Internal Control and Budgeting Procedures
VerifiedAdded on  2021/04/24
|15
|2094
|26
AI Summary
The assignment discusses the significance of internal control procedures in ensuring financial stability. It covers the process of preparing and submitting budgets to directors for approval, as well as circulating next year's budget among managers. The document also touches on the commencement of the budget period and provides references for additional information on internal control and budgeting procedures.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: INTERNAL CONTROL
Internal Control
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Authors Note
Course ID
Internal Control
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Authors Note
Course ID
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1INTERNAL CONTROL
Table of Contents
Answer to Question 1:................................................................................................................2
Answer to Question 2:................................................................................................................4
Answer to question 3:.................................................................................................................6
Answer to Question 4:................................................................................................................6
Answer to Question 5:................................................................................................................9
Reference List:.........................................................................................................................13
Table of Contents
Answer to Question 1:................................................................................................................2
Answer to Question 2:................................................................................................................4
Answer to question 3:.................................................................................................................6
Answer to Question 4:................................................................................................................6
Answer to Question 5:................................................................................................................9
Reference List:.........................................................................................................................13
2INTERNAL CONTROL
Answer to Question 1:
Notes
$000 % of
Revenue $000 % of Revenue
Revenue 1 115554 100.00% 95766 100.00%
Cost of sales -100444 86.92% -80632 84.20%
Gross profit 15110 13.08% 15134 15.80%
Distribution costs -724 0.63% -324 0.34%
Administrative expenses -12348 10.69% -10894 11.38%
Operating profit 2038 1.76% 3916 4.09%
Finance costs 2 -1182 1.02% -1048 1.09%
Finance income 2 314 0.27% 76 0.08%
Profit for the year from continuing
operations 3 1170 1.01% 2944 3.07%
Income tax expense
Profit for the year 1170 1.01% 2944 3.07%
Vertical Analysis of Income Statement:
Income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2010
2010 2009
Answer to Question 1:
Notes
$000 % of
Revenue $000 % of Revenue
Revenue 1 115554 100.00% 95766 100.00%
Cost of sales -100444 86.92% -80632 84.20%
Gross profit 15110 13.08% 15134 15.80%
Distribution costs -724 0.63% -324 0.34%
Administrative expenses -12348 10.69% -10894 11.38%
Operating profit 2038 1.76% 3916 4.09%
Finance costs 2 -1182 1.02% -1048 1.09%
Finance income 2 314 0.27% 76 0.08%
Profit for the year from continuing
operations 3 1170 1.01% 2944 3.07%
Income tax expense
Profit for the year 1170 1.01% 2944 3.07%
Vertical Analysis of Income Statement:
Income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2010
2010 2009
3INTERNAL CONTROL
Notes
% of
Revenue $000 % of Revenue
Non-current assets
Tangible assets 8 42200 123.34% 29522 89.34%
Total non-current assets 42200 123.34% 29522 89.34%
Current assets
Inventories 9 5702 16.67% 4144 12.54%
Trade and other receivables 10 18202 53.20% 16634 50.34%
Cash and cash equivalents 4 0.01% 12 0.04%
Total current assets 23908 69.88% 20790 62.92%
Total assets 66108 193.22% 50312 152.26%
Current liabilities 11 23274 68.02% 14380 43.52%
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings and finance leases 12 6000 17.54% 0.00%
Provisions 13 1356 3.96% 1508 4.56%
Accruals and deferred income 14 1264 3.69% 1380 4.18%
