studies would be taken on the basis of the
factor which is “quality of academic program”. It has been noticed that out of 50 respondents 22
has answered that the quality offered by the educational institute would be the major factor for
their choice for opting studies in abroad. 8 students have said that the decision regarding studies
abroad will depend on the opinion of their family members. Opinion of 10 Indian students
among those surveyed is their decision would be based on the income level of their family that is
the affordability of the family to send them abroad for education. And the remaining 10 said that
their instinct behind the abroad studies would be based on the desire to understand global culture.
An overall analysis of the above data we conclude that the quality of the educational program
being offered plays a major role in the decision making process that is whether to opt for
studying abroad or not. According to perception of Indian students has said, other factors such as
family income, opinion of the family members and desire to understand global culture also plays
a significant role in the decision making of the Indian students for opting abroad studies. It has
also been noticed that 8 of participants has stated that according to them family perception is also
one of critical aspect. It means by having an improved focus on family perception Indian
students make their decisions to have study in abroad.
Theme 5. Economic and social aspects has been changed in recent time due to act of BREXIT
Factors Frequency
Strongly Agree 20
Agree 10
Neutral 9
Disagree 6
Strongly Disagree 6

Analysing the above data we conclude that out of the sample population of 51 people 20
that is majority strongly feels that the economic and social aspects have been changed due to
BREXIT. While 10 among them agrees to the statement that economic & social aspects have
been changed in recent time due to BREXIT. 9 of Indian students are neutral that is they do not
form any opinion on the issue about whether BREXIT has caused social social and economic
changes or not. 6 of them disagrees with the statement and the other 6 strongly disagree with the
statement that BREXIT led to the changes in economic and social aspects in recent times. The
overall analysis of the data collected helps us to conclude that the majority of people that is a
total of 30 out of 51 either strongly agree or agrees to the fact that BREXIT has caused social
and economic changes in the recent scenarios. However some of Indian students are either
neutral or they do not agree or they strongly disagree with the above mentioned fact.
Theme 6. Economic values of nation impacts your perception in respect to abroad studies
Factors Frequency
Yes 35
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0 5 10 15 20 25
Economic and social aspects has been changed in recent time due to act of BREXIT
Column B
Illustration 5: Theme 5. Economic and social aspects has been changed in recent time
due to act of BREXIT

No 15
Analysis of the above data clearly states that 35 out of the sample size of 50 students
agrees to the fact that economic values of nation impacts their perception in respect of the abroad
studies. The rest 15 students disagrees to the statement that is their opinion of studying abroad is
not affected by the economic values of the nation. However through overall analysis it is
concluded that 70% of the Indian students perception to study abroad is affected by the economic
values of the nation. But there are about 30% who does not consider the economic value of a
nation as a criteria to opt for the abroad studies.
Theme 7. Brexit has increased the value of SAARC as compared to EU
Factors Frequency
Strongly
Agree 20
Agree 10
Neutral 9
Disagree 5
70%
30%
Economic values of nation impacts your perception in respect to abroad studies
Yes
No
Illustration 6: Theme 6. Economic values of nation impacts your perception
in respect to abroad studies

Strongly
Disagree 6
Analysis of the above data we can state that out of the population consisting of 50 people
20 strongly agrees to the statement that BREXIT has increased the value of SAARC as compared
to EU. 10 of them agrees that BREXIT has enhanced the value of SAARC when compared to
EU. 9 of them haven't formed any opinion about the matter stated . 5 out 50 disagree with the
fact stated. Rest 6 strongly disagree with the issue raised. An overall analysis of the data
presented that majority that is 40% of the sample population believes that BREXIT has increased
a value of SAARC in comparison to EU. 20% of the population surveyed are of the opinion they
agree to the fact mentioned.18% of them does not have any opinion on the view raised. 10% of
the population disagrees with the fact that BREXIT have any impact on the value of SAARC as
compared to EU while the remaining 12% strongly disagrees to this statement.
Theme 8. Improvement in fee structure due to Brexit impacts your perception in respect to
abroad studies
Factors Frequency
Strongly 18
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Brexit has increased the value of SAARC as compared to EU
Column B
Illustration 7: Theme 7. Brexit has increased the value of SAARC as compared to EU

Agree
Agree 12
Neutral 9
Disagree 4
Strongly
Disagree 7
Analysis of the data given above for a population of 50 Indian students represents that 18
of them strongly agree with the statement improvement in fee structure due to BREXIT will
strongly impact their perception to study abroad. The next set consisting of 12 students agrees
with the statement. Thus, a total of 30 out of 50 students that forms a majority of the population
is of the opinion that if there is improvement in the fee structure due to BREXIT will make an
impact on their perception to study abroad. 9 out of 50 are neutral that is do not have any opinion
on the matter when asked. While the other 4 strongly disagree and the remaining 7 disagrees
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Improvement in fee structure due to Brexit impacts your perception in respect to abroad studies
Column B
Illustration 8: Theme 8. Improvement in fee structure due to Brexit impacts your perception
in respect to abroad studies

with the statement when questioned. The ones who disagrees or strongly disagrees is of the
opinion that their perception to study abroad will remain unaffected with improvement in fee
structure due to BREXIT. From the overall analysis we can interpret that majority of the Indian
students believe that BREXIT is going to have a positive impact on the fee structure which will
have an impact on their perception for studying abroad.
Theme 9. Brexit creates positive environment that forces you to join education programs
within UK
Factors Frequency
Strongly
Agree 18
Agree 12
Neutral 9
Disagree 4
Strongly
Disagree 7

Through the analysis of the above depicted data it can be stated that out of the population
size 50 students 18 who forms the majority of 36% strongly agrees with the fact that BREXIT
creates a positive environment which forces the students to join the educational courses in UK.
Again a considerable majority of 24% constituting of 12 Indian students agrees to the statement.
9 students do not have any opinion regarding this aspect when questioned that means they are
neutral. 8% consisting of 4 people disagree and 14% consisting of 7 Indian students strongly
disagree with the statement which states that BREXIT does not encourage them to join the
educational programs in UK. The overall analysis brings us to the conclusion that majority of the
students are of the view that BREXIT has formed a positive studying environment and thus it
definitely has an impact on their decisions to join educational programs in UK.
Theme 10. Brexit impacts factor related to UK economic and social development
Factors Frequency
Fee structure 15
Education
program 15
Cost of living 12
36%
24%
18%
8%
14%
Brexit creates positive environment that forces you to join education programs within UK
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
Illustration 9: Theme 9. Brexit creates positive environment that forces you to join
education programs within UK

Employment
ratio 8
Analysis of the data on the basis of research conducted on the population of 50 people
reveals their opinions on the view regarding the impact of BREXIT in relation to the social and
economic development in UK. 30% consisting of 15 people stated that BREXIT would have an
impact on the Fee Structures of various educational programs. An equal number of people that is
15 constituting 30% is of the opinion that BREXIT would affects the educational programs
conducted in various ways. Another set of 12 people constituting 24% opined that BREXIT
would have an impact on cost of living of the people while 8 people consisting of 16% states that
it will impact the employment ratio. Thus it can be concluded that all the people that is 100% of
the population is of the opinion that BREXIT would affect economic and social development in
UK.
Theme 11. Changes in work environment due to Brexit Impacts the perception of Indian
students'
Factors Frequency
30%
30%
24%
16%
Brexit impact factor related to UK economic and social development
Fee structure
Education program
Cost of living
Employment ratio
Illustration 10: Theme 10. Brexit impacts factor related to UK economic and social
development

Yes 38
No 12
Analysis of the above data from the graph it can be said that 38 out of 50 that is majority
of the students agrees with the cause which states that Indian students morale and perception
impacts due to changes in work environment due to Brexit. On the contrary 12 disagreed with
the statement that means they are of the opinion that uncertain work culture prospects in UK is
not a hindrance for finding job for Indian students. Overall it can be concluded that the
maximum Indian students feels that the uncertainty in difficulty of finding job in the UK market
is caused due to uncertainty in work culture. BREXIT will improve the situation by creating a
separate economic market and hence the opinion of the students will change.
Theme 12. Brexit is having indirect impact on
Factors Frequency
Internationa
l rates 37
Yes No
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Work culture prospects are uncertain that still creates an issue of Indian students' to find job in UK while studyin
Column B
Illustration 11: Theme 11. Work culture prospects are uncertain that still creates an issue of
Indian students' to find job in UK while studying

Tution fees 13
Analysis of the above data suggests that out of a sample size of 50 people 37 that is 74%
is of the opinion that BREXIT would have an indirect impact on international rates. While the
remaining 13 constituting 26% said that BREXIT would impact tuition fees. Thus we can
conclude that BREXIT would have a major impact on the international rates and a significant
impact on the tuition fees. In addition to this, it can be said that respondents overall rates in
respect to international terms will be decreased. It will attract more Indian students to have study
in UK. It will provide better benefits to the UK economy and education system.
Theme 13. Brexit provides long term success to UK economy and education system
Factors Frequency
International rates Tution fees
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Brexit is having indirect impact on
Column B
Illustration 12: Theme 12. Brexit is having indirect impact on

Yes 38
No 12
Analysis of the above data suggests that out of the population of 50 people 38 is of the
opinion that BREXIT will provide long term success to UK economy and education systems.
The remaining 12 people stated that BREXIT will not be able to contribute to the long term
success and education system. Hence, it can be concluded on the basis of opinion of the majority
of people BREXIT will effectively contribute to the long term success of UK economy and
education system.
Theme 14. According to you which is one of key benefit that Indian students attain due to act
of Brexit
Factors Frequency
Low cost
education 15
Yes
No
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Brexit provides long term success to UK economy and education system
Column B
Illustration 13: Theme 13. Brexit provides long term success to UK economy and education
system

