This report discusses the rights to privacy and the impact of surveillance and monitoring on these rights. It explores the violation of privacy laws by the government and organizations, and the influence of surveillance on individuals' personal lives.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: Information Confidentiality REPORT ON INFORMATION CONFIDENTIALITY Name of the Student Name of the University Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1Rights to Privacy Individual’s right to privacy: The rights to privacy stand to represent the rights of an individual to take personal decision without any interruption of the government laws and regulation. In simple words the Right to privacy protects the fundamental rights of an individuals from the governmental surveillance and threats. The privacy right of an individual includes to secure the personal aspects, papers and relationship with the existing population. As an example getting married and taking divorce is a choice of an individual, thus as per the rules of Rights to privacy there will be no interruption by the government. However, the surveillance to those private information and activities by the government as well as the private sectors has made a significant impact on the individual’s life (Milanovic 2015). Impact of advance surveillance and monitoring on the rights to privacy: ConsideringtheaspectsofRightstoprivacy,ithasbeenobservedthatthe surveillance as well as monitoring process by the government in order to analyse the activities of the human has intended to violate the primary objective of Rights of Privacy (Polonetsky & Tene 2013). From the analysis of several studies in has been noticed that in the country like United States the government has allowed the monitoring and surveillance techniqueslikevideomonitoringsystem,listingandrecordingthephonecallsand conversation as well as the biometric monitoring system, which actions are entirely violating the laws of Right to Privacy. As the implementation of these surveillance and monitoring system interrupt the personal conversation and private issues it can be stated that the
2Rights to Privacy government laws has violated the privacy law which was developed to maintain the privacy of individuals (Fuchs 2013). Influence of organization on its employ rights to privacy: Along with the actions which has been taken by the government in order to monitor the activities of the citizen, it has been noticed by the analysis of the organizational working process and their employment process the organizations are opted to analyse the social media as well as personal information in order to determine the nature of that employ. However, this process way adopted to provide most preferable work environment to the employ, this action has violated the law of Right to Privacy. Along with that most of the organization has implemented the biometrics in which it analyses the particular physical part of the worker’s, however followed by the rules of individual’s rights to privacy, any individual has the right to protest against this action (Flaherty 2014). Along, with that the analysis of big data related to the social media activities, personal conversation of the employs as well as the customers the organizations are enhancing their decision making approach (Ajunwa, Crawford & Schultz 2017). Whereas, analysing any individuals personal data for any personal benefit is entirely against the Rights to Privacy. Thus, it can be stated that however there are several aspects related to the privacy concern of an individual has been covered in the law of Rights to Privacy, government of United States has violated most of the regulation in order to determine the crime scenario,
3Rights to Privacy industrial improvement as well as the development of the country by the surveillance to those actions of the citizens. Reference: Ajunwa, I., Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2017). Limitless worker surveillance.Calif. L. Rev.,105, 735. Flaherty, D. H. (2014).Protecting privacy in surveillance societies: The federal republic of Germany, Sweden, France, Canada, and the United States. UNC Press Books. Fuchs, C. (2013). Societal and ideological impacts of deep packet inspection internet surveillance.Information, Communication & Society,16(8), 1328-1359. Milanovic, M. (2015). Human rights treaties and foreign surveillance: Privacy in the digital age.Harv. Int'l LJ,56, 81. Polonetsky, J., & Tene, O. (2013). Privacy and big data: making ends meet.Stan. L. Rev. Online,66, 25.