Total non-current liabilities 8620 25.19% 2888 8.74%
Total liabilities 31894 93.22% 17268 52.26%
Net assets 34214 100.00% 33044 100.00%
Equity
Share capital 15 22714 66.39% 22714 68.74%
Retained earnings 11500 33.61% 10330 31.26%
Total equity 16 34214 100.00% 33044 100.00%
Vertical Analysis of Balance Sheet:
2010 2009
Balance sheet
as at 31 December 2010
Notes
% of
Revenue $000 % of Revenue
Non-current assets
Tangible assets 8 42200 123.34% 29522 89.34%
Total non-current assets 42200 123.34% 29522 89.34%
Current assets
Inventories 9 5702 16.67% 4144 12.54%
Trade and other receivables 10 18202 53.20% 16634 50.34%
Cash and cash equivalents 4 0.01% 12 0.04%
Total current assets 23908 69.88% 20790 62.92%
Total assets 66108 193.22% 50312 152.26%
Current liabilities 11 23274 68.02% 14380 43.52%
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings and finance leases 12 6000 17.54% 0.00%
Provisions 13 1356 3.96% 1508 4.56%
Accruals and deferred income 14 1264 3.69% 1380 4.18%
Total non-current liabilities 8620 25.19% 2888 8.74%
Total liabilities 31894 93.22% 17268 52.26%
Net assets 34214 100.00% 33044 100.00%
Equity
Share capital 15 22714 66.39% 22714 68.74%
Retained earnings 11500 33.61% 10330 31.26%
Total equity 16 34214 100.00% 33044 100.00%
Vertical Analysis of Balance Sheet:
2010 2009
Balance sheet
as at 31 December 2010
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4INTERNAL CONTROL
Answer to Question 2:
Notes 2010 2009
% of
Increase/
(Decrease)
$000 $000
Revenue 1 115554 95766 120.66%
Cost of sales -100444 -80632 124.57%
Gross profit 15110 15134 99.84%
Distribution costs -724 -324 223.46%
Administrative expenses -12348 -10894 113.35%
Operating profit 2038 3916 52.04%
Finance costs 2 -1182 -1048 112.79%
Finance income 2 314 76 413.16%
Profit for the year from continuing
operations 3 1170 2944 39.74%
Income tax expense
Profit for the year 1170 2944 39.74%
Horizontal Analysis of Income Statement:
Income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2010
Answer to Question 2:
Notes 2010 2009
% of
Increase/
(Decrease)
$000 $000
Revenue 1 115554 95766 120.66%
Cost of sales -100444 -80632 124.57%
Gross profit 15110 15134 99.84%
Distribution costs -724 -324 223.46%
Administrative expenses -12348 -10894 113.35%
Operating profit 2038 3916 52.04%
Finance costs 2 -1182 -1048 112.79%
Finance income 2 314 76 413.16%
Profit for the year from continuing
operations 3 1170 2944 39.74%
Income tax expense
Profit for the year 1170 2944 39.74%
Horizontal Analysis of Income Statement:
Income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2010
5INTERNAL CONTROL
Notes 2010 2009
% of
Increase/
(Decrease)
$000 $000
Non-current assets
Tangible assets 8 42200 29522 142.94%
Total non-current assets 42200 29522 142.94%
Current assets
Inventories 9 5702 4144 137.60%
Trade and other receivables 10 18202 16634 109.43%
Cash and cash equivalents 4 12 33.33%
Total current assets 23908 20790 115.00%
Total assets 66108 50312 131.40%
Current liabilities 11 23274 14380 161.85%
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings and finance leases 12 6000 0 6000.00%
Provisions 13 1356 1508 89.92%
Accruals and deferred income 14 1264 1380 91.59%
Total non-current liabilities 8620 2888 298.48%
Total liabilities 31894 17268 184.70%
Net assets 34214 33044 103.54%
Equity
Share capital 15 22714 22714 100.00%
Retained earnings 11500 10330 111.33%
Total equity 16 34214 33044 103.54%
Balance sheet
as at 31 December 2010
Horizontal Analysis of Balance Sheet:
2010 2009
% of Increase/
(Decrease) 2010 2009
% of
Increase/
(Decrease)
Class of Business:
Automotive Components 115554 95766 120.66% 1170 2944 39.74%
Geographical Segment:
Local 109566 92020 119.07%
Rest of Europe 5290 3746 141.22%
Japan 698 0 698.00%
Total 115554 95766 120.66%
Revenue Profiot before Tax
Segmental Analysis
for the year ended 31 December 2010
Horizontal Analysis of Segmental Analysis:
Notes 2010 2009
% of
Increase/
(Decrease)
$000 $000
Non-current assets
Tangible assets 8 42200 29522 142.94%
Total non-current assets 42200 29522 142.94%
Current assets
Inventories 9 5702 4144 137.60%
Trade and other receivables 10 18202 16634 109.43%
Cash and cash equivalents 4 12 33.33%
Total current assets 23908 20790 115.00%
Total assets 66108 50312 131.40%
Current liabilities 11 23274 14380 161.85%
Non-current liabilities
Borrowings and finance leases 12 6000 0 6000.00%
Provisions 13 1356 1508 89.92%
Accruals and deferred income 14 1264 1380 91.59%
