Information System Homework Solution: AI in Education and Tech

This assignment solution addresses two exercises related to information systems and AI. The first exercise examines the challenges of offensive words in spell checkers and the trade-offs between censorship and user experience, discussing solutions like bit-level word restriction and the limitations of handwriting recognition. The second exercise focuses on a Tablet PC-based system designed to support active learning in computer science courses. It details the system's implementation, where students use tablets to solve problems and submit solutions wirelessly, which instructors then review and display. The paper highlights the benefits of collaborative learning, viewpoint diversity, and real-time feedback. The provided bibliography includes relevant sources on writing abstracts, reviewing papers, and using literature reviews.

Running head: INFORMATION SYSTEM
INFORMATION SYSTEM
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

INFORMATION SYSTEM 1
Exercise 1:
The shipping of the commercial products that contain a lexicon leads to the new as
well as somewhat responsibilities that are unexpected. One of the major issues which has
required the important debates and thoughts are offensive words. The consumer community
views some of the words like patently offensive. It has been obtained by the Microsoft team
that the lexicon from spellchecker that contains many of the offensive terms unfortunately.
The spellchecker has the ability to mark each of the incidents that are related to any of the
offensive terms that are misspelled that might lead for ridiculing as well as becomes also a
form of the censorship. However, if there needs to add words to the lexicon of the
spellchecker at the time someone misspells the some of the same words there is the chance
that an offensive word could show up in list of the corrections that are suggested. These
problems are avoided by the spell-checker with the addition of one single bit/ word. For the
handwriting recogniser, his life is not so much easy. This is not having the ability to perform
two jobs. This can just give the outputs of the possible recognitions into the list of top ten for
displaying in the writer window. Whether, this can mark one word as restricted, the
recogniser of the handwriting is not able to use this, the reason behind this is, at any of the
time the constitutes can offer this as one recognition. Thus, the one and only solution that is
for removing the word that is from the lexicon. A randomly selected 1000 words has been
filtered by the Microsoft teams, covering scatological and sexual terms, ethnic and racial
slurs as well as blasphemy. The reason behind this is an out of the dictionary system can be
supported by the lexicon for covering the things as part foreign names, numbers and so on.
The consumers are able to write still the terms that are offensive, however they have to
handprint them so neatly. All of that has been removed actually is support to the sloppy
cursive writing of the terms that are offensive.

2INFORMATION SYSTEM
Exercise 2:
1. In the paper, “Preliminary Experiences with a Tablet PC Based System” the authors
have demonstrated that there was so much research on the advantages of the
collaborative and active learning as well as on the use of this in the courses related to
the computer science. As the classroom related innovations become much prevalent,
this is natural for developing systems which can support the utilizations of the
techniques. The authors have developed a kind of a system as the extension for the
classroom presenter as well as to another system that is tablet PC based. The that
system the students or the group of students can be equipped with the tablet pc based
computers as well as at different points at the time of lecture, the students are asked
for solving one problem or respond to the questions. The students can respond
through writing the solutions of them on their tablet as well as submitting that
wirelessly to the instructor. After that the instructor can review the responses of the
students, then they can select one or even more students for displaying to the classes
as well the annotated responses. The responses of the students can also be saved for
reviewing after the lecture that was given by the instructor or even it can be made
electronically available to the pupils. In this paper the authors have also described the
system as well as their experiences while using the systems into two classes
(Computer Ethics and CSI) at the University of San Diego in Fall 2003. The authors
have also implemented extension for the Presenter that is known also as the student
submission that enables the pupils to equip with the Tablet PCs for contributing to as
well as for participating in the lecture. The submission of the students can be captured
as separate slides on the machines of the instructor as well as can be previewed and
displayed selectively to the class.

3INFORMATION SYSTEM
2. Thus it can be concluded that, in general the benefits that could be derived by using
active learning and the unique use of it in the classes of computer science is
thoroughly discussed in this research scope. The technology developers, instructors of
computer science and the students are placed uniquely in such a position that they
could adopt the required technology to support the class room active learning. Such
system was developed and implemented to express the early experience. Though the
deployment that was done in initial phase was small enough, but it was able to support
collaborative and active learning in the classroom of computer science. With the help
of this system, students got the capabilities to deal with the general mistakes and in
response came up with a wide array of solutions for the same as well as different
issues, the advantage of the rich environment was also taken to express their thinking,
and got benefits from the activities of the instance. When students take part in those
activities by attending a lecture, there is a chance of sharing their ideas and thinking
with the whole class by asking him to write down his solution on the board or to show
off using projectors. The happening of the solution share can offer a number of
benefits. The students get re-assurance by observing others whom are committing
similar type of mistake and get enlightened by observing the others who are coming
up with elegant and particular solution. Asking different students to expose their
solutions helps them to get familiar with viewpoint diversity and avail a platform to
compare the approaches, which are related to same problem. The same case serves the
teacher as well, through give him the opportunity to assess the student’s
understanding related to that particular topic. This paper describes about a system that
is Tablet PC-based that ensures the collaborative and active learning in the classroom
of computer science. In this research procedure all the instructors and students were
provided with a laptop, and at the spell of lecture any of the students were asked to

4INFORMATION SYSTEM
come up with solution to the problem or to note down their answer on the tablet. Then
the submitted responses of the students were displayed to the class by the instructor.

5INFORMATION SYSTEM
Bibliography:
Andrade, C. (2011). How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference
presentation. Indian journal of psychiatry, 53(2), 172.
Benos, D. J., Kirk, K. L., & Hall, J. E. (2003). How to review a paper. Advances in
physiology education, 27(2), 47-52.
Greenhalgh, T. (1997). How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic
reviews and meta-analyses). Bmj, 315(7109), 672-675.
Simon, B., Anderson, R., Hoyer, C., & Su, J. (2004). Preliminary experiences with a tablet
PC based system to support active learning in computer science courses. ACM
SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(3), 213-217.
Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal
of the royal society of medicine, 99(4), 178-182.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a
literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.