Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: KNOWLEDGE AND ITS ACCEPTANCE The quality of knowledge is best measured by how many people accept it Name of the Student: Name of the University: Author’s Note:
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1KNOWLEDGE AND ITS ACCEPTANCE As opined byAllen1,knowledge is any kind of information which can not only help in the process of mental as well as the personal development of the individuals. For example, it is seen that the different kinds of knowledge which has we emerged in the present times have contributed in a substantial manner to improve the quality of lives of the people. However, at the same time it is seen that the quality of different kinds of knowledge depends to a greatly on the extent to which it is being accepted by the people.Jahn et al.2are of the viewpoint that this can be explained on the basis of the fact that if the people are not being able to understand the meaning or the significance of a particular kind of knowledge then the usefulness or the effectiveness of the same is of no use to them. Furthermore, there are various factors like reason, logic, emotion and others which affect the acceptance of different kinds of knowledge by the people. For example to be effective as well as useful, it has to be in synchronicity with the logic, reasoning, language and the thought process of the people. This essay will argue the fact that the quality of any kind of knowledge is dependent to a large extent on the number of people who accept it. As opined byBroad3,language is one of the majority factors which not only determines to extent to which a particular knowledge will be accepted by the people but at the same time the number of people who would accept it. For example, it is seen that if the language which is being used by the authors for the formulators or the propounder of the concerned knowledge is a complex one then it is more likely that it will not be readily accepted by the people4. More importantly, this is also likely to affect the number of people who are likely to accept it. In this regard, mention needs to be made regarding the knowledge 1Allen, Barry.Knowledge and civilization. Routledge, 2018. 2Jahn, Katharina, Oliver Heger, Henrik Kampling, Krzysztof Stanik, and Björn Niehaves. "Designing For Knowledge-Based Familiarity, Trust, And Acceptance: The Case Of Affective Technology." (2017): 3224. 3Broad, Charlie Dunbar.The mind and its place in nature. Routledge, 2014. 4Cohen, Patricia Cline.A calculating people: The spread of numeracy in early America. Routledge, 2016.
2KNOWLEDGE AND ITS ACCEPTANCE of robotics, which although have much simplified as well as improved the quality of life of the human beings yet is not being readily accepted by a vast number of people5. This can be explained on the basis of the fact that the language which is being used to propound the varioustheoriesor conceptsrelatedto thisgenre of knowledgeisoften incomplex mathematical or scientific which the common people are unable to understand. I am of the viewpoint that language is indeed one of the major factors which influences not only the understanding of a particular knowledge but at the same time the number of people who would accept it. Human beings have a psychological tendency to reject the things which not have complex meaning but also are written in complex language6. The net of this is the fact that even though some of the knowledge or concepts which can actually prove helpful for the human beings are being rejected by the people. Kaplan7,on the other hand, has argued that the quality of knowledge and also its acceptance by the people is not at all determined by the number of people who accept it. As opined byLehrer8,the quality of any knowledge should be determined by the contribution that it has made to improve the condition of the human beings rather than on the extent to which it is being understood or accepted by the people. In this regard, it needs to be said that although the technology or the knowledge of robotics is being used by the different individuals and has simplified as well as improved the quality of life of individuals yet it is being rejected by the people. This can be explained on the basis of the fact that not everyone has the sample kind of intelligence level or educational training for that matter and it is not possible for everyone to understand the complex processes behind the knowledge related to 5Allen, Barry.Knowledge and civilization. Routledge, 2018. 6Habermas, Jürgen.Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. 7Kaplan, Abraham.The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioural science. Routledge, 2017. 8Lehrer, Keith.Theory of knowledge. Routledge, 2018.