Total non-current liabilities 8620 2888 298.48%
Total liabilities 31894 17268 184.70%
Net assets 34214 33044 103.54%
Equity
Share capital 15 22714 22714 100.00%
Retained earnings 11500 10330 111.33%
Total equity 16 34214 33044 103.54%
Balance sheet
as at 31 December 2010
Horizontal Analysis of Balance Sheet:
2010 2009
% of Increase/
(Decrease) 2010 2009
% of
Increase/
(Decrease)
Class of Business:
Automotive Components 115554 95766 120.66% 1170 2944 39.74%
Geographical Segment:
Local 109566 92020 119.07%
Rest of Europe 5290 3746 141.22%
Japan 698 0 698.00%
Total 115554 95766 120.66%
Revenue Profiot before Tax
Segmental Analysis
for the year ended 31 December 2010
Horizontal Analysis of Segmental Analysis:
6INTERNAL CONTROL
Answer to question 3:
Notes 2010 2009 % of Increase/
(Decrease)
Revenue 1 115554 95766 120.66%
Cost of sales -100444 -80632 124.57%
Distribution costs -724 -324 223.46%
Administrative expenses -4868 -4356 111.75%
Value Added by Operating Activities 9518 10454 91.05%
Finance Income 314 76 413.16%
Wealth Created 9832 10530 93.37%
Wealth Distribution:
Employees: Salaries & Wages 4 7480 6538 114.41%
Lenders: Finance Cost 1182 1048 112.79%
Government: Income Tax Expenses
Retained for Future Investment: Profit 1170 2944 39.74%
Distributed & Retained Wealth 9832 10530 93.37%
Vertical Analysis of Value Added Statement:
Income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2010
Answer to Question 4:
Vertical analysis can be defined as the method of analysing the financial statement in
which each entry for each of the category of accounts namely the assets, liabilities and
equities in the balance sheet representing as the proportion of total account. The vertical
analysis is used as the measure of analysis the financial statement in terms of percentage
(Shaitiet et al., 2014). As evident from the vertical analysis performed on the income
statement it is noticed that that gross profit reported by the firm during the year 2010 stood
13.08 where as in 2009 the company reported relatively higher gross profit. Simultaneously,
the operating profit during the year 2009 stood 4.09% while in the subsequent year of 2010
the operating profit for the firm stood relatively lower at 1.76%. On the overall basis, the
profit for the firm stood 3.07% in 2009 while in 2010 the same declined to 1.01%.
Answer to question 3:
Notes 2010 2009 % of Increase/
(Decrease)
Revenue 1 115554 95766 120.66%
Cost of sales -100444 -80632 124.57%
Distribution costs -724 -324 223.46%
Administrative expenses -4868 -4356 111.75%
Value Added by Operating Activities 9518 10454 91.05%
Finance Income 314 76 413.16%
Wealth Created 9832 10530 93.37%
Wealth Distribution:
Employees: Salaries & Wages 4 7480 6538 114.41%
Lenders: Finance Cost 1182 1048 112.79%
Government: Income Tax Expenses
Retained for Future Investment: Profit 1170 2944 39.74%
Distributed & Retained Wealth 9832 10530 93.37%
Vertical Analysis of Value Added Statement:
Income statement
for the year ended 31 December 2010
Answer to Question 4:
Vertical analysis can be defined as the method of analysing the financial statement in
which each entry for each of the category of accounts namely the assets, liabilities and
equities in the balance sheet representing as the proportion of total account. The vertical
analysis is used as the measure of analysis the financial statement in terms of percentage
(Shaitiet et al., 2014). As evident from the vertical analysis performed on the income
statement it is noticed that that gross profit reported by the firm during the year 2010 stood
13.08 where as in 2009 the company reported relatively higher gross profit. Simultaneously,
the operating profit during the year 2009 stood 4.09% while in the subsequent year of 2010
the operating profit for the firm stood relatively lower at 1.76%. On the overall basis, the
profit for the firm stood 3.07% in 2009 while in 2010 the same declined to 1.01%.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7INTERNAL CONTROL
The vertical analysis of the balance sheet represents that the percentage of tangible
assets in terms of revenue stood 89.34% during 2009 while in the subsequent year increased
significantly to 123.34%. The total assets represent a rising trend as well with 68.08%
represents the proportion of total revenue generated from this asset. The non-current
liabilities represent 8.74% in 2009 while in 2010 the non-current liabilities increased to
25.19%.
