Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 PART-A: YARNSHAW LIMITED................................................................................................1 a. Profit and Loss Statement.......................................................................................................1 b. Statement of Balance Sheet.....................................................................................................3 PART-B: RECKTURK PLC...........................................................................................................5 a. Determining contribution per wardrobe made towards covering fixed costs when selling price is £40.................................................................................................................................5 b. Calculating Break-even Point and Margin of Safety when selling price is £40.....................6 c. Ascertaining Company Profit when Unit Production is 54,000 wardrobes at £40 per unit....7 d. Assessing strategy for Reckturk Plc........................................................................................7 e. Identification of Underpinning Asssumptions in Break-even Model.....................................8 PART-C: ROSEVILLE PLC...........................................................................................................9 a. Recommendation of acceptance or rejection of Capital Budgeting Projects using Investment Appraisal techniques...................................................................................................................9 b. Report on key merits and limitations of various investment appraising techniques.............10 c. Report on identification of key merits and demerits of using Budgets as a strategy planning tool.............................................................................................................................................12 CONCLUSION..............................................................................................................................13 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................15
INTRODUCTION The concepts of Accounting and Finance are highly interrelated yet different fields. Accounting is mostly concerned with the acknowledgement of transactions that can be measured in monetary terms. While discipline of Finance relates to the presentation in the form of reports to the stakeholders of the business. These two elements ensure that financial transactions are recordedandcommunicatedtothestakeholdersofthecompanyinanefficientmanner (Ainsworth and Deines, 2019). They enable the procurement of financial resources as well as their allocation in a justifiable manner on the part of management who are responsible for taking informed decisions regarding the same. This report aims to provide a detailed account on the fundamental models, concepts and techniques used with financial and management accounting. For this purpose, it overlooks at the concept of preparation of financial statements such as Income Statements, Balance Sheet, determination of contribution, break-even point, Margin of Safety in terms of units and revenue. Additionally, various investment appraising tools utilised in capital budgeting related decisions along with benefits and limitations of budget as a strategic planning tool have been analysed. PART-A: YARNSHAW LIMITED a. Profit and Loss Statement For a business to ascertain whether or not it is able to grow or move in the direction which is in alignment of its vision and mission, an organisation tends to ascertain the net profit earned during a specific time-period. For this purpose, Income Statement is prepared which helps in communication of Earnings of the business after taking into account tax, interest, depreciation and other expenses(Alamad, 2019). Thus, providing an overview of corporate profitability for the management as well as stakeholders of a particular organisation such as Yarnshaw. This has been showcased as under: Statement of Income for the year ended December 31, 2018 Particulars£Particulars£ To Opening Stock-By Revenue3759600 To Purchases1630000By Closing Stock4273600 To Wages2143010 1
To Gross Profit (Balancing figure)260190 Total1033200Total1033200 To Electricity Bill Payments59270By Gross Profit b/d260190 To Van Running Expenses40320 To Irrecoverable Debts1800 To Rent paid to owner6108000 To Rates76930 To Depreciation on Van11000 To Net Profit for the year82870 Total260190Total260190 Working Notes: 1. Purchases: Particulars£ Credit Purchases583200 Cash Purchases incurred46800 Total Purchases made during the year630000 2.Wages: Particulars£ Total Wages paid during the year140400 Add: Wages owed for the last week of the year2610 Total Wage Expenses143010 3. Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018: Particulars£ Credit Sales604800 2
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Cash Sales154800 Total Sales made during the year759600 4. Determining Closing Stock Value: Particulars£ Stock available as on 01.01.2018- Add: Total Purchases made during the year1630000 Less: Cost of Goods Sold (=£291,600+£64,800)(356400) Stock available as on 31.12.2018273600 5. Electrical Bills Payments: Particulars£ Bills paid during the year6840 Add: Wages owed for the quarter as on 31.12.20182430 Total Wage Expenses9270 6. Rent paid: Particulars£ Total Rent paid to the owner of the premise135000 Less: Rent payments made in advance27000 Total Rent Paid108000 7. Rates: Particulars£ Payments for the period 01.01.2018 to 31.03.182880 Payments for the period 01.04.2018 to 31.03.2018 (=5400*9/12)4050 3
