This article discusses the issues and arguments surrounding the legalization of euthanasia. It covers the right to die, relief from pain, oppositions, and more.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
University LEGALIZATION OF EUTHANASIA Name
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
2 Table of Contents Introduction3 Issues Identified3 References5
3 Introduction In spite of the various reservations that authorities and scholars seem to have with the issue, euthanasia seems to be gaining ground among people having terminal illnesses and also their family members. Regarding this issue, drug companies also become associated as people with terminal illnesses as they are in most cases dependent on their medicines for their survival. Therefore, the organizations must ensure that their patients are cared for even when it might affect their profitability. As a part of their social responsibility they are ethically bound to look after those patients. Issues Identified A. Everyone has the right to live and die on their own 1. Living becomes more painful:Patients who have terminal illness experience too much pain to enjoy their lives. They are often left to suffer by family members. Therefore, euthanasia should be granted to them in order to end the suffering (Sydney Morning Herald, 2018). 2. Burden for family members:The patients evidently cannot look after their own needs. Family member would not have time to look after them and in most cases they are neglected. This intensifies their suffering. 3. Lack of financial resources:Keeping the patient alive shall mean heavy expenditure for family members. On top of the suffering, this is another added burden. B. Euthanasia provides relief from pain in cases where medication cannot help 1. Religion has been a barrier in offering painless death:Instances have been seen where religion has debated that people should die when their times comes and should not be killed before by human intervention (Grant, 2017). This statement can be termed to be irrational. 2. People above 18 should be allowed for euthanasia with help of doctor:Adults can take their own decisions about their life. Therefore, they can also decide whether they want to live or die in case of suffering and hence, euthanasia should be legalized. 3. People of Oregon have debated in for of euthanasia:In Oregon, many patients have asked for euthanasia and a considerable portion have also received that. Thus, most of the people agree to the legitimacy and nobility of the action (Brennan, 2011).
4 C. Euthanasia is painless way of getting relief from pain at the consent of the patients 1. Evidences of doctors helping their patients have been seen in the past:Dinchi supports the fact that instances of doctors helping out their patients to die in a peaceful way in case of suffering have been seen in the past. 2. It is not a crime if Doctor uses technology to offer painless death:It has been seen that with the consent of the patient, doctors have helped to offer help in other way when mediation have not worked on them. They have made sure that their patients die a painless death. 3. The patient dies with dignity and without suffering:If patients die with dignity and it is painless then doctors should be allowed to perform euthanasia (Dinchi, 2010). D. Explanation of Oppositions 1. There have been several oppositions:Oppositions to the practice of euthanasia mostly on religious or spiritual grounds. However, such arguments often have little to do with the physical state of the patient. 2. Use of theological grounds: Theological grounds are used to justify the oppositions rather than sociological or biological concerns. 3. Existence of legal framework:There should be proper legal framework that shall prevent the misuse of the legalization.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
5 References Abreu-Caballero, J., & Jimene, M. (2012). Annotated Bibliography. Retrieved from https://yourights.weebly.com/annotated-bibliography.html Brennan, F. (2011). Oregon on the euthanasia slippery slope.Eureka Street,21(12), 18. Dinchi, J. (2010). Baltimore Sun - We are currently unavailable in your region. Retrieved from https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bal-coverage-death-with-dignity- debate-20150216-storygallery.html Grant, E. (2017). Legal/Legislative Issues in Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https:// www.google.co.in/&httpsredir=1&article=2371&context=tcl Hyde, M. (2001). The call of conscience: Heidegger and Levinas, rhetoric and the euthanasia debate.Choice Reviews Online,38(11), 38-6114-38-6114. doi: 10.5860/choice.38-6114 Sydney Morning Herald. (2018). "A right to death, surely, as much as a right to life.."