To further understand the trend in financial statement Horizontal analysis has been
performed of Buzzard Ltd. The horizontal analysis represents the analysis of the financial
statements to reflect the changes in the corresponding amount of items in financial statement
over the particular time period (Dirnagl, 2016). The horizontal method is an effective method
of assessing the trend for two or more periods. As evident from the horizontal analysis the
revenue of the company increased by 120.66% whereas the operating profit declined to
52.04%. Simultaneously, the profit from operations stood 39.74%. On the other hand, the
non-current assets represent a percentage increase of 142.94% while the inventories peaking
at north-end of 137.60%. The cash and cash equivalent for the period stood at 33.33%. The
total asset for Buzzard Ltd represents an increasing trend at 115%.
An important consideration can be paid towards the borrowings, finance lease
expenses as the company reported a rise of 6000% since borrowing, and finance leases stood
6000. Furthermore, a horizontal segmental analysis has been performed to gain an in depth
understanding of the segmental performance of the organization (Scott, 2015). The
automotive component business of Buzzards Ltd represents a rise of 120.66% with revenue
increasing from 95,766 to 115554 in 2010. With increase in the revenue for automotive
components, the profit before tax for the same also increased to 39.74%.
The vertical analysis of the balance sheet represents that the percentage of tangible
assets in terms of revenue stood 89.34% during 2009 while in the subsequent year increased
significantly to 123.34%. The total assets represent a rising trend as well with 68.08%
represents the proportion of total revenue generated from this asset. The non-current
liabilities represent 8.74% in 2009 while in 2010 the non-current liabilities increased to
25.19%.
To further understand the trend in financial statement Horizontal analysis has been
performed of Buzzard Ltd. The horizontal analysis represents the analysis of the financial
statements to reflect the changes in the corresponding amount of items in financial statement
over the particular time period (Dirnagl, 2016). The horizontal method is an effective method
of assessing the trend for two or more periods. As evident from the horizontal analysis the
revenue of the company increased by 120.66% whereas the operating profit declined to
52.04%. Simultaneously, the profit from operations stood 39.74%. On the other hand, the
non-current assets represent a percentage increase of 142.94% while the inventories peaking
at north-end of 137.60%. The cash and cash equivalent for the period stood at 33.33%. The
total asset for Buzzard Ltd represents an increasing trend at 115%.
An important consideration can be paid towards the borrowings, finance lease
expenses as the company reported a rise of 6000% since borrowing, and finance leases stood
6000. Furthermore, a horizontal segmental analysis has been performed to gain an in depth
understanding of the segmental performance of the organization (Scott, 2015). The
automotive component business of Buzzards Ltd represents a rise of 120.66% with revenue
increasing from 95,766 to 115554 in 2010. With increase in the revenue for automotive
components, the profit before tax for the same also increased to 39.74%.
8INTERNAL CONTROL
The vertical analysis of the value added statement represents that the wealth created
by the firm in 2009 stood 10530 while in the subsequent year it stood 9832 representing
93.37% creation of wealth. The wealth distribution represents 114.41% among employees’
salaries and wages with 112.79% in finance cost. Overall, the distributed and retained wealth
stood 93.37%.
Commenting upon the corporate governance practices it is noticed that a diversified
board of directors with wide range of expertise is prevalent in Buzzards Ltd. The boards have
included the diversified expertise that hold each other responsible for offering board duties
with the sufficient time to thoughtfully address the relevant matters for decision making
(Schaltegger & Burritt, 2017). The internal policies highlights that the board collaborates
with the management by making use of their expertise to widen the perspectives and
analysing the decision making. The board also undertakes the evaluation of financial report as
the strategic planning procedure.