Visa policy
improveme
nt 20
Educational
standards
improveme
nt 15
Analysis of the data presented by conducting a survey on population size of 50 people we
found out the following conclusions. 15 out of 50 that is 30% of the population is of the opinion
that BREXIT would benefit the Indian students by providing them with low cost of education.
Similar percentage that is 30% or 15 out of 50 believed that BREXIT would lead to improvement
in visa policy for the Indian students. 20 out of 50 that is 60% people believed that BREXIT
would have a positive impact on improvement in educational standards. Hence, we can conclude
15
20
15
According to you which is one of key benefit that Indian students attain due to act of Brexit
Low cost education
Visa policy improvement
Educational standards
improvement
Illustration 14: Theme 14. According to you which is one of key benefit that Indian students
attain due to act of Brexit

that BREXIT will have a positive impact for the Indian students studying in UK by improvement
in the three factors mentioned above.
Theme 15. Changes in Visa restrictions due to application of Brexit will also provide better
convenience to Indian students
Factors Frequency
Strongly
Agree 22
Agree 8
Neutral 10
Disagree 6
Strongly
Disagree 4

Analysis of the above mentioned data based on the survey conducted on 50 people the
following interpretations can be drawn. 22 people strongly agree on the statement that the
changes in visa restrictions will cause convenience to Indian students. Majority of the population
is of this opinion. Again 8 more people agree with the above mentioned fact. 10 of Indian
students are neutral about the statement mentioned while 6 disagree and 4 people strongly
disagree when questioned. Hence, we can conclude on the basis of opinion of the majority that
changes in visa restrictions will definitely benefit the Indian Students.
Theme 16: Does affordable pricing of courses impact your perception
Factors Frequency
Yes 38
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Changes in Visa restrictions will also provide better convenience to Indian students
Column B
Illustration 15: Theme 15. Changes in Visa restrictions will also provide better convenience to
Indian students

No 12
Analysis of the population of 50 persons we draw the following interpretations. 38 out of
50 Indian students that is the majority said that affordable pricing will affect their perception of
buying while the other 12 said that affordable pricing have no impact on their perception. Based
on the following data we can conclude that affordable pricing does have an impact on the
perception of buying.
Theme 17: Conducting a fair in regard to Brexit and its impact is helpful in creating better
awareness and attract more and more students
Factors Frequency
Strongly
Agree 22
Agree 8
Yes
No
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Does affordable pricing of courses impact your perception
Column B
Illustration 16: Theme 16: Does affordable pricing of courses impact your perception

Neutral 10
Disagree 6
Strongly
Disagree 4
Analysis of the above data will lead us to the following conclusions and interpretations.
22 out of 50 students is of the strong opinion that conduct of fairs would be helpful in the
creation of awareness among the more and more groups of students. 8 people said that they
would agree for the above mentioned statement. 10 of Indian students are neutral becuase they
have no opinion on the statement. 6 disagree with the opinion mentioned while the rest 4 people
strongly disagree with the above mentioned fact.
Summary
In order to attract the Indian students towards the Brexit and improve their perception.
The government of UK can have conferences in colleges so that better understanding in regard
Brexit and advantages to community can be developed. It will influence the perception of
Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Conducting a fair is helpful in creating better awareness and attract more and more students
Column B
Illustration 17: Theme 17: Conducting a fair is helpful in creating better awareness and attract
more and more students

potential Indian students in positive manner which will helpful in offering support to the act of
Brexit. It is also necessary for UK government to focus on activities that may create better
awareness within market. It will also assist in attracting more and more students towards UK
education programs so that better support can be provided to sustainable development. percent of
Indian students also indicates that they are agreed with the statement that Brexit will have impact
on global competitiveness of British businesses in positive manner.In addition to this, it can be
said that in earlier the UK government was only allowed to make polices according to rules and
regulations of EU. It has reduced the work flexibility within UK government that has impacted
working in diverse manner. However through overall analysis it is concluded that 70% of the
students perception to study abroad is affected by the economic values of the nation. But there
are about 30% who does not consider the economic value of a nation as a criteria to opt for the
abroad studies.

CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
Conclusion
As per above primary and secondary analysis of information, it can be said that voting of
Brexit impacts the motivation of Indian students for study in UK. It has been noticed that Brexit
impact overall outcome in diverse manner which need to be referred effectively so that better
decisions can be taken into account. European Union's monetary policy was influencing
economic development. It means the Brexit is having positive impact on UK economy as well as
Indian students' perception. In addition to this, it can be said that in earlier the UK government
was only allowed to make polices according to rules and regulations of EU. It has reduced the
work flexibility within UK government that has impacted working in diverse manner. In order to
have better development and formation of monetary policies the exit from EU was essential.
Indian students has also stated that new standards can be set out that helps in developing the
monetary policies to boost economic conditions of UK. Key reason behind BREXIT is that many
people of UK believe that consideration of EU limits the development of UK policies and
economy. As a member of EU, UK government need to design governing policies as per
consideration of EU standards that means free and independent policy formation was not there.
Along with this, fiscal development can also be improved by having improved focus on BREXIT
and flexibility development.
In addition to this, it can be concluded that can conclude that BREXIT would have a
major impact on the international rates and a significant impact on the tuition fees. It has also
been witnessed that overall rates in respect to international terms will be decreased. It will attract
more Indian students to have study in UK. It will provide better benefits to the UK economy and
education system. BREXIT will not be able to contribute to the long term success and education
system. Hence, it can be interpreted that BREXIT will effectively contribute to the long term
success of UK economy and education system. Moreover, uncertain work culture prospects in
UK is not a hindrance for finding job for Indian students. Overall it can be concluded that the
maximum students feels that the uncertainty in difficulty of finding job in the UK market is
caused due to uncertainty in work culture. BREXIT will improve the situation by creating a
separate economic market and hence the opinion of the students will change.
Along with this, there are number of factors that impact the perception of Indian students'
while having participation in decision making process. One of key factor that influences students'

perception is qualities of academic program according to their needs. If education program is
beneficial for student in order to meet career objectives then Indian student will be attracted to
join the program. Primary and secondary data analysis also reflects that family members also
plays a key role in Indian students' perception that means UK government need to understand
cultural values of India. It has been noticed that many of Indian students' are attracted towards
abroad study because their parents wants them to improve their career. If student is not receiving
support from family members then it will impact the perception. It means it is necessary to
design education policies and other aspects in such manner that students' as well as family
members feel motivated towards abroad education system. According to in-depth interpretation
of secondary research the friends circle is also a key factor that motivates Indian students' to have
study in abroad. If friends who have studied or lived in abroad for any other reason is not
offering positive feedback then it will also impact the individual perception. It also reflects that
decision making process of student is linked with social and psychological aspects.
Interpretation of secondary research reflects that unavailability of courses in home
country is also one of key factor that impact the perception of Indian students'. In Indian there are
number of educational courses that are not offered so students' get attracted towards study in
other nation. However, if education standards in home nation is also not improved then it will
also impact the perception of Indian students'. Nowadays students' prefer courses and institutes
that offer core values and helps in meeting future needs. It means weakness of home notion
education system can be strength of other nations in order to have influence over perception.
Economic and social aspects has been changed in recent time due to act of BREXIT. Nation has
decided to quit the working as per EU because country will not be a member of EU. The stability
of UK’s economy and its equation with EU is now under the scanner. Higher education is an
important domain which is likely to see major changes after BREXIT, particularly for Indian
students' aspiring to study in the UK and EU.
In addition to this, it can be said that BREXIT is one of crucial decision that has diverse
impact on the Indian students' perception. It has been noticed that economic values of nation will
have great impact on the Indian students'. It is because the UK economy is already considered as
noticeable factor. After a slight fall in pound the growth is being noticed that means soon
economic conditions will be stable. Decision has increased the value of SAARC as compared to
EU that also impact Indian students' in many ways. It will also reduce the fee structure that

means the cost of study in UK will decrease. It will impact the Indian students'' perception in
positive manner and attract them more to join education programs within UK. Moreover,
primary information also explain that application of BREXIT is not having direct impact on the
international rates and tuition fees. It means the cost is again the key factor that may influence
the perception of Indian students'. In addition to this, it can be said that BREXIT will allow
government to have designing of impressive policies that may impact Indian students''
perception. If after exit policies are offering benefits to Indian students' then it will impact
perception in positive manner. In recent years it has been noticed that Indian students' are more
attracted towards US for higher studies instead of UK. It is because policies did not favour
students' in gaining work experience. By having improved focus on BREXIT the issue can be
overcome effectively which will impact Indian students' perception in positive manner.
Data collection and analysis process helps in drawing the final outcome that BREXIT
influences employment ratio and economic values in optimistic manner then Indian students'
perception will also be in favour of studies in UK. By having application of BREXIT the
governing policies will be changed to great context that will provide benefits to Indian students.
It means if this message has been shared in appropriate manner then perception of Indian
students can be influenced in positive manner. Along with this, changes in tuition fee is also a
critical factor that will enhance the motivation of Indian students to join higher education
programs within UK. With an assistance of this, the changes in Visa restrictions will also provide
better convenience to Indian students that allows to meet key goals and objectives.
Recommendation
On the basis of conclusion, it can be recommended that in order to attract the Indian
students towards the Brexit and improve their perception. The government of UK can have
conferences in colleges so that better understanding in regard Brexit and advantages to
community can be developed. It will influence the perception of potential Indian students in
positive manner which will helpful in offering support to the act of Brexit. It is also necessary for
UK government to focus on activities that may create better awareness within market. It will also
assist in attracting more and more students towards UK education programs so that better support
can be provided to sustainable development. Along with this, it can be said that it is necessary
for UK government to make sure that strategies and policies are being designed as per needs of
Indian students. As Indian students consider friends and family experience that means

