This report discusses the regulatory frameworks affecting the operations of Wells Fargo & Company in Australia and the impact of treaties and agreements on its products and services.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head:Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise1 Executive Summary Wells Fargo & Company is a multinational company which provides financial services in America. It is headquartered in San Francisco, California. It operates across 36 countries and 90 business. It has entered the Australian market through the purchase of GE Capital's Commercial Distribution Finance (CDF). TherearecertainnationallegalframeworksinAustraliawhichmakesurethattrading becomes fair forthecustomersandmultinationalcompanies(MNC)likeWellsFargo& Company. Financial regulation in Australia is governed by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA). Additionally, the Australian Securities Exchange also plays a crucial role in controlling the financial market. Australia has also entered into various treaties and agreements which ensure that the various national organizations work efficiently for international commerce through providing financial products and services. So, this report draws the attention of the readers towards the regulatory frameworks affecting the operations of Wells Fargo & Company. It shall discuss how and why they affect the company. Furthermore, various treaties and conventions affecting the products and services delivered by Wells Fargo & Company in Australia shall also be deliberated upon.
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise2 Contents Introduction to the company...............................................................................................................................3 Legislative regulatory frameworks affecting the operations of Wells Fargo & Company in Australia......3 Treaties, conventions or agreements that have impacted on the products or services delivered by Wells Fargo & Company.....................................................................................................................................5 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................................7 References...........................................................................................................................................................8
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise3 Introduction to the company Wells Fargo & Company is a multinational company which provides financial services. It is headquartered in San Francisco, California. It was founded in 1852. It is the fourth largest bank in the world in terms of market capitalization(Wells Fargo Commercial Distribution Finance, 2019). It provides diverse community based financial services with asset amounting to US$1.8 trillion. It has approximately 265,000 employees globally and operates in 36 countries. It operates its commercial activities through its authorized and controlled affiliates in North America, Asia Pacific and Europe (Wells Fargo, 2019). It entered into the Australian market in 2016 through the purchase of segments of GE Capital’sCommercialDistributionFinance(CDF)inAustraliaandNewZealand.The company agreed to purchase the platforms of CDF, Vendor Finance along with the portions of the Corporate Finance business of GE Capital( Wells Fargo Commercial Distribution Finance, 2019). Legislative regulatory frameworks affecting the operations of Wells Fargo & Company in Australia ThefinancialmarketinAustraliaismanagedjointlybytheAustralianSecuritiesand Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority (APRA). In addition to this, the Australian Securities Exchange plays a crucial role in managing the operations of the financial market. It is the responsibility of ASIC to protect the interests of the market and consumers. It regulates the financial companies and investment banks. It also supervises the functions of External Dispute Resolution Schemes(EDRs). APRAisaccountableforsupervisingtheprudentialandlicensingnormsofAuthorized Deposit-takingInstitutions(ADIs),superannuationfundsandlifeandgeneralinsurance companies. The financial institutions regulated by APRA must report periodically to APRA (Hunt and Terry, 2018). The capital adequacy norms are being issued by APRA for banks which have consistency withBaselIIguidelines.However,theinvestmentbankswhichdoesnotoperateas Authorized Deposit-taking Institutions are neither regulated as per Banking Act nor are they licensed under this act. They are also not prudentially supervised under APRA.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise4 The Reserve Bank of Australia has retained its banking function by managing the payment systemsandformulationofmonetary policy.Moreover,theAustralianCompetitionand Consumer Commission (ACCC)controls the anti-competitive behavior of banks and financial institutions.It has executed an agreement with ASIC that ASIC shall supervise the banking and financial services institutions and service providers(Allen, 2015). The Corporations Act 2001 regulates financial services by setting up a uniform disclosure and licensing regime. An individual or a corporate executing a financial services business in Australia must hold an Australian financial services license (AFSL) which is issued by ASIC. Moreover, as per the Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988, banks making any electronic fund transfers nationally or internationally have to report to Australian Transaction Reports or Analysis Centre (Austrac). Under the Income Tax Assessment Act, 1936 and the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, the taxation rate for the national and multinational companies is 30% (Deloitte, 2018). The financial services business for which the AFSL is required comprises of details such as dealing in financial products, formulating a market for a financial product, provision of advice, providing depository or custodial services in the context of financial products and operating registered managed investment scheme. Now the question arises how and why these legislative frameworks affect the working of Wells Fargo & Company in Australia. The role of APRA is to enforce and develop a prudential framework of standards, guidelines and legislation which helps in promoting the prudential behavior of ADIs, superannuation funds and insurance companies (Salim,Arjomandi and Seufert, 2016). Its major aim is to safeguard the interests of its policyholders, depositors and members of superannuation funds. So in order to execute its role, it shall enhance the confidence of the