Assignment on Justice Theory
5 Pages1377 Words281 Views
Added on 2021-06-22
Assignment on Justice Theory
Added on 2021-06-22
ShareRelated Documents
Justice theoryRELEVANT FACTS OF JUSTICE THEORYThe basic concept of justice—one that has been universally accepted since Aristotledescribed it over two thousand years ago—is that "equals should be treated fairly andunequal’s unequally." This concept is often articulated in the following contemporary form:"Individuals should be treated the same, unless their differences are important to the situationin which they are involved.RELEVANT ISSUES OF THIS CASE:The main issues concerned, with this case study, yes, revealing the confidentiality about theaccounting department, as well as the upcoming bankruptcy of the company, this cannot bedisclosed as easily to a person who is not Related to company as of now, because that maybea chance that this may be revealed to the public before taking any action. So, revealing ordisclosing the bankruptcy stage of the company is the main issue in this case.PRIMARY STAKEHOLDERS OF THE CASE:A stakeholder is a person or entity that has an interest in a business and can either influenceor be influenced by it. These are the people who have the most to gain from increasingcorporate expansion: the investors, the staff, the consumers, and the suppliers. In this case itis employees or prospective employee such as Mr. TuckerSECONDARY CASEHOLDERS OF THE CASE:Secondary stakeholders can be numerous and may include the following: corporate partners,rivals, inspectors, and regulators. consumer organisations government – federal, state, or localgovernment entities a variety of media interest groups landlords, labour unions, andcommunity organisations. In this case it is media and public who relies on this company
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS OF THE CASE:They main possible solution of this case, may be revealing the current situation of thecompany to Mr. Tucker because according to justice theory, each and every individual has tobe treated fairly and then even he has an opportunity to get employment in the company. So,he has to be revealed about the current situation. But at the same time, the justice theory saysthat the people who are unequal’s can be treated unequally in the same way he cannot berevealed about the situation because We are just analysing him over a phone call, as well aswe are interviewing and in no way, he's connected to the company as of now. So even if thesituation is not disclosed to the employees, or the stakeholders who are currently with thecompany, then there is no need to disclose this to Mr. Tucker.CONSEQUENCES:The main consequences may be either Tucker can withdraw from his idea of joiningthe company or he may join at the same time because he's a third party to the company. He isnot even a primary as well as secondary stakeholder. He can reveal about the situation of thecompany to the public, so it doesn't endanger to reveal this situation to him at the same timeif we undisclosed the situation to Mr. Tucker. It may seem to be an injustice done to theTucker who have very great ideas about moving his family as well as his children to thisplace.SOLUTION:Should not disclose about the situation to Mr. TuckerACTION:
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents
Case Study on Ethical Principleslg...
|6
|1246
|722
Framework for Fraud Case Analysislg...
|6
|1234
|409
Laws and Manage Effective Workplace Relationshipslg...
|16
|3803
|69
Industrial paternalism in progressive Americalg...
|8
|1958
|13
Acc300 Group Assignment PDFlg...
|7
|1952
|33