Legal Rules on Implied Terms in Sale of Goods and Supply of Services
Verified
Added on 2023/01/06
|10
|3763
|67
AI Summary
This document analyzes and advises on the legal rules and statutory provisions related to the sale of goods and supply of services. It discusses implied terms, transfer of property and possession, and buyer and seller remedies. The document also explores the concept of product liability for faulty goods.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Individual project
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................3 MAIN BODY.......................................................................................................................................3 Q1 Analysing and advising Mr John upon the legal rules on implied terms associated with the sale of goods and supply of services...............................................................................................3 Q2 Analysing and advising Mr John upon the statutory provisions on the transfer of property and possession........................................................................................................................................4 Q3 Evaluating the statutory provisions upon buyer and seller remedies related with sale of goods contract............................................................................................................................................6 Q4 Product Liability statutory provision for faulty goods...............................................................8 CONCLUSION....................................................................................................................................9
INTRODUCTION Business law which is also referred to as the body of law which in turn tends to govern the business and is referred to as the branch of business or civil law which tends to deal with the issue associated with the public and private law. It is significant in regulating corporate contracts and sales of consumer goods. The present study will analyse and also give advice on implied terms relating to the sale of goods and supply of services. Also, statutory provisions associated with the transfer of property and possession will be analysed. Moreover, statutory provisions upon buyer and seller remedies related with sale of goods contract. Lastly, product liability statutory provision related with faulty goods will be applied. MAIN BODY Q1 Analysing and advising Mr John upon the legal rules on implied terms associated with the sale of goods and supply of services. Sale of Goods Act 1979, is considered to be as an act of parliament of UK which has been significantly regulated by the UK commercial law and the English contract law in relation with the goods that has been sold and bought. The key purpose of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, is that it tends to regulate the sale of the goods which has been bought and sold within UK and the associated binding contract between both the parties (Aboukdir, 2016). The contract of sales tends to demonstrate that, the transfer of the property from the seller to the buyer is consummated through money transaction. Section 14(3) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, has an implied term associated with the sale of goods and supply of services is that, seller has significant level of right to sell the goods. The implied set of condition reflected on seller's part is that, he hasright to sell the goods and upon agreement the seller has the right to sell goods on the the specified time (McKendrick, 2020). As in the specific case scenario, Mr John was informed by the seller that, the TV set will be delivered to his place within 3 upcoming working days. Mr. John and the departmental store are under a contract. This is because essential element associated with the sale of good act is present in this specific case. In this case, Mr. John has made an offer to departmental store and the store has accepted the offer. Mr. John has the intention to purchase the specific television set, likewise, departmental store has intention to sell the product. However, Mr John and manager are under capacity. Another implied condition is associated with thesale by description: There seems to be a contract associated with the sale of goods by the description. However, there seems to be an implied condition that, the goods must correspond with the product description. The good needs to be of
