Ludification of Culture: Impact on Daily Life Practices

Ludification Of Culture
Due Date: 18 /04/2019
Word Count:1531

1
Games and play have opened up an entirely new dimension as well as fields in order to
analyze the digitization process and phenomenon within the framework of empirical and
theoretical cultural research1. The plays of these kinds along with its current digital
manifestations can be placed as the fundamental constituents of human behavior. A ludic society
is a picture that is in relation to the ludification of play that, in recent years has become
increasingly popular. The central concept of the theory revolves around the human nature of
being playful. In a similar discourse, the paper aims to discuss ludification of culture in terms of
the ways it has impacted on human’s daily life practices. There are several ways ludification of
culture has been observed in every aspect of society and its culture. It is in the same focus, the
paper will be carried out.
The logic of play and the ludification of culture have gained popularity in recent years
and still gaining in ever-greater significance. Play forms such as educational apps in education
field, fun digital tools and technologies in organizations and many more have been implemented
in the digitalized field every day and leading to the invention of more play forms. This
playfulness is reflected in the symptomatic questions recognized by the theorists of ludification
and media scholars such as Paul-Michel Foucault, Karl Marx. Although it sounds nothing
more than science fiction, it is the reality of the twenty-first century. The growing presence,
importance and recognition of play have been made in various sectors of the society and
certainly becoming the dominant socio-cultural organization forms.2
It is important to understand the term ludification in details before understanding the
impact of ludification in everyday life. It has become a strategic concept when the ludification of
culture is concerned when the concept is deconstructed to make sense of the present changes in
contemporary culture. During the 1960s, the term ‘ludic’ became popular which denoted fun
objects and playful behavior. Gradually the concept gains popularity, and now it is a common
phenomenon of culture. Although computer games, video games and mobile games are a striking
example of it, it is certainly not limited to this. In the present culture, every individual is
someway impacted by the ludification of culture3. For example, enterprise gamification example
1Norman, Donald A., and Roberto Verganti. "Incremental and radical innovation: Design research vs. technology
and meaning change." Design issues 30, no. 1 (2014): 78-96.
2Fuchs, Mathias. "Gamification as twenty-first-century ideology." Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds 6, no. 2
(2014): 143-157.
3Raessens, Joost. 2014. “The Ludification of Culture.” In Rethinking Gamification, edited by Mathias Fuchs, Sonia
Fizek, Paolo Ruffino and NiklasSchrape, 91-114. Luneburg: Meson Press.

2
includes salesforce with bunchball or nitro, badgville with Yammer, community network and
similar. This gamification creates interest and motivates people for some specific task.
In the contemporary era, people are spending more and more time in digital spaces. There
is only growing numbers of people being incorporated with the use of digital media and the
growing number of ways through which digital media is involving the daily lifestyle of humans4.
The importance of digital games and playful applications is a growing phenomenon in
contemporary culture. According to research, there are more than 1500 millions of people who
are the user of mobile games across the world belonging from various ages, genders and social
background5. As mentioned by Rey, Gamofication have certainly gained prominence in presence
and significance in the human culture. It is not used only for the sake of playing games. It
involves serious, educative, expressive of various purposes and even contributing to social
changes and advancement in science. Gamification has moved out of living rooms to other
different forms of settings. In the offices, it is found as gamified applications for business, in
medical institutions. In the medical institutions, it is found in games for health, and in public
means of transport, it is found in mobile phones and portable consoles. In the urban spaces, it is
found as augmented as well as virtual reality mobile gaming and in schools and universities, it is
found as part of the extra curriculum activities6. The diversity and different forms of play make
the entire phenomenon highly complicated and complex to understand. Play has become vague
and ambivalent in its every aspect including references, intentions, sense, contradictions and
meaning. In the sphere of play, anything and everything can be included. Joking, watching
television, playing with metaphors, celebrating birthdays or being sexually intimate are some of
the way playing can be seen as an ambivalent concept7. According to Rey, the implication
certainly have much more intense intention than mere fun as stated by Bogust. It is a modern day
manipulation similar to any other kind of cognitive manipulation that offers basically nothing in
http://meson.press/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/9783957960016-rethinking-gamification.pdf
4Yong, Su-Ting, and Peter Gates. "Born Digital: Are they really digital natives?." International Journal of e-
Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning 4, no. 2 (2014): 102.
5 Anshari, Muhammad, Yabit Alas, Glenn Hardaker, J. H. Jaidin, Mark Smith, and Annie D. Ahad. "Smartphone
habit and behavior in Brunei: Personalization, gender, and generation gap." Computers in Human Behavior 64
(2016): 719-727.
6Rey, P.J. 2012. “Gamification, Playbor and Exploitation”. Cyborgology, October 15, 2012.
http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2012/10/15/gamification-playbor-exploitation-2/
7Rey, P. Jessie. "Gamification and post-fordist capitalism." The gameful world: Approaches, issues,
applications (2015): 277-296.