Introduction to Computerised Systems

Added on - 16 Sep 2019

  • 3


  • 1162


  • 247


  • 0


Trusted by +2 million users,
1000+ happy students everyday
Showing pages 1 to 1 of 3 pages
IntroductionComputerised systems that support social networking such as Facebook andLinkedIn typically rely on underlying connectivity in the form of aFriendOfAFriend (FOAF) relation. This represents a relationship between twoobject supported by a link. Figure 1 illustrates the FOAF relation.Figure 1. Example of FOAF relations.Within a social network this relation is the basic building block of a network offriends. By focusing only on friendships (the relation) between friends (objects)it is possible to simplify the potentially complex interrelated world of manyobjects into one that only expresses a single type of relation that isunidirectional. Although this is a simplified view on how social networks buildconnectivity between objects, it does allow the relation between objects to beunified and weighted such that each relation becomes a link between two objectswith a ‘strength of association’. This network is represented in Figure 2. Top leftis the generalised case with three instances of that case below. The diagram onthe right represents an interconnected example of a number of instances formedinto a unidirectional graph.Figure 2. Series of relations and resultant network of friends.Design BriefFigure 2 represents a social network of 10 nodes (A-J). Each node is connected toa variable number of its neighbours via links (1-13). Each link between a pair ofnodes is given a simple integer weighting. High weightings equate to a high‘strength of association’ and thus a strong link between nodes. As links are two-way channels information can travel in either direction between two nodes.When communication occurs between two nodes, the ‘strength of association’for a particular network path is the cumulative weights of all the links for oneroute between two nodes. For example, one path between AbdulFay is A,C,G,Fwith a cumulative weighting of 56. Another might be A,C,D,E,F with a cumulativeweighting of 91. The most direct route is A,C,F with a cumulative weighting of 16,but this may not be the most reliable communication route since the strength ofassociation between Clare and Fay is only 2 so very weak. Another variablefeature of the graph in Figure 2 is the number of links a node supports. NodeRelationObjectObjectBobClareBrotherBobDaveClareEarlFayGillAbdula710532803014Hugh75JaneIris320personfriendlinkweightingBobClare180BobDave27EarlDave310412
You’re reading a preview
Preview Documents

To View Complete Document

Click the button to download
Subscribe to our plans

Download This Document