Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................1 1. The meaning of a ‘representation’ and how a mere representation can be distinguished from a term of a contract.................................................................................................................1 2. The grounds under which dismissal from employment would be unfair at law................3 3. The main duties governing the company directors.............................................................5 4. The principles governing award of damages in the Law of Tort and the ways in which damages may be limited.........................................................................................................7 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................8 REFERENCES................................................................................................................................9
INTRODUCTION Law for business managers means those areas or aspects of law which are of relevance in decision–making for the people who are in management positions in any business organisation. This law is used by the business managers in managing themselves along with the company's business. The laws which are of importance for business managers are the law of contracts, law of tort, business law, etc. Business law covers the laws which are of importance for a business manager to function as this deals with the commercial transactions in a business. The report provides an overview of various laws pertaining to business law, employment law, law of torts and law of contracts through providing a possible solution to the problems by applying the legal rules, legal reasoning and legal theories. The report focuses on various aspects of these laws along with legal precedents and other relevant case laws. MAIN BODY 1. The meaning of a ‘representation’ and how a mere representation can be distinguished from a term of a contract. While forming a contract or entering into a contract there are certain statements which induces or made the parties to enter into a contract. There are various kinds of pre-contractual statements which might give rise to contractual obligations, which are – Puffs, Terms and Representations A puff can be understood as a statement which does not give rise to legal consequences as they are not taken into consideration and does not bind the parties legally. In the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.[1893] 1 QB 256the advertisement was argued by the defendants as puff which was rejected by the Bench. In legal terms a 'representation' is a statement pertaining to a matter of fact or current intention of the parties which the parties generally does not intend to make a contractual term while having a contractual negotiation. These terms though induces the other party to enter into a contract (Cohen, 2011). A representation is not a term of contract, but, in terms of a financial transaction a representation is often treated as a contractual term, as held in the caseOscar Chess Ltd. V Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370.Therefore, arepresentation is a statement of fact which induces a party to enter into a contract which is made before or at the time of making a contract, and this statement is either about a past fact or an existing circumstance which is in relation to 1
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
the contract causing an influence on such party to enter into a contract. For instance, if a licensor represents to a licensee that he has the power and whole authority to enter into an agreement and can grant the rights under license to the licensee. A representation which is not true under rules of contract, forms to be a misrepresentation (Peel, 2015). Since, it is not a term of contract, a party cannot negate the contract on the basis of misrepresentation but the party which has suffered can make a claim for damages. Aterm of a contractis a provision which forms part of a contract which gives rise to a contractual obligation and breach of any contractual obligation can give rise to litigation or claim for damages (Lawson, 2011). Difference between a term of contract and a mere representation The difference between a mere representation and the terms of a contract is that whenever astatementismadeinthecourseofnegotiationscaneitherbeacontractualtermor representation.Thedeterminationofsuchastatementasacontractualobligationand representation is must as the cause of action and remedy will be ascertained in accordance to the nature of the statement (McKendrick, 2014). If a statement is a contractual term in a contract which is not fulfilled then the aggrieved party might sue for the breach of contract as there is automatically a right given to the party to claim for damages whereas if a statement is a mere representation which is not true then the aggrieved or innocent party can initiate an action for misrepresentation. An innocent party can claim for damages when the statements made can be proved to be fraudulent or negligent as under theMisrepresentation Act, 1967provides that an innocent representation does not result in a claim for damages unless it falls under any exception under section 2(2) of the Act, 1967. Another distinction which the courts consider for differentiating between the two terms is whether the statement is in writing or not, as if the statement is in writing then it will be assumed that it forms a term of a contract and not representation. There are various rules pertaining to this concept, which are - Theparol evidence rulestates that the parties cannot claim the existence of another from other sources if the terms are written in a contract (Fried, 2015). Collateral contractsare oral agreements which led to formation of written contract which runs aside the written contract. In the caseHenderson v Arthur[1907] 1 KB 10held that collateral agreement would only be considered if the terms in both the contracts are different. 2