government need to improve work culture so that existing Indians can feel comfortable. It means
structure and policies need to be transformed in order to improve word of mouth. It has also been
noticed that there are number of Indian students who are willing to study in abroad but due to
lack of financial resources they are not able to accomplish objectives.
Another recommendation is that government need to make sure that pricing of courses is
affordable or cheap as compared to other nations. It will enhance the morale of Indian students to
have participation in education programs offered in UK. Moreover, diverse scholarship programs
can also be introduced in order to make sure that goals and objectives are being accomplished
effectively.
For better understanding about the BREXIT and its impact on the UK economy, the
researcher can carry out further studies. It means a study on EU nations perception in context to
Brexit is significant. It allows to make sure about the key aspects that may influence the overall
economy of UK. With an assistance of this, better strategies can be designed in order to
overcome such issues and make sure that goals and objectives can be accomplished in desired
manner.
Reflection
From the above analysis, I have identified the impact of BREXIT on the UK economy. I
have witnessed that Brexit impact overall outcome in diverse manner which need to be referred
effectively so that better decisions can be taken into account. European Union's monetary policy
was influencing economic development. Indian students has also stated in my research that new
standards can be set out that helps in developing the monetary policies to boost economic
conditions of UK. Key reason behind BREXIT is that many people of UK believe that
consideration of EU limits the development of UK policies and economy. I can also state that
BREXIT is not having direct impact on the international rates and tuition fees. It means the cost
is again the key factor that may influence the perception of Indian students'. In addition to this, it
can be said that BREXIT will allow government to have designing of impressive policies that
may impact Indian students'' perception. If after exit policies are offering benefits to Indian
students' then it will impact perception in positive manner.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Agnew, H., 2015. City fears loss of access and influence in event of Brexit. Financial Times,
February, 28.
Ahamat, N., 2012. Access all ages: assessing the impact of age on access to surgical
treatment. The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 94(9). pp.300-300.
Akl, E. A., and et.al., 2012. Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to
follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review. Bmj. 344. p.e2809.
Akl, E.A., and et.al., 2012. Potential impact on estimated treatment effects of information lost to
follow-up in randomised controlled trials (LOST-IT): systematic review. Bmj. 344. p.e2809.
Anderson, K., Cockburn, J. and Martin, W., Would freeing up world farm trade reduce or
increase poverty?. East Asia. 4(9). p.17.
Annette Kroll, D., & Leuffen, D. (2016). Ties that bind, can also strangle: the Brexit threat and
the hardships of reforming the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 1-10.
Arie, S. (2016). What the leave campaign said about the NHS, and how the experts answered.
BMJ, 353, i3261.
Armstrong, A. and van de Ven, J., (2016). The Impact of Possible Migration Scenarios after
‘Brexit’on the State Pension System. Economies. 4(4). pp.23.
Arnorsson, A. and Zoega, G., (2016). On the causes of Brexit.
Atkinson, B., Bell, p. and Hadden, D., 2013. John Weaver.
Babonneau, F. L. F., Haurie, A. and Vielle, M., (2016). Brexit and Costs of EU Climate Policy
(No. EPFL-ARTICLE-219094). Nature Publishing Group.
Bafeta, A., and et.al., 2012. Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in
trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 344. p. 813.
Bafeta, A., and et.al., 2012. Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in
trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 344. p.e813.
Baker, A. H., Ali, R. R. and Thrasher, A. J., (2016). Impact of BREXIT on UK Gene and Cell
Therapy: The Need for Continued Pan-European Collaboration.
Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V. and Rasul, I., 2010. The impact of class size on the performance of
university students. Retrieved from VOX, CEPR’s Policy Portal website at http://www.
voxeu. org/article/impact-class-size-performanceuniversity-students.
Banerjee, A., 2010. Film copyright infringement: bypassing the ‘carbon copy’ handicap. Journal
of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 5(1). pp. 17-19.
Barnard, C. and Ludlow, A., (2016). Free Movement of Services, Migration and Leaving the EU.
National Institute Economic Review. 236(1). pp.23-30.
Barr, B., Bambra, C. and Whitehead, M., 2014. The impact of NHS resource allocation policy on
health inequalities in England 2001-11: longitudinal ecological study. BMJ. 348. p.g3231.
Barr, B., Taylor-Robinson, D. and Whitehead, M., 2012. Impact on health inequalities of rising
prosperity in England 1998-2007, and implications for performance incentives: longitudinal
ecological study. Bmj. 345. p.e7831.
Barr, B., Taylor-Robinson, D. and Whitehead, M., 2012. Impact on health inequalities of rising
prosperity in England 1998-2007, and implications for performance incentives: longitudinal
ecological study. Bmj. 345. p.e7831.
Bartlett, D., 2016. Viewpoint: Partnerships in action–Europe and beyond. inpractice: Bulletin of
the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management. 94. pp.13-15.

Bawaskar, H.S. and Bawaskar, p. H., 2011. Efficacy and safety of scorpion antivenom plus
prazosin compared with prazosin alone for venomous scorpion (Mesobuthus tamulus) sting:
randomised open label clinical trial. Bmj, 342, p. c7136.
Beck, T. and et.al., 2010. Bailing out the banks: reconciling stability and competition. Centre for
Economic Policy Research, London.
Beck, T., Uhlig, H. and Wagner, W., 2011. Insulating the financial sector from the European
debt crisis: Eurobonds without public guarantees. VoXEU. org, 17.
Bell, K. J., and et.al., 2013. Impact of autologous blood injections in treatment of mid-portion
Achilles tendinopathy: double blind randomised controlled trial. Bmj. 346. p.f2310.
Bell, K. J., and et.al., 2013. Impact of autologous blood injections in treatment of mid-portion
Achilles tendinopathy: double blind randomised controlled trial. Bmj. 346. p.f2310.
Benjamin, R. S., 2010. Regional hyperthermia: new standard for soft-tissue sarcomas?. The
Lancet Oncology. 11(6). p.505.
Bewley, S., Foo, L. and Braude, p. , 2011. Adverse outcomes from IVF.
Bewley, S., Foo, L. and Braude, p., 2011. Adverse outcomes from IVF.
Blanchard, O., 2012. Lessons from Latvia. IMF Direct, June, 11.
Blenner, S., Reddy, A. and Augustyn, M., 2011. Diagnosis and management of autism in
childhood. Bmj, 343, p. d6238.
Blockmans, S. and Emerson, M., 2016. The Impact of Brexit on the UK and the EU. European
neighborhood watch, (126). pp. 1-2.
Bond, A. J., Fundingsland, M., & Tromans, S. (2016). Environmental impact assessment and
strategic environmental assessment in the UK after leaving the European Union. Impact
Assessment and Project Appraisal, 34(3), 271-274.
Boulanger, P. and Philippidis, G., (2015). The End of a Romance? A Note on the Quantitative
Impacts of a ‘Brexit’from the EU. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), pp.832-842.
Boyd, A., 2015. Malcolm Boyd.
Brecknell, S., 2016. Civil service leaders must re-prioritise for Brexit, says chief John Manzoni.
Civil Service World, 9.
Breyer, F., Costa-i-Font, J. and Felder, S., 2011. Does ageing really affect health expenditures? If
so, why?. VoxEU. Org, 14.
Bryant, B.p. , 2013. Monopoly and Micro-Irrigation in Smallholder Water Markets.
Buchan, J. (2016). To leave or not to leave: Employing overseas nurses could be more difficult
and expensive if we leave the EU, argues James Buchan. Nursing Standard, 30(43), 27-27.
Buti, M. and Mohl, P., 2014. Lacklustre investment in the Eurozone: Is there a puzzle?. VOX,
CEPR’s Policy Portal. 4. p.14.
Carr, A., 2015. Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee.
Cassidy, J.D., Bronfort, G. and Hartvigsen, J., 2012. Should we abandon cervical spine
manipulation for mechanical neck pain? No. Bmj, 344, p. e3680.
Cavallo, D. and Cottani, J., 2010. For greece, a fiscal devaluation is a better solution than a
temporary holiday from the eurozone. VoxEU. org, 22.
Center, S. (2016). GWU’s Office of the Vice President for Research Awards $100,000 for RPI
Project. POLICY.
Ceschia, A., 2010. 12th World Congress on Gastrointestinal Cancer. The Lancet
Oncology. 11(8). p.722.

Chamnan, P., and et.al., 2010. Estimating the population impact of screening strategies for
identifying and treating people at high risk of cardiovascular disease: modelling
study. Bmj. 340. pp. 1693.
Chang, S. S., and et.al., 2013. Impact of 2008 global economic crisis on suicide: time trend study
in 54 countries. Bmj. 347. p.f5239.
Chang, S.S., and et.al., 2013. Impact of 2008 global economic crisis on suicide: time trend study
in 54 countries. Bmj. 347. p.f5239.
Chang, S.S., and et.al., 2013. Impact of 2008 global economic crisis on suicide: time trend study
in 54 countries. Bmj. 347. p.f5239.
Chen, Y. and et.al., 2013. Association between body mass index and cardiovascular disease
mortality in east Asians and south Asians: pooled analysis of prospective data from the Asia
Cohort Consortium. Bmj, 347, p. f5446.
Chick, J., 2011. War on disease: a history of the Lister Institute.
Chisholm, D., and et.al., 2010. Economic impact of disease and injury: counting what
matters. BMJ. 340. p.c924.
Chitturi, S., 2012. Chitturi Satyanarayana.
Chui, W., (2007). Research Methods for Law. Edinburgh University Press.
Chwieroth, J. and Walter, A., 2013. Banking crises and political survival over the long run: why
great expectations matter. Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Clow, M.E.,and et.al., 2015. William Menzies Clow.
Colantone, I. and Stanig, p. , 2016. The real reason the UK voted for Brexit? Jobs lost to Chinese
competition. Washington Post.
Coles, T. J., 2016. The Great Brexit Swindle: Why the mega-rich and free market fanatics
conspired to force Britain from the European Union. CLAIRVIEW BOOKS.
Coles, T.J., (2016). The Great Brexit Swindle: Why the mega-rich and free market fanatics
conspired to force Britain from the European Union. CLAIRVIEW BOOKS.
Coles, T.J., 2016. The Great Brexit Swindle: Why the mega-rich and free market fanatics
conspired to force Britain from the European Union. CLAIRVIEW BOOKS.
Collucci, C. (2016). Joint research projects will focus on social impact of Zika in Brazil.
Cooper, C., 2016. EU referendum: Immigration and Brexit–what lies have been spread?. The
Independent.
Corbett, A. (2016). Research and Higher Education: UK as International Star and Closet
European?. The Political Quarterly, 87(2), 166-173.
Corbett, A., (2016). Research and Higher Education: UK as International Star and Closet
European?. The Political Quarterly. 87(2). pp.166-173.
Coulter, S., & Hancké, B. (2016). A bonfire of the regulations, or business as usual? The UK
labour market and the political economy of Brexit. The Political Quarterly, 87(2), 148-156.
Crabb, A. (2016). Wine export: Impact of the'Brexit'on Australian wine exports. Wine &
Viticulture Journal, 31(3), 73.
Creswell, J. W., (2013). Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed.
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Cumming, D. J., & Zahra, S. A. (2016). International Business and Entrepreneurship
Implications of Brexit. British Journal of Management, 27(4), 687-692.
D’haen, T., 2016. Worlding the Social Sciences and Humanities. European Review. 24(02).
pp.186-199.
D’Silva, J., 2014. Judging the best of Indian healthcare. BMJ. 349. p.g5454.

