Australian Legal Issues and Case Studies
Added on 2020-06-05
10 Pages3387 Words149 Views
|
|
|
Legal Studies
TABLE OF CONTENTSQ 1....................................................................................................................................................1Vera: -.....................................................................................................................................1A. Siddo & Queenie: -............................................................................................................1B. Siddo & Elly: -...................................................................................................................2C. Siddo & Isobel: -................................................................................................................2Q 2....................................................................................................................................................3Joan: -.....................................................................................................................................4Frank: -...................................................................................................................................4Karl and Maria: -....................................................................................................................5REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6
Q 1Vera: -It is clear from the scenario that Siddo is liable under contract with Vera who is a well-known artistic painter and is specialized in creating landscape scenes. However, this case depictsthat she has asked Siddo to sell her newest painting named Dawn which is recognized as her bestpainting within past 10 years (Steel and et.al., 2016). Further, she guided Siddo to sell paintingwithin $40000 or may peddle it early at $32000 but not less that. Additionally, she evencommanded him to get her written approval before selling painting less than $32000. It hadbecome a contract within transfer of promises within both parties.A. Siddo & Queenie: -As mentioned under case study, Siddo was not allowed to sell Vera's painting less than$40000 while counter offer was made regarding quick sale in which he can sale it at $32000.itcan be determined as conditional acceptance which might turn up original contract. Concept ofthis issue lies under Siddo encounter offer which has terminated earlier contract. From this case,it can be seen that he sold that painting at $20000 to Queenie and did not acquire any note fromVera.Offeree promised offeror that he will sell painting at her desired value or will acquirewritten note from her if it would sell it at lesser value than estimated value (Tassé, Kirby andFortier, 2016).Vera possesses legal rights to continue or discontinue with the agreement or can even dueofferee against court.Now it showcases unfavorable acts among contracted parties can develop uncertainbehavior and attitude among each other (Piquero and et.al., 2016). If Vera doesn't want to sell her painting to Queeni she can file a valid offer andacceptance case against Siddo and meanwhile acquire ownership of painting back. (Alexy,2016).Further, Vera can personally discuss the issues with Siddo to resolve their disputes byrecognizing relevant remedy regarding occurred faulty situation (Creutzfeldt, Kubal and Pirie,2016). Mutual understanding is the best way to reduce conflicts without any court participationbecause it even consumes less time and does not incur huge amount of money. 1
End of preview
Want to access all the pages? Upload your documents or become a member.
Related Documents