Ask a question from expert

Ask now

(solved) Assignment on Tort Law

12 Pages2629 Words290 Views
   

Added on  2020-02-24

(solved) Assignment on Tort Law

   Added on 2020-02-24

BookmarkShareRelated Documents
Running head: TORT LAWTort LawName of the StudentName of the UniversityAuthor Note
(solved) Assignment on Tort Law_1
1TORT LAWTable of ContentsIssue.................................................................................................................................................2Rules................................................................................................................................................2Application......................................................................................................................................4Conclusion.......................................................................................................................................9Reference.......................................................................................................................................10
(solved) Assignment on Tort Law_2
2TORT LAWIssue According to the case study the issue is whether Essendon Football Club is liable for the healthissues suffered by Nathan Howlett-Murray and his 3 year old daughter for their health issues dueto the program of administering certain supplements to its professional ethics which is alsoknown as the supplement program.Rules According to the case study the Essendon Football Club held liable for the health issues of theparticipants in the Australian football league sessions1. The football club has provided somesupplement program which causes health and safety issues of the footballers and NathanHowlett-Murray who was suffering for the health issues along with his 3 years old daughter.Therefore it is a case of negligence where the football club has breach their duty of care andbreached the rules of duty of care2. It is a case of breach of duty of care due to the negligencewho owns the duty towards the other person. In the case of Donoghue vs. Stevenson3where ithas been found that the person who is providing the service to the consumer has breach the dutyof care while he serving the beer bottle, the plaintiff had found there is a decomposed Snail in thebottle which make her sick and therefore she claims compensation from the service provider forthe breach of Duty. it is a breach of duty of the restaurant attendant who is serving the drinks4. The negligence has been found on the breach of the duty of care of when a person makethe damages to the another person. The suffered person either got injuries or any other property1 Verbruggen, P., Wolters, P., Hildebrandt, M., Sieburgh, C. and Jansen, C., 2016. Towards Harmonised Duties ofCare and Diligence in Cybersecurity2 Dobbs, D.B., 2001. The law of torts (Vol. 2). West Group.3 Atkin, L., 1932. Donoghue v Stevenson. AC, 562, p.580.4 Stewart, P. and Stuhmcke, A., 2014. High Court Negligence Cases 2000–10.
(solved) Assignment on Tort Law_3
3TORT LAWdamage which makes the negligence by the service provider. The negligence only occurs whenthe duty of care is not perform and when the duty of care breached and along with negligencealso applied to the situation. In the case of Strong v Woolworths Limited [2012] the duty ofcare has been found by the defendant who failed to provide proper service to the plaintiff wherehe breach the duty and cause damages to the plaintiff 5. In the case of D'Arcy v The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane [2017]where the court has found that plaintiff has stated that breach has occur due to the negligence ofthe duty of care by the employees while he was driving. However it is the beach of duty and inanother case The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane v Greenway [2017] itwas found that the defendant was fined with penalties for breach the duty of care and occurnegligence towards the plaintiff who got injuries by the defendant6. In another case Stokes v House With No Steps [2016] the court has been found thesignificance of the breach of duty of care by the defendant who cause several damages to theplaintiff due to the negligence. The plaintiff also stated in the court that she was injured at herworkplace while the defendant failed to comply the duty of care towards a disable person and itcause injury and damage with the plaintiff7. When a breach has caused the Civil Liability Act provides the provisions in the tort lawwhere the injured person can take the precaution against the damage if any negligence occur bythe defendant. In another case Perre v Apand Pty Ltd [1999)8 the court describe the duty ofcare of the employment where defendant has failed to satisfy the terms of duty of care. Therefore5 Gray, A., 2016. Liability of police in negligence: a comparative analysis. Tort Law Review, 24(1), pp.34-62.6 Gray, A., 2016. Liability of police in negligence: a comparative analysis. Tort Law Review, 24(1), pp.34-62.7 Dobbs, D.B., 2001. The law of torts (Vol. 2). West Group.8 Verbruggen, P., Wolters, P., Hildebrandt, M., Sieburgh, C. and Jansen, C., 2016. Towards Harmonised Duties ofCare and Diligence in Cybersecurity
(solved) Assignment on Tort Law_4

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
A Case Study on Tort Law- Assignment
|12
|2853
|371

LAW5001 - Tort Law | MacTools Limited
|6
|1266
|168

Case Analysis of Natalie Kathleen D'Arcy vs The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane
|4
|978
|214

The Tort of Negligence Law: Assignment
|7
|1186
|242

Commercial Law Issues (Doc)
|11
|2790
|57

LLB 240- Law - Tort of Negligence | Assignment
|6
|1236
|90