D’Silva, J., 2014. Judging the best of Indian healthcare. BMJ. 349. p.g5454.
Dagnis Jensen, M. and Snaith, H., (2016). When politics prevails: the political economy of a
Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy. pp.1-9.
Davies, J. (2016). Are business school deans doomed? The global financial crisis, Brexit and all
that. Journal of Management Development, 35(7), 901-915.
Davies, J., (2016). Are business school deans doomed? 2008, Brexit and all that. Journal of
Management Development. 35(7). pp.1-16.
Davies, J., 2016. Are business school deans doomed? The global financial crisis, Brexit and all
that. Journal of Management Development. 35(7). pp.901-915.
Davies, L., 2010. The new public health strategy for England.
De Vries, C. and Hoffmann, I., 2016. Keep Calm and Carry on. What Europeans Think about a
Possible Brexit.
Dennis, M. J. (2016). Consider implications of Brexit for international student mobility.
Dennis, M. J., 2016. Consider implications of Brexit for international student
mobility. Enrollment Management Report. 20(6). pp.3-3.
Detering, K.M. And et.al., 2010. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in
elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. Bm. 340. pp. c1345.
Dhingra, S. and Sampson, T., (2016). UK–EU Relations after Brexit: What is Best for the UK
Economy. Brexit Beckons: Thinking ahead by leading economists. pp. 52-55.
Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G. I., Sampson, T., & Reenen, J. V. (2016). The consequences of Brexit
for UK trade and living standards.
Dominiczak, p. and Riley-Smith, B., 2016. David Cameron branded ‘totally irresponsible’for
warning of Brexit impact while not creating contingency plans. Daily Telegraph, 29.
Dommett, K. and Tonkiss, K., 2013. Embedding Impact and Engagement. Political Insight. 4(3).
pp.34-37.
Dong, B., Wang, Z., & Ma, J. (2016). Leg-to-trunk ratio and the risk of hypertension in children
and adolescents: a population-based study. Journal of Public Health, fdv203.
Donzé, J. D., and et.al., 2014. Impact of sepsis on risk of postoperative arterial and venous
thromboses: large prospective cohort study. BMJ. 349. p.g5334.
Dorling, D. (2016). Brexit: the decision of a divided country.
Duru, D. N., Hanquinet, L., & Cesur, N. S. (2016). Perceptions of diversity and attitudes of
tolerance in the ‘fragmented’UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1-19.
Dworzynski, K. and et.al., 2012. Management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: summary
of NICE guidance. BMJ, 344, p. e3412.
Dworzynski, K. and et.al., 2013. Rehabilitation after stroke: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ,
346, p. f3615.
Ebell, M., Hurst, I., & Warren, J. (2016). Modelling the long-run economic impact of leaving the
European Union. Economic Modelling, 59, 196-209.
Edwards, D. and Edwards, E.H.M., 2012. Errol Mendus Edwards.
Egron-Polak, E. and Ross, H., 2010. International Association of Universities et al.
Internationalization of higher education: global trends, regional perspectives--IAU 3rd
global survey report.
Ekins, R., 2016. Brexit and judicial power. Policy Exchange. Available at.
Elfström, K. M., and et.al., 2014. Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative
women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial. Bmj. 348. p.g130.

Elfström, K. M., and et.al., 2014. Long term duration of protective effect for HPV negative
women: follow-up of primary HPV screening randomised controlled trial. Bmj. 348. p.g130.
Esmail, A. and Roberts, C., 2013. Academic performance of ethnic minority candidates and
discrimination in the MRCGP examinations between 2010 and 2012: analysis of data. BMJ,
347, p. f5662.
Evenett, S. J. ed., 2010. The US-Sino currency dispute: New insights from economics, politics
and law. Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Ferner, R., 2013. Raising more antibodies. BMJ, 347, p. f5969.
Fischer, T. B., (2016). Lessons for impact assessment from the UK referendum on BREXIT.
Floyd, D. (2016). Brexit: How would withdrawal from the EU affect UK economic
performance?. Teaching Business & Economics, 20(1), 12.
Frances, A., 2013. The new somatic symptom disorder in DSM-5 risks mislabeling many people
as mentally ill. Bmj, 346. p. f1580.
Frankel, J., 2012. The death of inflation targeting. VoxEU. Org, 19.
Franklin, C. (2016). Lessons From The Conservative Party: A Hard Brexit And New Fiscal
Policies. The Market Mogul.
Fraser, A. and Laurence, M., 2010. Kenneth Fawcett Mole.
Gallo, J. J., and et.al., 2013. Long term effect of depression care management on mortality in
older adults: follow-up of cluster randomized clinical trial in primary care. BMJ. 346.
p.f2570.
Gallwey, S., Capturing Transformative Change in Education: The Challenge of Tracking
Progress towards SDG Target 4.7.
Gaulé, p. , 2010. Do highly skilled migrants return permanently to their home countries?. VOX.
Ghandat, S. (2016). The Indian energy sector. A complete analysis with respect to the natural gas
cross country pipeline TAPI.
Ghemawat, P. (2016). The Laws of Globalization and Business Applications. Cambridge
University Press.
Gibaldi, J., (2010). Handbook of Writers of Research Papers. 7th ed. Modern Language
Association of India.
Gibson, J. and McKenzie, D., 2010. What are the development impacts of “best practice”
seasonal migration schemes?. Vox, Research-based policy analysis and commentary from
leading economists.
Bernanke, B., 2016. Economic Implications of Brexit. The Brookings Institution. Tuesday.
Tomlinson, S. and Dorling, D., 2016. Brexit has its roots in the British Empire–so how do we
explain it to the young?. New Statesman.
Gunter, M.M., 1998. Turkey and Iran face off in Kurdistan. Middle East Quarterly.
Smith, K.E., 2015. Would Brexit spell the end of European defence?. LSE European Politics and
Policy (EUROPP) Blog.
Krause, T., Noth, F. and Tonzer, L., 2016. Brexit (probability) and effects on financial market
stability.
Habermas, J., 1981. New social movements. Telos. 1981(49). pp.33-37.

Minford, P., 2016. The Brexit Consensus Bug. Economists for Brexit
London.(https://economistsforbrexit. squarespace. com/brexit-consensus-bug).
Boyes, S.J. and Elliott, M., 2016. Brexit: The marine governance horrendogram just got more
horrendous!. Mar. Pollut. Bull. doi.10.
McEwen, N., 2016. Disunited Kingdom: Will Brexit spark the disintegration of the
UK?. Political Insight.7(2). pp.22-23.
McKee, M., 2016. Brexit: the NHS is far safer inside the European Union.BMJ. 353. p.i2489.
Heisbourg, F., 2016. Brexit and European Security. Survival. 58(3). pp.13-22.
Rutter, J. and McCrae, J., 2016. Brexit: Organising Whitehall to deliver.Institute for
Government. July.
Cressey, D., 2016. Brexit watch: scientists grapple with the fallout. Nature.
Dhingra, S., Van Reenen, J. and Wadsworth, J., 2016. Brexit and the Impact of Immigration on
the UK. CEP Brexit Analsyis. 5.
Sinclair, E., Stagnell, S. and Shah, S., 2016. Brexit and dentistry. British dental journal. 220(10).
pp.509-512.
Springford, J., 2013. Brexit and EU regulation: A bonfire of the vanities?.Group.
Finger, B., 2016. Brexit: A Victory for the Populist Right. New Politics (June 25) http://newpol.
org/content/brexit-victory-populist-right.
Albert, A., 2016. Home care bosses call Brexit result “disappointing”.Homecare website.
Available at: www. homecare. co. uk/news/article. cfm/id/1576802/Brexit-prompts-home-care-
leaders-to-voice-concern-about-impact (accessed on 30 June 2016).
Hobolt, S., 2016. Why did voters choose Brexit. LSE http://blogs. lse. ac.
uk/europpblog/2016/06/24/why-did-voters-choose-brexit.
Hickson, K. and Miles, J., 2016. The Labour Case for Brexit (London: Labour Leave)
http://www. labourleave. org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06. The-Labour-Case-for-Brexit. pdf.
Lea, R., 2016. The Authorities begin to get to grips with Brexit: post-referendum
update. Arbuthnot Banking Group.18.
Hume, T., 2016. Britain’s Labour Party in turmoil over Brexit vote results.CNN (June 27)
http://edition. cnn. com/2016/06/26/europe/uk-brexit-labour-corbyn.
Purdue, D., Huang, H. and Economics, N.T.M.A. 2015. Brexit and its Impact on the Irish
Economy. National Treasury Management Agency. Dublin.

