This essay discusses various leadership styles such as autocratic, democratic, transformational, and laissez-faire, and explores the skills required for effective leadership, including problem-solving, decisiveness, team-building, and dependability.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Leading and Managing Work Teams
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
INTRODUCTION Team management is considered as the ability of an entity or individuals to coordinate and administer an individual’s group in order to perform task(Valente, 2018). Within the organisation team can come within various sizes and shapes who work collaboratively and also relied on each other. They communicate as well as strive to achieve a particular goals as well as objectives. Present essay will focus on concept and theory related to team working and how it is related with performance management. MAIN BODY Compare and contrast concept and theory related to effective team working and relate with performance management In order to develop and form a team there are certain theories and concepts which are applied. The use of theory depends on what type of team is to be developed. It is necessary to have effective team so that goals and objectives are attained(Hoang, 2017). Moreover, effective team work in better way as compared to ineffective team. Besides that their performance is high as well. The theory are defined as Tuckman theory- in was developed in 1965 and there are 5 stages in it which is Forming- it is first stage in which team is formed but the members do no know each other. They behave independently and time is incurred on creating bond with each other and knowing. Storming- here, member start developing relations with each other. Also, tasks are performed and ideas are shared by members. Thus, they work together to attain common goal Norming- in this member take responsibility of their task. Moreover, they trust and support each other in completion of tasks. It leads to effective working(Moyo. and Perumal, 2020).
Performing–In this cooperation have been well -established and the team is mature, organized. There is a clear and stable structure, and members are committed to the goals. Problems and conflicts still emerge, but is dealt effectively. Adjourning- this is last stage where goals are attained and team is broken down. The members still share bond with others. It has been evaluated that both theories are related to team development. They are useful in forming effective teams in which there are diversified member. Moreover, it ensure that team developed is effective and roles are assigned properly. Besides that, members work together by creating bond. In belbin there are many roles defined that can be integrated in norming stage of tuckman theory. However, if effective team is formed than it leads to high performance management. This is because in that team there is systematic communication, roles assigned are clear and specific, there is equal contribution of each member, etc. Hence, it leads to attaining of goals in time. The performance of team is always effective as theory is uses to form it. Both concept helps in forming a balanced and effective teams. forexample- in Primark, tuckman theory is mostly used to form teams. And then performance of each team is measured. Belbin team theory- The theory categories entire team roles into 9 roles and is divided into 3 category that is action people and thought oriented. Thusthe roles are defined as below Action oriented- Shaper- they are those who want to improve team. They are extrovert and question other and identify best method to solve problem. They find challenge as interesting and are always have courage to push forward when they feel like to quit. Implementer- they are those who put ideas into practical and implement it. They are highly discipline and likes to work in organised way. On other hand implementer are flexible as well Finisher- they are those who want to finish project on time. Also, they focus on small mistake being occurred as they want to do all work in perfect way(Moyo. and Perumal, 2020). People oriented
Coordinator- basically they act as team leader and are having their own objectives. Moreover, they are able to recognize value of each member and on basis of that assign roles to him. They remain calm and are good in nature as well Team worker- As name depict they are those who support team in completion of goals. Also, they are diplomatic and flexible. They help people to get along with team. Resource investigator- these people are innovative and try to explore available options. Thus, they make contact with others to acquire resources. They are extrovert and work with external stakeholders to attain goals and objectives(Khan. and Harriss, 2019). Though oriented Plant- These are creative innovator who comes up with new ideas and approaches. They thrive on praise but criticism is especially hard for them to deal with. Plants are often introverted and prefer to work apart from the team. Monitor- they analyse and evaluate ideas given by other people. Besides that, benefit and weakness of each option is examine and then decision is taken by them. They are critical thinkers Specialist- As name shows these are those who are specialized in particular field and are having skills and experience. Their role is to act as expert within team(Glazer.and Liu,2017). On contrary there is difference between both theories. It can be identified that in tuckman there are 5 stages which is defined. So, there is nothing mentioned about roles and how team is formed. The stages are defined in brief. Similarly, in belbin theory it only shows that who all are there in team. Here, only different roles are defined and there is no particular formation of how team is developed is shown in it. Furthermore, tuckman and belbin are different from one another. One shows stages of team formation whereas other shows 9 team roles on basis of behavior and characteristics of members(Haunton, 2020).. The theory state about weak areas of team that need to be improved. In addition, all team roles are defined in detailed that what each person do and behave like while working in team and in tuckman there is nothing described like this. It shows that what happen in each stage and what member do in it. The both concept are related to performance managementasforming of ineffectiveteamresultsin not attainingof goalsand objectives. This also impact on member productivity and entire team performance.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Hence, in these both each stage and member role needs to be defined in clear way so that effective team is developed.For examplestesco uses belbin theory to form teams for various project and increasing performance of employees. CONCLUSION From the above it had been concluded that there are many team development theories likeTuckman theory, belbin, etc. in all there are several stages of forming team. In tuckeman stages areforming,Storming, Norming andPerformin.. In belbin stages areAction oriented, Implementer, Finisher, People oriented, Team worker, Resource investigator, Though oriented and many more.. INTRODUCTION It is necessary for leader to follow different leadershipstylesso that goals are attained. The use of styles depends on traits and characteristics of leader. Besides that, it also depends on situation as well. without leadership styles, a leader is not ableto lead team. This essay will discuss about various leadership styles and skills of leader. MAIN BODY Different leadership styles Autocratic leadership styles-This is the type of the leadership styles that can be centre around as well as fully focused on the leader. Here in this leadership styles all the decisions making are made through leaders without taking any consultation with other employees within firm. Here leader takes their own decisions and all other staff members follow their decisions as here authority is within the hands of a single person. It also improves performance within various situations as managers are also motivated. Also decision making is fast.With no consultation needed the leader makes the decisions quick.Also less stress within certain circumstances. For managers and other employees it can outcomes within less stress consider as a leader focuses on all the responsibility for results(Wiese, 2017). For examples- Aldi leader usually follow this type of leadership style. It has resulted in achieving goals.
