Limitation Important Variables and Transfer Pricing in Business

This article discusses the important variables that limit a firm's potential and the process of transfer pricing in business. It explains the computation of production plan and profit and provides insights on controlling overtime. The subject is relevant to business and finance courses. No course code or college/university is mentioned.

Accounts

Contents
Contents...........................................................................................................................................2
QUESTION 1..................................................................................................................................1
QUESTION 3..................................................................................................................................7
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................11

QUESTION 1
Limitation Important Variables: Also called as important components, primary budgeting
variables, or regulating characteristics, these are variables which constrain a firm's potential and
prohibit it from accomplishing an intended outcome, and also prohibiting endless development
and endless income (ABU-TAPANJEH and AL-SARAIRAH, 2021). Some instances of
restricting circumstances, like production or revenue growth restrictions, are listed below:
 Resource constraints due to a dearth of required supply grade, prolonged drought of
vendors, quota-imposed regulatory or commercial restrictions, and so forth.
 Workforce constraints, either nationally or internationally, extra constraints, etc.
 Production capability limitations or a lack of real space to accommodate industrial units.
 A financial shortfall that could be broad or specific.
The following are the actions taken throughout the judgement call process to offset the
adverse effects of a major constraint:
 Compute the payment rate every piece of output.
 Calculate the restricting component required to produce a single piece of output.
 Compute the restricting factor's contributions every component.
 Depending on the modified supplier and transport combinations, modify the profit
projection (Amnuai, 2019).
The below are the 6 stages that will help the business identify the limiting variables:
 To establish if a limiting element exists, the management needs to initially set the
optimum income which the business could reach whilst removing any restricting
variables that effect item manufacturing.
 Identifying the limiting variables as the management should figure out what is preventing
the corporation's various commodities from being produced.
 Subtract changeable expenditures from the sales cost to determine the contributions of
every item every piece of manufacturing.
 Assess the value of every item by piece of limiting component as quantity of funds an
item produces for every piece of scarce item it uses.
 Put the goods in precedence way as based on the results of Step 4, the item that
contributes the most per piece of limiting component is rated foremost, following by next
closest, and so forth.

 Determine the quantity of pieces to be manufactures as owing to limited supply
allocation, the first-placed item in Step 5 would be made up to the entire transmission
limitation (Bloechl, Michalicki and Schneider, 2017).
Statement showing computation of production plan to achieve maximum profit:
Particulars Product A (£
per unit)
Product B (£
per unit)
Product C (£
per unit)
Product D (£
per unit)
Selling Price (a) 28.00 34.00 45.00 46.00
Direct Material 6.00 7.00 9.00 7.00
Direct Labour 5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00
Variable
Overhead
3.00 3.00 6.00 6.00
Total Variable 14.00 15.00 25.00 23.00
Costs (b)
Contribution
per unit (a – b)
= (c)
14.00 19.00 20.00 23.00
Machine Hours
(d)
4.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Contribution
per machine
hour (c/d) = (e)
3.50 6.30 5.00 4.60
Rank IV I II III
Maximum
demand per
week (f)
200.00 180.00 250.00 100.00
Total machine
hour required (d
x f) = (g)
800.00 540.00 1000.00 500.00
Machine hour
can be utilised
(Maximum 200
hours) (h)
Nil 540.00 1000.00 460.00 (2000
-1540)
Unit can be
produced to
maximum the
profit (h/d) = (i)
Nil 180.00 250.00 92.00

Statement showing profit:
Particulars Product B (£) Product C (£) Product D (£) Total (£)
Selling Price (a) 34.00 45.00 46.00
Direct Material 7.00 9.00 7.00
Direct Labour 5.00 10.00 10.00
Variable
Overhead
3.00 6.00 6.00
Total Variable
Costs (b)
15.00 25.00 23.00
Contribution
per unit (a-b) =
(c)
19.00 20.00 23.00
No. of units 180.00 250.00 92.00
produced (d)
Total
contribution
earned (d x c) =
(e)
3420.00 5000.00 2116.00 10536.00
Fixed Overhead
(Working Note
1)
8640.00
Profit 1896.00
Working Note 1: Calculation of fixed overhead
Total labour hours required = (200 x 1) + (180 x 1) + (250 x 2) + (100 x 2)
= 200 + 180 + 500 + 200
= 1080
Overhead rate per hour = £8
Total fixed overhead = 1080 x £8 = £8640
Statement showing contribution at full demand fulfilled:
Particulars Product A
(£)
Product B
(£)
Product C
(£)
Product D
(£)
Total (£)
Selling Price
(a)
28.00 34.00 45.00 46.00
Direct
Material
6.00 7.00 9.00 7.00