Total Rates for the year6930 b. Statement of Balance Sheet A statement of Balance Sheet is another component of financial reporting which depicts the financial position of a business at a given point of time (Brusca, Gómez‐villegas and Montesinos, 2016). This provides comparability between company's financial position for previous years in relation to current years as well as among other businesses operating within the same industry. The following statement depicts the financial position of Yarnshaw Limited: Statement of Financial Position for the year ended December 31, 2018 ASSETS (I)£ Current Assets Advance Rent27000 Advance Rates1350 Accounts Receivables177400 Closing Stock Value273600 Total Current Assets (A)379350 Non Current Assets Delivery Van261000 Total Non-Current Assets (B)61000 Assets (I) [= (A) + (B)]440350 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY (II) CurrentLiabilities Owed Wages2610 Owed Electricity Expenses2430 Accounts Payables3111600 4
Bank Overdraft424840 Total Liabilities (C)141480 Owners Equity (D) Capital216000 Add: Net Profit for the year82870298870 Shareholder's Equity and Liabilities (II) [=(C)+(D)]440350 Working Notes: 1. Accounts Receivables as on 31.12.2018: Particulars(£)(£) Credit Sales604800 Less: Cash recived from accounts receivables525600 Irrecoverable debt1800527400 Closing Balance77400 2.Depreciation Charged on Delivery Van using Straight-Line Method: Particulars(£) Cost of Delivery Van Purchased on 01.01.201872000 Less: Depreciation on Van ((72000-6000)/6)*11000 Cost of Van as on 31.12.201861000 *-It is important to note that salvage value of van is£6000 with an expected useful life of 6 years. 3. Accounts Payable: Particular(£) Goods purchase on credit583200 Less: Account Payables repaid during the year471600 5
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Closing balance of Accounts Payables111600 4. Cash and Cash Equivalents at the end of the year: Cash/Bank Account Particular(£)Particular(£) To Capital Account216000By Purchases46800 To Cash recived from receivables525600By Cash paid to Creditors471600 To Cash Sales154800By Delivery Van Expenses40320 To Balance C/d (Overdraft)24840By Wage Payments140400 By Electricity Bill Expenses6840 By Rates8280 By Rent135000 By Delivery Van Purchased72000 Total921240Total921240 PART-B: RECKTURK PLC a. Determining contribution per wardrobe made towards covering fixed costs when selling price is £40 Particulars(£' per unit)Actual(£) Budgeted (£) Units Produced7800060000.00 Total Sales (A)40.0031200002400000 Material15.751228500945000 Labour8.85690300531000 6
Variable Overhead5.55432900333000 Total Variable Costs (B)23517001809000 Contribution [(C) = (A)-(B)]768300591000 Contribution per unit [(D) = (C)/Units Produced]9.859.85 b. Calculating Break-even Point and Margin of Safety when selling price is £40 Break-even Point (BEP): (i) In units of Wardrobe: ParticularsActualBudgeted Fixed Costs: Production177000177000 Selling142800142800 Total(£)319800319800 Contribution per unit(£)9.859.85 BEP (=Fixed Costs/Contribution per unit)32467.0132467.01 (ii) In (£): ParticularsActualBudgeted Selling price for each wardrobe(£)40.0040.00 Contribution per wardrobe sold (£)9.859.85 Contribution Margin (=(Contribution per unit/Selling price)*100)24.63%24.63% Total Fixed Costs (=£177000+£142800)319800319800 BEP (£) 1298680.2 01298680.20 Margin of Safety (MoS): 7
(a) In units of Wardrobe: ParticularsActualBudgeted Units produced to be sold (given)78000.0060000.00 Break Even Point (as calculated in b(i))32467.0132467.01 Margin of Safety45532.9927532.99 (b) In (£): ParticularsActualBudgeted Wardrobes sold(£)31200002400000 BEP(£)1298680.201298680.20 MoS (=Wardrobes Sold- BEP)1821319.801101319.80 c. Ascertaining Company Profit when Unit Production is 54,000 wardrobes at £40 per unit Particulars(£) per unitAmount (£) Number of Wardrobes produced and sold54000 Total Sales (A)40.003120000.00 Material15.75850500.00 Labour8.85477900.00 Variable Overhead5.55299700.00 Total Variable Cost (B)1628100.00 Contribution [(C)=(A) -(B)]1491900.00 Fixed Costs (given) (D): Production-related177000.00 Sales-related142800.00 Profit (E)=(D)-(C)1172100.00 8
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
