Usability Interface Design for Local Farm Shop

The assignment details the process of designing usability interfaces for a local farm shop, including the creation of wireframe diagrams, the analysis of user requirements, and the selection of a suitable design. It also discusses the importance of ensuring that the interface is error-tolerant and meets the preferences of users.

Interface Usability
NAME OF THE STUDENT
NAME OF THE UNIVERSITY

Introduction
 The presentation is prepared for demonstration of the wireframe
diagrams created for the Mountain Artists Cooperative. The
design 1 is created by maintaining a balance between the
functionality and the visual elements of the user interface
designed for the company. A research is done on the different
design elements that can be applied for designing the interface
of the local farm shop. The requirement of the organization is
analyzed for the accomplishment of the goals of the project and
meet the needs of the users. The analysis of the task is important
for reduction of the errors in the project and develop the
wireframe framework for inspection of the usability of the
wireframe diagrams.

Wireframe Design 1

Wireframe Design 1 (Contd.)

Wireframe Design 1 (Contd.)

Wireframe Design 1 (Contd.)

Wireframe Design 1 (Contd.)

Wireframe Design 2

Wireframe Design 2 (Contd.)

Wireframe Design 2 (Contd.)

Wireframe Design 2 (Contd.)

Wireframe Design 2 (Contd.)

Design 1 Description
 The design 1 is created by following the requirement of the local
farm shop and for increasing the usability of the interface the
design is keep simple and consistent. More number of images
and short text are used for the design because it increases the
readability and efficiency of the design. The user can get all the
details of the website at a single look and would not face any
problem while using the web interface design.

Design 2 Description
 For designing the second interface design for the local farm shop
and inspection is made on the targeted group of users and the
user interface is aligned with their requirement. The common
usability problems faced by the users are analyzed for the
preparation of the user interface design. The prototype of the
user interface is created and tested such that the designer can
understand the viewpoints of the users and develop the design
accordingly. The look and feel of the wireframe is kept attractive
such that user can establish a link between the desired action
and the action taken by the user to buy a product or service from
the website.

Selection of the design
 The design 2 is selected as the best solution for proceeding with
the website development because it is aligned with the targeted
grouped of users. The design is made error tolerant such that the
user can get the desired action at a minimum action. The
usability interface is designed to meet the preference of the user
and the skill of the user should not be dependent on using the
interface.

Conclusion
 It can be concluded from the presentation that the two set of
alternate wireframe interface is designed for the local farm shop.
The user interface is designed for maintaining a conformity and
meeting the expectation of the users targeted. The selected
design meets all the presentation attributes such as clarity,
consistency, discriminability, legibility and the comprehensibility.
For testing the usability of the user interface the understanding
of the user is important and the graphic design and the
typography should be consistent for all the pages designed such
that it improves the appeal of the design and does not detract
the user from using the interface.

Bibliography
 Arnhold, M., Quade, M., & Kirch, W. (2014). Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based
usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. Journal of
medical Internet research, 16(4).
 Devine, E. B., Lee, C. J., Overby, C. L., Abernethy, N., McCune, J., Smith, J. W., & Tarczy-Hornoch, P. (2014). Usability
evaluation of pharmacogenomics clinical decision support aids and clinical knowledge resources in a computerized
provider order entry system: a mixed methods approach. International journal of medical informatics, 83(7), 473-483.
 Farhat, A. M. B. (2017). Usability Evaluation of E-learning Systems in Al-Madinah International University. International
Journal of Contemporary Computer Research, 1(1), 1-5.
 Olivia, G. S., & Christopher, T. A. (2015). In-use monitoring of buildings: An overview and classification of evaluation
methods. Energy and Buildings, 86, 176-189.
 Orfanou, K., Tselios, N., & Katsanos, C. (2015). Perceived usability evaluation of learning management systems:
Empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed
Learning, 16(2).
 Rusu, C., Rusu, V., Roncagliolo, S., & González, C. (2015). Usability and user experience: what should we care
about?. International Journal of Information Technologies and Systems Approach (IJITSA), 8(2), 1-12.
 Ventayen, R. J. M., Estira, K. L. A., De Guzman, M. J., Cabaluna, C. M., & Espinosa, N. N. (2018). Usability Evaluation of
Google Classroom: Basis for the Adaptation of GSuite E-Learning Platform.
 Walji, M. F., Kalenderian, E., Piotrowski, M., Tran, D., Kookal, K. K., Tokede, O., ... & Kimmes, N. S. (2014). Are three
methods better than one? A comparative assessment of usability evaluation methods in an EHR. International journal
of medical informatics, 83(5), 361-367.