logo

Innovation for IMPACT Running Head: INNOVATION FOR IMPACT 6 6 Innovation for IMPACT

   

Added on  2022-10-13

8 Pages1584 Words213 Views
Running Head: INNOVATION FOR IMPACT
INNOVATION FOR IMPACT
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

INNOVATION FOR IMPACT
1
Table of Contents
Introduction:-...................................................................................................................................2
Evidence:-........................................................................................................................................2
Opportunities:-.................................................................................................................................3
Risks:-..............................................................................................................................................4
Response/ Feedback:-......................................................................................................................4
Justification of investment prospectus:-..........................................................................................5
References:-.....................................................................................................................................6

INNOVATION FOR IMPACT
2
Introduction:-
Many technical issues are affecting human culture and activities. Cybercrime is one of
them. The technical official should recover these issues. The first part of this project is relating to
the identification and effectiveness of potential shareholders. This assignment is also to identify
the problems of cybersecurity, system structure and types of shareholders (Kesan and Hayes
2014). After the completion of part 1, the project maker finds some risks, opportunities, and
justification.
Evidence:-
In this project, the project maker is proposed to create a proper strategy for cybercrime
protection. The part 1 research proposal also describes some methods of cybersecurity
(Filatotchev and Dotsenko 2015). The project maker also introduces an advanced interruption
system in a commercial environment that can be very much helpful to shield the online
connections. In this project, there are two different parts which are mainly concentrating one is
data integrity, and other is data confidentiality. The type of speculation which is necessary for
this project is investment funds. The frequent expenditures associated with this inventive right
from the start of the project to the last phase. The first critiques of this project are the project
maker should implement some modern innovation like IoT, AI and cloud. In the first project, the
maker is working on the unique issues of cybercrime, but they cannot justify the proper
procedure of this system (Muller 2015). The deliverables of this project are clear, and it is
relating to the investors. But in this project, the project maker cannot verify the investor's value
and cannot focus their role in this task. The primary evidence of this project is the investor's
activity. This project can concentrate on the financial stability of an investor, but at the same

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.