3KNOWLEDGE AND ITS ACCEPTANCE robotics9. In this regard, I would like to say that I disagree with this fact since I am of the viewpoint that if I am not being able to understand a particular theory or concept then it is likely to have very less significance for me. More importantly, I believe that this is also likely to reduce the number of people who would accept that particular knowledge as useful since it is not possible for people to use or appreciate any kind of knowledge if they are not being able to understand its basic working principle. Furthermore, I would also like to say that this has nothing to do with the basic understanding of the knowledge or the quality of the knowledge rather it has to do with the language which has been used to articulate the working mechanism of the concerned knowledge. Popper10is of the viewpoint that emotion is an important aspect which not only dictates the principle actions of the human beings but at the same time affects their thought process as well. In this context, mention needs to be made of the fact that the human beings have a tendency to reject the things or concepts which are not in synchronicity with their emotional beliefs or emotions for that matter11. As opined byRouse12,the emotions of the individuals in turn are dictated to a large extent by the kind of past experiences, knowledge, up-bringing and other aspects of their life. The net result of this is the fact that the human beings always tend to analyze any new information or knowledge on the basis of their past experiences or emotions. More importantly, it is generally seen that if these individuals are being able to correlate with these knowledge or information of the basis of their past 9Machlup, Fritz.Knowledge: its creation, distribution and economic significance, Volume I: Knowledge and knowledge production. Vol. 741. Princeton university press, 2014. 10Popper, Karl.Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. routledge, 2014. 11Jahn, Katharina, Oliver Heger, Henrik Kampling, Krzysztof Stanik, and Björn Niehaves. "Designing For Knowledge-Based Familiarity, Trust, And Acceptance: The Case Of Affective Technology." (2017): 3224. 12Rouse, Joseph.Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Cornell University Press, 2018.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4KNOWLEDGE AND ITS ACCEPTANCE experiences or knowledge then it is being accepted by them or otherwise rejected13. I personally believe the emotions of individuals are a pivotal factor in determining whether the concerned knowledge would be accepted by them or not. This will become more apparent from one of my own personal experiences which I faced a while back. I would like to say in this regard that a while back I was reading an article about the stem cells and also the manner in which they could be used to make the human beings immortal. However, that new piece of knowledge was rejected by me on the basis of the fact that they were not I synchronicity with my emotional beliefs. For example, I have been brought up as per the strict dictums of Christianity in which God is supposed to be the creator of human beings. However, this new piece of knowledge by challenging by existing emotions related to God articulated that the human beings have gained the knowledge to create similar living beings like them. This was one of the major reasons why this particular piece of knowledge was rejected by me although it could prove to be very beneficial for mankind in future. Shusterman14, on the contrary, argue the fact that emotions are a very subjective entity and differ from people to people. For example, it is generally seen that the emotions of an individuals are dependent on a plethora of factors and these factors differ from individuals to individuals. The net result of this is the fact that not everyone had the same understanding of the different kinds of knowledge which are conveyed to them. However, at the same time, it needs to be said that the emotions of the individuals should not be the solely determining factor of the quality of the knowledge or for that matter the number of people who would accept it15. On the other hand, the sole determining factor the quality of a particular 13Psouni, Elia, Simona Di Folco, and Giulio Cesare Zavattini. "Scripted secure base knowledge and its relation toperceivedsocialacceptanceandcompetenceinearlymiddlechildhood."Scandinavianjournalof psychology56, no. 3 (2015): 341-348. 14Shusterman, Richard.Practicing philosophy: Pragmatism and the philosophical life. Routledge, 2016. 15Machlup, Fritz.Knowledge: its creation, distribution and economic significance, Volume I: Knowledge and knowledge production. Vol. 741. Princeton university press, 2014.
5KNOWLEDGE AND ITS ACCEPTANCE knowledge and also the number of people who would accept it rather the contribution made by the concerned knowledge towards the improvement of the human beings should be sole determining factor16. As mentioned in the particular context of the knowledge of stem cells and the manner in which this knowledge can be used to improve the condition of human beings the sole determining factor is emotions and not its quality. In this regard, it can be said that this knowledge can be used to medically empower the human beings and cure various diseases. However, I personally disagree with this fact since I believe that for knowledge to be useful it has to connect emotionally with the people. To conclude, knowledge is a very subjective and its interpretation varies from people to people. More importantly, it is seen that one particular kind of knowledge which has provedusefulforoneindividualcanprovetobedestructiveforotherindividuals. Furthermore, it is seen that the factors like emotions, language, thought process and others determine to a great extent whether a particular kind of knowledge would be accepted by the people. Moreover, it is also seen that in the recent times the quality of a particular kind of knowledge is determined to a large extent on the basis of the fact that whether the people are able to connect with it emotionally or understand its language or not. Furthermore, the number of people who accept the concerned knowledge also determines to a great extent the quality of that knowledge. 16Lehrer, Keith.Theory of knowledge. Routledge, 2018.
6KNOWLEDGE AND ITS ACCEPTANCE References Allen, Barry.Knowledge and civilization. Routledge, 2018. Broad, Charlie Dunbar.The mind and its place in nature. Routledge, 2014. Cohen, Patricia Cline.A calculating people: The spread of numeracy in early America. Routledge, 2016. Habermas, Jürgen.Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. Jahn, Katharina, Oliver Heger, Henrik Kampling, Krzysztof Stanik, and Björn Niehaves. "DesigningForKnowledge-BasedFamiliarity,Trust,AndAcceptance:TheCaseOf Affective Technology." (2017): 3224. Kaplan, Abraham.The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioural science. Routledge, 2017. Lehrer, Keith.Theory of knowledge. Routledge, 2018. Machlup, Fritz.Knowledge: its creation, distribution and economic significance, Volume I: Knowledge and knowledge production. Vol. 741. Princeton university press, 2014. Popper, Karl.Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. routledge, 2014. Psouni, Elia, Simona Di Folco, and Giulio Cesare Zavattini. "Scripted secure base knowledge anditsrelationtoperceivedsocialacceptanceandcompetenceinearlymiddle childhood."Scandinavian journal of psychology56, no. 3 (2015): 341-348.
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7KNOWLEDGE AND ITS ACCEPTANCE Rouse, Joseph.Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Cornell University Press, 2018. Shusterman,Richard.Practicingphilosophy:Pragmatismandthephilosophicallife. Routledge, 2016.