publicthroughtheformationoftheprudentialframeworkwhichequalizesthefinancial efficiency, safety and competition. It formulates a risk-based approach for supervising the commercial activities of Wells Fargo & Company. It also implements its enforcement and remediation measures on the company in order to make sure that its risk-bearing activities are conducted within reasonable limits. Its risks should be clearly managed and identified. On the other hand, the role of ASIC is to manage and regulate the integrated market, corporate, financial services and consumer credit in theAustralian financial market. It is required to assist in maintaining, facilitating and improving the financial system of Wells Fargo & Company(ASIC, 2019). Furthermore, it ensures that Wells Fargo & Company meet the standards which shall also comprise of their responsibilities towards their consumers. These responsibilities are listed in the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009. As amarker regulator, it analyzes how
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise5 efficiently the company is complying with its legal commitments in order to operate fairly and transparently in the market. The answer to why ASIC and APRA affect the commercial affairs of the company is that their mission is to seek innovation which fosters the confidence and trust amongst the consumers. Their major challenge is to ensure that the financial entity operates in a fair and orderly manner in the transparent markets(Gitman, Juchau and Flanagan, 2015). In this era, the financial technology is emerging rapidly and seeking to provide newer ways of sharing and creating values for the consumers. The motto of ASIC and APRA is to provide offerings which are demand driven. Thus the services must put the interests of the consumers at the core along with embedding their interests into the commercial operations of the company. It also calls for designing financial products and services in a responsible manner. In order to promotepositiveoutcomesoftheconsumers,thecompanyhasgreaterresponsibility pertainingtothe targeteddistributionof its products.Itwouldhelpinstrengthening the confidence and trust amongst the consumers along with reducing the cases where the behavior of consumers and imbalances of information is disregarded(Pukała, Vnukova and Achkasova, 2017). Thus ASIC and APRA ensure that Wells Fargo & Company has a consumer-centric focus. Its productsmustbedesignedtoprovideutilityforthetargetconsumers.Likewise,the consumers must have access to the financial products and services which would meet their needs. It has also been instructed to the company that when the products and services are sold to the consumers, they should also be informed about the associated level of risk. Treaties,conventionsoragreementsthathaveimpactedontheproductsorservices delivered by Wells Fargo & Company The financial regulators in Australia participate in various formal and informal cooperative arrangementswhichmakesurethatthefinancialmarketworkseffectivelyforglobal commerce.TheAustralianSecuritiesCommission(ASC)hasarrangedwithother international securities regulators for developing the policies and gathering of evidence and enforcement with the help of working parties of International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO). InAustralia,thelegislativeassistantforthiscooperationisgeneratedbytheMutual Assistance in Business Regulation Act1992 (Cth). This has assisted ASC and ACCC for obtaining the evidence on behalf of the international regulators.The informal evidence and information sharing arrangements amongst the various foreign securities regulators are called Memoranda of Understanding (MOU).
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise6 Additionally, Australia has a wide network of tax treaties with its OECD member countries. These treaties help the multinationals such as Wells Fargo & Company by providing them relief from double taxation on their income. Australia meets its compliances under the taxation treaties by assimilating these laws into its domestic regulations. Each of its treaties is applicable domestically as per the International Tax Agreements Act 1953 (ITA Act) and its provisions override any inconsistent provisions under the national law. So, inconsistency with the self-assessment regime of Australia, Wells Fargo & Company is not required to obtain a certificate of residence or any other certification for obtaining the benefits of the treaty. Furthermore,AustraliahasalsoenteredintotheAustralia–UnitedStatesFreeTrade Agreement(AUSFTA) which is a preferential trade agreement amongst Australia and United States. The provisos of the agreement are consistent with the applicable sections of General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 and the General Agreement on Trade in Services(GATS). Section 10 of FTA gives clarity to the meaning of ‘cross –border trade in services'. It provides a free environment for the suppliers of services to operate their business. So in accordance with this section, Wells Fargo & Company can operate its business freely in Australia. This proviso requires Australia to give national or most-favored-nation treatment to Wells Fargo & Company and prohibits any limitations to access in the market or transfers(Hundt, 2015). Besidesthis,theinvestmentchapterofFTAclearlydefinesthevariousaspectsof investmentswhicharecoveredinthetreaty.Italsogivescross–borderinvestorsan assurance so that they can invest safely in the other country. Apart from this, it clearly prohibits Australia from restricting or enforcing each of the following requirements relating to the investments in its region to Wells Fargo & Company. It cannot order Wells Fargo & Company to export a certain level of services or products. The company cannot be asked to accomplish a certain level of domestic content along with the purchase, use or grant a preference to the services produced in its territory. It cannot be asked to acquire the goods from individuals in its territory(Titi,2015). The company cannot be asked to restrict its sales in the territory of Australia so that the investmentproducesorsuppliescanbecorrelatedtothevalueofexportsorforeign exchange earnings. Moreover, the value of imports cannot be related to that of the exports or foreign exchange earnings-related to the investment. The company cannot be restricted from transferring the technology, process, knowledge to a person of its territory. It cannot be restricted to supply goods or services which are produced or supplied by the investment to a particular regional market or the international market (Alschner and Skougarevskiy, 2016).