d. Assessing strategy for Reckturk Plc Given Information: The business wants to know whether or not is it feasible to spend £135,000 on marketing and advertising as by doing so, the overall selling price per wardrobe would rise by 8%. Thus, the new selling price being£43.20 (=£40+0.08*£40) per wardrobe produced and sold. This would also result in improving the sales level by 15% which brings the number of wardrobes produced and sold from mere 54,000 units to 62,100 (=54000+0.15*54000) wardrobes. Particulars(£) per unitAmount (£) Number of Wardrobes produced and sold62100 Total Sales (A)43.203369600.00 Material15.75978075.00 Labour8.85549585.00 Variable Overhead5.55344655.00 Total Variable Cost (B)1872315.00 Contribution [(C)=(A) -(B)]1497285.00 Fixed Costs (given) (D): Production177000.00 Selling142800.00 Marketing and Advertising Expenses135000.00 Profit (E)=(D)-(C)1042485.00 e. Identification of Underpinning Asssumptions in Break-even Model Break-even Analysis can be defined as the technique which is usually employed by a particular business in order to achieve that point whereby the entity would be able to earn revenues which are sufficient for meeting its cost of production (Kai, Loh and Lian, 2017). As a result, while undertaking a Break-even Analysis, the manager takes into account different price levels in relation to varying quantities of a particular product demanded. This enables the management to ascertain the exact level of sales that would furnish a complete coverage of company's total fixed costs. It is important to note that Total Fixed Costs are that components which are incurred regardless of the quantity produced and sold by the organisation. Hence, 9
determination ofthis cost element enables the manager to undertake informed decision-making practices within the organisation. It is calculated using the following formula: Break-even Point:In Units: BEP= Fixed Costs/ (Revenue earned per unit-Variable Cost incurred per unit) In terms of Sales: Contribution (£) = Sales- Total Variables Cost Contribution Margin (%) = Contribution (£)/ Total Sales BEP= Fixed Costs/ Contribution Margin Some of the main assumptions on the basis of which Break-even Analysis is conducted have been enumerated as under: TotalCostscanbebifurcatedintoFixedandVariableCostsonly.Thereisno consideration provided to Semi-Variable Costs (Maas, Schaltegger and Crutzen 2016). Price of the product remains unchanged. Volume of unit Sold = Volume of units Produced. Fixed Costs remain unchanged irrespective of volume of units produced. Rate of increment in Variable Costs is constant. Changes in technology or improvements in labour efficiencies are not taken into account. By analysing such assumptions it can be said that BEP Analysis is postulated on the grounds which encourage similarity. As a result, differing businesses can undertake such an activity irrespective of their size, nature and complexity. PART-C: ROSEVILLE PLC a. Recommendation of acceptance or rejection of Capital Budgeting Projects using Investment Appraisal techniques Payback Period Initial Investment8000000 Net Annual Cash inflow2120000 Payback Period3.7735849057 10
Accounting Rate of Return Purchase Cost of New Machine8000000 Expected annual Cash inflow3400000 Depreciation1400000 Accounting Rate of Return0.09 Net Present Value Year Cash Inflow Cash Outflow Net Cash Inflows Discounting Factor PV of Net Cash Inflows 13400000128000021200000.9171944954.128 23400000128000021200000.8421784361.586 33400000128000021200000.7721637028.978 43400000128000021200000.7081501861.447 53400000128000021200000.6501377854.539 Salvage Value10000000.650649931.386 Sum of PV of Net Cash Inflows£8,895,992 NPV£895,992 Recommendations: As per the above calculations, it is clearly evident that the purchase of new machinery worth £8,000,000 would be a wise decision for Roseville PLC. This is indicated by the three investment appraising techniques which state that: Payback Periodfor the given project is 3 years and 8 months. Since the machinery is to be utilised for at least 5 years this figure is less than Machinery's useful life (Maskell, Baggaley and Grasso, 2017). Thus, making it feasible for the company. TheAccounting rate of returnis equal to WACC (Weighted Cost of Capital), that is, 9%. Thus, minimum requirement of return on investment is also fulfilled by this project. NPVis positive, even after taking the salvage value as well as the initial investment into account. 11
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Thus, it is recommended to the management of Roseville PLC to undertake the project analysed using the aforementioned investment Appraising Techniques. b. Report on key merits and limitations of various investment appraising techniques INVESTMENT APPRAISAL TECHNIQUES Every organisation undertakes certain types of capital budgeting activities so as to further their objectives to grow and seize opportunities that add value to the business in current as well as future periods of its operations. For this purpose, the financial manager of an organisation may undertake certain types of investment appraising techniques which may facilitate their decisions in a justifiable manner. As a result, the key merits and limitations of such methodologies have been discussed under this report: 1.Pay-Back Period:This technique enables the financial manager to determine the exact time-period it would take for a particular project to requite its initial investment. As a result, Payback period is the time wherein the net cash inflows gained from a project are equivalent to the amount of initial outlay incurred on it. It is calculated as under: PBP = Initial Outlay/ Net Cash Inflows Merits: Clear indicator of capital blockages possibilities as longer period would mean that the recovery of initial investment would be delayed (Morris, 2018). This technique is most suitable when there is a lot of uncertainty present regarding a project's future annual cash flows or in those industries where technological changes occur frequently. Limitations: It tends to disregard time value of money which is a crucial component from capital budgeting perspective. A Shorter PBP, also, does not guarantee profitability of the project. 2.Accounting Rate of Return:This techniqueis considered to be a financial ratio which is frequently used in capital budgeting (Ramiah, Xu and Moosa, 2015). It aims to provide a return based on the net income generated by a proposed project. ARR is calculated as follows: ARR= Average Net Profit/ Average Investment 12