Direct
Labour
5.00 5.00 10.00 10.00
Variable
Overhead
3.00 3.00 6.00 6.00
Total
Variable
Costs (b)
14.00 15.00 25.00 23.00
Contribution
per unit (c) =
(a – b)
14.00 19.00 20.00 23.00
Maximum
Demand
200.00 180.00 250.00 100.00
Machine
hours
required
fulfil
maximum
demand
to
200 x
=800.00
4 180 x
540.00
3 = 250 x
1000.00
4 = 100 x
500.00
5 = 2840.00
Total
Contribution
at full
demand
fulfilled
200 x 14 =
2800
180 x 19 =
3420
250 x 20 =
5000
100 x 23 =
2300
13520
Working Note 2:
Labour hours
per unit
1 1 2 2
Labour costs
per hour (Direct
labour
costs/Hours per
unit)
5/1 = 5 5/1 = 5 10/2 = 5 10/2 = 5
To fulfil demand, the company require additional 840 machine hours:
Labour cost per hour is minimum for product A, B, C and D i.e., 5 per hour
Total contribution at full demand £13520
Less: Additional cost of overtime (840 hours x 5 x 50%) £2100

Less: Additional variable overhead (£2100 x 75%) £1575
Total contribution margin £9845
Description Product A Product B Product C Product D
Product Mix ........ 180 250 92
Option (b) (i) is better as it will give higher contribution margin as compared to option (i)
Steps and calculations are below;
(a) Description Product A Product B Product C Product D
Per Unit
Selling Price £28.00 £30.00 £45.00 £42.00
Variable Costs:
Direct material £5.00 £6.00 £8.00 £6.00
Direct labor £4.00 £4.00 £8.00 £8.00
Variable OH £3.00 £3.00 £6.00 £6.00
Total per unit VC £12.00 £13.00 £22.00 £20.00
Per unit CM £16.00 £17.00 £23.00 £22.00
Per unit Machine Hours 4 3 4 5
CM per MH £4.00 £5.67 £5.75 £4.40
Order of preference Ivth Iind Ist IIIrd
Maximum production units 200 180 250 100
MH required 800 540 1,000 500
Production ........ 180 250 92
Calculation for Product D =(2000-1000-540)/5
(b)
i Description Product A Product D Total
Short production units 200 8
Required MH 800 40
Total MH required extra 840
Per unit Extra labor Cost £2.00 £4.00
Per unit Extra VOH £1.50 £3.00
Additional per unit cost £3.50 £7.00
New CM per unit £16.00 £15.00
Additional profits £3,200.00 £120.00 £3,320.00

ii Buy Product B
Per unit Selling price £30.00
Less buying and packaging cost £20.00
Per unit CM £10.00
Reduction in CM if produced £7.00
Loss of CM £1,260.00 =180*7
Savings of MH if B is bought 540
Production Product D 8 units
Production of A (540-(8*5))/4 125 units
Additional CM
Product D 8*22 £176.00
Product A 125*16 £2,000.00
Total Additional CM £2,176.00
Net increase in CM £916.00 =2176-1260
The contribution margin factor is the proportion of overall participation range to entire
selling volume. It comes in a variety of shapes and sizes. Even if static expenses remain constant,
a higher profitability percentage would result in a higher overall operational revenue. Break-even
analysis could also be aided by the contribution margin proportion. Item A, B, C, and D
contribute 3.5, 6.3, 5, and 4.6 each machines hours for every item, respectively, and then after
examining the four items, item B contributes more than the others. Item C and D, following item
B, are more lucrative for the corporation than item A (Burnett and Merchant, 2020). As a result,
the corporation produces products B, C, and D in order to generate income for its activities.
Gemini plc's sales manager is concerned regarding the firm's inability to meet customer
expectation for volumes, so they perform overtime to increase the amount of days worked with
current equipment. They would've been paid a 50% premium over typical employment earnings
if they worked overtime, and changeable administrative expenses will probably climb in tandem
with employment prices. Extra hours are seen as ordinary straight personnel costs that are
applied to the supply of a commodity on the identical degree as time spent throughout ordinary
period; yet, the excess paid throughout overtime is repaid as industrial overhead by the overhead
recuperation ratio (Herawati, Dewi and Dewi, 2020). Whenever overtime is conducted on a
project to meet objectives or to fulfil specific customer requests whereby a premium is given, the

