Case Study: Peter Mitchell

INIDVIDUAL CASE STUDY 1
Scenario One: Peter Mitchell

INDIVIDUAL CASE STUDY 2
Scenario One: Peter Mitchell
According to the given situation, Peter Mitchell is a patient who is experiencing type 2
diabetes and he is a 52 year old individual. He was conceded into the emergency clinic with
ineffectively controlled diabetes, corpulence and other wellbeing related issues. It is seen that
Peter has been a smoker for around 30 years and he smokes 20 cigarettes in the multi day
because of which he is experiencing the sort 2 diabetes and another wellbeing infection. The
point of this paper is to break down the circumstance of Peter and distinguish key factors that
expansion the issue of sort 2 diabetes and heftiness in dwindling. This paper additionally centres
on the priorities of care and the clinical reasoning cycle in order to understand and evaluate the
health issues faced by Peter.
As per the contextual investigation, Peter was conceded in the emergency clinic for
decreasing the effect of sort 2 diabetes and specialists recommended a high protein diet in order
to lessen weight. After 4 weeks the Peter was conceded into the restorative ward for controlling
and dealing with their weight (Levett-Jones, 2017). For the most part, Peter is a jobless
individual that gets government advantages and he lost his employment three years prior. As
indicated by the case study he has dependably been a biggish individual with his typical weight
sitting at practically 145kg which is extremely high and it is one of the basic key factors that
expansion the issue of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Amid therapeutic treatment specialists gave
quantities of medications to Peter for diminishing the issue of sort 2 diabetes and overweight that
involves, insulin novomis 30 B D, metformin 1000mg BD, Lisinopril 10mg day by day,
pregablin 50mg and some more (Tan, Ladyshewsky, & Gardner, 2010).
It is very important to focus on the health issues faced by Peter and identify the key
factors that increase the problem of chronic disorders (Hoffman, et al., 2011). After analyzing the
situation of Peter there are major two types of priorities of care, for example, Availability and
coordination. The term caring is defined as the process which helps consumers for controlling
and managing their health problems (Geisler, & Lazenby, 2009). The caring process also
supports patients for understanding their disease and help them in improving their health in an
effective manner (Salminen, Zary, Björklund, Toth-Pal, & Leanderson, 2014). The lack of

INDIVIDUAL CASE STUDY 3
motivation is one of the common factors due to which Peter was suffered from type 2 diabetes
and other health issues and he was not able to reduce their weight.
Therefore, both coordination and availability can be used as priorities of care in order to
receive care from the caregiver (Kumar, Singh, & Sanyal, 2009). Moreover, healthy foods and
physical activities both can be included in these priorities of care in order to reduce the weight of
Peter. By using such kind of priorities of care the Peter can reduce the impact of chronic
conditions from their body and maintain their daily life activities (Mather, McKay, & Allen,
2015). It is ordered that peter has taken numbers of medicines for improving their health but they
did not work effectively so, better dietary plan and exercise both can help them to recover Peter
in less time.
According to world health organization best dietary process and exercise play, a major
role in the reduction of type 2 diabetes and many health care providers suggest both these steps
to patients (Delany, & Golding, 2014). The National Health Service identified and provided a
plan related to a diet which can be followed by Peter such as vegetables, fruits, eggs, fish, milk
and soft water (Geisler, & Lazenby, 2009). If Peter follows this plan then he can reduce their
weight and maintain health related issues. The coordination priority of care will help Peter for
understanding health problem and motivating towards the exercise. The availability of care will
evaluate the medication, process and treatment on the priority basis (Gorogiannis, Hunter, &
Williams, 2009). Therefore, it is suggested that Peter should ensure that he follow proper
guidance in order to reduce the rate of obesity and other health infections in less time (Kriewaldt,
& Turnidge, 2013).
In order to understand and evaluate health problems faced by Peter, the clinical reasoning
cycle can be used. The clinical reasoning provides a platform for nurses for controlling and
managing chronic disease faced by patients (Marcum, 2012). However, such kind of process will
be effective for Peter in order to justify the utilization of the two priorities of care adopted for the
patient. The clinical reasoning cycle contains a total of 8 steps which would be appropriate for
explaining the selection of the priority of care for Peter Mitchell. These steps involve, consider
the patient situation, collect information, process information, identify issues, establish goals,
take action, evaluate outcomes, reflect on the process and new learning (Gruppen, 2017). The
initial stage of the clinical reasoning cycle considers the issues faced by peter and the care