The evidences gained from the study suggest that the corporate bylaws include the
description of duties and accountabilities of the vital role. The bylaws clearly outline the
accountabilities and responsibilities for every position of the organization (Warren & Jones
2018). The board members evidently review the reports and perspective in order to expand
the scope for discussion with the expert qualification and diversified board structure. The
company usually implements the organizational policies of good corporate governance,
fairness, accountability and transparency in order to assist the financial growth of the
organization. The structure of corporate governance complies with the organizational policies
of control and offers guidelines that directs the organization in the direction of satisfying the
needs of the stakeholders.
The vertical analysis of the value added statement represents that the wealth created
by the firm in 2009 stood 10530 while in the subsequent year it stood 9832 representing
93.37% creation of wealth. The wealth distribution represents 114.41% among employees’
salaries and wages with 112.79% in finance cost. Overall, the distributed and retained wealth
stood 93.37%.
Commenting upon the corporate governance practices it is noticed that a diversified
board of directors with wide range of expertise is prevalent in Buzzards Ltd. The boards have
included the diversified expertise that hold each other responsible for offering board duties
with the sufficient time to thoughtfully address the relevant matters for decision making
(Schaltegger & Burritt, 2017). The internal policies highlights that the board collaborates
with the management by making use of their expertise to widen the perspectives and
analysing the decision making. The board also undertakes the evaluation of financial report as
the strategic planning procedure.
The evidences gained from the study suggest that the corporate bylaws include the
description of duties and accountabilities of the vital role. The bylaws clearly outline the
accountabilities and responsibilities for every position of the organization (Warren & Jones
2018). The board members evidently review the reports and perspective in order to expand
the scope for discussion with the expert qualification and diversified board structure. The
company usually implements the organizational policies of good corporate governance,
fairness, accountability and transparency in order to assist the financial growth of the
organization. The structure of corporate governance complies with the organizational policies
of control and offers guidelines that directs the organization in the direction of satisfying the
needs of the stakeholders.
9INTERNAL CONTROL
As evident from the current situation, it is noticed that management of the
organization are accountable for the each aspect of its financial health. The management
upholds the responsibilities of understanding the unit’s financial situation and does not allows
unintended deficits to take place (Henderson et al., 2015). The evidences obtained from the
study suggest that the resources are entrusted to them that includes funding, facilities and
staffing even though the board have delegated the accountabilities to their staff.
The budgetary funds are required to spend in compliance with the policy of
organization and operating requirements that meet with the available budgets. Evidences has
been obtained suggest that company does not conducts a separate budget to cover the deficits
(Ge et al., 2014). Therefore, there is a need for alternative resources that should be offered
such as departmental budgets. Buzzards Ltd are accountable for internal financial
management and creating a budgeting financial reporting and management practices becomes
necessary. Simultaneously, organizations are encouraged to create an oversight of procedure
that are based on the best practices.
The financial department of Buzzards Ltd responsibly delegates the management of
the organization the cash flow and makes sure that there are sufficient amount of funds are
available to meet the regular payments (Feng et al., 2014). The accounting policies of the
organization encompasses the credit and collection policies for the customers of company to
make sure that the organization collects its accounts receivable on time. In addition to this,
the accounting policies of Buzzards Ltd ensures that payment policies are in line with the
credit terms of the organization suppliers. The accounting policies accompanies the regular
assessment of cash to determine the needs of the working capital and ongoing cash
requirements.
As evident from the current situation, it is noticed that management of the
organization are accountable for the each aspect of its financial health. The management
upholds the responsibilities of understanding the unit’s financial situation and does not allows
unintended deficits to take place (Henderson et al., 2015). The evidences obtained from the
study suggest that the resources are entrusted to them that includes funding, facilities and
staffing even though the board have delegated the accountabilities to their staff.
The budgetary funds are required to spend in compliance with the policy of
organization and operating requirements that meet with the available budgets. Evidences has
been obtained suggest that company does not conducts a separate budget to cover the deficits
(Ge et al., 2014). Therefore, there is a need for alternative resources that should be offered
such as departmental budgets. Buzzards Ltd are accountable for internal financial
management and creating a budgeting financial reporting and management practices becomes
necessary. Simultaneously, organizations are encouraged to create an oversight of procedure
that are based on the best practices.