entire personnel expenditure is applied to the contract as direct personnel expenditure. It is vital
to maintain control of overtime because it has the ability to grow and constitute a typical strategy
for obtaining extra funds. It has a detrimental effect on professional well-being and enthusiasm,
and also on productivity. It could also lead to a significant absence percentage. As a
consequence, the number of overtime worked hours could be closely controlled. Overtime work
must only be allowed if strictly needed. Authorized overtime labour must be closely managed to
assure the most better use of available. It is typically one and a half to two times the average
hourly income. The amount payable in excess to the standard salary ceiling is known as the
overtime surcharge. The direct labour expense includes standard pay. The overtime bonus should
be determined depend on the situation under which it was done, and the prior authorization
amount should be deducted as a consequence.
QUESTION 3
Transfer pricing is utilised whenever one part of a company needs to pay another part of the
identical corporation for goods and goods it provide. For instance, division A may develop a part
which is used in an item made by the similar company, but which may simultaneously be
marketed to the general public, especially rivals of department B's item. As a consequence, A
will be able to generate 2 types of income.
 Exterior selling to certain other organisations generate income.
 Interior selling income from selling to different commitment units throughout the single
company, assessed at the transaction value (Lepistö and Ihantola, 2018).
Transfer pricing is the process of transferring an item through one division to someone inside
a firm. This technique is employed to assess a primary firm's subsidiaries as separate revenue
generators. Transfer pricing does have an impact on branch purchasing decisions, which could
have corporate taxation implications for the entire company. Here are some crucial topics to
think about:
 The cost of a product supplied beyond the company is handled in the similar manner by
the management of a branch on the grounds of income. Since it is component of his
branch's revenue, it is critical to the monetary outcomes for that they were evaluated.
 Consumers who already are prioritised; in this instance, the shift supervisor has the
option of selling their goods to other departments within the same organisation or to
clients. If the departmental director is dissatisfied with the transmission cost offered by

another division, they could market their goods to external clients who have paid a higher
amount (Mukhametzyanov, Nugaev and Muhametzyanova, 2017).
 Recommended network operators, in this scenario, the departmental director has the
option of purchasing coming from external vendors or from another division within the
business in order to cost customers cheaper. If the cost supplied by external vendors is
acceptable to the supervisor, they will buy through them instead of from different
division within the identical organisation.
Additional aspect which influences overall company profitability is the financial benefit
taxation received each year. If a corporation has branches in many taxation countries,
transferring charges can be utilized to change its branch's claimed profitability. In an ideal world,
the main firm would concentrate on earning the greatest amount of reported revenue in taxation
regimes having reduced corporation revenue taxation. This will be achieved by lowering the
expenses of shifting parts to companies in taxation jurisdictions with the cheapest levels of
taxation. Transfer pricing can be used by a firm to obtain the best operating earnings with the
total production of the business (Oesterreich and Teuteberg, 2019). This nearly always implies
that perhaps the corporation will fix the selling cost to be the product's acquisition cost, as stated
previously in the discussion of corporate taxation identification. By establishing ready to trade to
both external and inner firms, local branches could be possible to manufacture extra revenue for
the firm overall. Branches are urged to develop their manufacturing capacities in particular to
embark on more projects.
Transfer Pricing's Objective- The following are the most important considerations when
putting in place a transferable price strategy:
 Distinct revenue estimations must be generated for every section, and every division's
results must be examined separately.
 Assist in the integration of manufacturing, selling, and price choices across divisions.
Executives are becoming more conscious of the relevance of products and solutions in
those other areas of the organisation as a result of transmission percentage.
 Employing transferring price, the firm would create profit (or price) projections for every
sector separately.
 The transfer pricing affects not only the stated profitability of every location, but also
how a firm's assets are assigned (Romadhoni, 2016).

Transfer price techniques include:
Market-based strategy: If transferable goods have had an outside cost level,
profitability zone management would've been notified of the value company might receive and
then have to spend on the international markets for particular goods, and that they should
eventually link this cost to the transaction value. While the external marketplace for the product
seems to be well, effective, and consistent, firms apply the marketplace cost as a maximum
bound for the transferring pricing.
Fears about market-based transferring price abound- If rivals are offering at reduced
prices or using one of numerous "unique" price approaches, relying on market-based transferring
prices might distort interior decision-making while the exterior marketplace is ineffective and
uncertain. Moreover, reliance on share prices creates issues when it comes to safeguarding
"newer" parts.
Benefits:
 Interior transference can be forecast in specific cases in which the transferring pricing is
at marketplace pricing, allowing the purchasing department to benefit from additional
services, increased freedom, and supplier reliability. All departments could profit from
reduced administration, marketing, and shipping charges. As a consequence, utilising the
marketplace value as the transferring pricing would lead to actions that are in the finest
interests of the organisation as a whole.
 In a fragmented organisation, departmental leaders must have the authority to determine
manufacturing, marketing, and buying choices which appear to be in the greatest
advantage of the branch's performance (Zhong and Fan, 2021).
Drawbacks:
 The marketplace pricing might well be transient due to adverse macroeconomic
conditions or selling, and it can be set by the profitability centre’s scale of output
supplied to the international markets.
 A market-worth transferring pricing could act as a barrier to deploying any regional
excess capacity in some instances. A pricing based on additional expenditure, on the
other hand, could offer a chance for using up excess resources in addition to contribute
marginally to profitability.