Democratic leadership-As per this leadership style the leaders of the firm takes the decisions by taking the help of the other employees within a firm. In the contrast of the autocratic leadership the ideas as well as opinions are freely shared and also open discussed is boosted. Here the leader’s role is boosted to guide as well as direct such discussions. In addition to this ultimately makes decisions as democratic leaders expect their employees so that have provides valuable experience as well as self confident (Moyo. and Perumal, 2020). Here one of the big advantages is that has good working environment at several levels can also feels engaged as well as takes responsibility in order to challenge themselvesas they are included within the process ofdecision makingaswell assuch sense of engagementthat canprovidesa good working environment as well as enhanced job satisfaction. for example-in M&S leader engage employee to take decisions. Transformationalleadership-Hereleadersboosted,motivateandinspirestaff members in order to innovate as well as creates changes that will aids grow and shape for the future perspectives of the firm. It is achieved through setting an example at the executive level by corporate culture’s strong sense, staff members’ independence ad ownership within the firm. Transformational leaders are the one who motivates and inspires their employees without micromanaging as they trust trained staff members so that the authority over decisions within assigned jobs(Glazer.and Liu,2017). It is considered as a management style so that the decisions in order to give staff members more room to be creative, find new solutions regarding old problems look to the future. (Chen, 2020).Here there is a balanced goal as leaders balance the requirements for the long term and short term goals. Also employee also feels deeply trust and supported their leader as they behave in build strong coalitions. Here transformation leaders are also very focused by the communicating the vision more regularly with clarity and passion, strategic vision as well as motivated. For instance- in Apple this type of style is followed where staff is inspired and encouraged Laissez- Fair Leadership-This is the style which is directly appositive to the autocratic leadership. As here instead of the single leader who makes the decisions for an entity, team or group, Laissez fair leaders also makes the decisions as well as enables their employees to choosesrelevant workplace solutions. It creates personal responsibility as
such challenges subordinates in order to take personal responsibility for their work. It also supports high retention as motivated workers as well as expert thrive within workplace environment that aids decision making(Chen, 2020). For instance- in H&M leader are following this type of style. It has allowed in encouraging workers. Leadership skills Leadership skills are considered as skills when organising individuals in order to accomplish a shared goal. Problem solving-Good leaders are the skilled ones in order to solve problems on the job. As effective leader problem solving needs, staying calm as well as recognising step by step solution(Khan. and Harriss, 2019). These skills can aids leaders make the rapid decisions, remove obstacles within external team and assure projects are accomplished on time as per the specifications. Decisiveness-Leaders who are considered themselves as effective are the one who makes decisions very quickly with the data they have. Effective decisions are comes with experience and time. Once an individual’s is more particular with specific industry then one can makes decisions quickly even without the sufficient information. Decisiveness is also considered as valuable leadership skills as it can aid move projects more faster as well as efficiency is also improved. Team building-Leadership also needs the capacity to build as well as maintain a collaborative strong team ofpeople who are working for the same goal. Team building alsoneedsotherleadershipstrengthssuchasconflictsresolutionandeffective communication(Haunton, 2020). Dependability-A dependable leader means that the people can trust as well as relied on the staff members. A person who is dependable also follows by keep promised. Through a dependable leaderthere is a creation of a resilient team that can be capable to work through several issues that may arise(Hoang, 2017). CONCLUSION It can besummarised that there are various types of leadership styles such as autocratic leadership styles, democratic leadership, transformational leadership, Laissez- Fair Leadership,
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
etc. besides that, there are different leadership skills as well which is required in leader such as problem solving, dependability, decisiveness, etc.
REFERENCES Books and Journals Chen, L.I.N., 2020.Challenges in Managing Amoeba Teams: Evidence from Fast Fashion Industry(Doctoral dissertation, Department of Marketing, China Europe International Business School). Glazer, S. and Liu, C., 2017. Work, stress, coping, and stress management. InOxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology. Haunton, M., 2020. The no-nonsense guide to leadership, management and teamwork and Leading and managing archives and manuscripts programs. Hoang,H.,2017.MANAGINGINTERNATIONALTEAMSFROMBUSINESS COMMUNICATION PERSPECTIVES. Khan, A. and Harriss, A., 2019. Helping hand: managing work-related HAVS.Occupational Health & Wellbeing,71(7), pp.24-28. Moyo, Z. and Perumal, J., 2020. A systematic review of research on women leading and managing education in Zimbabwe.Gender & Behaviour,18(2), pp.15688-15697. O'Neil, E., 2018. Leading—Not Managing—Through a New World Order.Generations,42(1), pp.41-44. Ozimek, W. and Urbaniak, J., Team One2tribe Lab: Using Machine Learning to Manage Work- Related Stress. Turner, P.S., 2019. Leading, Managing, and Facilitating Organizational Change. InEvidence- Based Initiatives for Organizational Change and Development(pp. 261-282). IGI Global. Valente, A., 2018. Leading the implementation of a successful community college e-learning program. InLeading and Managing e-Learning(pp. 351-367). Springer, Cham. Vries, S.J., 2017.Peer Control & Self-Managing Work Teams in the healthcare industry: A literature review(Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente). Wiese, C., 2017.The best recruitment practices in self-managing teams: an explorative study at the Dutch curative care organization(Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente).