This essay discusses the impact of the Cold War on international relations and the clash between realism and idealism. It explores the ideologies and conflicts between the US and USSR during this period.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Name of the student: Name of the university: Author note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Q1. For years cold war has been has been understood as events that proved the rivalry between USSR and the United States without ever having a direct conflict (Sarantakes & Westad, 2019). After analyzing the ideological clash is seen as the major reason of the war that has impacted the entire world. The paper aims to discuss the two of the ideologies that have resulted to conflict between the US and the USSR. It is important to understand the bases of each theory in order to understand the way the two ideologies oppose each other. International relations have existed as a discipline ever since the World War I occurred. Along with it came the need to explain the events that occurred across the globe (Kubálková, 2015). In order to achieve the analysis the two theories are undertaken to fit the requirement of the discipline. Occurred in October 1962 theCuban Missile Crisisof was a direct as well as dangerousconfrontation between the Soviet Union and the United States during the Cold War. The cold war is however considered as war of ideologies. The theory of realism is widely known for its anthropological pessimism that appears when it is faced with the likelihood of collective interests. Since anarchic is the pattern of international system, the rise of realism was natural. It naturally aroused specifically for the idea that all nations seek ways to increase their power. Also, the other significant factor of this theory is the national interest that was based on the fact that the US is the main actor and its security is the prime concern of it. Through these following characteristics the conclusion can be made that in realism is a theory that cannot be applied to political actions (Frankel, 2018). According to the liberal thinkers, international cooperation must be promoted for the purpose of achieving peace, justice and welfare across the world.
2INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Considering this theory, international relation is possible. The theory provides a goal that can be reached through institution that can regulate the actions of the United States. According to Ross (2016), the cold war an ideological conflict between US and USSR or it can be stated that it was a conflict between capitalism and communism. While the USSR determined themselves as socialists, the North Americans were communists. It was one of the main issues that led to the Cold war. The national interest of the two nations was different with different type of methods. The speeches of John F. Kennedy that was delivered when compared with the soviet leader Khrushchev, the difference between the terms is reflected. Realism as a theory in the field of international relationship began rising during the cold war. It occurred during that period due to much of its approach consisted to justify the actions of the United States in order to maintain its hegemony. Idealism, on the other hand, is a tradition in which international relations head towards the concept of freedom, prosperity and peace and progress. The rise of this ideology was from the assumption that the transformation of international relations coming from modernization and the other political, social and economic changes that occurred in the recent centuries.
3INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS References: Frankel, M. (2018). Learning from the Missile Crisis. InCuban Communism, 1959-2003(pp. 80- 90). Routledge. Kubálková, V. (2015).International relations in a constructed world. Routledge. Ross, R. S. (2016).China, the United States and the Soviet Union: Tripolarity and Policy Making in the Cold War: Tripolarity and Policy Making in the Cold War. Routledge. Sarantakes, N. E., & Westad, O. A. (2019). The Cold War: A World History.Naval War College Review,72(1), 164-174.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Q2. The cold war certainly affected the whole world in every aspect including socially, economically and politically that shifted around the moment of peace that was hoped by the UN (Baylis, Smith & Owens, 2017). The essay aims to discuss the ways it was a realistic or idealist values that maintained the peace. According to Russett (2018), the two main ideologies that clashed and resulted to the war between the nations are realism and idealism. It was one of the critical time when the Missile crisis occurred and the population panicked. Throughout the continuous chaos that occurred from the cold war, the system finally managed to settle down (Ross, 2016). It was the idealistic path that was followed. The United States made alliance for fulfilling their goals. However, it was then when things turned into complications. The United States cooperated in order to accomplish certain goals however the world was divided into two: The USSR and its allies (Warsaw Pact) and the US and its allies (NATO). In order to maintain the game and take the most advantage the military alliance was present. According to idealism, the selfish nature do not have space along with the crave for the constant need for power however, the theory of realism had these characteristics.Theconflictwasclearlybetweentwoideologieswhichmadeeverything complicated. The theories were considered again in order to find solution to the war. According to Caute (2017), there was never a direct war with direct arm between the two superpowers however it was conflict between the ideologies that took place during this specific period. It is important to taken in consideration the two undertake the conflict of ideologies and the countries involved. While one country wanted to gain power through realism, the other country wanted the same with the ideology of idealism. The rivalry between the two nations led
5INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS to the strife of power which is talked about immensely and the in the process of it. Although the idealistic path that was followed the realism did not step down while making the decision. Considering the characteristics of the two ideologies, there were difficult situations leading to difficult decision making.
6INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS References: Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (Eds.). (2017).The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press. Caute, D. (2017).Politics and the Novel during the Cold War. Routledge. Ross, R. S. (2016).China, the United States and the Soviet Union: Tripolarity and Policy Making in the Cold War: Tripolarity and Policy Making in the Cold War. Routledge. Russett, B. M. (2018).No clear and present danger: a skeptical view of the United States entry into World War II. Routledge.