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise7 It is also concerned with providing a nondiscriminatory environment in the context of financial services. The Financial Services can be defined as all the services related to insurance, financial and other banking services along with the services which are ancillary or incidental to the services of financial nature. It lays down the regulations applicable for the financial institutions which are located in the territory of Australia and managed by the individuals in the other country such as Wells Fargo & Company in this case. It is also associated with the investors of the other party who have invested in the financial institutions located in that party(Nottage, 2014). So, Chapter 13 of FTA requires every party to grant a national treatment and most-favored- nation treatment to the investors, financial institution and investment of investors of the other party. National treatment pertains to a treatment which is not less favorable than a party grants to its own financial institutions, investors along with the investment of its own investors in the financial institutions. Thus theconceptof nationaltreatment andmost-favored-nationsareapplicabletothe formation, acquisition, expansion, conduct, management and sale of Wells Fargo & Company or the investments in the Wells Fargo & Company in the territory of Australia. Moreover, Article 13.5.2 states that each of the parties is permitted to purchase financial services from suppliers of the other party which are situated in the territory of another party (the U.S.A.in this case). Lastly, this chapter does not prevent Wells Fargo & Company from taking appropriate actions required for securing the compliance with the legislation not inconsistent with the chapter. But it should be done in such a way so that it does not create unjustifiable discrimination among both these countries where such conditions prevail. Also, it should not restrict the investments in Wells Fargo & Company or international trade in the financial services(Tully, 2016). Conclusion Hence to conclude, it can be said that the objective of these legislative frameworks and treaties is to establish a developed framework so that the investment flows can be well administratedbetweenAustraliaandothercountries.Theseshallcomplimentwiththe negotiations done by Australia with its fellow OECD members in terms of trade in services and goods. The treaties seek for opportunities to reduce the unnecessary barriers imposed by the other countries on the investors in Australia in terms of licensing requirements and other related legislation. They also ensure that the negotiations are made in light of the foreign investment policy of Australia.
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise8
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise9 References Allen, H.J.( 2015) Putting the Financial Stability in Financial Stability Oversight Council.Ohio St. LJ.76(2015), p.1087. Alschner, W. and Skougarevskiy, D.(2016) Mapping the universe of international investment agreements.Journal of international economic law.19(3), pp.561-588. ASIC (2015)Financial innovation: ASIC’s role and how it affects you[online]. Available from: https://download.asic.gov.au/media/3225872/speech-to-financial-innovation-symposium- published-5-may-2015.pdf[Accessed 23rdApril 2019]. ASIC (2019)Our role[online]. Available from:https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-do/our- role/[Accessed 23rdApril 2019]. Deloitte(2018)TaxationandInvestmentinAustralia2018[online].Availablefrom: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-australiaguide- 2018.pdf[Accessed 24thApril 2019]. Gitman, L.J., Juchau, R. and Flanagan, J.( 2015)Principles of managerial finance. Australia : Pearson Higher Education AU.Pp. 1-50. Hundt, D.( 2015) Free trade agreements and US foreign policy.Pacific Focus.30(2), pp.151- 172. Hunt, B. and Terry, C.( 2018)Financial institutions and markets. Australia : Cengage AU.Pp. 1-10. Nottage,L.R.(2014)Investor-StateArbitration:NotintheAustralia-JapanFreeTrade Agreement, and Not Ever for Australia?.Journal of Japanese Law.19(38), pp.37-52. Pukała, R., Vnukova, N. and Achkasova, S.( 2017) Identification of the priority instruments affecting regulations on the development of insurance in the framework of international requirements.JournalofInsurance,FinancialMarketsandConsumerProtection.23(1), p.2017. Salim,R.,Arjomandi,A.andSeufert,J.H.(2016)Doescorporategovernanceaffect Australian banks' performance?.Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money.43(2016), pp.113-125. Titi,C.(2015)InternationalinvestmentlawandtheEuropeanUnion:towardsanew generationofinternationalinvestmentagreements.EuropeanJournalofInternational Law.26(3), pp.639-661.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Legal Aspects of International Trade & Enterprise10 Tully, S.R.(2016) Free Trade Agreements with the United States: 8 Lessons for Prospective Parties from Australia’s Experience.British Journal of American Legal Studies.5(2), pp.395- 418. Wells Fargo (2019)Locations and Contacts for Companies Doing Business Internationally [online].Availablefrom:https://www.wellsfargo.com/com/international/locations/businesses/ [Accessed 23rdApril 2019]. WellsFargoCommercialDistributionFinance(2019)Region[online].Availablefrom: https://cdf.wf.com/australia/[Accessed 23rdApril 2019]. Wells Fargo Commercial Distribution Finance(2019)Wells Fargo completes acquisition of GE Capital’s Commercial Distribution Finance Business in Australia and New Zealand[online]. Availablefrom:https://cdf.wf.com/wells-fargo-completes-acquisition-ge-capitals-commercial- distribution-finance-business-australia-new-zealand/[Accessed 23rdApril 2019].