logo

Leadership Management Name of the Student Name of the University Author note

   

Added on  2022-08-12

15 Pages3891 Words20 Views
Running head: LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT
Leadership Management
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author note

LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT
1
Executive Summary
The report has thrown light in analysing the different kinds of aspects of the stewardship in
the leadership approach which is followed in different companies. In the current scenario, the
different companies are preferring the different kinds of leadership aspects which are
stewardship in nature as they will be helpful in taking into consideration the different kinds of
viewpoints of the employees. Moreover, from the comparison between the charismatic and
the stewardship in leadership approach, it can be concluded that the stewardship is the most
significant element which needs to be implemented by the companies for improving the
efficiency of the company as a whole.

LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT
2
Table of Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Analysis and Definition of Steward Leadership........................................................................3
Analysis and Discussion Related to Difference Between Servant and Steward Leadership.....5
Comparison Between Steward Leadership and Charismatic Leadership..................................6
Conclusion................................................................................................................................10
References................................................................................................................................11

LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT
3
Introduction
The report throws light in analysing the concept of Steward leadership along with
difference between the steward leadership and servant leadership as after reviewing idea of
Wilson, all the stewards are not servants, however, all servants are stewards. Lastly, there
should be the comparison between the steward leadership along with transformational
leadership which will be providing a high level of focus on the two kinds of theories which
will be beneficial in understanding the pros and cons of the leadership approach successfully.
Analysis and Definition of Steward Leadership
As commented by Welty Peachey and Burton (2017), the steward leadership is
considered to be the concept of the leadership which helps in reflecting the revelation of us in
becoming the leaders. Moreover, the steward leadership mainly focuses on others, society
and community at large rather than self. In addition, stewardship is considered to be the most
pragmatically successful kind of model in different kinds of companies present in different
parts of the world which can be inclusive of both profit as well as non-profit companies.
Moreover, as opined by Sy, Horton and Riggio (2018), the leaders are considered to be
stewards at the team level wherein they perform the work for ensuring the fact that the
different individuals within the company interact in a well and effective manner with one
another.
As commented by Steinmann et al. (2018), the steward leadership or the leaders can
be seen in the business world as well as in the non-profit world and they have the capability
in recognizing the fact they work on behalf of the other. Moreover, the steward has been able
to be entrusted with the different resources, role along with power for acting on the behalf of
the one for whom they perform the different tasks. As opined by Shamir and Howell (2018),

End of preview

Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.

Related Documents
Management- Stewardship and Governance
|9
|2143
|486

Servant Leadership: Pros and Cons for Organizational Behavior
|8
|2125
|488

Analysis of Leadership Styles: CEO and Supervisor
|8
|2138
|24

Comparison of Servant Leadership and Authentic Leadership Styles
|9
|2679
|358

Leadership Theories and Styles
|6
|1138
|69

Principles of Management
|10
|1929
|158