INTRODUCTION •This presentation illustrates the importance of comparative HRM. •It also discusses the difference between HRM practices of UK and France. •It also illustrates the different between training as well as development, reward and alumni of Tesco and Carrefour.
IMPORTANCE OF COMPARATIVE HRM •Human Resource Managementdeals with the concerns associated with performance management, safety, wellness, training and development, and rewards and compensations. •Comparative HRM compares the strategy that HRM is focused, conceptualised as well as, targeted in, specifically in UK and France. •As a proficient subject, it is associatively recent research area, although it develops the current foundations in fields like international business and industrial relations (Forth and Rebérioux, 2016).
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CULTURE OF UK AND FRANCE (Sources: Hofstede insights, 2020).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEST HRM PRACTICE IN TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT OF UK AND FRANCE •In Uk,the workforce may practice training and development tool at the time of working in the workplace.It could support to meet the objective of the organization. •In France, on average, workforces receive 3 to 5 days of training per annum (French and Rees, 2016).
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BEST HRM PRACTICE IN REWARDING AND APPRAISAL •In Uk, rewards as well as bonuses could set by the decentralized bargaining. •In Uk, salary is usually reviewed yearly. •In Uk, ministry and appropriate experience are most important factors of base wage for all marks with job content, qualification, as well as performance. •In France, rewards are exchanged centrally at decentralised level or independently. •A variety of aspects contribute to base income levels and, educational educations being mainly feasible for administration and specialists (Ganesh, 2018).
BEST FIT MODELS OF HRM •In UK, Tesco have placed heavy reliance on statistical forms of elasticity as compared to more qualitative forms of rigidity. •In Uk, Tesco follows traditional short-termist pragmatism model in its HRM practices (French and Rees, 2016).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
REASONS WHYUK AND FRANCECOUNTRIES REMAIN DIFFERENT IN THE WAYS THAT THEY CONCEPTUALISE AND CONDUCT HRM •The reason of difference between conceptualise and conducting HRM in UK and Franceis related to institutional components. •For illustration, female return to organisation after childbirth in France is much more probable to pursue full-time employ as compared to its UK complements (Forth and Rebérioux, 2016).
SOME OF THE WAYS IN WHICH HRM DIFFERS BETWEENUK AND FRANCE •In France, part-time employment is very often entered into only in case of unavailability of full-time employment,therefore such constrained for performing part-time would seem moderately long employed times with respect to increases their earnings. •In the UK, there is indeed a willing supply of work for part-time work for short days(French and Rees, 2016).
HOW TESCO ANDCARREFOUR RETAIL COMPANIESHAVE TO BALANCE BETWEEN BEING GLOBALLY EFFECTIVE AND FAIR WHILE APPRECIATING AND BENEFITING FROM NATIONAL DIFFERENCES •In Tesco, part-time work is significantly smaller (15.4 hours) than in Carrefour (23.1 hours). •It is imperative as it means which is significance for workers of practicing part-time staff are likely to be distinguished (Ganesh, 2018).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
CONCLUSION •From the above interpretation, it can be concluded that there is difference between training and development HRM practices of Tesco and Carrefour. •It can be summarised that there is difference between reward and compensation HRM practices of Tesco and Carrefour.
REFERENCES •Forth, J. and Rebérioux, A., 2016. Workplace structure and governance: how do employers differ between Britain and France?. InComparative Workplace Employment Relations(pp. 27-60). Palgrave Macmillan, London. •French, R. and Rees, G. eds., 2016.Leading, managing and developing people. Kogan Page Publishers. •Ganesh, A., 2018. Intricacies of connection between incentives and employee productivity.Training & Development Journal,9(2), pp.121-134. •Hofstede insights. 2020.Country comparison.[Online]. Available at: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/france,the-uk/(Accessed: 30 March 2020).