high satisfactory quality and must comply with the legal terms and requirements. As in the specific case scenario, the TV set was described to be as ofhigh quality, good value for money and durable and the same has been mentioned on the TV set. Section 14 of the Sales of goods Act, 1979 tends to hasimplied terms associated with the quality and fitness. This states, when the seller sell goods within the specific business course, there seems to implied set of term that the goods which has been supplied within contract are of highly satisfactory quality. The goods which in turn has been found faulty within the period of 6 months from the day product has been brought. Then the trader has considered to have breached the contract of law with consumer (Explain the Implied Conditions and Warranties in a Contract of Sale of Goods,2020).The good bought by the customer must be fit for the main purpose it has been bought. As in the specific case scenario, the television has stopped to work within 3 weeks of purchase. So it will be implied that, the television set which has been bought by Mr. John is considered to be faulty from day of purchase and need to replace or repair the television set even if the contractual document has been signed and ensures there seems to be no responsibility for malfunctioning of goods which has been once supplied and installed.The main purpose of this act is to maintain appropriate condition and the quality of the good is fit for all the purposes, appear and look good, free from minor defects, safe and durable. Q2 Analysing and advising Mr John upon the statutory provisions on the transfer of property and possession. Statutory provision are various rules and regulation that are made by parliament on basis of court decision and written constitution. It is written in particular documents that content laws related to specific subject or specific nature. There are various statutory provision on transfer of property and possession of goods in the above case study of Mr John and Miss Sarah. Such as: As per section 16– Goods must be ascertained thus it illustrated that goods or services can only be transferred from one person to another when good exchanged are clearly specified. Such as in case of Mr john, Miss Sarah has specified that TV set is “ very high quality, durable and goods are value for money. So, the good exchange in above case were ascertained so there is transfer of goods from Miss Sarah to Mr john (Hawes and Twigg-Flesner, 2018). Section 17-This section states that property can passed when both parties are intended or agreed to sells and buy products or services at specific rates to satisfy their respective requirements. It also specific that good needs to be delivered at particular time specific by person that is purchasing good. Both parties should have intention to purchase and sells goods, at the same time agreed to all terms and condition, code of conduct. Like in case of Mr john, both party were ready to purchase
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
and sells at specific rates and John has signed or agreed to term and condition and code of conducts. Section 18-This sections contain 5 rules that specifies intention of parties at time of exchange of products and services or when goods are transferred from seller or buyer. Rule 1:This rules state when there is unconditional contract then the ascertained good will be sold at time of contract made between two parties. Therefore, in case of Mr john the contract was signed by him at time of installation of TV set which acts as proofthat everything was okay at time the TV was installed. It clearly stated that there will be no responsibility of faulty TV after delivery of products to customers. Rule 2:In this rule there is contract between parties, so seller is bound or forced to delivered goods to users in specific manners as prescribed by him. Thus, property will passed when all crucial steps are taken by sellers to deliver goods to end users (Sale of Goods Act 1979, 2020). Such as miss Sarah has delivered goods to Mr John house with next three next working days as specified before delivery of products. Rule 3:The seller is bound to measure, test and weigh ascertained goods in order to determined prices of good exchanged at the same time all these needs to be noticed by the individual to whom goods are passed. Therefore, department stores after installation of TV set have informed Mr john that it is working well and then it signed the document that clearly stated that everything was okay (Møllmann, 2016). Rule 4:All terms such as sales, return need to be approved by buyers at time goods are sold thus in case it does not specify its approval and retained goods without prior notice of rejection or time period for return of goods. So, Mr john has approved by signing on document that state that department stores will not be responsible for any fault in future circumstances thus there is no option of reject. Rule 5: Whether it is unconditional or unascertained goods, the property or ownership needs to be transferred to buyer thus the assent may be either implied or expressed. As per rule 5 good were ascertained or it was clearly specified by Mr john type of TV it wants to fulfil its requirements, but they were unconditional (Hunter and et.al., 2020). So the ownership of TV set transferred from Miss Sarah to Mr John. Section 19- Reservation of Right of disposal 1)In case of valid contract between buyers and sellers of specific goods the title of transferred of good will be given to buyer only when all duties or steps or measure have been taken by sellers. Thus, title of goods is not transmitted until all condition specified by buyers are fulfilled.
