This article explores the implications of the meaning of behavior with a focus on the concept of love. It discusses the philosophical questions of free will versus determinism and mind-brain problem in relation to love. The article also reviews two discussions on nature versus nurture and interest as examples of behavior.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: Implications of the meaning of behavior IMPLICATIONS OF THE MEANING OF BEHAVIOR
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1 Implications of the meaning of behavior There can be several implications regarding the concept of behavior. I have chosen the concept of love as one of the implications of behavior as a concept. For that reason, I have selected free will versus determinism and mind-brain problem as the two philosophical questions in order to explain love. According to Stenberg’s triangular theory of love, love includes three factors such as Intimacy, passion, commitment. The need of love for human species relies on four basic needs to be alive that are the need of Survival, socialization, affirmation, procreation. There are certain criteria for identifying true love such as physical abuse cannot be there if love is there in a relationship. On the other hand, it can be assumed that people show Positive behavior if someone likes them. One of the significant philosophical issues regarding human behavior is the conflict between free will and determinism. Free will is a kind of belief that every behavior is an outcome of independent decisions taken by individuals. The concept of love is related to this issue as two people are in love because they decide independently to be in love. On the other hand, determinism states that every behavior has definite and measurable cause behind it. In the context of love, this can be said that if someone loves a person then certainly there must be some reasons for falling in love with that person. On the other hand, mind-brain problem is another philosophical question that has two views including monism and dualism. Monism supports the idea that physical brain is inseparable from conscious experience while Dualism believes that mind is the all powerful element in human beings that controls not only the brain but also each part of the body and is not inseparable from brain. In this regard, this can be said that love can be defined from both the views. From the perspective of dualism, it can be said that love does not happen after calculating the outcomes of being in love with a particular person but when it happens both the physical and emotional aspects of a human being. Moreover, after love consumes a person, the senses of brain and mind get mixed up and inseparable.
2 Implications of the meaning of behavior Discussion review 1.The first discussion has chosen nature versus nurture and free will versus determinism as two philosophical questions. The concept of both the questions can be well understood from this discussion. On the contrary, it is not clear from the discussion what implication or example of behavior has been chosen for this. It can be assumed that may be the student chose Anger as an example of explaining behavior but even if that is the chosen example then the whole argument lacks centrality. This is so because the explanation of both the questions cannot be traced back to the concept of anger as it seems that the topic is about those two questions and not about anger itself. Moreover, it has been found that the world view of a person depends on these questions whereas the definition of anger as a part of human behavior could not be perceived from this discussion. 2.In this discussion, interest has been chosen as an example for explaining what behavior is. For that reason, interest has been defined precisely and it has been mentioned that interest is related to motivation of a person regarding something or something. Free will versus determinism and nature versus nurture have been chosen to explain interest further. This discussion holds the belief that interest of a person can depend on certain factors such choice, personal abilities and on the environment where that person grew up. These factors trace back to concepts of both the philosophical issues and thus it has been established that interest can be well defined from the perspective of both of them. In this context, it can be said that human interest might be better understood from mind-brain problem rather than nature versus nurture issue as interest can well be defined more precisely from the perspective of the mind brain problem.