Implementation of Cloud Computing in VideoDev

VideoDev is considering moving some of its computer infrastructures into the Cloud. This presentation discusses how VideoDev can benefit from cloud computing, its deployment models, types, advantages, and differences between IaaS and PaaS. It also explores the best SDOE for VideoDev and its pros and cons.

Implementation of Cloud
Computing in VideoDev

Introduction
Video Dev provides video
and productions across
Australia and New Zealand
The cloud based system
will help in the
automation, email services
and also storage of online
files.

What is Cloud Computing
 Cloud Computing allows companies to store their confidential and
valuable data to cloud based storages using the internet and many
applications used by the company can be stored in the cloud and
used without even installing it in every computer of the organization.
 Due to the adaptation to cloud based system, the cost decreases
while the security and flexibility of the system increases.

Deployment models of cloud
computing
I. Community Clouds
II. Hybrid Clouds
III. Public Clouds
IV. Private Clouds

Types

Several aspects of Cloud Computing
 The basic concepts of cloud computing includes four main parts
which VideoDev needs to understand before implementing the
one which bests suits their purpose – Infrastructure as a Service
(IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), Software as a Service
(SaaS) and Desktop as a Service (DaaS).
 IaaS – Cloud hosting is generally done here and a computer
infrastructure, a virtualized version, is used.
 PaaS – Deployment of application testing and also support of
web-applications.
 SaaS – Deployment and testing of the softwares, usually paid
one with the use of internet.
 DaaS – Modified version of the SaaS and allows the access of
multiple applications at the same time.

Continue

Advantages of Adopting Cloud Computing
 One of the main problems with VideoDev is the failure of many
pending tasks due to the absence of adequate databases in the
company datacenters. If VideoDev moves their platform into the
clouds, the rate of their efficiency in making production and
videography development will enhanced to a biggest extent.
 Entire database and applications will be stored in the cloud servers
and as a result the staff of VideoDev can access them from anywhere
and the video processing softwares will also be updated (Almorsy,
Grundy & Müller, 2016). Along with this, the security of the data will
be maintained using cloud computing models.

• Ensures Business Continuity
• Scalability, mobility and
Flexibility
• Ensures Business Continuity
• Reduced Capital Expenditure

IaaS vs. PaaS
 IaaS – Infrastructure as a Service arrange for information, network, hardware and
equipment for the operations. The organization opting this service only needs to
maintain the hardware and all the devices to keep running the service. This will
allow the organization to work from any geographical location without even
installing any software in a system.
 PaaS – Platform as a Service delivers both the hardware and software based
support for the organization and the employees does not need to adopt or install
any software or hardware in order to access or work on any data located into the
cloud server.

•PaaS as a services are included in
the .net,linux,j2EE
IaaS are included the storage
device service (Sari, 2015).
•PaaS are Rack space cloud sites.
IaaS are cloud server
•Example is Microsoft Azure
(PaaS)
IaaS are Amazon EC2
•PaaS is the Google app engine
IaaS are attenda RT1

Dissimilarity between IaaS and PaaS

VideoDev
Organization creates video and they have almost 100 odd employees who will
adopt the change in the system.
Adopting to PaaS would solve this issue of
VideoDev and would also provide better
working opportunities for the employees.

Platform as a Service (PaaS)
 Platform as a Service provides software and hardware support to the
organization with the assistance of a third party association over the
internet.
 Platform as a Service delivers both the software and hardware based
support for the organization and the employees does not need to
adopt or install any software or hardware in order to access or work
on any data located into the cloud server

Pros and cons of PaaS
 By using the PaaS, the workers of VideoDev can get admittance
of the data anytime of the day and from anywhere and later
the price issue will also reduce by a great margin and due to
this the company can invest the funds in other business
operations. With the help of PaaS, the expansion and difficult of
original softwares that are developed can be done.
 The data is stored in a off-site which might create a case of
data security when PaaS is applied. Everything on the existing
infrastructure might not be converted into cloud based system
and hence in such case the existing framework will be stored in
other applications.

Basic Disadvantage of PaaS
• Vendor dependency
• Compatibility of infrastructure
• Risks security
• Provides PaaS
• Less flexible
• Programming model

Architectural pattern
Client infrastructure are
mainly connected to the
internet and there are two
types
• Front end
• Back end
Frontend is mainly directly
connected to the internet.
Backend mainly related to the
management and service
security as well, it is also
depends on the storage and
primary applications.

Problems with backlog
• Random task can not figure out and tasks shown in the row of
impediments.
• The total hierarchy has to be shown in the single order in the task
board
• Some small tasks are not of this part but epic tasks can not be
moved according to their status.
• Separately manages in the story points at the each level of parent
hierarchy (Almorsy, Grundy & Müller, 2016).

Best SDOE for VideoDev – Amazon Workspaces

Advantages of Standard Desktop Operating
Environment
• Upgraded easily and software ,hardware
maintain on various systems as they're unique.
• Significantly cost s are little and censored as
bulk hardware acquisitions and software
certifying can be made.
• Short connection time and low time consumed
in systems maintaince.
• Importantly upgradations and fixes can
identify on a low number of systems before
network rolling it is very much easy to maintain
the hardware and on different identical
computers.

Disadvantages of Standard Desktop Operating Environment
• Unavailability of specialist software operators.
• Needed more administrator to known about the network systems.
• User adjust it manually but it is correct or wrong they do not
understand

• Proper planning
• Defining
• Model designing
• Building
• Testing
• Deployment

SDOE delivered smart members laptop
Smart members laptops are mainly introduced in the different
cases.
Smart members of laptops are
mainly introduced in different
cases.
The state of a laptop examined
by running programs' basic
hardware and software
characteristics. DOS systems is
the nature of an area in memory
which is use to store the
programs and operating system
in a different types of
miscellaneous data.

CONCLUSION
The company is considering moving some
of its computer infrastructures into the
Cloud. They engage some advice from the
cloud computing related flexibilities and
reliabilities. This would include providing a
standard desktop to any device that their
staff may be using, as well as access to
office automation like word processing,
email, spreadsheet proficiencies, as well
as online storage for their files. The Board
wants the SDOE to be available on any
device that their staff use, whether they
are in the office, at family, or positioned at
a consumer’s office in the arena. The
main y the concept should be undertaken
from the videoDev board for this reason
they produced better quality video for the
cloud systems.

RECOMMENDATIONS
VideoDev is the famous video produce company. VideoDev
implemented their software in a PaaS systems .After using this
software VideoDev achieve some benefits.
• VedioDev company improve their productivity and develop their
business quality.
• In future VedioDev can reduced their capital expenditure in very
easily.
• Number of users also increased and VideoDev easily enhanced
their number of customer.
• Platform as a service are innovated very quickly that is the reason
this company also upgraded their service and internal systems
very easily.
• With the help of PaaS , VedioDev customized their applications
and enhanced their business productions.

REFERENCES
Tsai, W., Bai, X., & Huang, Y. (2014). Software-as-a-service (SaaS):
perspectives and challenges. Science China Information Sciences, 57(5),
1-15.
Vacca, J. R. (Ed.). (2016). Cloud computing security: foundations and
challenges. CRC Press.
Wei, J. (2014). How Wearables Intersect with the Cloud and the Internet
of Things: Considerations for the developers of wearables. IEEE
Consumer Electronics Magazine, 3(3), 53-56.
Zhao, F., Li, C., & Liu, C. F. (2014, February). A cloud computing security
solution based on fully homomorphic encryption. In 16th International
Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (pp. 485-488).
IEEE.

Singh, S., Jeong, Y. S., & Park, J. H. (2016). A survey on cloud computing
security: Issues, threats, and solutions. Journal of Network and Computer
Applications, 75, 200-222.
Soofi, A. A., Khan, M. I., Talib, R., & Sarwar, U. (2014). Security issues in
the SaaS delivery model of cloud computing. International journal of
computer science and mobile computing, 3(3), 15-21.
Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Xiong, Y., & Zhu, G. (2014). Data security and privacy in
cloud computing. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks,
10(7), 190903.
Tari, Z. (2014). Security and Privacy in Cloud Computing. IEEE Cloud
Computing, 1(1), 54-57.
Toosi, A. N., Calheiros, R. N., & Buyya, R. (2014). Interconnected cloud
computing environments: Challenges, taxonomy, and survey. ACM
Computing Surveys (CSUR), 47(1), 7.

Lalasaheb, N., & Arasanal, R. M. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,676,710.
Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Rasheed, H. (2014). Data and infrastructure security auditing in cloud
computing environments. International Journal of Information Management,
34(3), 364-368.
Rittinghouse, J. W., & Ransome, J. F. (2017). Cloud computing:
implementation, management, and security. CRC press.
Rubóczki, E. S., & Rajnai, Z. (2015). Moving towards cloud security.
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems: INDECS, 13(1), 9-14.
Sabin, J. A. (2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,789,179. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent
and Trademark Office.
Sadiku, M. N., Musa, S. M., & Momoh, O. D. (2014). Cloud computing:
opportunities and challenges. IEEE potentials, 33(1), 34-36.
Sari, A. (2015). A review of anomaly detection systems in cloud networks
and survey of cloud security measures in cloud storage applications.
Journal of Information Security, 6(02), 142.

Fehling, C., Leymann, F., Retter, R., Schupeck, W., & Arbitter, P. (2014).
Cloud computing patterns: fundamentals to design, build, and manage
cloud applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ghazizadeh, E., Zamani, M., Ab Manan, J. L., & Alizadeh, M. (2014). Trusted
computing strengthens cloud authentication. The Scientific World Journal,
2014.
Hendre, A., & Joshi, K. P. (2015, June). A semantic approach to cloud
security and compliance. In 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on
Cloud Computing (pp. 1081-1084). IEEE.
Islam, T., Manivannan, D., & Zeadally, S. (2016). Classification and
characterization of security threats in cloud computing. Int. J. Next-Gener.
Comput, 7(1).
Kavis, M. J. (2014). Architecting the Cloud: design decisions for cloud
computing service models (SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS). John Wiley & Sons.
Khalil, I., Khreishah, A., & Azeem, M. (2014). Cloud computing security: A
survey. Computers, 3(1), 1-35.
Krishna, B. H., Kiran, S., Murali, G., & Reddy, R. P. K. (2016). Security issues
in the service model

Berger, S., Goldman, K., Pendarakis, D., Safford, D., Valdez, E., &
Zohar, M. (2015, March). Scalable attestation: A step toward secure
and trusted clouds. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud
Engineering (pp. 185-194). IEEE.
Chang, D. Y., Benantar, M., Chang, J. Y. C., & Venkataramappa, V.
(2014). U.S. Patent No. 8,769,622. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office.
Choi, C., Choi, J., & Kim, P. (2014). Ontology-based access control
model for security policy reasoning in cloud computing. The Journal of
Supercomputing, 67(3), 711-722.
Esposito, C., Castiglione, A., Martini, B., & Choo, K. K. R. (2016). Cloud
manufacturing: security, privacy, and legal concerns. IEEE Cloud
Computing, 3(4), 16-22.

Ali, M., Khan, S. U., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2015). Security in cloud
computing: Opportunities and challenges. Information sciences, 305,
357-383.
Aljawarneh, S. A., Alawneh, A., & Jaradat, R. (2017). Cloud security
engineering: Early stages of SDLC. Future Generation Computer
Systems, 74, 385-392.
Almorsy, M., Grundy, J., & Müller, I. (2016). An analysis of the cloud
computing security problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.01107.
Bacon, J., Eyers, D., Pasquier, T. F. M., Singh, J., Papagiannis, I., &
Pietzuch, P. (2014). Information flow control for secure cloud
computing. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management,
11(1), 76-89.
Baron, H., Heide, S., Mahmud, S., & Yeoh, J. (2019). Cloud Security
Complexity: Challenges in Managing Security in Hybrid and Multi-
Cloud Environments.

THANK
YOU