Ethical Dilemma in Cash Management: A Case Study of Linbarger Company
Verified
Added on 2023/06/11
|5
|927
|154
AI Summary
This case study discusses the ethical dilemma faced by Linbarger Company in cash management and the potential consequences of unethical behavior. It also suggests alternative solutions to fulfill the cash shortfall.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.
ACCOUNTING STUDENT ID [Pick the date]
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Question 1 With regards to the loan terms, it is essential that Linbarger company must maintain a closing cash balance of atleast $ 200,000 on a monthly basis. Based on the given scenario, it is apparent that for the June month ending , the cash balance for the company is standing at 80,000 and hence Lisa is requesting the financial controller to keep the cash receipts book open for one more day so that incremental cash can be received from the distributor and the minimum balance condition is satisfied. Thus, the key accounting problem which has been highlighted in the given case relates to cash management. The company was aware of the obligation of the minimum closing balance that it required and hence it should have been proactive to look at ways of ensuring that short term funding mechnism are available in the condition there is a particular shortfall so that there is no breach of the terms of the loan given by the insurance company. The dismal cash management of the company is the real reason for the current ethical crisis faced by the financial controller (Deegan, 2014). Question 2 The desired action of ensuring that cash receipts is allowed for one more day in order to ensure that the minimum cash requirement condition would be fulfilled would evidently be termed as unethical action. The financial vice president also must not encourage such an unethical behavior. In accordance with the accounting periodicity concept, with regards to account book closure, uniformity is to be exhibited. As a result, the cash received after June 30 should not be included in the June 30thclosing balance. Further, this practice in the long run could be responsible for cumulative errors on account of errors done in the previous months which lead to misrepresentation of key financial information for the users. Thus, the given action of financial controller would have serious ethical implications (Caanz, 2016).
Question 3 The negative impact in case the financial controller does not follow Lisa’s instructions would be immense. In this regards, the most pertinent would be that the default on the loan agreement for not meeting the monthly cash balance requirement. This may also lead to bankruptcy of the company which in turn amounts to job loss. Besides, the job controller might also lose job for disobeying the instruction from the vice president (Lisa). The vice president (Lisa) understands these ramifications and hence is pushing the financial controller to consider the unethical request (Gay & Simnett, 2012). Question 4 If I do comply with Lisa’s request, then this would amount to compromise of my integrity. Besides, a beginning of ethical compromises at this juncture would send a message to Lisa that I am open to such manipulation and unethical conduction in the future which I actually am not open. Further, the insurance company interests would be impacted negatively as potentially the default risk on the loan may increase but the lender would not be compensated or appraised about the same (Deegan, 2014).Also, if this event eventually leads to any worsening in cash management at company, then insurance company shareholders are adversely impacted. Besides, indulging in wrong conduct may open the shareholders to reputation risk since if a practice comes into public domain, then there could be potential integrity issues and possible backlash from regulators which would have future implications in the form of higher finance costs (Caanz, 2016). Question 5
Taking into cognizance, the various negative implications for the business especially in the long term along with issues related to professional integrity, it would be correct not to falsify the cash balance and thereby deny compliance with the request to keep the cash receipt open for one more day. It would be better if the same is addressed with the lender by highlighting the issues and providing greater comfort in the form of collateral.Besides, going forward, the company can provide incentive in the form of discount to key customers so that early payments are realised. Also, to fulfill the shortfall in the cash balance, the company can possibly offer an attractive discount for cash based sales only. Besides, the company can mobilize the funds from employees for meeting the shortfall and provide them with some gifts or interest for the help. Further, it is likely that the employees would be willing to provide help to the company considering the potential that the company might be shut down if such help is not extended. Therefore, it is evident that the company has various options for fulfilling the shortfall in cash that it is expected to witness(Gay & Simnett, 2012).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
References Caanz, S. (2016),Auditing and Assurance Handbook 2016 Australia, 3rded., Sydney: John Wiley & Sons Deegan, C. (2014).Financial Accounting Theory, 4th ed. Sydney: McGraw-Hill Gay,G. & Simnett, R. (2012).Auditing and Assurance Services in Australia,5thed., Sydney: McGraw-Hill Education