Legal Writing: Determining Criminal Liability for Involuntary Manslaughter
Verified
Added on 2023/05/31
|5
|842
|417
AI Summary
This legal writing discusses the relevant law relating to involuntary manslaughter in the United States and determines the criminal liability of Prem for the death of Vijay.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
Running head: LEGAL WRITING Legal Writing Name of the Student Name of the University Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
1LEGAL WRITING Issue The issue in this present scenario is to determine the criminal liability of Prem for the death of Vijay. Relevant Rules The present issue can be determined by discussing the relevant law relating to involuntary manslaughter in the United States. Manslaughter refers to the unlawful act of causing death to a person, which can be categorised as voluntary and involuntary. 18 U.S. Code § 1112provides that involuntary manslaughter is the act of killing a person in the absence of any actual intention to kill that person. The death of the person may have been occurred as the result of the reckless or negligent act of the defendant. An act of involuntary manslaughter involves criminal liability for the accused though it is a less serious crime (Seibold 2017). This act can be identified as the justifiable homicide. As per the decision of UnitedStatesvGomez-Leon,545F.3d777,791(9thCir2008)criminalnegligent manslaughter happens when there is an omission to perform a duty which is owed by the defendant to the victim that resulted into the death of a person. InUnited States v Dominguez-Ochoa, 386 F.3d 639, 645-46 (5thCir. 2004)the recklessness or negligence involves a high grade of risk of serious injury or death. Involuntary manslaughter by negligence or recklessness involves a high risk of substantial personal injury of another, resulting from the negligent act of the accused. The fact that the accused did not foresee the death of another person as an outcome of his unlawful conduct, would not safeguard him from his liabilities. A person would be made liable for his act if it is proved that he was negligent by ordinary standards and the negligence caused the death of the victim. InState v Butler 297 U.S. 1 (1936), the Supreme Court decided that the responsibility for involuntary manslaughter could be imposed on the
2LEGAL WRITING defendant, irrespective of his intention. The Court further held that unless the act resulted into the violation of a law, the accused cannot be charged with involuntary manslaughter. The United States Code under Section 1112, a person can be liable for imprisonment for a term of years or for life. As the involuntary manslaughter does not involve the intention, the defendant cannot take the defence that it was not her intention to commit the crime. Application In this case, it was the responsibility of Prem to take reasonable care before firing his rifle in the bush. It can be considered an unlawful act that Prem fired his rifle without exercising proper care that a reasonable man in his position would have exercised. As the factor of intention does not play in this case, Prem cannot take the defence that he did not caused the death of Vijay, intentionally. Because of the negligent act of Prem while hunting, Vijay died. If Prem had taken a little care before firing his rifle in the bush and examined the reason behind the movement in the bush, he would not have caused death to Vijay. The death of Vijay was directly resulted from the negligent act of Prem. As per 18 U.S. Code § 1112, Prem would be liable for his act irrespective of the intention of Prem to harm Vijay. The act of Prem can be defined as an involuntary manslaughter as he killed Vijay even if he was not intending to do that. The degree of this negligence was so extreme that he should have known that his act might result into death of a person. A reasonable man in his position would have foreseen the high degree of risk that can be caused from his act. It can be proved that Prem was negligent from his ordinary standard and failed to exercise his duty to take care. As a consequence, Vijay died. Prem is guilty of involuntary manslaughter for which he might be fined under the 18 United States Code or be liable for imprisonment for not more than 8 years or both.
3LEGAL WRITING Conclusion Prem should be criminally liable for the death caused to Vijay from his act.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
4LEGAL WRITING References: 18 U.S. Code State v Butler 297 U.S. 1 (1936) United States v Dominguez-Ochoa, 386 F.3d 639, 645-46 (5thCir. 2004) United States v Gomez-Leon, 545F.3d 777, 791 (9thCir 2008) Seibold, J.H., 2017. The Felony-Murder Rule: In Search of a Viable Doctrine.The Catholic Lawyer,23(2), p.8.