Merits: Itconsiderstheconceptofnetearningsearnedafterdeductingtaxand depreciation. Thus, providing a clear picture of the project's profitability. Facilitates comparison between one or more projects based on the percentage value calculated. Limitations: It ignores time factor which is crucial while undertaking the selection of alternative uses of funds. It does not take into account the cash inflows which form the foundation for accounting profits. 3.Net Present Value:One of the most preferred investment appraising technique, Net Present Value is defined as the value of all future net cash inflows that have been discounted to the present (Ramirez, 2015). It is calculated as under: NPV =Σ(Present Value of all future cash flows) – Initial Investment Merits: ItconsidersTimeValueofMoney,thus,prioritisingcashinflows chronologically. Ittakesintoaccounttheassumptionofreinvestment,thus,following conventionalism. Limitations: It does not undertake the impact of sunk costs. It is difficult to ascertain the required rate of return using this method. c. Report on identification of key merits and demerits of using Budgets as a strategy planning tool BUDGETS: A STRATEGIC PLANNING TOOL An organisation is responsible for identifying, planning, organising, managing and controlling of resources so as to maintain its profitability and comparative advantage in the market without compromising on quality and customer service. With this objective, a business entity tends to formulate budgets.ABudgetcan be defined as the process wherein a financial plan is created 13
that enlist estimations of revenues and expenditures that are to be earned within a stipulated future time-period (Renz and Herman, 2016). Under this report, various types of budgets have been analysed, mainly, on the basis of their benefits and drawbacks. This is enumerated as under:1.Activity Based Budgets:This type of budget includes the preparation of a financial plan after taking overhead costs into account and largely aims at determining the efficiency in organisational activities. However, past year's budget does not form the basis for current year. Merits: It roots out unnecessary activities, thus, proving to be an effective cost saver. The problem of bottlenecks is eliminated substantially as the budget is activity based. Limitations: It isa complex process that requiresa detailed understanding of various functional activities of the business. Activity Based Budget is primarily focused on achieving short-term goals which can be detrimental to the business in the long-run (Schaltegger and Burritt, 2017).2.Zero Based Budgets:This type of budget that involves development of a financial plan for a particular period is mostly based on the expenditure for the new period and is postulated on the basis of actual expenses that are estimated to be incurred. Hence, for every period, the budget is prepared from scratch taking zero as the base. Merits: Accuracy and Efficiency is heightened within the business which employs this budget as their choice of strategic planning tool (Shawver and Miller, 2017). Redundant Activities are duly recognised as well as minimised in an effective manner. Limitations: It is very time-consuming as the manager needs to start from scratch every new period. Its preparation process can turn out to be expensive for the management. 14
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
3.Incremental Budgets:As the name suggests, this type of budget involves making improvements into an existing financial plan. Thus, its postulated on the basis of facts and figures arrived at in the past year (Webb and Chaffer, 2016). Merits: It is very easy to implement. Time and Cost-effective as there few changes that are required to be made to the existing budgetary plan of the business. Limitations: It can result in developing lack of innovation as it often leads to budgetary slack. Unnecessaryspendingmaybecomeacommonpracticeduetotheeasier availability of budget. CONCLUSION From the above report, it can be concluded that Accounting and Finance play a crucial role in determination of how fiscal resources of a business are utilised in order to enhance profitability and overall corporate performance for a particular business. Utilization of Costing can enable the management to ascertain the contribution of resources made per unit as well as revenue. It also enables them to know the Break-even Points which ensure that the allocation of resources does not result in deterioration of existing profits on per unit of a product sold. On the other hand, Investment Appraising Techniques and Budgeting enable that capital budgeting as well as Strategic Planning activities undertaken by the enterprise are in synchronization with other related processes. This enables the manager to make significant decisions in an informed way. 15