International Law Analysis Assignment

INTERNATIONAL LAW 1
INTERNATIONAL LAW
By (Student’s Name)
Professor’s Name
College
Course
Date

INTERNATIONAL LAW 2
INTERNATIONAL LAW
'Discuss the effectiveness of the International Criminal Court in aiding victim reparations
in regard to domestic and international genocide cases'.
ABSTRACT
The international community honor victims and survivors of such things as genocides. In
honoring the victims the international community through international criminal court stands in
affirm solidarity with victims of violation of human rights. The international community is
convinced that adopting a victim oriented perspective affirms its human solidarity with victims
of violations through adopting the international law. Within the law it contains, legal principles
of accountability, justice and the rule of law.
Even in adapting the help for these challenging situations, there have been a lot of
challenges on the effectiveness of the reparation system that is chosen by the international
criminal court on genocide victims. Many organizations have understood the need to provide a
comprehensive support to the victims who have been affected by crimes against humanity. A lot
of initiatives from the international concerns have shown that their concern is actually not about
whether it is the right of the genocide victims to be awarded reparation. The International
Criminal Court already has sounded a legal concern about the right of reparation that should be
given to genocide victims. The Court has also given detailed expositions on how the different
form of reparation might also take place.
The concern of this paper then is the effective implementation of the right reparation to
the genocide victim. The paper explores the practice of governments, nationals and international
courts and commissions on trying to consider the rhetoric that involves application, process,

INTERNATIONAL LAW 3
implementation and enforcement of these laws. The paper even analyzes the legal practice and
how it directly benefits the community affected by the genocide. The paper analyses most of the
technical and procedural challenges that policy makers undergo in trying to help the genocide
victims under reparation. One of the key aims of the study is to provide an analysis of the
aspects of the International Criminal Court and its different statute and how they relate to the
important legal statute and rules that will make the reparation more competent in relation to the
legal statutes. The ICC rules suggest that reparations only work after convictions are made.
Separate trust funds have existed to doubt this move by claiming that victims are not supposed to
complement the operations of the courts and how the reparation procedure is carried out. It is
such places of contradictions that the report aims at clarifying and identifying any possible
solutions. This report attempts to summarize the main issues, debates and experiences that arise
from the implementation of the laws regarding reparation of genocide victims.
Literature review
Genocide is considered a crime against humanity. Just like war crimes and abhorrent
crimes. All these kind of crimes and the perpetrators are considered as enemies of all the
mankind. The perpetrators have to be held account as possible. In any case the perpetrators are
within the help of any government and organizations that enabled them to abuse any of the
crime, and then they too should not escape any liability. It is from the analysis of Bilsky and
Klagsbrun (2018), that re affirms every single aspect of recognizing how perpetrators should
always be held responsible for crimes against humanity. The author reaffirms each of the every
aspect of the jurisprudence of the national and the international criminal courts. The author