Terlikowski, M., 2013. No One Left Behind? European Defence and ‘Brexit’.The RUSI
Journal. 158(4). pp.26-30.
Franks, B., 2016. Anti-State Activists and the Problem of the Scottish Independence
Referendum: Implications for the Brexit Campaign. Anti-state activists and voting: implications
for the brexit and future independence referendum campaigns–a talk with Benjamin Franks, The
Autonomous Centre, Edinburgh. 21. p.2016.
Wyplosz, C., 2012. The ECB’s trillion euro bet. VoxEU. org. 13.
Curtice, J., 2016. Brexit: Behind the Referendum. Political Insight. 7(2). pp.4-7.
Matthews, A., 2016. The Potential Implications of a Brexit for Future EU Agri‐food
Policies. EuroChoices. 15(2). pp.17-23.
Wyplosz, C., 2012. The ECB’s trillion euro bet. VoxEU. org 13.
Lea, R., 2016. Brexit really does mean Brexit: Article 50 to be triggered by end-March
2017. Arbuthnot Banking Group. 9.
Bongardt, A. and Torres, F. 2016. The Political Economy of Brexit: Why Making It Easier to
Leave the Club Could Improve the EU. Intereconomics. 51(4). pp.214-219.
Curtice, J., 2016. Brexit: Behind the Referendum. Political Insight. 7(2). pp.4-7.
Bongardt, A. and Torres, F., 2016. The Political Economy of Brexit: Why Making It Easier to
Leave the Club Could Improve the EU. Intereconomics.51(4). pp.214-219.
Lannoo, K., 2016. EU financial market access after Brexit. Intereconomics. 51(5). pp.255-260.
Dickel, H., Kuss, O., Schmidt, A. and Diepgen, T.L., 2002. Impact of preventive strategies on
trend of occupational skin disease in hairdressers: population based register
study. Bmj. 324(7351). pp.1422-1423.
Rojas-Rueda, D., Tainio, M. and Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J., 2011. The health risks and benefits of
cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study. Bmj, 343.
p.d4521.
Pell, J.P., Simpson, E., Rodger, J.C., Finlayson, A., Clark, D., Anderson, J. and Pell, A.C.H.,
2003. Impact of changing diagnostic criteria on incidence, management, and outcome of acute
myocardial infarction: retrospective cohort study. Bmj, 326(7381). pp.134-135.
Rietveld, R.P., van Weert, H.C., ter Riet, G. and Bindels, P.J., 2003. Diagnostic impact of signs
and symptoms in acute infectious conjunctivitis: systematic literature search. Bmj 327(7418).
p.789.

Maruyama, K., Sato, S., Ohira, T., Maeda, K., Noda, H., Kubota, Y., Nishimura, S., Kitamura,
A., Kiyama, M., Okada, T. and Imano, H., 2008. The joint impact on being overweight of self
reported behaviours of eating quickly and eating until full: cross sectional survey. Bmj. 337.
p.a2002.
Békési, L., Kovalszky, Z. and Várnai, T., 2017. Scenarios for potential macroeconomic impact
of Brexit on Hungary (No. 2017/125). Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary).
Lin, T. and Jiang, K., 2016. The Impact of BREXIT on Global Economy.
Kelly, B., 2016. The Impact of Brexit on Food and Drink Regulations. World Food Regulation
Review.26(3) p.28.
Kostovicova, D., 2016. What previous political divorces in Europe tell us about the emotional
impact of Brexit. LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog.
Fakude, T., 2016. The Sociopolitical Impact of Brexit on Africa.
Macaulay, R., Pandey, V. and Ahuja, A., 2016. What EU Mean to the MHRA! Potential Impact
of ‘Brexit’on Pharmaceutical Regulation in the UK.Value in Health. 19(7). p.A439.
Kirchmaier, T. and Ruiz de Gauna de Santiago, N. 2016. Turning on the Light: Assessing the
Impact of Brexit Using Electricity Demand as a Proxy.
MacMillan, C., 2016. The Impact of Brexit upon English Contract Law. King's Law
Journal 27(3). pp.420-430.
Portes, J. and Forte, G., 2016. The Economic Impact of Brexit-induced Reductions in Migration.
Golding, B.T., 2017. The impact of Brexit on British science: Also Sprach Zunderland. Future
Medicinal Chemistry. (0).
Johnston, C.M. and Buongiorno, J., 2016. Impact of Brexit on the forest products industry of the
United Kingdom and the rest of the world. Forestry.
Hubble, S., 2016. Briefing Paper: Number 7843: 13 December 2016: Impact of exiting the EU
on higher education.
Herzog, M., 2015. Let's Talk Business: The Economic Impact of Brexit.
Fakude, T., 2016. The Sociopolitical Impact of Brexit on Africa.
Hunter, F. and de Wit, H., 2016. Brexit and the European Shape of Things to
Come. International Higher Education. (87). pp.2-3.
Hubble, S., 2016. House of Commons Library: Briefing paper: Number 7834, 13 December
2016: The impact of leaving the EU on higher education.

Nkabinde, S., 2016. Brexit's impact on SA: too soon to tell...: markets.Personal Finance
Newsletter. 2016(427). p.16.
Vlandas, T. and Halikiopoulou, D., 2017. Labour market determinants of support for Brexit.
Tsiligiris, V., 2016. TNE and exporting UK higher education, post-Brexit: opportunities and
challenges.
Beck, T., Coyle, D., Dewatripont, M., Freixas, X. and Seabright, P., 2010. Bailing out the banks:
reconciling stability and competition. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.
Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., Sampson, T. and Van Reenen, J., 2016. The impact of Brexit on
foreign investment in the UK. BREXIT 2016. p.24.
Reinaud, J., 2004. Emissions trading and its possible impacts on investment decisions in the
power sector. Oil, Gas & Energy Law Journal (OGEL). 2(1).
Kroeger, A., Avila, E.V. and Morison, L., 2002. Insecticide impregnated curtains to control
domestic transmission of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Venezuela: cluster randomised
trial. Bmj. 325(7368).pp.810-813.
Boulanger, P. and Philippidis, G., 2015. The End of a Romance? A Note on the Quantitative
Impacts of a ‘Brexit’from the EU. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66(3).pp.832-842.
Ottaviano, G.I.P., Pessoa, J.P., Sampson, T. and Van Reenen, J., 2014. Brexit or Fixit? The trade
and welfare effects of leaving the European Union.
Matthews, A., 2015. Implications of British exit from the EU for the Irish agri-food
sector. Trinity Economic Papers. (215).
Barrett, A., Bergin, A., FitzGerald, J., Lambert, D., McCoy, D., Morgenroth, E., Siedschlag, I.
and Studnicka, Z., 2015. Scoping the possible economic implications of Brexit on Ireland. ESRI
Research series. 48.
Peña, F.D.L., 2016. Gentle Brexit, a very British Exit: EEA Membership as the Most Favourable
Model to Secure Financial Services Passports. European Business Law Review. 27(7). pp.1057-
1089.
Broughton, N., Keohane, N. and Ketola, T., 2016. Working Together?.
Humphrey, E., 2016. How will BREXIT affect the Caribbean?.
Kreindler, R., Gilbert, P. and Zimbron, R., 2016. Impact of Brexit on UK Competition Litigation
and Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration.33(4). pp.521-540.

Armour, J., 2017. Brexit and Financial Services.
Noor, M.T.,and at.el., Brexit and the Impact on Bangladesh.
Busch, B. and Matthes, J., 2016. Brexit: The Economic Impact–A Survey. InCESifo Forum (Vol.
17, No. 2, pp. 37-44). Ifo Institute-Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of
Munich.
Busch, B. and Matthes, J., 2016. Brexit: The Economic Impact–A Survey. InCESifo Forum (Vol.
17, No. 2, pp. 37-44). Ifo Institute-Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of
Munich.
Soegaard, C. and Schröder, P.J., 2017. An economic perspective on Brexit.Culture. 2(1). pp.21-
27.
Casson, J., 2016. Boards and Brexit: The key measures and immediate
considerations. Governance Directions. 68(6). p.372.
Langan, M., 2016. Brexit and Trade Ties between Europe and Commonwealth States in Sub-
Saharan Africa: Opportunities for Pro-poor Growth or a Further Entrenchment of North–South
Inequalities?. The Round Table, 105(5). pp.477-487.
Ford, M., 2016. The Impact of Brexit on UK Labour Law. International Journal of Comparative
Labour Law and Industrial Relations. 32(4). pp.473-495.
Wilcock, J. and Miller, A., 2016. The truth and consequences of Brexit: could a catastrophe for
academia be an opportunity for publishers?. Insights. 29(3). p.216.
Sector, H., 2016. Financing Developments in the Irish Economy. Q4Central Bank Quarterly
Bulletin, p.29.
Stošić-Mihajlović, L. and Zdravković, I., 2016. Brexit impact on Serbian economic
development. Journal of Process Management. New Technologies. 4(3). pp.24-29.
Charles, C.A., 2016. Opportunities or Challenges for the Caribbean after Brexit?.
Kokkinis, A., 2016. The impact of Brexit on the legal framework for cross-border corporate
activity. European Business Law Review. 27(7). pp.959-987.
Micossi, S. and Perissich, R., 2016. The Brexit Negotiations: An Italian Perspective. CEPS
Commentary. 25 October 2016.
Mendez-Parra, M., Papadavid, P. and te Velde, D.W., 2016. Brexit and development.
Flaherty, E., Northern Ireland’s economy post-Brexit: Is North-South reunification the answer?.
Dean, J. and Lovely, M., 2008. Trade growth, global production, and environmental degradation.

