MANAGEMENT LAW LAWS20061 MANAGEMENT LAW 20061 Management Law Name of the University Author

Running head: LAWS20061 MANAGEMENT LAW
Management Law
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1LAWS20061 MANAGEMENT LAW
Table of Contents
Question 1........................................................................................................................................3
Issue.............................................................................................................................................3
Rules............................................................................................................................................3
Application..................................................................................................................................4
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................4
Question 2........................................................................................................................................5
Issue.............................................................................................................................................5
Rules............................................................................................................................................5
Application..................................................................................................................................5
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................6
Question 3........................................................................................................................................7
Issue.............................................................................................................................................7
Rules............................................................................................................................................7
Application..................................................................................................................................7
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................8
Question 4........................................................................................................................................9
Issue.............................................................................................................................................9
Rules............................................................................................................................................9
Application................................................................................................................................10

2LAWS20061 MANAGEMENT LAW
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................11
Reference.......................................................................................................................................12

3LAWS20061 MANAGEMENT LAW
Question 1
Issue
According to the case study the issue has been arises whether Susan is entitled to have all
the fortunes from his husband after their divorce or she was only entitled to have $100,000
according to the contract which has been formed at the time of marriage?
Rules
As per the case study it is a case of contract law. When a contract was formed it make the
concerned with the legal enforcement of promises where the terms of contract has been made
freely and have common intention to make a legal relationship between the parties. It has sets
particular of terms where as per the basis of such terms a contract can be formed under the
Australian contract law. The terms of the contract are agreement where proposal and acceptance
must be included, consideration, capacity to contract, intention to create legal relationship and
certainty of the contract. If a contract fails due to the dissatisfied these terms then it will never
form a valid contract.
In the case of Administration of PNG v Leahy (1961) the court has found that the terms
of contacts are missing when the contract has been formed. It also failed to establish improper
legal relationship due to the failure of the illegal intension between the parties which make the
contract completely invalid.
Another case is Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth High Court
of Australia (1954) where the contract has failed to form due to the dissatisfaction of the terms
of contract. According to the terms of contract there was no consideration, condition and legal