2)Goods may also deliver through shipping, so title of goods is transferred at time goods have been taken by buyer (Transfer of Title, 2020). Therefore, there was valid contract between Mr John and Miss Sarah and all steps were taken by department store to delivered goods so title of good transferred from Sarah (Seller) to Mr john (buyer). Section 20:It clearly states that as soon goods are delivered to end users the associate risk with good is also transferred to buyer. This section has clearly stated amount of quantity or specific amount to which sellers is responsible for sending damage goods to other users. Thus, all associated cost of damage, harm to TV set would be bear by Mr John as department stores have delivered goods to him in good condition as specified. Q3 Evaluating the statutory provisions upon buyer and seller remedies related with sale of goods contract. Rights of unpaid seller in sales of goods act This is when the buyer of the goods foes not clear the dues to seller. Here, the seller tends to become an unpaid seller. The seller tends to have certain set of rights in comparison to buyer. However, such rights are the remedy of seller against breach of contract by buyer. Seller's remedies against the buyer The remedies to the seller is not only dependent upon the the acceptance whether the buyer accepts goods or not. In case of breach, the contract for which seller is entitled is incidental to damages, sue for fraud and may also sue the third party for any tort (Bridge, 2019). Suit for price As per section 55 of the Sales of good Act, when the party is under contract and buyer refuses to pay for goods in accordance with the term of contract. However, the seller has the right to sue the person for price of goods. Damages for non- acceptance This is when the buyer tends to refuse or wrongfully neglect to pay or accept for the goods and services. This way seller may sue the person for damages associated with non- acceptance. Buyer's remedy against the seller Damages for non- delivery Section 57 is when the seller refuse or wrongfully neglect to deliver goods to buyer . Hence, in this
case the buyer may sue the person for damages associated with non- delivery (Airen and Omo, 2020). The measure associated with the damages is considered to be loss and naturally leads to the breach of contract. Remedy associated with the breach of warranty Section 59 of the Sales of goods act is linked with the breach of warranty on the part of sellers or where the buyer is elected to treatbreach of condition on part of sellers. The buyer can sue for damages associated with the breach of warranty. Specific performance Section 58 of the Sales of goods act, is useful in providing equitable relief which has been granted by court in order to effectively enforce contractual set of obligation between parties. It is considered to be useful in providing equitable set of remedies for the specific performance. The consumer has been benefited by the additional set of rights under sales of goods act, 1979. It is mainly associated with the repair and replacement. Section 48B (1) of Sales of good Act 1979 repair or replacement is associated with the sale of goods act, 1979 the repair or replacement of the goods is given to the customer within the reasonable period of time. This is to be done without causing any significant set of inconvenience to buyer (ENAKIRERU and Airen, 2020). Also, the party needs to bear any sort of necessary cost which in turn has been incurred at the time of cost of labour, material and etc. Section 48 C (1) of Sales of good Act 1979 is linked with the reduction of price. As per this, the seller has to reduce the price of goods in case he has not replaced or repaired the goods because it has been considered disproportionate to carry out such practice. Section 48 C (2) of Sales of good Act 1979 is linked with the rescission of contract. This is associated with the sale of contract upon pre- contractual position where the buyer tends to return the product back to the seller and he seller in return gives back the purchase price. Remedy for Mr. John Mr. John has made full payment to the seller and has the right to effectively recover the expenses which has been paid for the TV set. Mr. John can also recover for the damages in the case the goods has not been delivered. Mr. John has to obtain order in case of specific performance. Mr. John also has the right to recover for liquidated damages. Remedy of seller
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
If the seller knows that, the buyer has become insolvent and he has the right to stop goods within transit. The seller also has the right to significantly cancel order of buyer. The seller has the right to effectively recover goods in case the buyer has not been making payment. The seller also needs to obtain order for the specific performance. Q4 Product Liability statutory provision for faulty goods Defective products are goods or raw material, component that are damaged or having limitation in terms of qualitative and quantity that cause harm or damage to customer. Key individual that are responsible for defective products are supplier, manufacture and distributors of goods to end users (Collins, 2016).There are several rules related to product liability or products liability statutory provision that can be illustrated