2INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE The term ‘double jeopardy’ is not just a reference of a game show. In addition, it applies to provisions that insure that someone can no longer be charged in criminal court for the same crime more than once, thereby safeguarding the accused from the persistent threat of prosecution after the case has been adjudged. It has a long criminal history, and the basis of this concept is Fifth Amendment of the U.S Constitution (Rugh, 2014). According to many authors the defense of double jeopardy is justified. Often, the defense of double jeopardy prohibits the state from retrying an individual for the same crime after acquitting that person. Nor can the state many willingly drop a case in order to start over after the trial has started. There is no danger under U.S. law until the jury is sworn in a jury trial or until the first witness in a bench trial is sworn in. Actions before adding liability will not preclude a future trial (Hernandez, 2011). Many authors supported the concept of double jeopardy for some reasons. For instance, if, due to lack of evidence, a judge dismisses a case at a preliminary hearing, this decision does not prevent the government from bringing new charges for the same crime, because there will not be a risk at that stage. In the famous case of Stanisic and Simatovic case both of them has been suspended and removed their respectable positions. Both of them were also prosecuted for war crimes. Not only that initially in 2013 they were acquitted, but in 2015 even after appealing successfully the verdict was changed by the ICTY Appeals Chamber. However, various scholars are of the view that this case is not contrary to the widely accepted concept of double jeopardy and therefore it can be said that double jeopardy is justified as it prohibits the state from retrying an individual for the same crime after acquitting that person.
3INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE Reference Hernandez, D. J. (2011). Double Jeopardy: How Third-Grade Reading Skills and Poverty Influence High School Graduation.Annie E. Casey Foundation. Rugh, J. S. (2014). Double jeopardy: Why Latinos were hit hardest by the US foreclosure crisis.Social Forces,93(3), 1139-1184.