League of Nations Mandate and Formation of States in the Middle East

This essay discusses the League of Nations mandate and its impact on the formation of states in the Middle East after World War I. It delves into the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, the Sykes-Picot Treaty, and the mandate of the League of Nations. The essay also explores the impact of the mandate system on the region and the rise of nationalistic movements.

Running head: HISTORY ESSAY
HISTORY ESSAY
Name of the Student
Name of the Author
Author note:

1HISTORY ESSAY
The League of Nations was formed in order to bring about a solution to the international
conflict that was a common phenomenon throughout the globe. After the World War I it was
necessary to bring about an international stability in order to establish peace and harmony. The
Paris Peace Conference directly gave rise to the League of Nations. The primary idea was to
maintain peace and harmony1. The League of Nations mandate was a legal status given to some
of the territories which were transferred from the subjugation of one country to another.The
mandate of the league of nation was promulgated under the “Article 22” of the “Covenant of the
League of Nations”. The mandates of the Middle East were Syria, Lebanon, Transjordan and
Palestine.
Syria and Lebanon which are the two mandates of the League of Nations are the two
areas in the middle east that was formed as a result of this mandate. This was as a result of the
partitioning of the “Ottoman Empire”. The defeat of the Ottomans resulted in the entering of the
British troops and Faisal son of the “Sharif Hussain of Mecca” was the head of the new
government post war. However in the following times the French army occupied the Lebanese
coast. The following paragraphs delve deep into the Mandate of the League of Nations and the
formation of the states in the Middle Eastern countries. The American King Crane Commission
arrived in Syria and the objective was to inquire about the general public opinion about the
country and its future2. This visit was functional in establishing the fact that the Syrian’s were in
generally against the provisions of the mandate. This finding of the commission was completely
rejected and ignored by both Britain and France. The mandate of the League of Nations were
1 Clavin, Patricia. Securing the world economy: the reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920-1946. Oxford
University Press, 2013.
2 Housden, Martyn. The League of Nations and the Organization of Peace. Routledge, 2014.

2HISTORY ESSAY
often considered by many of the countries to be unacceptable and forced. This was one of such
cases were the mandate was not popular and many people resented it.
World War I was an essential vital event ever of Middle East. It featured the game plan of
new states from the disintegrating of the Ottoman Empire by the demand framework. The
request framework was only a hidden endeavor to cover the inducing of imperialistic motivation
of the Triple Entente by and large called France, Britain, and Russia at the cash related and
political cost of the Middle East. The demand for framework proceeded with the moving
instance of intensity from the Middle East to Europe. This is essential to the Middle East since it
would set the course of future nationalistic uprisings against European countries and expand the
opening among East and West. The opening between the Middle East and Europe started some
time before World War I. World War I maybe can be viewed as a total of activities of the past.
The European forces were determinedly trying to keep up their cash related perfect conditions
over the Middle East. The Treaty of Balta Liman in 1838 is one case, the Treaty of Peace and
Commerce in Turkmanchai was another. History is stacked with understandings of European
forces getting the high ground against the Middle East. World War I was the knockout punch.
Europe in the past required an assembled Ottoman Empire, yet when a bound together German
Empire changed the modify of power in Europe, the Ottoman Empire was never again required.
What was required notwithstanding, was the advantages and markets that made up the Middle
East, yet this time not under Ottoman control, yet rather under Russian, French, or British
control. Every single one of these countries scanned for the benefits of the Middle East to
guarantee that they remained powerful against each other, against a making German Empire, and
a thriving United States of America. European countries expected a basic part in the Middle East

3HISTORY ESSAY
amidst the war. They did this by disseminating Ottoman Empire among themselves through
conundrum social gatherings and blueprints. Thusly offering ascend to the charge structure.
The Sykes-Picot Treaty of 1916 was the postponed result of one of the mystery social
events by the Triple Entente. The settlement gave Russia attestation over their cases of the
Turkish straits and the city that ignored them, Istanbul. The French got insistence for its cases in
Syria, and the British got assertion of cases to areas in Persia. To the European Nations this was
sensible pay for their war costs. Toward the day's end remuneration should appear as brisk
European control over spaces having a place with the Ottoman Empire. This was not utilizing all
methods the primary arrangement that occurred because of World War I. There was additionally
the Husayn-McMahon letters of 1915-1916 and the Balfour Declaration of 1917. The Husayn-
McMahon letters were correspondence between British mediator Henry McMahon and Sharif
Husayn. In these letters McMahon urged the Arabs to restrict the Ottoman Empire. This was a
fundamental move by the British to extend Ottoman obsession from different points of view.3
Consequently Sharif Husayn was guaranteed gold and weapons, and toward the total of the war
the advantage to set up Arab states. The Balfour Declaration of 1917 was an official
verbalization for the upside of the British government revealing the foundation in Palestine of a
national home for the Jewish individuals. Toward the day's end it the English supported the
Zionist focus of working up a national home in Palestine for Jews around the world4. Deplorably
at the time the effect that this choice would have later on of the Middle East.
3 Pedersen, Susan. "Settler Colonialism at the Bar of the League of Nations." In Settler Colonialism in the Twentieth
Century, pp. 127-148. Routledge, 2012.
4 Helmreich, William. The Third Reich and the Palestine Question. Routledge, 2017.