In the given problem Monica could claim for damages from Chandler on the ground of misrepresentation as the statements made while negotiating resulted into a contract and she bought the car on the basis of his knowledge and expertise as held in the case ofDick Bentley Productions v Harold Motors[1965] 1 WLR 623. But, Chandler has a defence under the Misrepresentations Act, 1967 if the statements made by him falls under the purview of innocent representations. 2. The grounds under which dismissal from employment would be unfair at law In general terms unfair dismissal means that the employment contract is terminated by the employer without having a fair reason to do so. According to business law dictionary unfair dismissal means 'termination of a contract of employment for unfair or inadmissible reasons' (Unfair Dismissal, 2018). Whenever termination is challenged in a court of law, the employer has to prove that the termination was on substantial grounds, such as gross misconduct, etc. and the court takes into consideration the statutory rights of the employee. The persons employed in any of the jobs have the protection of law from any unfair or unethical grounds of termination (Barrett, 2003). The Employment law provides an employee protection against being subjected to unfair dismissal and if the employer is terminating an employee then he has to establish a reason which are covered under the categories provided under theEmployment Rights Act, 1996.The categories under which an employer can be dismissed or terminated are as follows: Firstly, the employee lacks capability or qualifications in relation to the work, for which employee is recruited. Secondly, the dismissal is due to the conduct of the employee, for instance, the employees' conduct was dishonest or amounted to gross misconduct or employee failed to follow the instructions etc. Thirdly, if the employer can prove there was a genuine redundancy. Lastly, if the employer can establish that continuing with the employment will result in contravention of a statute (Ewing and Hendy Qc, 2012). There are another substantial grounds under which the employer could dismiss or terminatetheemployeebeforethequalifyingperiodofemploymentactuallyterminates according to the terms of the contract. But, since these are not specified under the provisions of the legislation the employer has to prove a strong case before terminating the employment of the 3
employee. For instance, if there are personality clashes between the employer and employee, or whereintheclientexpresslywishesthattheemployeeshouldnotbecontinuingwith management of the clients' account, or where the employee unreasonably refuses to accept any changes in the terms of the contract. These grounds are determined by the court according to the facts and circumstances of the case (Acharya, Baghai and Subramanian, 2013). The dismissal or termination of an employee has to be proved by the employer to be covered under one of the provisions specified in the Act, 1996, if the employer fails to establish that the dismissal falls under the act then such a dismissal is termed to be unfair. Further, even if the employer succeeds in proving that the ground of termination falls under the provisions of the act then also it is the discretion of the Employment Tribunal to decide in accordance to equity and on the merits of the case. Qualifying period of employment for unfair dismissal and Automatic unfair dismissal Any employee to make a claim for unfair dismissal has to e employed for a period of 23 months and 3 weeks without any breaks in between and should not be serving a notice before expiration of 2 years of employment apart from certain exceptions wherein the claim for unfair dismissal can be made without serving the notice period. This simply means that the employee has to be under employment of the employer for a period of not less than 2 years. There are certain exceptions to the notice period under which a dismissal will be automatically unfair with no specific period of qualifying time such as dismissal under health and safety reasons, or under businesstransfer,orparticipatingintradeunionactivitiesorwhileassertingstatutory employment right or whistle-blowing, etc. Compensation The Employment Tribunal can award compensation which includes basic award and compensatory award. The basic award is provided under a statute which is calculated by multiplying the important factors consisting of length of continuous service, employees' age and a weeks' pay. The tribunal can reduce the amount of basic award if it is satisfied that the conduct of the employee was unreasonable and unjustifiable before dismissal (Collins, Ewing and McColgan, 2012). The compensatory award according to the Employment Rights Act, 1996 the amount of the award will be in accordance to the discretion of the Tribunal, that is, which it seems to be just and equitable considering the loss of current and future wages, etc. 4
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Therefore, applying the above mentioned law Monica can suggest the Board about the terms under which dismissal of the employee would amount to be unfair along with the legal implications arising out of the such dismissal, which is litigation and claims for compensatory awards under the Act, 1996. 3. The main duties governing the company directors TheCompanies Act, 2006is the prime legislation which deals with the commercial transactions and other dealings in a business organisation. Any business organisation functions through two bodies of people, which are the directors and the shareholders. The board of directors in an organisation are in charge of the management of the business activities as they take major strategic and operational decisions of the company and ensures that the statutory obligations of the company are met (Mann and Roberts, 2011). As an individual director, the duty of a director is to participate in the meetings of the board so that the board could come to decision to carry on the business of the company. Monica can advice the two new directors of the company Young & Ernst LLP about their roles and responsibilities in accordanceto the provisions of the Act, 2006. The main duties governing the directors in an organisation are as follows: Act within the powers: The director must act in accordance to the articles of association which is the constitution of the company. The director should exercise within their powers to carry out the functions of the company, as there are legal implications if the directors act ultra vires of their powers (The responsibilities and duties of a company director, 2018). Promote the success of the company: A director should act in good faith in order to ensure the promotion of success of the company for the benefits of the members of the company. A company's success means the long term increase in value but it is the duty of every director to decide and act in good faith as to whether the taken course of action would be appropriate or not. Exercise independent judgement: A director must exercise independent judgement while making the decisions. The director should be acting in accordance to thecompany's constitution and this should not affected by the independent judgement of a director (Mortimore, 2013). 5
Exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence: A director is expected to exercise care, skill and diligence which would be used by an ordinary prudent person. This includes the general knowledge, skill and experience that a person possess and which are expected from a reasonable person to carry out or perform any function. A directors' expected care, skill and diligence can be measured by taking into consideration both the objective and subjective standards. Avoid conflicts of interests: A director should try to avoid getting into a situation in which he has or could have a conflicting interest, meaning thereby the director should avoid having an interest which is conflicting to the interests of the company. This includesinstancesofexploitationofpropertyorinformationoropportunityetc. Conflicting situations could arise if a director has multiple directorships, i.e., if a director is a major shareholder along with a competitor or customer of the company, etc. or the director is also an advisor to the company, or if any related person of director is in a position which could create conflicting situations.In these situations a director is expected to stick to the constitution of the company, regulate his behaviour or take approval before coming on to a decision (Conac, 2013). Does not accept benefits from third parties: As a director of Young & Ernst LLP should not accept benefits from a third party given because of the virtue of being a director or because of any action taken as a director. The duty to not to accept benefits is not infringed if any director is accepting such interests are not likely to give rise to any conflict of interests in that regard (ANDREW, 2016). Declare interests in proposed or existing transactions of the company: A director is under an obligation to disclose or declare whether he is directly or indirectly have any interest in any of the transaction or agreements of the company. A director is responsible to make any such disclosure before entering into such a transaction or agreement and in case there is an existing transaction then the director should make a disclosure within a reasonable time. The non disclosure does not create any liability if the directed having an interest is not aware of existence of such an interest or the other directors are already aware of the interest, or the interest does not amount to be conflicting directly or indirectly (Laster and Zeberkiewicz, 2014). 6
The directors owe their general duties to the company of which they are director of and not to any other group of companies or shareholdings, as the company can take any action against breach of duty under its own name. The penalty for breach of general duties is injunction or claim for damages or compensation or criminal liability for non disclosure of interests. 4. The principles governing award of damages in the Law of Tort and the ways in which damages may be limited A tort is a civil wrong which is committed against an individual and not against the state. The main principle underlying the law of tort is that an individual has interests which have protection of law and their infringement results in claims for damages. Any person who suffers loss or damage because of the wrongful act is entitled to a remedy, which is in the form of sum of money, called damages (Deakin, Johnston and Markesinis, 2012). Damages are awarded in tort law to restore the injured person in the same position as he wouldhavebeenifthetortwasnotoccurred,whichisdifferentfromtheconceptof compensation in the law of contract as that aims to put the innocent party in the position he would have been if the terms of the contract were performed. The principle of damages under law of tort is subjected to the other principles of remoteness, causation and mitigation. The principle of recovering damages under the English law of Tort was laid down by Lord Blackburn in the case ofLivington v Rawyards Coal Co.