The financial department of Buzzards Ltd responsibly delegates the management of
the organization the cash flow and makes sure that there are sufficient amount of funds are
available to meet the regular payments (Feng et al., 2014). The accounting policies of the
organization encompasses the credit and collection policies for the customers of company to
make sure that the organization collects its accounts receivable on time. In addition to this,
the accounting policies of Buzzards Ltd ensures that payment policies are in line with the
credit terms of the organization suppliers. The accounting policies accompanies the regular
assessment of cash to determine the needs of the working capital and ongoing cash
requirements.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
10INTERNAL CONTROL
Answer to Question 5:
Internal controls policies and procedure are regarded as the important process in
ensuring that reliability of accounting are maintained. In the current business world, it
requires accuracy and reliability. Without the correct accounting records managers fail to
undertake correct financial decisions (Vovchenko et al., 2017). Considering the current
financial reports evidences can be drawn by stating that the there is a need for Budgetary
control to regulate the increasing costs. The budgetary planning procedures would help in
formalizing the objectives of the firm.
The budgetary planning for Buzzards is stated below;
The budget assist planning: By formalizing the goals and objective through budget the
business will be able make sure that their plans are attainable. It will enable the managers of
each department to make a decision on what is required to generate the output and goods and
to make sure that everything is available at the right time.
Communication of budget and co-ordination: As the budget is agreed by, the business, all
the necessary managers and staff will be working in the direction of the same end. At the time
of setting the budget any form of expected problems must be resolved and eliminating the
confusion (Ogneva et al., 2014). All the department must be in the position of delegating the
part in attaining the overall objectives.
Implementing monitoring and control through budget: One of the important reason for
implementing budgetary procedure is to produce a budget for the managers that are able to
use the budget as the tool for measuring the actual result from the budgeted results to
determine the budget variances (Feng et al., 2014). As a result of this appropriate actions can
be undertaken to modify the business operations with the passage of time to possibly change
the budget when it becomes attainable.
Answer to Question 5:
Internal controls policies and procedure are regarded as the important process in
ensuring that reliability of accounting are maintained. In the current business world, it
requires accuracy and reliability. Without the correct accounting records managers fail to
undertake correct financial decisions (Vovchenko et al., 2017). Considering the current
financial reports evidences can be drawn by stating that the there is a need for Budgetary
control to regulate the increasing costs. The budgetary planning procedures would help in
formalizing the objectives of the firm.
The budgetary planning for Buzzards is stated below;
The budget assist planning: By formalizing the goals and objective through budget the
business will be able make sure that their plans are attainable. It will enable the managers of
each department to make a decision on what is required to generate the output and goods and
to make sure that everything is available at the right time.
Communication of budget and co-ordination: As the budget is agreed by, the business, all
the necessary managers and staff will be working in the direction of the same end. At the time
of setting the budget any form of expected problems must be resolved and eliminating the
confusion (Ogneva et al., 2014). All the department must be in the position of delegating the
part in attaining the overall objectives.
Implementing monitoring and control through budget: One of the important reason for
implementing budgetary procedure is to produce a budget for the managers that are able to
use the budget as the tool for measuring the actual result from the budgeted results to
determine the budget variances (Feng et al., 2014). As a result of this appropriate actions can
be undertaken to modify the business operations with the passage of time to possibly change
the budget when it becomes attainable.
11INTERNAL CONTROL
Budget as the source of motivating managers: The budget forms the part of the techniques
for motivating the managers and other members of staff to attain the objectives of the
business. The degree to which this will take place is reliant on the agreement and criteria set
and determining whether it is fair or attainable.
Periodic reconciliations: Budgets are subjected to periodic reconciliations that helps in
making sure that the balances in the accounting system matches up with the balances in the
accounting system that are held by the suppliers and credit terms of customers (Ge, et al.,
2014). Discrepancies among the complementary accounts can reveal the error or
discrepancies in their accounts.
Obtaining the authority approval: Needing the specific managers to authorize the certain
types of transactions can add a layer of accountability in the budgetary procedure by making
sure that the transactions have been analysed and approved by the proper authorities.
Budget as the source of motivating managers: The budget forms the part of the techniques
for motivating the managers and other members of staff to attain the objectives of the
business. The degree to which this will take place is reliant on the agreement and criteria set
and determining whether it is fair or attainable.
Periodic reconciliations: Budgets are subjected to periodic reconciliations that helps in
making sure that the balances in the accounting system matches up with the balances in the
accounting system that are held by the suppliers and credit terms of customers (Ge, et al.,
2014). Discrepancies among the complementary accounts can reveal the error or
discrepancies in their accounts.
