Lessons Learned INTRODUCTION ThelessonslearnedduringtheprojectofUniversitymobileapplicationshavebeen documented and the purpose of the activity is to keep a track of the lessons acquired. Also, the activity will make sure that the strengths, weaknesses, and the areas of improvement are identified so that the future results are better. LESSONSLEARNEDAPPROACH The lessons learned approach was to comprise of the list of the lessons from the beginning of every phase and the documentation of the same at the end of the phase. The discussion with the fellow team members along with one-on-one discussion with the Project Manager were also done to verify and validate the same. LESSONSLEARNEDFROMTHISPROJECT CategoryIssue NameProblem/SuccessImpactRecommendation Communication Management Non- availability of the members Thecommunication planwasdefinedin thebeginningwith thesharingofthe discussionand meetingschedulein advancetoensure that availability of the members(Tavan& Hosseini, 2016). The presence rate in themeetingsand discussions was good andthestakeholder communications couldalsobe facilitatedusingthe same approach. The communication processesshallbe streamlinedand there shall be use of automated communication handling tools done sothatthe associated risks are avoided. Performance Management Trackingof theresource performance Thereweregapsin thescheduleand budget of the project butthetimely detection could make surethatthe associated risks were avoided. The completion of the projectactivities couldbedoneon timeandwithinthe budgetthatwas defined. The use of adequate estimationand trackingtechniques shall be done. ResourceLackofThe resources showedThedeterioratedTheProject 2
Lessons Learned Managementmotivationdeteriorated productivityand efficiencylevelsat variousinstances during the project. levelshadpoor impacts on the other project areas, such as project schedule and budget(Al-Freidi, 2015). Managershall conduct the one-on- one discussions with theresourcesto determinethe issues. Stakeholder Management Stakeholder Interest levels Thestakeholders showeddeteriorated interestlevelsat variousinstances during the project. Thedeteriorated levelshadpoor impacts on the other project areas, such as project schedule and budget. TheProject Managershall conduct the one-on- one discussions with thestakeholdersto determinethe issues. Risk HandlingScheduleand Budget Risks Thescheduleand budget risks emerged duringtheearly phasesof implementationbut couldbecontrolled well in time (Fanning, 2014). The project could be completedontime and within the budget defined. The tracking of the schedule and budget levels shall be done regularlywithrisk managementin place. LESSONSLEARNEDKNOWLEDGEBASE/ DATABASE The use of the previous projects completed by the project team especially in the domain of education and web development were used to acquire the lessons. The use of numerous web sources was also done. LESSONSLEARNEDAPPLIEDFROMPREVIOUSPROJECTS The previous projects showed the issues of schedule and budget overrun in such projects and the lessons obtained from those projects were utilized in this one to keep the schedule and budget on track (Hairul Nizam Md Nasir, Sahibuddin, Ahmad & Sanim Mohd Fauzi, 2015). 3
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Lessons Learned PROCESSIMPROVEMENTRECOMMENDATIONS The improvements could be made in the project as the various project areas had a few issues during the project timeline. Frequent tracking of the project areas should have been done to improve on the processes. 4
Lessons Learned References Al-Freidi, S. (2015). A Unified Project Management Methodology (UPMM) based on PMBOK and PRINCE2 protocols: foundations, principles, structures and benefits of the integrated approach.International Journal Of Business Policy And Strategy Management,2(1), 27-38. doi: 10.21742/ijbpsm.2015.2.03 Fanning, F. (2014). Adapting PMBoK Guidance to Public Sector Projects.Organization, Technology And Management In Construction: An International Journal,6(3). doi: 10.5592/otmcj.2014.3.3 Hairul Nizam Md Nasir, M., Sahibuddin, S., Ahmad, R., & Sanim Mohd Fauzi, S. (2015). How the PMBOK Addresses Critical Success Factors for Software Projects: A Multi- roundDelphiStudy.JournalOfSoftware,10(11),1283-1300.doi: 10.17706//jsw.10.11.1283-1300 Tavan, F., & Hosseini, M. (2016). Comparison and analysis of PMBOK 2013 and ISO 21500.Journal Of Project Management, (10), 27-34. doi: 10.5267/j.jpm.2017.1.002 5