Legal Aspects of International Trade and Enterprise
Verified
Added on 2022/12/26
|10
|2726
|20
AI Summary
This report discusses the legislative regulatory framework and treaties, conventions, and agreements in international trade and enterprise. It focuses on the case of Royal Dutch Shell and its compliance with government provisions. The report also explores the impact of these regulations on the company's products and services.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Legal Aspects of International Trade and Enterprise
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1 Executive Summary There are various provisions which are imposed by governments with an objective to govern the operations of multinational corporations to make sure that they effectively discharge their obligations. In this report, the case of Royal Dutch Shell is evaluated in order to determine the location of its headquarters, industry and number of employees. Along with these details, the company has to make sure that it effectively complies with the legislative regulatory framework which applies to its operations. The company is also bound to comply with the provisions which are implemented by governments under the treaties, conventions and agreements formed between them since it affects their products and services.
2 Table of Contents Introduction of Royal Dutch Shell..........................................................................................3 Legislative Regulatory Framework........................................................................................3 Treaties, Conventions and Agreements................................................................................5 References.............................................................................................................................8
3 Introduction of Royal Dutch Shell Royal Dutch Shell is a leading corporation that operates in the industry of oil and gas. It is a British-Dutch enterprise that was founded in 1907 (Shell, 2019). The corporation offers a wide range of products that are available for its customers worldwide such as LNG, natural gas,petrochemicals,lubricantsandpetroleum.Theenterprisehasestablishedits headquarters in The Hague, Netherlands (Shell, 2019). The corporation has hired more than81thousandemployeestohandleitsoperationsglobally(Statista,2018).The company has also established its operations in Australia by hiring around 1800 employees to handle its operations (Macdonald, 2016). In recent years, the company has started to diversify its portfolio by entering into the industry of renewable energy. The company has started to offer renewable energy options to its customers such as air, water and solar energy options. Legislative Regulatory Framework The legislative regulatory framework of a company includes a range of provisions which are imposed by the government. The corporation is bound to comply with these guidelines to make sure that they did not suffer any legal consequences. These provisions are implemented by the government to govern the operations of companies. This assists in the protection of the rights of individuals that are protected by the actions of the organisation such as employees, customers and local communities (Morgan, 2017). The corporation has to understand that it implement effective policies in the workplace that are targeted towardscompliancewiththeseguidelinestomakesurethatitdidnotviolateany provisions. Royal Dutch Shell is also bound by these provisions since the company operations in Australia. In case the management of the company violates these provisions, then they could face legal penalties. Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) This is a major act that is implemented by the Australian government. Under this act, provisions are given to govern the operations of organisations operating in the country which include domestic as well as foreign entities. Royal Dutch Shell is also obligated to complywiththeseguidelinestomakesurethattheenterprisedidnotviolateany provisions given under this act. For example, the directors of the company have to comply with the provisions regarding general duties given under section 180-183 of the Act to
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4 make sure that they ethically discharge their duties (Hedges et al., 2016). They have to make sure that they take corrective actions while maintaining a degree of care and diligence which is enforced on them under section 180. They are also obligated to act in good faith for the organisation by avoiding prioritising their personal interest above the interest of the company as per section 181. They are also prohibited from misusing their position in the company and the information regarding the company which they have to gain unfair personal advantage or could detriment to the company as given under section 182 and 183 respectively. Taxation Policies The government of Australia has imposed a range of taxes on companies that generate revenue from the country. As per these guidelines, obligations are imposed on companies to make sure that they discharge their taxation obligations without violating the laws implemented by the Australian government. The provisions regarding corporate tax apply to the operations of Royal Dutch Shell. The corporation is bound to give tax at 30 per cent to the government for the revenue which it generates in Australia (Deloitte, 2018). This rate can be increased or decreased by the government by making amendments in the taxation policies. Along with these provisions, the company is also obligated for the Goods and Services Tax (GST). This tax is imposed by the Australian government on the goods and services which are offered by the corporation in Australia. The rate of this tax is fixed by the government at 10 per cent. As per these provisions, Royal Dutch Shell has to make sure that it effectively complies with these guidelines to avoid imposing a penalty by the government. Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) The Australian government is serious towards promoting competition in the country since it is the key factor that supports the economy of the country. As per these provisions, organisations are obligated to make sure that they did not engage in practices or form contractual relationships that adversely affect the competition level in the organisation (Pearson, 2017). These policies are implemented by the government to make sure that leading corporations such as Royal Dutch Shell did not use their position in the market to form contractual relationships or unfair trading agreements that make it difficult for its competitors or small businesses to effectively discharge their duties. The company is also obligated to promote competition practices in the country by making sure that they comply withtheguidelinesgivenunderscheduleoneofthisactthatprovidespoliciesfor
5 competition laws in the country (Pearson, 2017). Along with these guidelines, the company is also obligated to comply with schedule two of this act. In this schedule, provisions regarding consumer rights and protections are given to make sure that companies such as Royal Dutch Shell did not violate the interest of their customers. For example, general guidelines are given for the company to make sure that it did not make any false or misleading claims to its customers regarding its products and services as provided under section 29. Employment Laws Various guidelines are given for the protection of employment rights in Australia under employment law policies and guidelines. As per these provisions, Royal Dutch Shell has to make sure that it pays at least minimum wages to its customers and does not hire them at a salary below the minimum wage. The provisions regarding employment laws are given under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). Along with the provisions regarding minimum wage, the company is also bound to make sure that it complies with maximum working hour requirements while engaging with employees (Cain, 2017). It cannot enforce its employees to work for more than 38 hours is a week or enforce them to work on public holidays. Thus, compliances with these guidelines are important for Royal Dutch Shell to avoid lawsuits. Treaties, Conventions and Agreements Royal Dutch Shell is multinational organisation, and it operates in more than one country; therefore, it is bound to comply with the provisions given under the treaties, conventions and agreements which are formed between these nations. The countries formed treaties, conventionsandagreementsbetweeneachotherinordertomakesurethatthey implement effective policies that are targeted towards promoting trading relationships between the organisations (Widdows, 2017). Under these treaties and agreements, new policies are implemented by the government to make sure that companies are able to effectively expand their operations in overseas markets without facing legal complexities. Organisations that are operating in these nations have to make sure that they comply with the guidelines imposed under these treaties since they affect their products and services. Compliance with these provisions is crucial to make sure that companies did not face legal penalties or charges when they conduct their operations in these nations (Widdows, 2017). Royal Dutch Shell is also required to make sure that it effectively complies with the provisions given under these treaties, conventions and agreements since they affect its products and services.
6 ChAFTA or China-Australia Free Trade Agreement Royal Dutch Shell operates in multiple countries one of which includes China that is a major market for the enterprise. Australia and China have positive trade relationships which provide an advantage to Royal Dutch Shell. Both countries have formed a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) that further strengthens their trading relationship (Zhou and Xi, 2017). The company has to make sure that it complies with these guidelines since they affect the operations of the company. Under this treaty, various legal complexities have removed. The governments have further removed the imposition of a number of legal duties and tariffs which are imposed on the operations of companies when they export or import to these countries. These policies open up new business opportunities for Royal Dutch Shell by making it easier for the organisation to make sure that it offers its products in the Chinese market (Zhou and Xi, 2017). These policies affect the products and services of the company by making it easier for the organisation to offer them in the Chinse market without imposing additional fees on its customers which increases its market share. AustraliaNewZealandCloserEconomicRelationsTradeAgreement (ANZCERTA) There is a positive trading relationship between Australia and New Zealand. Based on this