Industrial Psychology: Theory, Practice, and Future Directions

Verified

Added on  2022/12/12

|5
|972
|217
Report
AI Summary
This report delves into the critical discourse surrounding the balance between theory and practice in industrial psychology. It examines the significance of a strong theoretical foundation and its practical implementation, drawing upon research that highlights the existing gap between the two. The report explores the historical context, current debates, and potential future directions within the field, referencing key publications and research findings. It highlights the importance of aligning theoretical understanding with real-world applications to address workplace challenges effectively. The report also analyzes the acquisition of knowledge and the philosophical underpinnings of the field, concluding with recommendations for strengthening the integration of theory and practice through education and research.
Document Page
Running head: INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY
INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY: THEORY AND PRACTICE
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author note
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
1INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Industrial
psychology
Scientific
enquiry
Problem
Solving
A good theory of
industrial
psychology is
backed by
A good practice in
industrial
psychology is
backed by
Extensive and
purposeful
sampling
Large scale
identification
of issues
Large scale
implementation
of practical
understanding
of theory
Well educated
and trained
practitioners
Scores of research into the
domain of industrial psychology
has highlighted the significance
of theory in the field establishing
the need for a strong theoretical
understanding of work
psychology and an equally
signified implementation
practically (Augustyn & Cille,
2008)
However, recent interventions
have shown that the importance
that is provided to practical
applications is overshadowed by
the amount of priority that is
provided to the establishment of
a theoretical and academic base
(Augustyn & Cille, 2008).
Background
Based within the field
of psychology, the
characteristics of
human affairs are
entailed by
Personal behaviour,
thought and emotion
Difference in exhibition
of behaviour, thought
and action.
Situational factors
influencing
exhibition
Interaction
between the
two
Good
Theory:
Describes
Explains
Predicts
Good practice:
Bases
implementation
on good theory
to modify
Problematic
Behaviour
Document Page
2INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Theory and practice in Industrial Psychology: Quo vadis? – A summary
This article is focused on the theoretically and practically existing viewpoints,
opinions and practices in the field of industrial and organisational psychology. While
on one hand, the practical implementations of this field has multi-variate implications
that can be positively explored to understand in depth the psychological problems
and relevant solutions extant in the workplace, on the other, the implications are
drowned by the overwhelming theoretical importance that is provided to the field in
terms of academic priority and literary discussions and debates (Augustyn & Cille,
2008). The authors of this paper highlight that with the current pace of the work and
the mismatched priorities being provided, there are high probabilities that the field
would soon serve the purpose of simply filling the academic and theoretical space
kept reserved for it while the spotlight from its practical applications continue to dim.
While highlighting the objective of the paper as attempting to revitalise the debate
between the theory and the practice that exists within the field of industrial
psychology, the authors resort to previously published papers for support, reaching
the conclusion that all contemporary publications highlight the mammoth gap
between the theoretical underpinnings and the practical applications in the field of
industrial psychology (Dunnette, 1990,).
The backdrop of this paper is based on the notion of publication as a
replacement for the lack of viable practical implementations. The authors highlight
the predominance of the academic focus that is being provided to the field while the
practitioners in industrial psychology continue to be reluctant in their task, forgetting
the significance of the prospect and delimiting their efforts to more publications
(Augustyn & Cille, 2008). In all this, the takeaway that is gathered is that the authors,
Document Page
3INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY
in their attempts at rejuvenating this field has deemed the impotency of applied
industrial psychology as the key highlight of contemporary research based focus and
that the only way to mask this drawback is to provide more data and information
rather than implementing some of them practically.
The paper further highlights that the crucial requirement currently is the
application of the theoretical understanding in a practical situation from today’s
perspective instead of irrelevant assumptions from the past (Landy & Conte, 2004). It
acknowledges firstly, the richness of the data and information that yesterday’s
research provides us with but also indicate that the clear discrepancy between the
science and the practice needs to be the first issue to be addressed. Secondly the
issue of the debate between the well-developed industrial psychology paradigms
need to be evaluated in terms of the relevance of them in practice (Augustyn & Cille,
2008). Thirdly, the difference between a good scientific theory and a good
managerial theory is discussed in terms of their contemporary relevance (Klimosky,
1992). While providing further discussions on the acquisition of knowledge and the
philosophical backdrop of the field, the paper concludes by establishing the
understanding that the field can benefit with proper schooling of students and
academics in practice while re-establishing the theoretical background of the
practitioner by engaging them more in academic studies.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
4INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY
References
Augustyn, J. C., & Cillie, G. G. (2008). Theory and practice in Industrial Psychology:
Quo vadis?. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 34(1), 70-75.
Dunnette, M.D. (1990). Blending the science and practice of industrial psychology:
Where are we and where are we going? In M.D. Dunnette & L. Hough (1990),
Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Volume 1 (Second
edition). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Klimoski, R. (1992). Industrial and organizational psychology: The interface between
theory and practice. Unpublished presidential address presented at the
annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational
Psychology, Montreal. Spring 1992.
Landy, F.J. & Conte, J.M. (2004). Work in the 21st century: An introduction to
industrial and organizational psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Riggio, R. E. (2017). Introduction to industrial/organizational psychology. Routledge.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 5
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]