logo

Case of Law - Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots

7 Pages1307 Words82 Views
   

Added on  2020-05-28

Case of Law - Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots

   Added on 2020-05-28

ShareRelated Documents
Running Head: Law1Law
Case of Law - Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots_1
Law2Answer 1Issue:Whether Yash is liable to sell displayed painting to the Poppy?Law:Offer is completely different from invitation to deal, but it is not easy to determine the differencebetween the two. Test in this scenario includes the intention of the parties under which Court determines whether statement made by parties give result to an agreement or further negotiation. In this context leading case law is Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots1. It must be noted that goods displayed by sellers in their shops are not considered as offer but it’s just an invitation to treat. In this customer makes the offer to the seller to purchase the goods, andit completely depends on the discretion of parties whether they accept or reject the offer. Application:In the present case, painting displayed by the Yash in his shop cannot be considered as an offer and it was mere an invitation to deal because Yash does not intend to sell the painting but he just displayed it. In above stated case, Court of Appeal stated that Goods on shelf does not constitute any offer but it’s just an invitation to deal, and customers takes the goods and makes the offer. Therefore, Yash does not make any offer and there is no contract concluded between Yash and Poppy. Conclusion:1Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v BootsCourt of Appeal [1953] 1 QB 401; [1953] EWCA Civ 6; [1953] 1 All ER 482, [1953] 2 WLR 427.
Case of Law - Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots_2
Law3In this case, offer is made by Poppy to purchase the painting and such offer is rejected by Yash and Yash is not liable to sell the painting. Answer 2Part AIssue:Whether Zaffa have any right to take action against the Earlham Bee Keepers’ School under tort law?Law:Breach of duty under tort law is considered at that time when defendant fails to fulfill his obligation related to standard of care required by the law. For making the claim under tort law, claimant must establish:Defendant own duty of care towards the plaintiff.Defendant breach duty of care.Plaintiff suffered loss or injury. This can be understood through case law Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 5622. In this case, Court establishes the modern law of negligence and also introduced neighbor test. Duty of care is considered as those situations and relationships under which law impose duty on person to take care, and if any person fails in fulfilling this obligation and because of which 2 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562.
Case of Law - Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots_3

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Liability of Sam in Three Aircraft Losses Due to Negligence
|7
|1373
|223

Liability under Tort Law: A Case Study on Negligence and Duty of Care
|5
|1314
|458

Liabilities in Tort - Assignment
|10
|2906
|132

Business Law Assignment 2018: Potential Plaintiffs in Case of Negligence
|5
|1227
|254

A Case Study on Tort Law- Assignment
|12
|2853
|371

M1K316 - Applied Commercial Law
|6
|1198
|74