relationship, the government has implemented a number of treaties and agreements to open up new trading opportunities for organisations operating in these nations. The ANZCERTA is a good example which is a treaty that is formed between these two nations with an objective to support their economic growth by building trading relationships. Through these treaties, governments have made it easier for companies to expand their operations in both markets without facing strict legal penalties (Vidigal, 2017). Provisions are also imposed for removal of high tariff or duties which are otherwise imposed on the organisations. Due to removal of these provisions, Royal Dutch Shell is able to offer its products to customers in New Zealand. The prices of these products remain almost the same since the company is not obligated to pay tariff or duties. It assists the company is making sure that it did not hike the prices of its products and services to overcome the loss suffered by the enterprise. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Along with treaties and agreements, there are various conventions in which provisions are given that apply to the operations of multinational companies. A good example is UNFCCC
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
7 in which the Paris Agreement was signed. Australia is a part of this agreement due to whichthegovernmenthasimplementedvariousprovisionstoprovideprovisionsfor companies to make sure that they comply with their corporate responsibilities by taking corrective actions to address the issue of climate change and global warming. Royal Dutch Shell uses fossil fuel in its operations and the company also offers them to its customers, and they are a key factor that has increased the issue of climate change on a global stage (Maraseni and Reardon-Smith, 2019). The company has to make sure that it takes corrective measures in order to reduce its carbon footprint in the country. The company is bound to make sure that it implements policies that reduce its carbon footprint and reduces its carbon emissions to make sure that it did not cause pollution in the country. Due to compliance with these policies, prices of the products and services of Royal Dutch Shell are affected since the company has to increase its prices while offering them to customers in Australia. ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand FTA (AANZFTA) This is another relevant treaty that is formed between the government of Australia and New Zealand. Both governments have formed free trade areas between them to make surethatcompaniesareabletofreelyconducttheiroperationsinthesenations. Companies operating in these areas are not obligated to comply with complex legal regulations or additional tariffs or duties which are imposed by the government (Das, 2016). Since Royal Dutch Shell operates through these free trade areas, the company is able to bypass major laws and implement effective policies that assist the company in ensuring that it quickly export its products between both countries. The guidelines of this treaty benefit Royal Dutch Shell and it impacts its products by making sure that their prices are not hiked when it offered them in New Zealand.
8 References Cain, P. (2017) A history of Australian legal education [Book Review].Ethos: Official Publication of the Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory, (246), p.61. Das, S.B. (2016) Challenges FaCingthe RCeP negotiations.Trade Regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: Developments and Future Challenges, p.122. Deloitte.(2018)TaxationandInvestment.[PDF]Availablefrom: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax- australiaguide-2018.pdf [Accessed on 3rd May 2019]. Hedges, J., Bird, H., Gilligan, G., Godwin, A. and Ramsay, I. (2016) The policy and practice of enforcement of directors' duties by statutory agencies in Australia: An empirical analysis.Melb. UL Rev.,40, p.905. Macdonald, A. (2016)Shell Australia prepares to cut Queensland jobs after BG takeover. [Online] Available from: https://www.smh.com.au/business/shell-australia-prepares-to-cut- queensland-jobs-after-bg-takeover-20160215-gmuqyb.html [Accessed on 3rd May 2019]. Maraseni,T.andReardon-Smith,K.(2019)MeetingNationalEmissionsReduction Obligations: A Case Study of Australia.Energies,12(3), p.438. Morgan, B. (2017)Social citizenship in the shadow of competition: the bureaucratic politics of regulatory justification. Abingdon: Routledge. Pearson, G. (2017) Further challenges for Australian consumer law. InConsumer Law and Socioeconomic Development(pp. 287-305). New York City: Springer, Cham. Shell. (2019)Who we are.[Online] Available from: https://www.shell.com/about-us/who- we-are.html [Accessed on 3rd May 2019]. Statista. (2018)Royal Dutch Shell's number of employees 2009-2018. [Online] Available from:https://www.statista.com/statistics/279425/number-of-royal-dutch-shell-employees/ [Accessed on 3rd May 2019]. Vidigal, G. (2017) Why Is There So Little Litigation under Free Trade Agreements? Retaliation and Adjudication in International Dispute Settlement.Journal of International Economic Law,20(4), pp.927-950.
9 Widdows,K.(2017)Whatisanagreementininternationallaw?.InTheLawof Treaties(pp. 73-105). Abingdon: Routledge. Zhou, W. and Xi, J. (2017) China’s Liberalization of Legal Services Under the ChAFTA: Market Access or Lack of Market Access for Australian Legal Practices.Journal of World Trade,51(2), pp.233-264.