Obtaining the authority approval: Needing the specific managers to authorize the certain
types of transactions can add a layer of accountability in the budgetary procedure by making
sure that the transactions have been analysed and approved by the proper authorities.
12INTERNAL CONTROL
Time Line
Budgetary Control July August September October November December
Meeting of Budget
Committee to plan next
year's Budget
Preparation of Initial
Draft
Reviewing of Budget
Draft
Amendment of Budget
Draft in light of review
Further review and
redrafting of the final
budget
Submission of budgets
to directors for
Approval
Circulation of next year
budget among
managers
Commencement of
Budget Period
Budget Timeline
Time Line
Budgetary Control July August September October November December
Meeting of Budget
Committee to plan next
year's Budget
Preparation of Initial
Draft
Reviewing of Budget
Draft
Amendment of Budget
Draft in light of review
Further review and
redrafting of the final
budget
Submission of budgets
to directors for
Approval
Circulation of next year
budget among
managers
Commencement of
Budget Period
Budget Timeline
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
13INTERNAL CONTROL
Reference List:
Dirnagl, U., (2016). Quality Control and Standard Operating Procedures. In Rodent Models
of Stroke (pp. 291-300). Humana Press, New York, NY.
Feng, M., Li, C., McVay, S.E. & Skaife, H., (2014). Does ineffective internal control over
financial reporting affect a firm's operations? Evidence from firms' inventory
management. The Accounting Review, 90(2), pp.529-557.
Ge, W., Koester, A. & McVay, S., (2014). Assessing the Accuracy of Small Firms' Internal
Control Disclosures. Working paper, University of Washington and Georgetown
University.
Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K. & Howieson, B., (2015). Issues in financial
accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Ogneva, M., Subramanyam, K. & Raghunandan, K., (2014). Internal control weakness and
cost of equity. The Accounting Review, 82(5), pp.1255-129.
Schaltegger, S. & Burritt, R., (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting: issues,
concepts and practice. Routledge.
Scott, W.R., (2015). Financial accounting theory (Vol. 2, No. 0, p. 0). Prentice Hall.
Shaiti, H., Duan, Y. & Rasaratnam, S., (2014). An examination of the role of Enterprise
Resource Planning (ERP) systems in supporting the effectiveness of internal control
procedures: a contingency approach.
Vovchenko, G.N., Holina, G.M., Orobinskiy, S.A. & Sichev, A.R., (2017). Ensuring financial
stability of companies on the basis of international experience in construction of risks
maps, internal control and audit. European Research Studies Journal, 20(1), pp.350-
368.
Reference List:
Dirnagl, U., (2016). Quality Control and Standard Operating Procedures. In Rodent Models
of Stroke (pp. 291-300). Humana Press, New York, NY.
Feng, M., Li, C., McVay, S.E. & Skaife, H., (2014). Does ineffective internal control over
financial reporting affect a firm's operations? Evidence from firms' inventory
management. The Accounting Review, 90(2), pp.529-557.
Ge, W., Koester, A. & McVay, S., (2014). Assessing the Accuracy of Small Firms' Internal
Control Disclosures. Working paper, University of Washington and Georgetown
University.
Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K. & Howieson, B., (2015). Issues in financial
accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU.
Ogneva, M., Subramanyam, K. & Raghunandan, K., (2014). Internal control weakness and
cost of equity. The Accounting Review, 82(5), pp.1255-129.
Schaltegger, S. & Burritt, R., (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting: issues,
concepts and practice. Routledge.
Scott, W.R., (2015). Financial accounting theory (Vol. 2, No. 0, p. 0). Prentice Hall.
Shaiti, H., Duan, Y. & Rasaratnam, S., (2014). An examination of the role of Enterprise
Resource Planning (ERP) systems in supporting the effectiveness of internal control
procedures: a contingency approach.
Vovchenko, G.N., Holina, G.M., Orobinskiy, S.A. & Sichev, A.R., (2017). Ensuring financial
stability of companies on the basis of international experience in construction of risks
maps, internal control and audit. European Research Studies Journal, 20(1), pp.350-
368.
14INTERNAL CONTROL
1 out of 15
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
 +13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024  |  Zucol Services PVT LTD  |  All rights reserved.