as follows: Consumer protection act Contract Tort Individual that claim for following act need to prove that products or good exchanged were defective in nature, caused harm to users and defendant in under liability to pay for losses that have to be suffered by customer. As per consumer protection Act:This laws strictly emphasis that liability for all damages lies with manufacture of products or goods and services. Consumer protection act is made to protect people from various fraudulent practices promoted or performed by sellers with an motive to earn huge profit margin. So, in other words, no efforts need to be made by customers to prove that the fault in damage is caused by manufacture itself and it has to pay fine. Instead of that it needs to give evidence with regard to that products were deflective, they caused harm or loss to him (Consumer Protection Act 1987). Like in case of Mr john, The TV set that it have purchased was damage or defective as it was stopped working within time frame of 3 weeks after installation. Therefore, as per consumer protection act, buyer need to be paid for all losses that it have suffered due to mistakes of manufacture. Contract act: It is an agreement between two parties that stated roles, responsibilities and obligation need to be fulfilled by each individual for valid contract. It clearly stated that parties that will bear losses in case of any damage or deflect cause in goods that are exchanged. Similar in case of Miss Sarah and department stores has clearly specify that it would not be responsible for any
damage that is caused after delivery of TV set. Tort Law:This law covers most civil suits and covers areas such as wrong done to some individual or provides remedies that can be available for wrong act. Thus, the intent of Tort law is to provide full compensation of damage or harm or loss caused to person. So, buyers needs to prove that sellers is under liability for breaching of contract of performing specific duties or responsibilities. Due to its negligences and unreasonable care customers have to bear huge losses or harm so it need to pay for amount for which it has caused loss (Hunter and et.al., 2020). Thus, it can be stated that Miss Sarah have to pay for losses that are suffered by Mr john because of negligences of Miss Sarah as it sold defective or damage TV set that stop working in 3 weeks only. CONCLUSION From the above report it can be concluded that business law are made in order to regulate, monitors and control operation so that desired outcome can be achieved. Sales of good and supply of services is one such law that is made by government to control process related to sales, transfer or deliver of products to end customers. There are several statutory provision that need to be abided by sellers and buyer both in time of acquisition and transfer of resources for smooth operation of business. So, various alternative remedies discussed above can be used by both seller and buyer in case of sales of contract act to resolve their respective disputes. It has been learned and analysed from above report that sellers need to take crucial steps to protect interest of consumers so that it can be satisfied and happy.At last, it can be concluded that there are numerous laws related to products or faulty goods such as consumer act, contract and tort law which can be used to resolved dispute among two different parties.
REFERENCES Books and journals Aboukdir, A., 2016. The timing of the passing of property and risk under the English Sale of Goods Act 1979, the CISG and the Libyan law–the interplay between the principle of party autonomy and the default rule. Airen, A .I. and Omo, E. E., 2020. THE NATURE OF TRANSFER OF RISK IN SALE OF GOODS CONTRACTS-A CRITICAL ANALYSIS.Journal of Commercial and Property Law,7(1). Bridge, M., 2019. Risk, property and bulk goods in international sales.Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly. Collins, H., 2016. Is a relational contract a legal concept?. ENAKIRERU, E.O. and Airen, A.I., 2020. THE NATURE OF TRANSFER OF RISK IN SALE OF GOODSCONTRACTS:ACRITICAL ANALYSIS.TheNnamdiAzikiweUniversity Journal of Commercial and Property Law,7(1). Hawes, C. and Twigg-Flesner, C., 2018. Sales and guarantees. InHandbook of Research on International Consumer Law, Second Edition. Edward Elgar Publishing. Hunter, H. O and et.al., 2020. The Duty of Good Faith and Security of Performance'(1993).Journal of Contract Law,19. McKendrick, E. ed., 2020.Sale of Goods. Taylor & Francis. Møllmann, A., 2016.Delivery of goods under bills of lading. Taylor & Francis. Sagaert, V. and Gruyaert, D., 2017. Retention of Title or the Transfer of Ownership in a Slideway: Ownership in Adultery?.European Review of Private Law,25(2). Online ConsumerProtectionAct1987,[ONLINE].Available through:<https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/43>. Explain the Implied Conditions and Warranties in a Contract of Sale of Goods. 2020.[ONLINE]. Availablethrough<https://www.owlgen.in/explain-briefly-the-implied-conditions-and- warranties-in-a-contract-of-sale-of-goods/> SaleofGoodsAct1979,2020,[ONLINE].Availablethrough: <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/54>. Transfer of Title, 2020,[ONLINE]. Available through:<https://www.toppr.com/guides/business- laws/the-sale-of-goods-act-1930/transfer-of-title/>.