4HISTORY ESSAY
Amidst World War I European countries plotted the course and claims to the land and
assets of the Middle East. After all some individual would need to pay for all the military
exertion, butcher, and walloping that was made by the war, and it quite was not going to be the
British, the Russians, or the French. These countries had made different mystery courses of
action with each other and other key players. The mystery and open settlements made amidst
World War I were dark and consistently limiting. Precisely when the war was at long last
finished, the victors of the war met in France to go to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 to talk
about the terms and states of the peace assentions, the slackening up of clashing cases made by
different governments, and set up the structures for the post war world.
The deferred outcome of this party offered ascend to the foundation of the League of
Nations and its affirmed demands structure. The ask for structure was made to discard the zones
of the Axis powers and the crumbling of the Ottoman Empire. The requests had verbiage
conveying that exceptional countries, in context of their favorable circumstances, encounters,
and land position could best handle a commitment of this size5. It moreover observed that
specific frameworks of the Ottoman Empire had achieved a specific time of progress where their
reality as self-representing states could be by chance observed. The solicitations given amidst the
Paris peace gathering gave Britain control of three past Ottoman domains in Mesopotamia that
would finally up known as the free kingdom of Iraq. It in like way gave Britain control the
region known as Transjordan, and Palestine. France got the demand for the region of what may
wind up known as Syria and Lebanon. At that point Russia experienced a sensation and gave
another Bolshevik government. This association denied claims made by its forerunners and
5 Oppenheim, Lassa. The League of Nations and its problems. BoD–Books on Demand, 2018

5HISTORY ESSAY
humiliated France and Britain by passing on crafted by the astound assentions, in like manner
called the Sykes-Picot understanding.
The Mandate framework should be quickly observed a subject to render help by an
essential power until the moment that the minute that such time as they can remain single, the
needs of the frameworks must be a standard thought in the confirmation of the mandatory.
Shockingly this was not the condition. The truth was that states known as Syria, Lebanon, Israel,
Jordan, and Iraq were on a very basic level settlements of their required states. The thriving of
these countries were not the need. Syria for instance did not require France as their required
power but rather nobody tuned in. The need rather was compelled financial surrender of fiscal
vitals of the zone to remote forces. The solicitations structure was unimportant more than
daintily secured imperialism. Europe manhandled the zone by applying its own particular
military, political, and budgetary plans6. The requests were pulled in the tendency that they
would profit the Middle East, yet what it genuinely did was it surrendered their cash related
assets for Europe, thusly moving the adjust of capacity to Europe and ensured fiscal reliance by
these starting late circled countries for a broad time designation to come. The British additionally
anticipated that would finish some open and private guarantees made to Sharif Husayn and the
Jewish individual7s. In the wake of the Arab revolt Amir Faysal kept upbraiding his impact in
Damascus and the encompassing zones. France clearly bound Faysal and sent an outfitted
capacity to remove him. To Faysal's hose the British favored France in expect that tip top France
remained among them and a countering dried Germany. They dealt with this political issue by
part their Palestine mastermind into two pieces. At the west Sharif Husayn and his family would
6 Simons, Geoff. The United Nations: A chronology of conflict. Springer, 2016.
7 Katz, Yossi. Partner to partition: the Jewish Agency's partition plan in the mandate era. Routledge, 2014.

6HISTORY ESSAY
achieve the region of Transjordan, which would finally breeze up known as Jordan. At the east
Palestine remained, in any case open to movement of Jewish pioneers.
In conclusion World War I was a principal fragment over the cross of present day history.
The war understood the crumbling of the Ottoman Empire and the making of new country states.
The war moved the difference in capacity to Europe and in light of a present establishment of
ceaseless loathe from the Middle East towards the countries of Britain, France, and Russia.
These countries, by and large called the Triple Entente guided by their own specific use cut out
the areas of the Levant and Mesopotamia into show day country states by announcement because
of baffle approaches made amidst the war. The total of World War I passed on cash related focal
concentrations to the Triple Entente and further detached the opening among Europe and the
Middle East. The request structure ended up being a covered sort of money related dominion and
offered move to nationalistic headways in the Middle East which spread a hole between
countries that keeps being unpreventable today.

7HISTORY ESSAY
Reference:
Clavin, Patricia. Securing the world economy: the reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920-
1946. Oxford University Press, 2013.
Helmreich, William. The Third Reich and the Palestine Question. Routledge, 2017.
Housden, Martyn. The League of Nations and the Organization of Peace. Routledge, 2014.
Katz, Yossi. Partner to partition: the Jewish Agency's partition plan in the mandate era.
Routledge, 2014.
Katz, Yossi. Partner to partition: the Jewish Agency's partition plan in the mandate era.
Routledge, 2014.
Oppenheim, Lassa. The League of Nations and its problems. BoD–Books on Demand, 2018.
Pedersen, Susan. "Settler Colonialism at the Bar of the League of Nations." In Settler
Colonialism in the Twentieth Century, pp. 127-148. Routledge, 2012.
Pedersen, Susan. The guardians: the League of Nations and the crisis of empire. OUP Oxford,
2015.
Simons, Geoff. The United Nations: A chronology of conflict. Springer, 2016.