Lee, J., 2016. ENERGY: Louisiana Slips into Recession amid Oil Bust.
WEINSWIG, D., 2016. BREXIT BRIEFINGS 1.
Xing, L., Dong, X. and Guan, J., 2016. Global industrial impact coefficient based on random
walk process and inter-country input–output table. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications.
Cooper, B., 2016. See EU later: Brexit and us. Governance Directions. 68(7). p.414.
Morgan, J.A., 2016. Brexit: What next? Sovereignty, Devolution, and Economic Policy–an open
forum.
Xing, L., Ye, Q. and Guan, J., Spreading Effect in Industrial Complex Network Based on
Improved Structural Holes Theory.
de Mars, S., Murray, C., O'Donoghue, A. and Warwick, B.T., 2016. Policy paper: Brexit, Ireland
and Northern Ireland.
Sutherland, E., 2017. The implications of Brexit for the governance of telecommunications
markets in the United Kingdom. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance. 19(1).
Rousseau, J.M., 2016, December. Copper‘s Crisis and its Reciprocal Impact on Global Politics
and Economy. In Europe in Trouble (pp. 167-178). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
Roy, G., 2016. Outlook and appraisal [December 2016]. Fraser of Allander Economic
Commentary. 40(3). pp.4-26.
Bhattacharyya, K., 2016. Brexit Exposes Moral Hypocrisy. Economic & Political
Weekly. 51(33). p.33.
Samothrakis, Y., 2016, June. Brexit: a legal analysis of the impact on European insurers’
operations. In ERA Forum (Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 161-172). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Melchior-Walsh, S., 1995. Sociocultural alienation: experiences of North American Indian
students in higher education (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University).
Peltzer, K., Nzewi, E. and Mohan, K., 2004. Attitudes towards HIV-antibody testing and people
with AIDS among university students in India, South Africa and United States. Indian Journal of
Medical Sciences. 58(3). p.95.
Hardy, C.P. and Eston, R.G., 1985. Aerobic fitness of Anglo-Saxon and Indian students. British
journal of sports medicine. 19(4). pp.217-218.
Godlee, F., 2013. Balancing benefits and harms. Bmj. 346. p.f3666.
Godlee, F., 2015. Conflict of interest: forward not backward. Bmj, 350. p. h3176.

Godlee, F., 2016. Healthcare in an interdependent world. Bmj, 353, p. i2511.
Godlee, F., Abbasi, K., Gulland, A., & Coombes, R. (2016). Why doctors should vote to remain
in the EU on 23 June. BMJ, 353, i3302.
Godlee, F., and et.al., 2016. Why doctors should vote to remain in the EU on 23 June. BMJ. 353.
p.i3302.
Goodwin, M. J. and Heath, O., (2016). The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind: An
Aggregate‐level Analysis of the Result. The Political Quarterly. 87(3). pp.323-332.
Gough, E. K., and et.al., 2014. The impact of antibiotics on growth in children in low and middle
income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled
trials. Bmj. 348. p.g2267.
Grant, W. (2016). The challenges facing UK farmers from Brexit. EuroChoices, 15(2), 11-16.
Grass, S., Preuss, K. D. and Pfreundschuh, M., 2010. Autosomal-dominant inheritance of
hyperphosphorylated paratarg-7. The lancet oncology. 11(1). p.12.
Graves, B., 2013. Lower costs and better outcomes: a system of care built on relationships. BMJ,
347, p. f5301.
Gulland, A. (2016). Would Brexit stop the flow of doctors and patients between EU countries?.
BMJ, 353, i3138.
Habermas, J., 2016. Core Europe To The Rescue: A Conversation With Jürgen Habermas About
Brexit And The EU Crisis. Social Europe, 12.
Haldane, A., 2012. What have the economists ever done for us?. VoxEU. org, 1.
Haldane, A.G., 2013. Have we solved ‘too big to fail’. VoxEU. Org, 17.
Halpin, D.M.G., 2011. Improving the management of COPD.
Ham, C., 2010. The coalition government’s plans for the NHS in England.
Harrison, B.A., (2016). Brexit and Anglo-Australian Defence Policy: Back to the future?.
Hassan, F. and Ottaviano, G., 2013. Productivity in Italy: The great unlearning. VoxEU. Org, 30.
Hatzigeorgiou, A., & Lodefalk, M. (2016). The Brexit Trade Disruption Revisited. The Estey
Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, 17(1), 41-58.
Hawkes, N., 2012. Polypill remains the only panacea in sight for cardiovascular disease, trial
organiser says.
Heathcote, J., Perri, F. and Violante, G.L., 2010. Inequality in times of crisis: Lessons from the
past and a first look at the current recession. manuscript, University of Minnesota.
Higgins, C., 2013. Charles Anthony Higgins.
Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European
Public Policy, 23(9), 1259-1277.
Hodson, M., 2014. John Batten.
Hook, D. and Szomszor, M., (2016). Examining implications of Brexit for the UK research base.
Hook, D. and Szomszor, M., 2016. Examining implications of Brexit for the UK research base.
Hopewell, S., and et.al., 2012. Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the
reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series
analysis. Bmj. 344. p.e4178.
Hopewell, S., and et.al., 2012. Effect of editors’ implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the
reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series
analysis. Bmj. 344. p.e4178.
Horton, R., 2016. Offline: the meanings of Brexit. The Lancet. 388(10039). pp. 14.
Howard, P.N. and Kollanyi, B., (2016). Bots,# strongerin, and# brexit: Computational
propaganda during the UK-EU referendum. Available at SSRN 2798311.

Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of Populism: Economic have-nots
and cultural backlash.
Iredale, J. P. (2016). BREXIT and science, where do we go from here. QJM, 109(10), 643-644.
Isaac, J. S. (2014). Redefining the jurisdiction clause under copyright and trade mark laws in
India. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, jpu218.
Isaac, J.S., 2014. Redefining the jurisdiction clause under copyright and trade mark laws in India.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, p. jpu218.
Ivers, N. M., and et.al., 2011. Impact of CONSORT extension for cluster randomised trials on
quality of reporting and study methodology: review of random sample of 300 trials, 2000-
8. BMJ. 343. Pp. 5886.
Jackson, L.S., (2008). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. 3rd ed.
Cengage Learning.
Jackson, T., 2013. Health and the economic crisis. Bmj. 346. p.f4140.
Jain, A., 2013. Rx: A dose of ethics to revive trust in medical practice. Bmj. 346. p.f2987.
Jain, A., 2014. Autoimmune conditions v lifestyle diseases. Bmj. 348. p.g2363.
Johnson, P. and Clark, M., (2006). Business and management research methodologies –Vols. 1-
6, London: Sage Publications.
Johnston, C. M., & Buongiorno, J. (2016). Impact of Brexit on the forest products industry of the
United Kingdom and the rest of the world. Forestry.
Jones, B.R. and et.al., 2013. Early morning headache with vomiting in a 5 year old boy. BMJ,
346, p. f3315.
Jones, R. (2016). Uncharted Waters. Br J Gen Pract, 66(649), 395-395.
Jonsas, K. (2016). Academic identities in higher education: the changing European landscape.
Kahol, K., 2014. Mobile phone messaging to improve health.
Kamerow, D., 2012. Direct primary care: a new system for general practice. BMJ, 345, p. e4482.
Kamerow, D., 2013. Big Tobacco lights up e-cigarettes. BMJ, 346, p. f3418.
Kapoor, S., 2013. FRENCH STUDIES IN INDIA: THEN AND NOW. French studies
bulletin. 34(127). pp.38-42.
Kempin, R. and Mawdsley, J., 2013. Newcastle University ePrints. RUSI Journal. 158(4). pp.32-
36.
Kempin, R. and Mawdsley, J., 2013. Newcastle University ePrints. RUSI Journal. 158(4). pp.32-
36.
Kempin, R. and Mawdsley, J., 2013. The UK, the EU and European Security: A German
Perspective. The RUSI Journal. 158(4). pp.32-36.
Kempin, R. and Mawdsley, J., 2013. The UK, the EU and European Security: A German
Perspective. The RUSI Journal. 158(4). pp.32-36.
Kempin, R., & Mawdsley, J. (2013). The UK, the EU and European Security: A German
Perspective. The RUSI Journal, 158(4), 32-36.
Keohane, N., Broughton, N., & Ketola, T. (2016). Working together: European workers in the
UK economy.
Kierzenkowski, R. and et.al., 2016. The economic consequences of Brexit: a taxing decision.
OECD Economic Policy Papers. (16). pp. 1.
Kierzenkowski, R., Pain, N., Rusticelli, E., & Zwart, S. (2016). The Economic Consequences of
Brexit.

King, M., and et.al., 2013. Medical school gift restriction policies and physician prescribing of
newly marketed psychotropic medications: difference-in-differences analysis. BMJ. 346.
p.f264.
Kipping, R. R., and et.al., 2014. Effect of intervention aimed at increasing physical activity,
reducing sedentary behaviour, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children:
active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) school based cluster randomised controlled trial. Bmj. 348.
p.g3256.
Kmietowicz, Z., 2014. More toilets in India did not improve health, finds study. BMJ. 349.
p.g6169.
Kmietowicz, Z., 2014. More toilets in India did not improve health, finds study. BMJ. 349.
p.g6169.
Kopp-Oberstebrink, H., 2012. Between Terror and Play: The Intellectual Encounter of Hans
Blumenberg and Jacob Taubes. Telos. 2012(158). pp.119-134.
Kyu, H.H. And et.al., 2016. Physical activity and risk of breast cancer, colon cancer, diabetes,
ischemic heart disease, and ischemic stroke events: systematic review and dose-response
meta-analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Bmj. 354. pp. i3857.
Lane, p. , 2010. Rethinking national fiscal policies in Europe. Completing the Eurozone Rescue:
What more needs to be done. pp. 59-63.
Lasserson, D., Fox, R. and Farmer, A., 2012. Late onset type 1 diabetes. Bmj, 344, p. e2827.
Lawler, M. and et.al., 2014. Ageism in cancer care.
Lock, S., 2013. John Angus Black.
Loder, E., Brizzell, C. and Godlee, F., 2015. Revisiting the commercial-academic interface in
medical journals.
Ma, X., and et.al., 2014. Effect of providing free glasses on children’s educational outcomes in
China: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 349. p.g5740.
Ma, X., and et.al., 2014. Effect of providing free glasses on children’s educational outcomes in
China: cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ. 349. p.g5740.
MacDonald, S. (2016). The impact of Brexit on the UK’s reputation, influence and soft power.
Cultural Trends, 25(4), 280-286.
Mackenzie, M. and Platt, E., 2016. How global markets are reacting to UK’s Brexit vote.
Financial Times, 24.
MacShane, D., (2015). Brexit: How Britain Will Leave Europe. IB Tauris.
Marteau, T. M., and et.al., 2010. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening
for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial. Bmj. 340. p. 2138.
Maruani, A., and et.al., 2014. Impact of sending email reminders of the legal requirement for
posting results on ClinicalTrials. gov: cohort embedded pragmatic randomized controlled
trial. Bmj. 349. p.g5579.
Mathers, N., 2016. General Practice Forward View: a new charter for general practice?.
Matti, J., & Zhou, Y. (2016). The political economy of Brexit: explaining the vote. Applied
Economics Letters, 1-4.
Mazumder, S., and et.al., 2014. Effect of implementation of Integrated Management of Neonatal
and Childhood Illness programme on treatment seeking practices for morbidities in infants:
cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 349. p.g4988.
McCarthy, M., 2013. Patient participation in decision making may raise cost of care, study
shows.
McCartney, M., 2012. The assault on the Liverpool care pathway. BMJ, 345, p. e7316.