[1880] 5 App. Cas., 25 at p. 29, as the amount of money which is awarded to the injured person to put him back into the position he would be if he had not suffered the wrong. There are two types of damages – compensatory and punitive. Compensatory damagescan be further classified as the general damages and the special damages, which are awarded in case of economic loss relating to earnings, property or medical expenses as special damages and for the non-economic loss such as pain, suffering and emotional distress, general damages are awarded (Van Dam, 2013). In the case ofThe Golden Victory[2007]2 AC 353the House of Lords held that while assessing the damages the court should consider the effects of subsequent events on the claimant's loss. The punitive damagesare awarded with the intent to reform or deter the defendant and not only to just compensate the plaintiff. These are awarded in special cases pertaining to action of the defendant involving blatant negligence, malicious or gross rashness, etc. 7
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Reduction of Damages The Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act, 1945 provides provisions pertaining to reduction of damages of the claimant if he himself is guilty of contributory negligence. The damages are reduced by the court in such cases to the extent it thinks just and equitable by considering the claimant's share in cause of damage (Cornford, 2016). In case ofLiebeck v McDonald's Restaurants (1994), the plaintiff spilled the coffee in her lap resulting in second and third degree burns which required skin grafting. After being refused a claim for medical expenses the lady filed a litigation and it was discovered that there were several complaints of severe burns caused by the company's coffee. The jury decided that the product of the company was injurious and harmful and awarded both compensatory and punitive damages to the plaintiff. Though, in this case the court reduced the damages on the grounds of plaintiff's own fault and negligence. Similarly, in the given case Joey can initiate a claim against Ross for the accident which resulted in causing him a fractured leg. But, since he was also at fault by continuing walking on the road, the court would reduce the amount of damages. CONCLUSION It can be concluded in the given report that business law encompasses all the transactions and activities in a business organisation. A business manager is responsible for knowing the rules and legislations covering the business transactions. The report throws light on the concepts of representationandtermsofcontract,unfairdismissalofemployees,andthedutiesand responsibilities of the directors in any company. The report briefly explains the importance of damages in the law of tort and how these damages could be limited or reduced. 8
REFERENCES Books and Journals Acharya, V. V., Baghai, R.P. and Subramanian, K. V., 2013. Labor laws and innovation.The Journal of Law and Economics. 56(4). pp.997-1037. ANDREW. KEAY, L.L.B., 2016.DIRECTORS'DUTIES. JORDAN PUBLISHING Limited. Barrett, R., 2003. Small business and unfair dismissal.Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(1). pp.87-93. Cohen,G.M.,2011.Interpretationandimpliedtermsincontractlaw(pp.125-151). Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar. Collins, H., Ewing, K. D. and McColgan, A., 2012.Labour law. Cambridge University Press. Conac, P. H., 2013. Director’s Duties in Groups of Companies–Legalizing the Interest of the Group at the European Level.European Company and Financial Law Review. 10(2). pp.194-226. Cornford, T., 2016.Towards a public law of tort. Routledge. Deakin, S. F., Johnston, A. and Markesinis, B., 2012.Markesinis and Deakin's Tort Law. Oxford University Press. Ewing, K. D. and Hendy Qc, J., 2012. Unfair dismissal law changes—unfair?.Industrial Law Journal. 41(1). pp.115-121. Fried, C., 2015.Contract as promise: A theory of contractual obligation. Oxford University Press, USA. Laster, J. T. and Zeberkiewicz, J. M., 2014. The rights and duties of blockholder directors.The Business Lawyer.pp.33-60. Lawson, R. G., 2011.Exclusion clauses and unfair contract terms. Sweet & Maxwell. Mann, R. A. and Roberts, B. S., 2011.Smith and Roberson’s business law. Cengage Learning. McKendrick, E., 2014Contract law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press (UK). Mortimore, S., 2013.Company directors: duties, liabilities, and remedies. Oxford University Press. Peel, E., 2015.Treitel on the Law of Contract(Vol. 414). London: Sweet & maxwell. Van Dam, C., 2013.European tort law. OUP Oxford. Online Unfairdismissal.2018.[Online]Availablethrough <http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/unfair-dismissal.html>./ The responsibilities and duties of a company director.2018. [Online] Available through <https://www.burges-salmon.com/news-and-insight/publications/the-responsibilities- and-duties-of-a-company-director/>./ GeneralprinciplesofTortlaw.2011.[Online]Availablethrough <https://elearn.unisofia.bg/pluginfile.php/100711/mod_resource/content/1/ understanding_torts.pdf>./ 9