logo

Tort Negligence: Extortionate PLC - Case Study Analysis

7 Pages1897 Words53 Views
   

Added on  2023-01-11

About This Document

This report analyzes a case study on tort negligence involving Extortionate PLC, highlighting the explanation of tort and duty of care, different ethical concerns for the banking sector, and the liability of Extortionate PLC for Samantha's injury. It also discusses defending points for Extortionate PLC.

Tort Negligence: Extortionate PLC - Case Study Analysis

   Added on 2023-01-11

ShareRelated Documents
BUSINESS LAW AND
ETHICS
Tort Negligence: Extortionate PLC - Case Study Analysis_1
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................2
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................2
Explanation of Trot and Duty of Care........................................................................................2
Different ethical concern for Banking sector..............................................................................3
Doctrine of tort consider whether Extortionate PLC is liable for Samantha’s injury.................3
Defending point for Extortionate PLC........................................................................................4
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6
1
Tort Negligence: Extortionate PLC - Case Study Analysis_2
INTRODUCTION
Trot is a civil wrong which used to cause someone a loss or the harm. This report used to
highlights the case study of “Trot negligence: Extortionate PLC”. This report highlights
explanation of trot and duty of care. After that the report highlights point on which Extortionate
PLC is liable for Samantha’s injury. In the end the report explain different ethical consideration
and point on which Extortionate PLC can defend their case.
MAIN BODY
Explanation of Trot and Duty of Care
Tort is generally define as a civil wrong which used to cause someone a loss or the harm
due to ignorance of responsibility by the other party. Not only that there are many other thing
which are also included in the tort such as infliction of the emotional negligence, financial losses,
injuries and many more. In UK there is a tort law which used to safeguard the different civil
remedies in the context of damages and criminal law (Bermingham, and Brennan,2018). Also,
this law used to punish the individual who is generally involved in such type of the activity in the
nation. Tortfeasor is the name given to the individual who looks to commit any unlawful activity
in the term of Trot Law. There are two type of trot which is governed by the trot that is crimes
and legal injury. Crimes hear not only means any activity related to the cause of the legal, any
negligence is also treated as a crime in the eye of the Trot law. At the same time legal injury
overhear not only restricted to the physical injury, it can be any injury which is related to the
emotion of the individual or the reputation hurt of the individual. Individual who is being
suffering from any of the criminal or legal injury is liable to get remedies over the same (Wright,
2017).
Care of duty is generally define as a legal obligation which is generally applied on
individual who is requiring a standard of reasonable in the care of the act which can harm other
in the organization (Palombo, 2019). Care of the Duty is one of the element which is consider, is
care of duty has been prohibited or not and on the basis of the same different activity are being
planned. As the first thing which has to be prove by the claimant in the court is that Tortfeasor
has not able to follow the duty of the care at the place where incident has been taken place. Duty
of the care must be imposed by the law but at the same time need to be related to some manner.
Duty of the care also used to form as a social contact.
2
Tort Negligence: Extortionate PLC - Case Study Analysis_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Business Ethics and Law
|7
|1921
|54

Tort and the Duty of Care in Business Law
|7
|2015
|95

Tort and Duty of Care in Business Law
|8
|1850
|78

Tort Law and Duty of Care: Liability of Extortionate Plc for Injury of Samantha
|7
|1830
|39

Tort of Negligence: Explaining Meaning, Duty of Care, and Extortionate Plc's Liability
|7
|1854
|84

Duty of Care and Tort Laws
|11
|3789
|57