McCartney, M., 2013. Profits from pregnancy: how trusted organisations sell out women to
commercial interests. BMJ, 346, p. f3448.
McKee, M., & Galsworthy, M. J. (2016). Brexit: a confused concept that threatens public health.
Journal of Public Health, 38(1), 3-5.
McKee, M., 2016. Brexit: the NHS is far safer inside the European Union. BMJ. 353. p.i2489.
Merriam, B. S., (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 3rd ed.
John Wiley & Sons.
Micha, R., and et.al., 2014. Global, regional, and national consumption levels of dietary fats and
oils in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition
surveys. Bmj. 348. p.g2272.
Miethe, J. and Pothier, D., 2016. Brexit: What's at Stake for the Financial Sector?. Diw
Economic Bulletin. 6(31). pp.364-372.
Mishra, E., 2014. Cover versions and the new copyright regime in India. Journal of Intellectual
Property Law & Practice, p. jpu023.
Mishra, E., 2014. Cover versions and the new copyright regime in India. Journal of Intellectual
Property Law & Practice, p. jpu023.
Mohamud, A. (2016). Teaching the British Empire. Teaching History, (164), 4.
Mohamud, A., 2016. Teaching the British Empire. Teaching History, (164). p. 4.
Mohamud, A., 2016. Teaching the British Empire. Teaching History. (164). p.4.
Moid, S., 2016. Mapping the Potential Impact of Brexit on Indian Economy. SAMVAD. 12.
pp.42-47.
Möller, A., & Oliver, T. (2014). The United Kingdom and the European Union: what would a
“Brexit” mean for the EU and other States around the World? European and global
perspectives. DGAPanalyse.
Moonesinghe, S.R. And et.al., 2011. Impact of reduction in working hours for doctors in training
on postgraduate medical education and patients’ outcomes: systematic review. Bmj. 342. pp.
d1580.
Morley, C. and Cursiter, J., 2016. Gillian Gandy.
Morton, R.L. and et.al., 2010. The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for
chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.
BmJ, 340. p. c112.
Moser, p. , 2015. Determinants of Creativity and Innovation—Evidence from Economic History.
NBER Reporter. 2015(3). pp. 23.
Moszynski, p. , 2010. Latest tuberculosis statistics are a “wake-up call for all governments to act
immediately”.
Motzer, R. J., Hutson, T. E. and Glen, H., 2014. Correction to Lancet Oncol. Trial. 15. pp.767-
74.
Motzer, R. J., Hutson, T. E., & Glen, H. (2014). Correction to Lancet Oncol. trial, 15, 767-74.
Moxnes, A., Ulltveit-Moe, K.H. and Bøler, E.A., 2012. Why trade policy matters for firms’
R&D investment. VoxEU. Org, 12.
Mua, K. K. (2016). Impact of BR-EXIT in Central African Sub-Region.
Mulley, A.G., 2010. Improving productivity in the NHS.
Mulley, G., 2012. Stop the medicalisation of old age. Bmj, 344.
Munro, A.J., 2016. Alan Wilfrid Gough Goolden.
Murray, S., Lamb, I. and Gaskell, p. , 2015. David Blaney.

Nataraj, S. and et.al., (2012). What is the impact of labour market regulation on employment in
LICs?.
Navarria, G., 2016. After Brexit, Keep a Close Watch on Italy and Its Five Star Movement. The
Conversation.
Nell, E., 2013. Profile: Local leadership national impact. Medicus. 53(4). p.46.
Nguyen, T.H., Morton, D.A. and Hapgood, K.p. , 2012. Understanding the unified compaction
curve model for wet granulation and subsequent tablet strength. Chemeca 2012: Quality of
life through chemical engineering: 23-26 September 2012, Wellington, New Zealand. pp.
654.
Nkabinde, S. (2016). Brexit's impact on SA: too soon to tell...: markets. Personal Finance
Newsletter, 2016(427), 16.
Nunez-Ferrer, J., & Rinaldi, D. (2016). The Impact of Brexit on the EU Budget: A non-
catastrophic event.
O’Dowd, A. (2016). UK exit from EU would be serious threat to science and healthcare, experts
warn. BMJ, 352, i1117.
Oliver, T. (2016). European and international views of Brexit. Journal of European Public
Policy, 1-8.
Overman, H., 2011. How did London get away with it. Centre Piece. 15. pp.16-18.
Padmanabhan, S., 2016. Do it yourself orthodontics: Alarmist or real?. Journal of Indian
Orthodontic Society, 50(3). p. 137.
Panieri, E., 2013. Breast-cancer awareness in low-income countries. The Lancet
Oncology. 14(4). pp.274-275.
Panieri, E., 2013. Breast-cancer awareness in low-income countries. The Lancet
Oncology. 14(4). pp.274-275.
Passlack, M. (2016). Brexit. Macroeconomic Consequences.
Philips, G. and Clark, A., (2012). Inside Book Publishing. Routledge.
Pinkney, T. D., and et.al., 2013. Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site
infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI
Trial). Bmj. 347. p.f4305.
Pinkney, T. D., and et.al., 2013. Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site
infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI
Trial). Bmj. 347. p.f4305.
POLICY, E., POLITICS, C., & DEVELOPMENTS, N. (2016). Fuel for thought May–late June
2016: UK Brexit (All dates refer to 2016 unless stated otherwise). Energy & Environment,
27(5), 597-676.
Powers, B.W., Navathe, A.S. and Jain, S.H., 2014. Medical education’s authenticity problem.
Punglia, R. S., and et.al., 2010. Impact of interval from breast conserving surgery to radiotherapy
on local recurrence in older women with breast cancer: retrospective cohort
analysis. Bmj. 340. Pp. 845.
Qibthiyyah, R., & Utomo, A. J. (2016). Family Matters: Demographic Change and Social
Spending in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 133-159.
Rasella, D., and et.al., 2014. Impact of primary health care on mortality from heart and
cerebrovascular diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of longitudinal data. Bmj. 349.
p.g4014.

Realities, D. and Unknowns, M., 2016. International Faculty in Higher Education. International
Faculty in Higher Education: Comparative Perspectives on Recruitment, Integration, and
Impact, p. 176.
Rhoades, G. and Stensaker, B., 2017. Bringing Organisations and Systems Back Together:
Extending Clark's Entrepreneurial University. Higher Education Quarterly.
Richards, T. and Godlee, F., 2014. The BMJ’s own patient journey.
Richards, T., Snow, R. and Schroter, S., 2015. Logging The BMJ’s “patient journey”.
Richards, T., Snow, R. and Schroter, S., 2015. Logging The BMJ’s “patient journey”.
Ridley, D., (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for students'. SAGE.
Ritchie, K. and et.al., 2010. Designing prevention programmes to reduce incidence of dementia:
prospective cohort study of modifiable risk factors. Bmj, 341. p. c3885.
Roberts, D., 2016. Trump, Brexit and demand for change: The year of the political outsider. The
Guardian, 4.
Rosati, E., 2013. The German ‘Google Tax’law: groovy or greedy?. Journal of Intellectual
Property Law & Practice. 8(7). pp.497-497.
Roy, A., and et.al., 2014. Effect of BCG vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis
infection in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 349. p.g4643.
Roy, A., and et.al., 2014. Effect of BCG vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis
infection in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 349. p.g4643.
Sadeghi, G., Sadeghi, G., Arabsalehi, M., Arabsalehi, M., Hamavandi, M., & Hamavandi, M.
(2016). Impact of corporate social performance on financial performance of manufacturing
companies (IMC) listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. International Journal of Law and
Management, 58(6), 634-659.
Sahr, D., Compton, M., Carr, A., Wilkes, G., & Behrens, A. (2016). Brexit: What are the options
for the financial services industry?. Journal of Investment Compliance, 17(4).
Sakata, R., and et.al., 2012. Impact of smoking on mortality and life expectancy in Japanese
smokers: a prospective cohort study. Bmj. 345. pp.7093.
Sakata, R., and et.al., 2012. Impact of smoking on mortality and life expectancy in Japanese
smokers: a prospective cohort study. Bmj. 345. pp.7093.
Sakata, R., and et.al., 2012. Impact of smoking on mortality and life expectancy in Japanese
smokers: a prospective cohort study. Bmj. 345. p.e7093.
Sample, I., 2016. UK scientists dropped from EU projects because of post-Brexit funding fears.
The Guardian Website.
Sanders, R., 2016. Brexit creates EU-Britain nightmare for the Caribbean. Jamaica Observer.
Sandole, D., 2010. Objective for Obama in the post-America future.
Sandole, D.J., 2012. Science of unintended consequences.
Saquib, N., Saquib, J. and Ioannidis, J. P., 2013. Practices and impact of primary outcome
adjustment in randomized controlled trials: meta-epidemiologic study. BMJ. 347. p.f4313.
Saunders, M. et. al., (2006). Research Methods for Business students', Harlow: Prentice Hall.
Schiereck, D., Kiesel, F. and Kolaric, S., (2016). Brexit:(Not) another Lehman moment for
banks?. Finance Research Letters. 19. pp.291-297.
Schneider, M., 2012. Measuring the scope and impact of IPR infringement in the EU. Journal of
Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 7(5). pp.313-316.
Schneider, M., 2012. Measuring the scope and impact of IPR infringement in the EU. Journal of
Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 7(5). pp.313-316.

Schnichels, D. and Sule, S., 2010. The Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry and its Impact on
Competition Law Enforcement. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice. 1(2).
pp.93-111.
Scott, G. (Ed.). (2016). Brexit: what are the implications for nurses?.
Sedgwick, p. , 2011. Meta-analyses V. Bmj, 342, p. d686.
Sedgwick, p. , 2011. Open label trials. Bmj, 342, p. d3427.
Sedgwick, p. , 2012. Standardisation of outcome measures (z scores). Bmj, 345, p. e6178.
Selak, V., and et.al., 2014. Effect of fixed dose combination treatment on adherence and risk
factor control among patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: randomised controlled
trial in primary care. BMJ. 348. p.g3318.
Senior, K., 2012. CRUK: funding policy under scrutiny. The Lancet Oncology. 13(5). p.e194.
Seow, H., and et.al., 2014. Impact of community based, specialist palliative care teams on
hospitalisations and emergency department visits late in life and hospital deaths: a pooled
analysis. Bmj. 348. p.g3496.
Seow, H., and et.al., 2014. Impact of community based, specialist palliative care teams on
hospitalisations and emergency department visits late in life and hospital deaths: a pooled
analysis. Bmj. 348. p.g3496.
Seow, H., and et.al., 2014. Impact of community based, specialist palliative care teams on
hospitalisations and emergency department visits late in life and hospital deaths: a pooled
analysis. Bmj. 348. p.g3496.
Sharma, D., 2015. Umesh Chandra Sharma.
Shatrugna, V. and Srivatsan, R., 2012. The right to food security.
Shaw, C., (2016). Why Brexit Still Does Not Matter. The Market Mogul.
Shelley, J., 2010. Frederick Shelley.
Sheppard, J. P., and et.al., 2012. Impact of age and sex on primary preventive treatment for
cardiovascular disease in the West Midlands, UK: cross sectional study. BMJ. 345. P.4535.
Shet, A. and et.al., 2014. Effect of mobile telephone reminders on treatment outcome in HIV:
evidence from a randomised controlled trial in India. Bmj, 349, p. g5978.
Shet, A., and et.al., 2014. Effect of mobile telephone reminders on treatment outcome in HIV:
evidence from a randomised controlled trial in India. Bmj. 349. p.g5978.
Sinclair, E., Stagnell, S. and Shah, S., 2016. Brexit and dentistry. British dental journal. 220(10).
pp.509-512.
Singh, K., (2010). Research Methodology. APH Publishing.
Song, C. H. (2016). Understanding the aftermath of Brexit: implications for the pharmaceutical
industry. Pharmaceutical Medicine, 30(5), 253-256.
Sood, N., and et.al., 2014. Government health insurance for people below poverty line in India:
quasi-experimental evaluation of insurance and health outcomes. BMJ. 349. p.g5114.
Sood, N., and et.al., 2014. Government health insurance for people below poverty line in India:
quasi-experimental evaluation of insurance and health outcomes. BMJ. 349. p.g5114.
Spence, D., 2012. Why doctors should support welfare reform. BMJ, 344, p. e4054.
Sreedharan, S.K., 2012. On the road to commercialization of patents in India. Journal of
Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 7(2). pp. 112-118.
Stafford, N., 2014. Kenneth C Edelin.
Stalford, H. (2016). The UK referendum on membership of the EU: Whither social welfare and
family law?.
Stanbridge, R., 2013. Lance Lee Bromley.

Steinbrook, R., Kassirer, J.p. and Angell, M., 2015. Justifying conflicts of interest in medical
journals: a very bad idea. BMJ, 350, p. h2942.
Stevens, C., & Kennan, J. (2016). Trade Implications of Brexit for Commonwealth Developing
Countries.
Stewart, H., 2016. UK Voters Leaning Towards Brexit Guardian Pool Reveals. The Guardian,
31.
Storebø, O.J. And et.al., 2015. Methylphenidate for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in
children and adolescents: Cochrane systematic review with meta-analyses and trial
sequential analyses of randomised clinical trials. BMJ. 351. pp. h5203.
Strumia, F., (2016). Brexiting European Citizenship through the Voice of Others. German Law
Journal.17(Brexit Supplement). pp.109-115.
Subramaniam, G. and Daivasigamani, D., 2014. Protecting incremental invention in India.
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, p. jpu187.
Swinbank, A. (2016). Brexit or Bremain? Future Options for UK Agricultural Policy and the
CAP. EuroChoices, 15(2), 5-10.
Tabernero, J., & Ciardiello, F. (2016). Brexit: a European perspective. The Lancet Oncology,
17(5), 558-559.
Tate, S.A. and Bagguley, p. , 2016. Building the anti-racist university: next steps.
Tavare, A., 2012. Where are we with transparency over performance of doctors and institutions?.
BMJ, 345, p. e4464.
Tielmann, A., & Schiereck, D. (2016). Arising borders and the value of logistic companies:
Evidence from the Brexit referendum in Great Britain. Finance Research Letters.
Torjesen, I., 2014. Impact of polypill difficult to demonstrate from varied studies, say Cochrane
reviewers. BMJ. 348. p.g2819.
Trachte, F., Geyer, S., & Sperlich, S. (2016). Impact of physical activity on self-rated health in
older people: do the effects vary by socioeconomic status?. Journal of Public Health,
fdv198.
Travasso, C., 2015. Incentives could help delivery of essential health services by frontline
workers, study finds.
Van der Loo, G. and Blockmans, S., 2016. The Impact of Brexit on the EU’s International
Agreements. CEPS Commentary, Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels, July, 15.
Vasiljevic, A. C. (2016). A “New” Beginning For Spain. The Market Mogul.
Vasilopoulou, S. (2016). UK Euroscepticism and the Brexit Referendum. The Political
Quarterly, 87(2), 219-227.
Velasco-Forero, C.A. and Jolly, C., 2015. Operational flood forecasting in Tasmania: A series of
case studies. In 36th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium: The art and science of
water (p. 783). Engineers Australia.
Vetter, S., 2014. A future in the EU? Reconciling the" Brexit" debate with a more modern
EU. Economist. 49(69). pp.910-31787.
Vijayanand, p. , 2016. Pain education in India. Indian Journal of Pain. 30(2). pp. 77.
Vijayanand, P., (2016). Pain education in India. Indian Journal of Pain. 30(2). pp.77.
Vijayanand, P., 2016. Pain education in India. Indian Journal of Pain. 30(2). p.77.
Vockley, J.G. and Niederhuber, J.E., 2015. Diagnosis and treatment of cancer using genomics.
BMJ, 350, p. h1832.
Walsh, T., and et.al., 2014. Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on
healthcare costs and savings: systematic review. BMJ. 348. p.g188.

Warriner, J. (2016). Life after Brexit: Nurses must show the importance of tolerance in the wake
of the referendum result, says Jason Warriner. Nursing Standard, 30(47), 27-27.
Weiler, Y.A., 2017. Trump’s Inaugural Speech: Populist Prattle with Islamophobic Innuendos.
Religion.
Westcott, B., 2016. Brexit: Racist abuse in UK reported since vote to leave EU.
Wieseler, B., and et.al., 2012. Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug
trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal
publications. BMJ. 344. p.d8141.
Wise, J. (2016). The weekend effect—how strong is the evidence?. BMJ, 353, i2781.
Wolff, G.B., (2016). Europe after Brexit: A proposal for a continental partnership. Bruegel
External Publication. Brussels.
Woodcock, J., and et.al., 2014. Health effects of the London bicycle sharing system: health
impact modelling study. Bmj. 348. p.g425.
Wurzel, R. K., Connelly, J. and Liefferink, D. eds., 2016. The European Union in International
Climate Change Politics: Still Taking a Lead?. Routledge.
Zbierska, K., 2013. The amended Polish Code of Civil Law Procedure: its impact on intellectual
property enforcement litigation. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 8(2).
pp.130-135.
Online
Deduction and Induction. 2006. [Online]. Available Through:
<http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.php>. [Accessed on 20 December
2016].
Kowalczyk, D., 2013. Purposes of Research: Exploratory, Descriptive & Explanatory. [Online].
Available Through: <http://education-portal.com/academy/lesson/purposes-of-research-
exploratory-descriptive-explanatory.html#lesson>. [Accessed on 20 December 2016].

APPENDIX
1. Are you in support of Brexit?
 Yes
 No
2. Brexit has impacted global competitiveness of British businesses in positive manner
 Strongly Agree
 Agree
 Neutral
 Disagree
 Strongly Disagree
3. European Union's monetary policy was influencing economic development
 Yes
 No
4. Which factor impacts your perception in regard to abroad studies
 Quality of academic program
 Opinion of family members
 Income level of family
 Desire to understand global culture
5. Economic and social aspects has been changed in recent time due to act of BREXIT
 Strongly Agree
 Agree
 Neutral
 Disagree
 Strongly Disagree
6. Economic values of nation impacts your perception in respect to abroad studies
 Yes
 No
7. Brexit has increased the value of SAARC as compared to EU
 Strongly Agree
 Agree
 Neutral

 Disagree
 Strongly Disagree
8. Improvement in fee structure due to Brexit impacts your perception in respect to abroad
studies
 Strongly Agree
 Agree
 Neutral
 Disagree
 Strongly Disagree
9. Brexit creates positive environment that forces you to join education programs within UK.
 Strongly Agree
 Agree
 Neutral
 Disagree
 Strongly Disagree
10. Brexit impact factor related to UK economic and social development
 Fee structure
 Education program
 Cost of living
 Employment ratio
11. Changes in work environment due to Brexit Impacts the perception of Indian students'
 Yes
 No
12. Brexit is having indirect impact on
 International rates
 Tution fees
13. Brexit provides long term success to UK economy and education system
 Yes
 No
14. According to you which is one of key benefit that Indian students attain due to act of Brexit
 Low cost education

 Visa policy improvement
 Educational standards improvement
15. Changes in Visa restrictions due to application of Brexit will also provide better convenience
to Indian students
 Strongly Agree
 Agree
 Neutral
 Disagree
 Strongly Disagree