Trusted by 2+ million users, 1000+ happy students everyday
Showing pages 1 to 3 of 8 pages
Learning Outcomes to be assessed (as specified in the validated module descriptor http://icis.glam.ac.uk):To analyse the requirements and design an appropriate solution for a problem of defined scope using advanced design/modelling techniques. Marking SchemeMarks AvailableMarks AwardedUse-case models model including written Use Case specifications.35Class diagram35Class attributes and operations20Assumptions10Total100Grading Criteria: See Appendix B
Performance LevelCriteriaFail (<40%)Has not captured significant requirements in use-case diagrams. Class model severely deficient in both diagram andattribute/operations. Few assumptions that demonstrate a lack of understanding of the scenario and real world issues.3rd Class / PASS(40%-49%)Some attempt at use-case refinement. Reasonably sound class model with some omissions and errors. Some attributesand operations identified. Some assumptions that demonstrate a reasonable understanding of the scenario and real world issues.Lower 2nd Class / PASS(50%-59%)Reasonable attempt at use-case refinement. Generally soundclass model with some omissions and errors. Most attributes and operations identified. Clearly documented assumptions that demonstrate a reasonably good understanding of the scenario and real world issues.Upper 2nd Class / MERIT(60%-69%)Good attempt at use-case refinement. Good class model withmost appropriate classes, associations and multiplicities. A good representative set of attributes and operations identified. Clearly documented assumptions that demonstratea good understanding of the scenario and real world issues.1st Class / DISTINCTION(70% +)Very comprehensive and informative use-case diagrams. Very good class diagram with all appropriate classes, associations and multiplicities. A very good representative setof attributes and operations for the classes. Clearly documented assumptions that demonstrate a very good understanding of the scenario and real world issues.
Feedback/feed-forward (linked to assessment criteria):Areas where you have done well:Feedback from this assessment to help you to improve future assessments:Other commentsMark:Marker’s Signature:Date: Work on this module has been marked, double marked/moderated in line with USW procedures.Provisional mark only: subject to change and/or confirmation by the AssessmentBoard
Found this document preview useful?
You are reading a preview Upload your documents to download or Become a Desklib member to get accesss