 The transported item might have had a relatively weak market, forcing the transferring
unit to reduce its resale value in terms of selling more internationally.
Negotiated transferring price- In this scenario, the corporation does not provide any rules
for calculating transferring rates. Regional managers are urged to negotiate a pricing
arrangement which is agreeable to all stakeholders. Unregulated availability is frequently paired
with negotiable transferring price. The leadership of some corporations has the power to manage
disputes and impose an "adjudicated" solution. Transferring pricing is also negotiated by the
executives of the providing and recipient divisions (Левицька, 2017). In such conversations,
marketplace pricing, and also optimum and total expenses are frequently employed as variables.
Benefits:
 Urge the managers of the company’s sales to devote more emphasis to expense reduction.
 Help the procurement department by acquiring the item at a lower cost than that of the
competition.
 Set the stage for a much more reasonable assessment of regional performance, which
leaders generally may track through agreements.
Drawbacks:
 The management' negotiating talents and ability to negotiate may affect the agreed
transferring pricing, and the end outcome would not be optimal.
 They could produce departmental disagreement, and overcoming these disagreements
might need some senior leadership intervention.
 They consume a significant amount of effort for the management involved, especially if
there are numerous operations (Серая and Слабая, 2016).

REFERENCES
Books and journals
ABU-TAPANJEH, A.M. and AL-SARAIRAH, T.M.K., 2021. The Availability of Forensic
Accounting Application Factors to Enhance the Auditors Efficiency in Jordan. The
Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), pp.807-819.
Amnuai, W., 2019. Analyses of rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in accounting
research article abstracts published in international and Thai-based journals. Sage Open,
9(1), p.2158244018822384.
Bloechl, S.J., Michalicki, M. and Schneider, M., 2017. Simulation game for lean leadership–
shopfloor management combined with accounting for lean. Procedia Manufacturing, 9,
pp.97-105.
Burnett, C. and Merchant, G., 2020. Literacy-as-event: Accounting for relationality in literacy
research. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 41(1), pp.45-56.
Herawati, N.T., Dewi, L.G.K. and Dewi, G.A.K.R.S., 2020, December. Development of
Android-Based Accounting Cycle Learning Applications to Improve Technology Skills
in Accounting Students. In 5th International Conference on Tourism, Economics,
Accounting, Management and Social Science (TEAMS 2020) (pp. 98-104). Atlantis
Press.
Lepistö, L. and Ihantola, E.M., 2018. Understanding the recruitment and selection processes of
management accountants. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management.
Mukhametzyanov, R.Z., Nugaev, F.S. and Muhametzyanova, L.Z., 2017. History of accounting
development. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), pp.1227-1236.
Oesterreich, T.D. and Teuteberg, F., 2019. The role of business analytics in the controllers and
management accountants’ competence profiles. Journal of accounting & organizational
change.
Romadhoni, R., 2016. Penerapan Enviromental Management Accounting (Ema) Dalam
Meningkatkan Eco-Effieciency Pada Home Industry Tahu Paritan-Jombang (Doctoral
dissertation, Universitas Brawijaya).
Zhong, M. and Fan, T., 2021, March. Research on the Integration of Corporate Financial
Accounting and Management Accounting under Big Data and Block Chain. In Journal
of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1827, No. 1, p. 012202). IOP Publishing.
Левицька, С.О., 2017. Еволюція становлення управлінського обліку та його місце в
системі корпоративного управління (Evolution of formation of managerial
accounting and its place in corporate management). Наукові записки Національного
університету «Острозька академія». Серія «Економіка»: науковий журнал, (4
(32)), pp.218-221.
Серая, Н.Н. and Слабая, М.А., 2016. Особенности оценки материально-производственных
запасов в системе управленческого учета. Инновационная экономика:
перспективы развития и совершенствования, (3 (13)).